Have we lost the ability to engage in public discourse/ reasonable debate?
Comments
-
cincybearcat said:So I think perhaps part of the problem are statements like "most of the right...human decency" and "anyone with half a brain..." thinks like me...
I think statements like that ignore the potential of the opposing or even just differing voice. They look to try and make that differing voice stupid or even keep that differing voice from speaking up.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
HughFreakingDillon said:PJ_Soul said:I personally think the main problem here that didn't used to exist so much is simply people being way more mean and much more willing to throw personal insults and to demean others on a completely personal, one-on-one level, and then people reacting to it. I think dialogue would go just fine no matter how much we all disagreed with each other's views if the meanness and snark and constant pestering and so-called sarcasm (insults in poor disguises) would go away. There is altogether too much actual personal dislike here, being shared way too openly, and it's just rude.
as cincy pointed out, many people leave so little room for discussion that it gets frustrating.
I do find it interesting, your entire post seems to go in direct contradiction to a previous post where you said that too many people are way too sensitive and take things too personally. and no, I'm not trying a "gotcha moment". Just trying to understand my perceived difference in your opinion from then to now.There is nothing contradictory. Having a thick skin relates to people discussing the topics and being able to take opposition to opinions and topical viewpoints - taking disagreements with their views to personally (not to mention the constant habit of changing the discussion from the topic to how someone expresses themselves - that is what's really ruining this forum). NEVER when it relates to personal insults and being mean to someone on that level. Nobody should be expected to put up personal harassment and personal insults and aggressive digs on a personal level here. And when I say things are meaner than they used to be, I mean within the past year or two, getting gradually worse until now - I'm not talking about ancient history.Post edited by PJ_Soul onWith all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
Meltdown99 said:HughFreakingDillon said:Meltdown99 said:benjs said:Meltdown99 said:Please point to a time you could engage civilly in most political discussion. There has never been a time. People have their team and they stick with their team blindly no matter what...
Fuck some of you people can twist shit up into a knot without reason...and sure as hell don't need to comment on everything I say. I don't agree, then move the fuck on...are you capable? Or do you just like piling on because that makes you feel good. I'll go at you all day if you want. One minute you are full drama, my nerves can't take this place to picking arguments...make up your fucking mind...
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
PJ_Soul said:cincybearcat said:So I think perhaps part of the problem are statements like "most of the right...human decency" and "anyone with half a brain..." thinks like me...
I think statements like that ignore the potential of the opposing or even just differing voice. They look to try and make that differing voice stupid or even keep that differing voice from speaking up.
As far as "no way anyone here can ever keep someone else from speaking up"...I think you know what I mean. There are a lot of people that leave cause they just don't want to deal with it anymore. You see that, yes? Running people off is eliminating their voice.hippiemom = goodness0 -
PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:PJ_Soul said:I personally think the main problem here that didn't used to exist so much is simply people being way more mean and much more willing to throw personal insults and to demean others on a completely personal, one-on-one level, and then people reacting to it. I think dialogue would go just fine no matter how much we all disagreed with each other's views if the meanness and snark and constant pestering and so-called sarcasm (insults in poor disguises) would go away. There is altogether too much actual personal dislike here, being shared way too openly, and it's just rude.
as cincy pointed out, many people leave so little room for discussion that it gets frustrating.
I do find it interesting, your entire post seems to go in direct contradiction to a previous post where you said that too many people are way too sensitive and take things too personally. and no, I'm not trying a "gotcha moment". Just trying to understand my perceived difference in your opinion from then to now.
edit: I see your post wasn't finished by the time I quoted it, so just an added comment: I honestly recall your "too sensitive" comment coming on the heels of someone being offended by something you or another poster said to them they interpreted as personal. But it was some time ago, so who knows.
I wouldn't consider a few years ago ancient history, but alright.
But I digress......
is it possible that is a direct correlation to who is currently POTUS? Now, I'm not blaming him directly, well, at least not entirely. I think the rules have changed re: actual discourse. Being a mainly liberal forum, is it possible that people are quick to be more caustic because of the political climate at present, whether that be a direct result of how POTUS conducts himself or just the fact that liberals are constantly angered at his and his supporters' antics?
