Have we lost the ability to engage in public discourse/ reasonable debate?

1235

Comments

  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,758
    So I think perhaps part of the problem are statements like "most of the right...human decency" and "anyone with half a brain..." thinks like me...

    I think statements like that ignore the potential of the opposing or even just differing voice.  They look to try and make that differing voice stupid or even keep that differing voice from speaking up.


    Sometimes it is the case though. It's not like every opinion or viewpoint deserves respect, and not every differing voice has potential to be anything but stupid. It's only the right to hold an opinion that automatically deserves respect (at least most of the time), and there is no way anyone here can ever keep someone else from speaking up.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,758
    edited March 2019
    PJ_Soul said:
    I personally think the main problem here that didn't used to exist so much is simply people being way more mean and much more willing to throw personal insults and to demean others on a completely personal, one-on-one level, and then people reacting to it. I think dialogue would go just fine no matter how much we all disagreed with each other's views if the meanness and snark and constant pestering and so-called sarcasm (insults in poor disguises) would go away. There is altogether too much actual personal dislike here, being shared way too openly, and it's just rude.
    this place was way "meaner" a long time ago. then it went pay to post and it weeded out most of the assholes. the mods went into overdrive. many of the assholes have been banned or just left. some still remain. 

    as cincy pointed out, many people leave so little room for discussion that it gets frustrating. 

    I do find it interesting, your entire post seems to go in direct contradiction to a previous post where you said that too many people are way too sensitive and take things too personally. and no, I'm not trying a "gotcha moment". Just trying to understand my perceived difference in  your opinion from then to now. 
    There is nothing contradictory. Having a thick skin relates to people discussing the topics and being able to take opposition to opinions and topical viewpoints - taking disagreements with their views to personally (not to mention the constant habit of changing the discussion from the topic to how someone expresses themselves - that is what's really ruining this forum). NEVER when it relates to personal insults and being mean to someone on that level. Nobody should be expected to put up personal harassment and personal insults and aggressive digs on a personal level here. And when I say things are meaner than they used to be, I mean within the past year or two, getting gradually worse until now - I'm not talking about ancient history.

    Post edited by PJ_Soul on
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,758
    edited March 2019
    benjs said:
    Please point to a time you could engage civilly in most political discussion.  There has never been a time.  People have their team and they stick with their team blindly no matter what...


    Are you blindly sticking with your team of naysayers no matter what on this topic then?
    You have also proven my point.  I just made an observation and you continue with a personal jab.  
    he didn't prove your point in the slightest. you missed his point. you stated "people have their team and they stick with their team blindly no matter what". so does that mean you are sticking to your team as well by making this statement?
    I do not have a team duh.  Double duh, I have voted for all 4 political parties in Canada.  WTF is the matter with you, its just general statement.  And most people stick with their team...I don't.  Have you paid attention at all?  I think most politicians are corrupt and crooked.

    Fuck some of you people can twist shit up into a knot without reason...and sure as hell don't need to comment on everything I say.  I don't agree, then move the fuck on...are you capable?  Or do you just like piling on because that makes you feel good.  I'll go at you all day if you want.  One minute you are full drama, my nerves can't take this place to picking arguments...make up your fucking mind...
    Yeah, conversations like this. This is the kind of thing ruining this forum.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • cincybearcat
    cincybearcat Posts: 16,880
    PJ_Soul said:
    So I think perhaps part of the problem are statements like "most of the right...human decency" and "anyone with half a brain..." thinks like me...

    I think statements like that ignore the potential of the opposing or even just differing voice.  They look to try and make that differing voice stupid or even keep that differing voice from speaking up.


    Sometimes it is the case though. It's not like every opinion or viewpoint deserves respect, and not every differing voice has potential to be anything but stupid. It's only the right to hold an opinion that automatically deserves respect (at least most of the time), and there is no way anyone here can ever keep someone else from speaking up.
    I understand what you are saying...to a degree.  The problem is people to what you are saying without finding out more first.  

