Should I ask Agnes out on a date?
Comments
-
YesHughFreakingDillon said:
but that saying is absolutely not meant as reciprocal. it's a derogatory term meant to convey that if you keep your wife happy, she won't nag you, thereby making yourself happy. there's nothing circular about that term.PJ_Soul said:OffSheGoes35 said:
What about "Happy wife, happy life"?HughFreakingDillon said:
everyone is fucked up to a degree. psychologists are no different. I once read a psychologist say that they can be some of the MOST fucked up people! LOLThoughts_Arrive said:
I feel great shame when people ask me what I do with myself and I say I'm a full time student rather than giving an occupation.PJ_Soul said:
Ya, well some people are jerks, lol. I actually worked part time all through full time university myself, but man, it sure would have been nice to not have, lol. I chose to move out from my parents' house early so had to work to support myself without screwing myself with too many loans... but that is just one of the legit options. Dude, stop caring so much about what other people think about your choices. I feel like you haven't had the greatest epiphany of adulthood: who cares what other people think???? Fuck 'em!!Thoughts_Arrive said:
People are like 'well I went through university and held a part time job bla bla"PJ_Soul said:
Uh, well no, I wouldn't say that. I mean, yeah, people normally work which makes it normal in society. But people have to work to support themselves, feed themselves, clothe themselves, etc. But FYI, being a full time student is considered a job. It is very very normal for a full time student not to work. That's why student loans are so high, lol. So just tell people that when they ask about your unemployment status. If you stop being a full time student and still don't have a job, then you'll just be someone who doesn't support himself.Thoughts_Arrive said:
Won't happen.PJ_Soul said:oftenreading said:Thoughts_Arrive said:Forgot to add,
When my mum mentions my future children I tell her that it won't happen and she gets all sad and scared.
Having children just because your mother wants grandchildren is one of the worst reasons to have children. They aren't accessories.Words of wisdom.Never let bullshit societal norms or the desires of others force you into something you don't truly want for yourself.
What is starting to get to me is people questioning my unemployed status. Is it a societal norm to work?
Psychology is so competitive that you need a very high GPA to get accepted into postgraduate degrees.
If that wasn't the case I'd work part time and study full time. I need to dedicate 100% of my time to my current degree to have a chance at postgraduate.
I don't even know what I want to do after university. I feel like a lost soul in this world.
Thought I wanted to be a clinical psychologist when I went back to uni, now I am not sure it's for me. Plus I have my own shit that is unresolved. Not exactly the ideal practitioner. Not sure if academia/research is my thing either. I was thinking maybe social work but my fucking passion is art (even though I have been lost for painting ideas the past 3 weeks and have done nothing).
I'm 44. have a decent job, but it's not my passion. I just kind of lucked into it through working at the same place since I was 23 when I started in security.
when i was younger I always thought I was going to be a cop. Then in high school I thought I'd be a good accountant.
You know what I really want to be when I grow up? HAPPY. that's what.
I like the people I work with, my job isn't stressful, the benefits/pension are out of this world, it puts food on the table and my girls in dance and me at concerts and my wife out for dinner and drinks with friends. I've come to appreciate this. People may think I have "settled" and I'm wasting my potential. I say "fuck you" to anyone that thinks they know what I want/need. it took me a long time to realize I need to stop giving a shit what people think. satisfying others will NEVER make you happy. it doesn't matter if it's a spouse, a friend, a peer, a parent.
a guy I'm friends with once said to me "why don't you go back to school so you can make more money? don't you want your kids to want for nothing?". why, so they can see their dad miserable and non-engaging because he's too stressed out/busy with work like my dad was? yeah, no thanks. I'd rather play board games with my kids.
what opened my eyes? a guy i went to high school with, I saw years later through work. He was an accountant. i asked him how he liked it. He said "I fucking hate it. I only do it because that's what my parents wanted me to do".