This is really the only forum I go to, so I don't know what the climate is like elsewhere.Post edited by HughFreakingDillon onBy The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0 -
HughFreakingDillon said:PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:PJ_Soul said:I personally think the main problem here that didn't used to exist so much is simply people being way more mean and much more willing to throw personal insults and to demean others on a completely personal, one-on-one level, and then people reacting to it. I think dialogue would go just fine no matter how much we all disagreed with each other's views if the meanness and snark and constant pestering and so-called sarcasm (insults in poor disguises) would go away. There is altogether too much actual personal dislike here, being shared way too openly, and it's just rude.
as cincy pointed out, many people leave so little room for discussion that it gets frustrating.
I do find it interesting, your entire post seems to go in direct contradiction to a previous post where you said that too many people are way too sensitive and take things too personally. and no, I'm not trying a "gotcha moment". Just trying to understand my perceived difference in your opinion from then to now.
I wouldn't consider a few years ago ancient history, but alright.
But I digress......
is it possible that is a direct correlation to who is currently POTUS? Now, I'm not blaming him directly, well, at least not entirely. I think the rules have changed re: actual discourse. Being a mainly liberal forum, is it possible that people are quick to be more caustic because of the political climate at present, whether that be a direct result of how POTUS conducts himself or just the fact that liberals are constantly angered at his and his supporters' antics?
This is really the only forum I go to, so I don't know what the climate is like elsewhere.Okay, then you don't understand what I am saying maybe, because it's not a contradiction. Like I said, the difference is between having a thick skin in debate, and dealing with PERSONAL insults. I think there is a very clear divide there, and I have always been clear about that divide. People taking things that aren't meant personally personal is having thin skin. People reacting to actual personal insults is another thing altogether.I do not think it's about Trump. I think it's about the people in this forum.It was more than a few years ago when this wasn't a member's only forum.
Post edited by PJ_Soul onWith all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:PJ_Soul said:I personally think the main problem here that didn't used to exist so much is simply people being way more mean and much more willing to throw personal insults and to demean others on a completely personal, one-on-one level, and then people reacting to it. I think dialogue would go just fine no matter how much we all disagreed with each other's views if the meanness and snark and constant pestering and so-called sarcasm (insults in poor disguises) would go away. There is altogether too much actual personal dislike here, being shared way too openly, and it's just rude.
as cincy pointed out, many people leave so little room for discussion that it gets frustrating.
I do find it interesting, your entire post seems to go in direct contradiction to a previous post where you said that too many people are way too sensitive and take things too personally. and no, I'm not trying a "gotcha moment". Just trying to understand my perceived difference in your opinion from then to now.
I wouldn't consider a few years ago ancient history, but alright.
But I digress......
is it possible that is a direct correlation to who is currently POTUS? Now, I'm not blaming him directly, well, at least not entirely. I think the rules have changed re: actual discourse. Being a mainly liberal forum, is it possible that people are quick to be more caustic because of the political climate at present, whether that be a direct result of how POTUS conducts himself or just the fact that liberals are constantly angered at his and his supporters' antics?
This is really the only forum I go to, so I don't know what the climate is like elsewhere.Okay, then you don't understand what I am saying maybe, because it's not a contradiction. Like I said, the difference is between having a thick skin in debate, and dealing with PERSONAL insults. I think there is a very clear divide there, and I have always been clear about that divide.I do not think it's about Trump. I think it's about the people in this forum.
But anyway....having been around here during the Obama presidency, there is a very noticeable shift in how people talk to each other here. And not just here....in other forms of social media.
I rarely, if ever, had anyone attack me personally during those years, save for one person (who many people also had issues with), until the last while.
I'm not convinced the timing is merely coincidence.By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0 -
HughFreakingDillon said:PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:PJ_Soul said:I personally think the main problem here that didn't used to exist so much is simply people being way more mean and much more willing to throw personal insults and to demean others on a completely personal, one-on-one level, and then people reacting to it. I think dialogue would go just fine no matter how much we all disagreed with each other's views if the meanness and snark and constant pestering and so-called sarcasm (insults in poor disguises) would go away. There is altogether too much actual personal dislike here, being shared way too openly, and it's just rude.
as cincy pointed out, many people leave so little room for discussion that it gets frustrating.