    As far as "no way anyone here can ever keep someone else from speaking up"...I think you know what I mean.  There are a lot of people that leave cause they just don't want to deal with it anymore.  You see that, yes?  Running people off is eliminating their voice.
    hippiemom = goodness
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,758
    edited March 2019
    PJ_Soul said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    I personally think the main problem here that didn't used to exist so much is simply people being way more mean and much more willing to throw personal insults and to demean others on a completely personal, one-on-one level, and then people reacting to it. I think dialogue would go just fine no matter how much we all disagreed with each other's views if the meanness and snark and constant pestering and so-called sarcasm (insults in poor disguises) would go away. There is altogether too much actual personal dislike here, being shared way too openly, and it's just rude.
    this place was way "meaner" a long time ago. then it went pay to post and it weeded out most of the assholes. the mods went into overdrive. many of the assholes have been banned or just left. some still remain. 

    as cincy pointed out, many people leave so little room for discussion that it gets frustrating. 

    I do find it interesting, your entire post seems to go in direct contradiction to a previous post where you said that too many people are way too sensitive and take things too personally. and no, I'm not trying a "gotcha moment". Just trying to understand my perceived difference in  your opinion from then to now. 
    There is nothing contradictory here. People having a thick skin and being able to take it does not make mean things nicer. Also, having a thick skin relates to people discussing the topics when I say that, NEVER when it relates to personal insults and being mean to someone. And when I say things are meaner than they used to be, I mean within the past year or two, getting gradually worse until now - I'm not talking about ancient history.
    well, I disagree. of  course it doesn't make mean comments nicer, haha. I think making a statement seemingly "complaining" that people are way too sensitive but then also "complaining" (I used that word as I'm struggling for a better one at the moment) that people are too mean is a contradiction. 

    edit: I see your post wasn't finished by the time I quoted it, so just an added comment: I honestly recall your "too sensitive" comment coming on the heels of someone being offended by something you or another poster said to them they interpreted as personal. But it was some time ago, so who knows. 

    I wouldn't consider a few years ago ancient history, but alright. 

    But I digress......

    is it possible that is a direct correlation to who is currently POTUS? Now, I'm not blaming him directly, well, at least not entirely. I think the rules have changed re: actual discourse. Being a mainly liberal forum, is it possible that people are quick to be more caustic because of the political climate at present, whether that be a direct result of how POTUS conducts himself or just the fact that liberals are constantly angered at his and his supporters' antics?

    This is really the only forum I go to, so I don't know what the climate is like elsewhere. 
    Post edited by HughFreakingDillon on
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,758
    edited March 2019
    PJ_Soul said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    I personally think the main problem here that didn't used to exist so much is simply people being way more mean and much more willing to throw personal insults and to demean others on a completely personal, one-on-one level, and then people reacting to it. I think dialogue would go just fine no matter how much we all disagreed with each other's views if the meanness and snark and constant pestering and so-called sarcasm (insults in poor disguises) would go away. There is altogether too much actual personal dislike here, being shared way too openly, and it's just rude.
    this place was way "meaner" a long time ago. then it went pay to post and it weeded out most of the assholes. the mods went into overdrive. many of the assholes have been banned or just left. some still remain. 

    as cincy pointed out, many people leave so little room for discussion that it gets frustrating. 

    I do find it interesting, your entire post seems to go in direct contradiction to a previous post where you said that too many people are way too sensitive and take things too personally. and no, I'm not trying a "gotcha moment". Just trying to understand my perceived difference in  your opinion from then to now. 
    There is nothing contradictory here. People having a thick skin and being able to take it does not make mean things nicer. Also, having a thick skin relates to people discussing the topics when I say that, NEVER when it relates to personal insults and being mean to someone. And when I say things are meaner than they used to be, I mean within the past year or two, getting gradually worse until now - I'm not talking about ancient history.
    well, I disagree. of  course it doesn't make mean comments nicer, haha. I think making a statement seemingly "complaining" that people are way too sensitive but then also "complaining" (I used that word as I'm struggling for a better one at the moment) that people are too mean is a contradiction. 

    I wouldn't consider a few years ago ancient history, but alright. 