I often see people I used to work with. They look at me with shock (and seeming disdain) when I tell them I still work there. Then I get the "lifer, eh?" comments, like it's something to be embarassed about. you know how I respond? "yep. why would I leave? it's a great place to work". if you respond to people like that with unapologetic, positive confidence, it shuts them down/up immediately. you simply cannot make fun of someone's happiness.
if you are confident in the choices you've made for yourself then project that.It's actually a good question. I think saying that satisfying others will never make one happy is a really misguided statement. This is far from a black and white issue. Doing things for others, and to place oneself in a position within a shared relationship where compromises are made is very human, healthy, and unavoidable unless you isolate yourself way too much. Black and white statements against that might just create more inner conflict rather than solve anything. I know what he meant, but yeah, I doubt there are too many truly happy people who revolve their entire lives around themselves and their own wants and needs alone.And I think "happy wife, happy life" would be a great term, but only assuming people understand that it's meant as a reciprocal, circular kind of concept, lol.It's not meant as reciprocal when it's used by people now, no. That's what I meant. Like, if only people understood it that way. I do actually think the ORIGINAL meaning of it was indeed meant to be like a kind of humourous riddle or whatever that was meant to be cyclical. Or at least that's what I like to think, lol. I.e. husband treats wife well = happy wife = wife treats husband well = happy husband = husband treats wife well = happy wife = wife treats husband well = happy husband... and so on to infinity, lol.Honestly, I feel like this common cynical view of the phrase is sad. I mean, Happy wife DOES often equal happy life for a husband. That is undeniable. How many men do you know when happy wives who are miserable?? I don't know any. That phrase makes no mention at all of the husband being nagged or anything like that. People just infer it. I think that inference tells a much bigger story than the phrase itself (and is sexist too), and also simply gave the phrase a "bad name" that it probably doesn't deserve, just as an innocent sentence.
Post edited by PJ_Soul onWith all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
YesI spoke via Facebook messenger to the woman I recently friended on Facebook.
So that's two online chats we've had about 2 weeks apart.
Not sure if I should just take it easy and keep chatting online before trying to sum up the courage to ask her out or do it sooner.
Heck, I don't even know if I want a relationship right now.Adelaide 17/11/2009, Melbourne 20/11/2009, Sydney 22/11/2009, Melbourne (Big Day Out Festival) 24/01/20140 -
YesThoughts_Arrive said:I spoke via Facebook messenger to the woman I recently friended on Facebook.
So that's two online chats we've had about 2 weeks apart.
Not sure if I should just take it easy and keep chatting online before trying to sum up the courage to ask her out or do it sooner.
Heck, I don't even know if I want a relationship right now.
Asking someone out does not equal having a relationship. If you don't want a relationship, that's perfectly okay, but that doesn't mean you can't date casually. In fact, it may be better to just aim for having some enjoyable dates without any pressure, rather than imbuing it with all the stress of a "relationship".
my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0 -
YesHmmm interesting point. We both love Simpsons and food.Adelaide 17/11/2009, Melbourne 20/11/2009, Sydney 22/11/2009, Melbourne (Big Day Out Festival) 24/01/20140
-
Yes
Does she love food? This is too good to be true, now you MUST ask her out!!!!Thoughts_Arrive said:Hmmm interesting point. We both love Simpsons and food.
Don't forget to start a thread about it so we all can join in on your adventures together
0 -
Yes
She's a vegan but I am not haha.Annafalk said:
Does she love food? This is too good to be true, now you MUST ask her out!!!!Thoughts_Arrive said:Hmmm interesting point. We both love Simpsons and food.
Don't forget to start a thread about it so we all can join in on your adventures together

I don't know, thinking about it.Adelaide 17/11/2009, Melbourne 20/11/2009, Sydney 22/11/2009, Melbourne (Big Day Out Festival) 24/01/20140 -
I would think think this depends a bit on who she is and how you got to be facebook pals. Etc.Thoughts_Arrive said:I spoke via Facebook messenger to the woman I recently friended on Facebook.
So that's two online chats we've had about 2 weeks apart.
Not sure if I should just take it easy and keep chatting online before trying to sum up the courage to ask her out or do it sooner.
Heck, I don't even know if I want a relationship right now.
Why not ask her out as a friend first, if you've only talked to her online... maybe she sucks IRL.
And if she eats meat. Dump her."Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
NoSpiritual_Chaos said:
Do you want him to be a 40 year old virgin? Who gives a shit if she eats raw meat at this point?
I would think think this depends a bit on who she is and how you got to be facebook pals. Etc.Thoughts_Arrive said:I spoke via Facebook messenger to the woman I recently friended on Facebook.
So that's two online chats we've had about 2 weeks apart.