I do find it interesting, your entire post seems to go in direct contradiction to a previous post where you said that too many people are way too sensitive and take things too personally. and no, I'm not trying a "gotcha moment". Just trying to understand my perceived difference in your opinion from then to now.
I wouldn't consider a few years ago ancient history, but alright.
But I digress......
is it possible that is a direct correlation to who is currently POTUS? Now, I'm not blaming him directly, well, at least not entirely. I think the rules have changed re: actual discourse. Being a mainly liberal forum, is it possible that people are quick to be more caustic because of the political climate at present, whether that be a direct result of how POTUS conducts himself or just the fact that liberals are constantly angered at his and his supporters' antics?
This is really the only forum I go to, so I don't know what the climate is like elsewhere.Okay, then you don't understand what I am saying maybe, because it's not a contradiction. Like I said, the difference is between having a thick skin in debate, and dealing with PERSONAL insults. I think there is a very clear divide there, and I have always been clear about that divide.I do not think it's about Trump. I think it's about the people in this forum.
But anyway....having been around here during the Obama presidency, there is a very noticeable shift in how people talk to each other here. And not just here....in other forms of social media.
I rarely, if ever, had anyone attack me personally during those years, save for one person (who many people also had issues with), until the last while.
I'm not convinced the timing is merely coincidence.I also edited my response.I think the difference between Obama and Trump years is just that most posters cleared out because the topics and the entire situation is just too stressful and divisive, and they mostly cleared out because of that, leaving only the most stalwart debaters. Unfortunately that also means that a large number of those who kind of helped keep shit balanced and reasonable disappeared. I think the ratio of aggressive posters changed radically, making the entire atmosphere, well, aggressive! So yeah, I guess you're right that it's related to Trump in that he's too awful for a lot of people to even talk about!With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:PJ_Soul said:HughFreakingDillon said:PJ_Soul said:I personally think the main problem here that didn't used to exist so much is simply people being way more mean and much more willing to throw personal insults and to demean others on a completely personal, one-on-one level, and then people reacting to it. I think dialogue would go just fine no matter how much we all disagreed with each other's views if the meanness and snark and constant pestering and so-called sarcasm (insults in poor disguises) would go away. There is altogether too much actual personal dislike here, being shared way too openly, and it's just rude.
as cincy pointed out, many people leave so little room for discussion that it gets frustrating.
I do find it interesting, your entire post seems to go in direct contradiction to a previous post where you said that too many people are way too sensitive and take things too personally. and no, I'm not trying a "gotcha moment". Just trying to understand my perceived difference in your opinion from then to now.
I wouldn't consider a few years ago ancient history, but alright.
But I digress......
is it possible that is a direct correlation to who is currently POTUS? Now, I'm not blaming him directly, well, at least not entirely. I think the rules have changed re: actual discourse. Being a mainly liberal forum, is it possible that people are quick to be more caustic because of the political climate at present, whether that be a direct result of how POTUS conducts himself or just the fact that liberals are constantly angered at his and his supporters' antics?
This is really the only forum I go to, so I don't know what the climate is like elsewhere.Okay, then you don't understand what I am saying maybe, because it's not a contradiction. Like I said, the difference is between having a thick skin in debate, and dealing with PERSONAL insults. I think there is a very clear divide there, and I have always been clear about that divide.I do not think it's about Trump. I think it's about the people in this forum.
But anyway....having been around here during the Obama presidency, there is a very noticeable shift in how people talk to each other here. And not just here....in other forms of social media.
I rarely, if ever, had anyone attack me personally during those years, save for one person (who many people also had issues with), until the last while.
I'm not convinced the timing is merely coincidence.I also edited my response.I think the difference between Obama and Trump years is just that most posters cleared out because the topics and the entire situation is just too stressful and divisive, and they mostly cleared out because of that, leaving only the most stalwart debaters. Unfortunately that also means that a large number of those who kind of helped keep shit balanced and reasonable disappeared. I think the ratio of aggressive posters changed radically, making the entire atmosphere, well, aggressive! So yeah, I guess you're right that it's related to Trump in that he's too awful for a lot of people to even talk about!By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0 -
PJ_Soul said:Meltdown99 said:HughFreakingDillon said:Meltdown99 said:benjs said:Meltdown99 said:Please point to a time you could engage civilly in most political discussion. There has never been a time. People have their team and they stick with their team blindly no matter what...