    But I digress......

    is it possible that is a direct correlation to who is currently POTUS? Now, I'm not blaming him directly, well, at least not entirely. I think the rules have changed re: actual discourse. Being a mainly liberal forum, is it possible that people are quick to be more caustic because of the political climate at present, whether that be a direct result of how POTUS conducts himself or just the fact that liberals are constantly angered at his and his supporters' antics?

    This is really the only forum I go to, so I don't know what the climate is like elsewhere. 
    Okay, then you don't understand what I am saying maybe, because it's not a contradiction. Like I said, the difference is between having a thick skin in debate, and dealing with PERSONAL insults. I think there is a very clear divide there, and I have always been clear about that divide. People taking things that aren't meant personally personal is having thin skin. People reacting to actual personal insults is another thing altogether.

    I do not think it's about Trump. I think it's about the people in this forum.

    It was more than a few years ago when this wasn't a member's only forum.

    Post edited by PJ_Soul on
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,758
    PJ_Soul said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    I personally think the main problem here that didn't used to exist so much is simply people being way more mean and much more willing to throw personal insults and to demean others on a completely personal, one-on-one level, and then people reacting to it. I think dialogue would go just fine no matter how much we all disagreed with each other's views if the meanness and snark and constant pestering and so-called sarcasm (insults in poor disguises) would go away. There is altogether too much actual personal dislike here, being shared way too openly, and it's just rude.
    this place was way "meaner" a long time ago. then it went pay to post and it weeded out most of the assholes. the mods went into overdrive. many of the assholes have been banned or just left. some still remain. 

    as cincy pointed out, many people leave so little room for discussion that it gets frustrating. 

    I do find it interesting, your entire post seems to go in direct contradiction to a previous post where you said that too many people are way too sensitive and take things too personally. and no, I'm not trying a "gotcha moment". Just trying to understand my perceived difference in  your opinion from then to now. 
    There is nothing contradictory here. People having a thick skin and being able to take it does not make mean things nicer. Also, having a thick skin relates to people discussing the topics when I say that, NEVER when it relates to personal insults and being mean to someone. And when I say things are meaner than they used to be, I mean within the past year or two, getting gradually worse until now - I'm not talking about ancient history.
    well, I disagree. of  course it doesn't make mean comments nicer, haha. I think making a statement seemingly "complaining" that people are way too sensitive but then also "complaining" (I used that word as I'm struggling for a better one at the moment) that people are too mean is a contradiction. 

    I wouldn't consider a few years ago ancient history, but alright. 

    But I digress......

    is it possible that is a direct correlation to who is currently POTUS? Now, I'm not blaming him directly, well, at least not entirely. I think the rules have changed re: actual discourse. Being a mainly liberal forum, is it possible that people are quick to be more caustic because of the political climate at present, whether that be a direct result of how POTUS conducts himself or just the fact that liberals are constantly angered at his and his supporters' antics?

    This is really the only forum I go to, so I don't know what the climate is like elsewhere. 
    Okay, then you don't understand what I am saying maybe, because it's not a contradiction. Like I said, the difference is between having a thick skin in debate, and dealing with PERSONAL insults. I think there is a very clear divide there, and I have always been clear about that divide.

    I do not think it's about Trump. I think it's about the people in this forum.
    And I edited my response to you after the fact.

    But anyway....having been around here during the Obama presidency, there is a very noticeable shift in how people talk to each other here. And not just here....in other forms of social media. 

    I rarely, if ever, had anyone attack me personally during those years, save for one person (who many people also had issues with), until the last while. 

    I'm not convinced the timing is merely coincidence. 
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,758
    PJ_Soul said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    I personally think the main problem here that didn't used to exist so much is simply people being way more mean and much more willing to throw personal insults and to demean others on a completely personal, one-on-one level, and then people reacting to it. I think dialogue would go just fine no matter how much we all disagreed with each other's views if the meanness and snark and constant pestering and so-called sarcasm (insults in poor disguises) would go away. There is altogether too much actual personal dislike here, being shared way too openly, and it's just rude.
    this place was way "meaner" a long time ago. then it went pay to post and it weeded out most of the assholes. the mods went into overdrive. many of the assholes have been banned or just left. some still remain. 

    as cincy pointed out, many people leave so little room for discussion that it gets frustrating. 