Not sure if I should just take it easy and keep chatting online before trying to sum up the courage to ask her out or do it sooner.
Heck, I don't even know if I want a relationship right now.
Why not ask her out as a friend first, if you've only talked to her online... maybe she sucks IRL.
And if she eats meat. Dump her.0 -
YesI said she's a vegan.Adelaide 17/11/2009, Melbourne 20/11/2009, Sydney 22/11/2009, Melbourne (Big Day Out Festival) 24/01/20140
-
HAVE SOME STANDARDS WOMAN!OffSheGoes35 said:Spiritual_Chaos said:
Do you want him to be a 40 year old virgin? Who gives a shit if she eats raw meat at this point?
I would think think this depends a bit on who she is and how you got to be facebook pals. Etc.Thoughts_Arrive said:I spoke via Facebook messenger to the woman I recently friended on Facebook.
So that's two online chats we've had about 2 weeks apart.
Not sure if I should just take it easy and keep chatting online before trying to sum up the courage to ask her out or do it sooner.
Heck, I don't even know if I want a relationship right now.
Why not ask her out as a friend first, if you've only talked to her online... maybe she sucks IRL.
And if she eats meat. Dump her."Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
I know. That's why I added the last part.Thoughts_Arrive said:I said she's a vegan."Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
Sure, perpetuate the argument, that'll solve everything. It should be enough to admit you're wrong.OffSheGoes35 said:
That means you were very very much at fault, and you made someone very very angry. Sometimes admitting fault just ain't enough. The adrenaline is still pumping--- you're past the point of admitting fault, you have to admit defeat.HesCalledDyer said:
9a. When a man admits fault, do not begin your next sentence with "I just think it's funny how..."OffSheGoes35 said:Okay married folks, what do you think about these rules?

https://youtu.be/iiq5tnzmLBM
Star Lake 00 / Pittsburgh 03 / State College 03 / Bristow 03 / Cleveland 06 / Camden II 06 / DC 08 / Pittsburgh 13 / Baltimore 13 / Charlottesville 13 / Cincinnati 14 / St. Paul 14 / Hampton 16 / Wrigley I 16 / Wrigley II 16 / Baltimore 20 / Camden 22 / Baltimore 24 / Raleigh I 25 / Raleigh II 25 / Pittsburgh I 250 -
No
STANDARDS BE DAMNED, I'm coming straight on for you!!!!! In a meat dress like Lady Gaga!Spiritual_Chaos said:
HAVE SOME STANDARDS WOMAN!OffSheGoes35 said:Spiritual_Chaos said:
Do you want him to be a 40 year old virgin? Who gives a shit if she eats raw meat at this point?
I would think think this depends a bit on who she is and how you got to be facebook pals. Etc.Thoughts_Arrive said:I spoke via Facebook messenger to the woman I recently friended on Facebook.
So that's two online chats we've had about 2 weeks apart.
Not sure if I should just take it easy and keep chatting online before trying to sum up the courage to ask her out or do it sooner.
Heck, I don't even know if I want a relationship right now.
Why not ask her out as a friend first, if you've only talked to her online... maybe she sucks IRL.
And if she eats meat. Dump her.
0 -
OffSheGoes35 said:
STANDARDS BE DAMNED, I'm coming straight on for you!!!!! In a meat dress like Lady Gaga!Spiritual_Chaos said:
HAVE SOME STANDARDS WOMAN!OffSheGoes35 said:Spiritual_Chaos said:
Do you want him to be a 40 year old virgin? Who gives a shit if she eats raw meat at this point?
I would think think this depends a bit on who she is and how you got to be facebook pals. Etc.Thoughts_Arrive said:I spoke via Facebook messenger to the woman I recently friended on Facebook.
So that's two online chats we've had about 2 weeks apart.
Not sure if I should just take it easy and keep chatting online before trying to sum up the courage to ask her out or do it sooner.
Heck, I don't even know if I want a relationship right now.
Why not ask her out as a friend first, if you've only talked to her online... maybe she sucks IRL.
And if she eats meat. Dump her.
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
NoRight on, I would do that to a guy dressed in a Cosby sweater too...