Fuck some of you people can twist shit up into a knot without reason...and sure as hell don't need to comment on everything I say. I don't agree, then move the fuck on...are you capable? Or do you just like piling on because that makes you feel good. I'll go at you all day if you want. One minute you are full drama, my nerves can't take this place to picking arguments...make up your fucking mind...By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0 -
HughFreakingDillon said:PJ_Soul said:Meltdown99 said:HughFreakingDillon said:Meltdown99 said:benjs said:Meltdown99 said:Please point to a time you could engage civilly in most political discussion. There has never been a time. People have their team and they stick with their team blindly no matter what...
Fuck some of you people can twist shit up into a knot without reason...and sure as hell don't need to comment on everything I say. I don't agree, then move the fuck on...are you capable? Or do you just like piling on because that makes you feel good. I'll go at you all day if you want. One minute you are full drama, my nerves can't take this place to picking arguments...make up your fucking mind...
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
gotchaBy The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0
-
Personal attacks are just not okay. It is possible to attack opinions and viewpoints and political positions without attacking and belittling the actual individual person expressing the opinion - the real person who very well might be fun to have drinks with. Some people don't seem willing or able to separate the two.Post edited by PJ_Soul onWith all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0
-
Meltdown99 said:benjs said:Meltdown99 said:Please point to a time you could engage civilly in most political discussion. There has never been a time. People have their team and they stick with their team blindly no matter what...
In spite of your aggressive direct message to me, and your aggressive stance with HFD, I will not obey you and ignore false statements. I'd expect and welcome the same treatment if roles were reversed.
This doesn't have to be ugly either, and if you consider my message ugly in light of what I've written, I'm happy to be taught why it was and fix that in my conduct. This can be a good place or it can be a bad place - we get to choose.'05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 10 -
I blame Canada... for pretty much everythingPost edited by my2hands on0
-
brianlux said:cincybearcat said:Man this is priceless. Can't even get past 3 pages without people cursing someone out, other's saying "the other side" lacks decency, another saying they have less than half a brain, and another making a point and then saying "not debatable".
So I guess my answer to this question is, in the online/written form I do believe you can have reasonable debate from people that disagree...it's not likely though. It becomes less likely once you have people that find others that agree with them and build a pack. It becomes less likely when certain behaviors from individual with certain opinions is ignored while the opposing viewpoints same behaviors result in interventions.
Probably a good 10% chance...and I do not have any data to back that up. Though I imagine if we went through this forum alone that10% might be high.
I SAW PEARL JAM0 -
no...how can you? people don't listen anymore. label and dismiss doesn't make for good chats
Randall's Island 9-29-1996, MSG 9-10/11-1998, Meadows, CT 9-13-1998, Sacramento 10-30-2000, Bridge School 10-26-2002,MSG 9-8/9-2003, Hartford 2013, Amsterdam 2014(2), Memphis 2014, MSG 5-1/2-2016, Fenway 8-7-16, Fenway 9-2/4-18 MSG 9-11-220 -
my2hands said:I blame Canada... for pretty much everything
Except when it's Hillarys fault0 -
dankind said:brianlux said:cincybearcat said:Man this is priceless. Can't even get past 3 pages without people cursing someone out, other's saying "the other side" lacks decency, another saying they have less than half a brain, and another making a point and then saying "not debatable".
So I guess my answer to this question is, in the online/written form I do believe you can have reasonable debate from people that disagree...it's not likely though. It becomes less likely once you have people that find others that agree with them and build a pack. It becomes less likely when certain behaviors from individual with certain opinions is ignored while the opposing viewpoints same behaviors result in interventions.
Probably a good 10% chance...and I do not have any data to back that up. Though I imagine if we went through this forum alone that10% might be high.
"It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.9K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 275 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help