    I do find it interesting, your entire post seems to go in direct contradiction to a previous post where you said that too many people are way too sensitive and take things too personally. and no, I'm not trying a "gotcha moment". Just trying to understand my perceived difference in  your opinion from then to now. 
    There is nothing contradictory here. People having a thick skin and being able to take it does not make mean things nicer. Also, having a thick skin relates to people discussing the topics when I say that, NEVER when it relates to personal insults and being mean to someone. And when I say things are meaner than they used to be, I mean within the past year or two, getting gradually worse until now - I'm not talking about ancient history.
    well, I disagree. of  course it doesn't make mean comments nicer, haha. I think making a statement seemingly "complaining" that people are way too sensitive but then also "complaining" (I used that word as I'm struggling for a better one at the moment) that people are too mean is a contradiction. 

    I wouldn't consider a few years ago ancient history, but alright. 

    But I digress......

    is it possible that is a direct correlation to who is currently POTUS? Now, I'm not blaming him directly, well, at least not entirely. I think the rules have changed re: actual discourse. Being a mainly liberal forum, is it possible that people are quick to be more caustic because of the political climate at present, whether that be a direct result of how POTUS conducts himself or just the fact that liberals are constantly angered at his and his supporters' antics?

    This is really the only forum I go to, so I don't know what the climate is like elsewhere. 
    Okay, then you don't understand what I am saying maybe, because it's not a contradiction. Like I said, the difference is between having a thick skin in debate, and dealing with PERSONAL insults. I think there is a very clear divide there, and I have always been clear about that divide.

    I do not think it's about Trump. I think it's about the people in this forum.
    And I edited my response to you after the fact.

    But anyway....having been around here during the Obama presidency, there is a very noticeable shift in how people talk to each other here. And not just here....in other forms of social media. 

    I rarely, if ever, had anyone attack me personally during those years, save for one person (who many people also had issues with), until the last while. 

    I'm not convinced the timing is merely coincidence. 
    I also edited my response. ;)

    I think the difference between Obama and Trump years is just that most posters cleared out because the topics and the entire situation is just too stressful and divisive, and they mostly cleared out because of that, leaving only the most stalwart debaters. Unfortunately that also means that a large number of those who kind of helped keep shit balanced and reasonable disappeared. I think the ratio of aggressive posters changed radically, making the entire atmosphere, well, aggressive! So yeah, I guess you're right that it's related to Trump in that he's too awful for a lot of people to even talk about!
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,758
    PJ_Soul said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    I personally think the main problem here that didn't used to exist so much is simply people being way more mean and much more willing to throw personal insults and to demean others on a completely personal, one-on-one level, and then people reacting to it. I think dialogue would go just fine no matter how much we all disagreed with each other's views if the meanness and snark and constant pestering and so-called sarcasm (insults in poor disguises) would go away. There is altogether too much actual personal dislike here, being shared way too openly, and it's just rude.
    this place was way "meaner" a long time ago. then it went pay to post and it weeded out most of the assholes. the mods went into overdrive. many of the assholes have been banned or just left. some still remain. 

    as cincy pointed out, many people leave so little room for discussion that it gets frustrating. 

    I do find it interesting, your entire post seems to go in direct contradiction to a previous post where you said that too many people are way too sensitive and take things too personally. and no, I'm not trying a "gotcha moment". Just trying to understand my perceived difference in  your opinion from then to now. 
    There is nothing contradictory here. People having a thick skin and being able to take it does not make mean things nicer. Also, having a thick skin relates to people discussing the topics when I say that, NEVER when it relates to personal insults and being mean to someone. And when I say things are meaner than they used to be, I mean within the past year or two, getting gradually worse until now - I'm not talking about ancient history.
    well, I disagree. of  course it doesn't make mean comments nicer, haha. I think making a statement seemingly "complaining" that people are way too sensitive but then also "complaining" (I used that word as I'm struggling for a better one at the moment) that people are too mean is a contradiction. 

    I wouldn't consider a few years ago ancient history, but alright. 