Actually, he dresses more like Carlton from Fresh Prince...Post edited by OffSheGoes35 on0 -
No
Yes, but why are you sorry? And is your answer lengthy and remorseful? Do you have a detailed inventory of your wrongdoings? She needs to know that you caught everything. Don't leave anything out.HesCalledDyer said:
Sure, perpetuate the argument, that'll solve everything. It should be enough to admit you're wrong.OffSheGoes35 said:
That means you were very very much at fault, and you made someone very very angry. Sometimes admitting fault just ain't enough. The adrenaline is still pumping--- you're past the point of admitting fault, you have to admit defeat.HesCalledDyer said:
9a. When a man admits fault, do not begin your next sentence with "I just think it's funny how..."OffSheGoes35 said:Okay married folks, what do you think about these rules?
0 -
pretty sure if you look at the history of it, and the generation it came from, the opposite is true. I think it originated as a sexist term, and is now being considered as reciprocal.PJ_Soul said:It's not meant as reciprocal when it's used by people now, no. That's what I meant. Like, if only people understood it that way. I do actually think the ORIGINAL meaning of it was indeed meant to be like a kind of humourous riddle or whatever that was meant to be cyclical. Or at least that's what I like to think, lol. I.e. husband treats wife well = happy wife = wife treats husband well = happy husband = husband treats wife well = happy wife = wife treats husband well = happy husband... and so on to infinity, lol.Honestly, I feel like this common cynical view of the phrase is sad. I mean, Happy wife DOES often equal happy life for a husband. That is undeniable. How many men do you know when happy wives who are miserable?? I don't know any. That phrase makes no mention at all of the husband being nagged or anything like that. People just infer it. I think that inference tells a much bigger story than the phrase itself (and is sexist too), and also simply gave the phrase a "bad name" that it probably doesn't deserve, just as an innocent sentence.
and no, happy wife does not equal happy life for a husband. saying that is assuming that a man's happiness is in large part dependent on the happiness of his wife, which discounts his life/feelings/self almost entirely. men, especially these days, aren't the emotional simpletons you seem to be making them out to be.Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 -
Yes
No, that isn't what I meant at all, and I really don't get how you can be taking me the way your are, nor that you would think in any way that I believe men are emotional simpletons - I take that as an insult, and would have thought that you'd know me better than that by now. I'm talking in a bigger picture, and you're just not picking up what I'm putting down at all. I don't think it discounts anything, because I've never known a wife who was happy while her husband is completely miserable for whatever reason either, because she is also concerned about his happiness. And I'm not talking about happiness just relying on the simple happiness of another. I am (I thought obviously, because I saw no other alternative) assuming that happiness of both parties depends on EVERYTHING going on in their shared lives together, including the feelings and situation of the other. Again, reciprocal. FWIW, I'm not the emotional simpleton you apparently take me for, if you actually thought I was saying what you said, lol.HughFreakingDillon said:
pretty sure if you look at the history of it, and the generation it came from, the opposite is true. I think it originated as a sexist term, and is now being considered as reciprocal.PJ_Soul said:It's not meant as reciprocal when it's used by people now, no. That's what I meant. Like, if only people understood it that way. I do actually think the ORIGINAL meaning of it was indeed meant to be like a kind of humourous riddle or whatever that was meant to be cyclical. Or at least that's what I like to think, lol. I.e. husband treats wife well = happy wife = wife treats husband well = happy husband = husband treats wife well = happy wife = wife treats husband well = happy husband... and so on to infinity, lol.Honestly, I feel like this common cynical view of the phrase is sad. I mean, Happy wife DOES often equal happy life for a husband. That is undeniable. How many men do you know when happy wives who are miserable?? I don't know any. That phrase makes no mention at all of the husband being nagged or anything like that. People just infer it. I think that inference tells a much bigger story than the phrase itself (and is sexist too), and also simply gave the phrase a "bad name" that it probably doesn't deserve, just as an innocent sentence.
and no, happy wife does not equal happy life for a husband. saying that is assuming that a man's happiness is in large part dependent on the happiness of his wife, which discounts his life/feelings/self almost entirely. men, especially these days, aren't the emotional simpletons you seem to be making them out to be.
Post edited by PJ_Soul onWith all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
YesI'll come back after this is resolved.
0 -
NoI think it is a stalemate.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.2K The Porch
- 279 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.3K Flea Market
- 39.3K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help