    But I digress......

    is it possible that is a direct correlation to who is currently POTUS? Now, I'm not blaming him directly, well, at least not entirely. I think the rules have changed re: actual discourse. Being a mainly liberal forum, is it possible that people are quick to be more caustic because of the political climate at present, whether that be a direct result of how POTUS conducts himself or just the fact that liberals are constantly angered at his and his supporters' antics?

    This is really the only forum I go to, so I don't know what the climate is like elsewhere. 
    Okay, then you don't understand what I am saying maybe, because it's not a contradiction. Like I said, the difference is between having a thick skin in debate, and dealing with PERSONAL insults. I think there is a very clear divide there, and I have always been clear about that divide.

    I do not think it's about Trump. I think it's about the people in this forum.
    And I edited my response to you after the fact.

    But anyway....having been around here during the Obama presidency, there is a very noticeable shift in how people talk to each other here. And not just here....in other forms of social media. 

    I rarely, if ever, had anyone attack me personally during those years, save for one person (who many people also had issues with), until the last while. 

    I'm not convinced the timing is merely coincidence. 
    I also edited my response. ;)

    I think the difference between Obama and Trump years is just that most posters cleared out because the topics and the entire situation is just too stressful and divisive, and they mostly cleared out because of that, leaving only the most stalwart debaters. Unfortunately that also means that a large number of those who kind of helped keep shit balanced and reasonable disappeared. I think the ratio of aggressive posters changed radically, making the entire atmosphere, well, aggressive! So yeah, I guess you're right that it's related to Trump in that he's too awful for a lot of people to even talk about!
    I know. I can't keep up with all of your editing. LOL
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,758
    PJ_Soul said:
    benjs said:
    Please point to a time you could engage civilly in most political discussion.  There has never been a time.  People have their team and they stick with their team blindly no matter what...


    Are you blindly sticking with your team of naysayers no matter what on this topic then?
    You have also proven my point.  I just made an observation and you continue with a personal jab.  
    he didn't prove your point in the slightest. you missed his point. you stated "people have their team and they stick with their team blindly no matter what". so does that mean you are sticking to your team as well by making this statement?
    I do not have a team duh.  Double duh, I have voted for all 4 political parties in Canada.  WTF is the matter with you, its just general statement.  And most people stick with their team...I don't.  Have you paid attention at all?  I think most politicians are corrupt and crooked.

    Fuck some of you people can twist shit up into a knot without reason...and sure as hell don't need to comment on everything I say.  I don't agree, then move the fuck on...are you capable?  Or do you just like piling on because that makes you feel good.  I'll go at you all day if you want.  One minute you are full drama, my nerves can't take this place to picking arguments...make up your fucking mind...
    Yeah, conversations like this. This is the kind of thing ruining this forum.
    it's not the conversation ruining this forum. it's the overreaction and then personal assault. 
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,758
    PJ_Soul said:
    benjs said:
    Please point to a time you could engage civilly in most political discussion.  There has never been a time.  People have their team and they stick with their team blindly no matter what...


    Are you blindly sticking with your team of naysayers no matter what on this topic then?
    You have also proven my point.  I just made an observation and you continue with a personal jab.  
    he didn't prove your point in the slightest. you missed his point. you stated "people have their team and they stick with their team blindly no matter what". so does that mean you are sticking to your team as well by making this statement?
    I do not have a team duh.  Double duh, I have voted for all 4 political parties in Canada.  WTF is the matter with you, its just general statement.  And most people stick with their team...I don't.  Have you paid attention at all?  I think most politicians are corrupt and crooked.

    Fuck some of you people can twist shit up into a knot without reason...and sure as hell don't need to comment on everything I say.  I don't agree, then move the fuck on...are you capable?  Or do you just like piling on because that makes you feel good.  I'll go at you all day if you want.  One minute you are full drama, my nerves can't take this place to picking arguments...make up your fucking mind...
    Yeah, conversations like this. This is the kind of thing ruining this forum.
    it's not the conversation ruining this forum. it's the overreaction and then personal assault. 
    That's what I meant.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,758
    gotcha
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,758
    edited March 2019
    Personal attacks are just not okay. It is possible to attack opinions and viewpoints and political positions without attacking and belittling the actual individual person expressing the opinion - the real person who very well might be fun to have drinks with. Some people don't seem willing or able to separate the two.
    Post edited by PJ_Soul on
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • benjs
    benjs Toronto, ON Posts: 9,391
    benjs said:
    Please point to a time you could engage civilly in most political discussion.  There has never been a time.  People have their team and they stick with their team blindly no matter what...


    Are you blindly sticking with your team of naysayers no matter what on this topic then?
    You have also proven my point.  I just made an observation and you continue with a personal jab.  
    There's around five people a few posts up discussing how we used to engage civilly in political discussion on here. I'm one of them. That speaks to your first two statements being wrong (in addition to being so confidently delivered). So yes, you may be part of four political parties in Canada, but the team I'm referring to is actually "won't admit when I'm wrong, but will lash out at others extensively when confronted with that option". 

    In spite of your aggressive direct message to me, and your aggressive stance with HFD, I will not obey you and ignore false statements. I'd expect and welcome the same treatment if roles were reversed. 

    This doesn't have to be ugly either, and if you consider my message ugly in light of what I've written, I'm happy to be taught why it was and fix that in my conduct. This can be a good place or it can be a bad place - we get to choose.
    '05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2

    EV
    Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
  • my2hands
    my2hands Posts: 17,117
    edited March 2019
    I blame Canada... for pretty much everything  :)
    Post edited by my2hands on
  • dankind
    dankind Posts: 20,841
    brianlux said:
    Man this is priceless.  Can't even get past 3 pages without people cursing someone out, other's saying "the other side" lacks decency, another saying they have less than half a brain, and another making a point and then saying "not debatable".  

    So I guess my answer to this question is, in the online/written form I do believe you can have reasonable debate from people that disagree...it's not likely though.  It becomes less likely once you have people that find others that agree with them and build a pack.  It becomes less likely when certain behaviors from individual with certain opinions is ignored while the opposing viewpoints same behaviors result in interventions.

    Probably a good 10% chance...and I do not have any data to back that up.  Though I imagine if we went through this forum alone that10% might be high.
    It begs the question, "Have we lost the ability to engage in discourse/ reasonable debate", doesn't it?

    I SAW PEARL JAM
  • foodshop65
    foodshop65 Connecticut Posts: 731
    no...how can you? people don't listen anymore. label and dismiss doesn't make for good chats
    Randall's Island 9-29-1996, MSG 9-10/11-1998, Meadows, CT 9-13-1998, Sacramento 10-30-2000, Bridge School 10-26-2002,MSG 9-8/9-2003, Hartford 2013, Amsterdam 2014(2), Memphis 2014, MSG 5-1/2-2016, Fenway 8-7-16, Fenway 9-2/4-18 MSG 9-11-22
  • Bentleyspop
    Bentleyspop Craft Beer Brewery, Colorado Posts: 11,515
    my2hands said:
    I blame Canada... for pretty much everything  :)
    Why would you do that when everyone knows it's  Obama's fault.
    Except when it's Hillarys fault
  • brianlux
    brianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 43,669
    dankind said:
    brianlux said:
    Man this is priceless.  Can't even get past 3 pages without people cursing someone out, other's saying "the other side" lacks decency, another saying they have less than half a brain, and another making a point and then saying "not debatable".  

    So I guess my answer to this question is, in the online/written form I do believe you can have reasonable debate from people that disagree...it's not likely though.  It becomes less likely once you have people that find others that agree with them and build a pack.  It becomes less likely when certain behaviors from individual with certain opinions is ignored while the opposing viewpoints same behaviors result in interventions.

    Probably a good 10% chance...and I do not have any data to back that up.  Though I imagine if we went through this forum alone that10% might be high.
    It begs the question, "Have we lost the ability to engage in discourse/ reasonable debate", doesn't it?

    Fucking logic.  I HATE IT!  :lol:
    "It's a sad and beautiful world"
    -Roberto Benigni

  • brianlux
    brianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 43,669
    my2hands said:
    I blame Canada... for pretty much everything  :)
    Finally!  Some goddamn civil discourse around this place! :lol: 
    "It's a sad and beautiful world"
    -Roberto Benigni