Prediction: Concert Seating Will Change
Comments
-
Boozer wrote:There are other methods to reduce scalpers....put your name on your 10C ticket perhaps...or 10C number.
That leaves it up to security to stop scalping then, which isn't going to happen. What motivation would they really have to enforce that?<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jmgphotos/sets/72157600802942672/">My Pearl Jam Photos</a>
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jmgphotos/4731512142/" title="PJ Banner2 by Mister J Photography, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1135/4731512142_258f2d6ab4_b.jpg" width="630" height="112" alt="PJ Banner2" /></a>0 -
Um... I have sold tickets.. I have also had morons not show or just never call back. I will stand by my stance of selling your extra, SUCKS. I have put effort in.. and much more than the "tiniest bit", Mr. Elitist.
If there is an extra seat in a row, I am sure somone will buy it.
Let me also say this. I really don't like the term "Hometown System". I will never use it again. I live in the middle of nowhere, MD. They will not be setting up the stage here anytime soon. I thought it was fairly obvious however, that what we mean is, LET EVERYONE HAVE ONE SHOW (WHO CARES WHERE) BASED ON SENIORITY.0 -
Motown322 wrote:I'd suggest you do the same. It's your very own "wants and desires" to change a system that works very well into something that benefits you and your situation for the best. This whole "10C needs to do something with the tickets because I'M getting screwed" crap is such an old bit around here. When you joined, you knew that seniority was the way tickets were handled. I can't understand why it comes as such a shock that people who have been in the 10C for 10+ years might go to more than one show and they're sitting in front of you.
No one is shocked Mo. Just requesting a change. Like you've never posted any ideas on this board.....do you feel threatened?
|Montreal 03|Halifax 05|St. John's 1 05|St. John's 2 05|Toronto 1 06|Toronto 2 06|NYC 1 08|NYC 2 08|Toronto 09|Hartford 10|Boston 10|Newark 10|NYC 1 10|NYC 2 10|Alpine Valley 1 11|Alpine Valley 2 11|Montreal 11|Hartford 13|Ottawa 16|Chicago 1 16|Chicago 2 16|Boston 1 18|Quebec City 22|Ottawa 22|Boston 1 24|Boston 2 24|0 -
I say just be happy PJ has such an interactive fanclub still.denver 7/2/06 & 7/3/06, chicago 8/5/070
-
Boozer wrote:You have a low number.
Not particularly... 141xxx. I just get tired of the whining about a system that works. It's not going to be an optimal situation for everyone no matter what you do. How do you determine "hometown"?? By state? If I live in Marquette, MI, it's much closer for me to go to Milwaukee, Chicago or Minneapolis than Detroit... what if I live in Florida where they're not playing? What's my "hometown" show then?
Try your luck through Ticketmaster if you're pissed about the 10C seats. You'll probably be disappointed with them.0 -
and here's where the just because you've been in the fanclun longer doesn't mean you're a bigger fan (because it doesn't). sorry for being 7 when they first came out. sorry my parents don't go to concerts. i just killed the seniority arguement."Fuck the talkin' let's start rockin" - Eddie Vedder 9-5-00 Pittsburgh
4/26/03 Pittsburgh 5/3/03 State College 7/12/03 Hershey 10/1/04 Reading 9/28/05 Pittsburgh 5/20/06 Cleveland 6/23/06 Pittsburgh 6/22/08 DC
friends don't let friends listen to good charlotte0 -
SoonForgotten2 wrote:That leaves it up to security to stop scalping then, which isn't going to happen. What motivation would they really have to enforce that?
Who's job is it now to stop scalping? security? 10C? Judge Judy? Do you have any ideas to permanently eliminate scalping?|Montreal 03|Halifax 05|St. John's 1 05|St. John's 2 05|Toronto 1 06|Toronto 2 06|NYC 1 08|NYC 2 08|Toronto 09|Hartford 10|Boston 10|Newark 10|NYC 1 10|NYC 2 10|Alpine Valley 1 11|Alpine Valley 2 11|Montreal 11|Hartford 13|Ottawa 16|Chicago 1 16|Chicago 2 16|Boston 1 18|Quebec City 22|Ottawa 22|Boston 1 24|Boston 2 24|0 -
stop allready the american tour is on it's last leg don't people believe that 10c has looked at all options of distribution of tickets come on they have been doing this since when certanly before "98 ,man i do miss when not too many people new about 10c it was way better nobody bitched i hope they keep this system.jesus greets me looks just like me ....0
-
inmyrvm wrote:and here's where the just because you've been in the fanclun longer doesn't mean you're a bigger fan (because it doesn't). sorry for being 7 when they first came out. sorry my parents don't go to concerts. i just killed the seniority arguement.
It doesn't mean that, but it's the only indicator 10C has to go on. Seniority isn't about who has been a fan for longer. it's about who has literally paid their dues to the fan club longest. I think that's a fairly simple concept.<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jmgphotos/sets/72157600802942672/">My Pearl Jam Photos</a>
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jmgphotos/4731512142/" title="PJ Banner2 by Mister J Photography, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1135/4731512142_258f2d6ab4_b.jpg" width="630" height="112" alt="PJ Banner2" /></a>0 -
Boozer wrote:No one is shocked Mo. Just requesting a change. Like you've never posted any ideas on this board.....do you feel threatened?

No, not threatened at all... post away. It's just a tired old bit. You can't please everyone. 99% of the people who want them to change the setup do so because they want better seats, but they post under the guise of "for the greater good of all the lower-number 10C members". It's no less selfish a move by them than the people around here with 10+ years into the club saying the system works fine and them getting blasted because "you must have a low number".0 -
higher. more recently joining members of this fan club should not have and do not deserve any say in this matter. i totally understand where they are coming from in wanting to have the chance to sit closer but they shouldnt have a say. we have been paying this club loyally and buying everything and anything they put in front of our faces since 1992 on. loyalty should be rewarded not penalized. i agree there are way too many testosterone raged dudes in the first 10 rows. but that isnt there fault that 'do the evolution' was written about them. you cannot fault a fan for wanting to be there for every show and buy everything the band sells.
so there is no logical or fair way for the system to completely overhaul without screwing those who have stood by you when most fans over 250xxx didnt even know that no code or yield were ever released albums.
loyalty means being loyal and it means always being there good or bad. and to try and mess with that to get a little more vibe in the first many rows just doesnt make sense.
the only way i see it fair is if every 10th ticket pair issued were randomly given to members that are out of that lot for the first 20 rows say. whatever...point being that there is a lottery for newer members to potentially get some great seats.
and i am not trying to be a jerk. save my name and pm me next time there is a show and if i have sweet 6th row seats and can take someone who wants that experience i will be glad to0 -
We will continue to bitch, moan, cry and raise our voice. Check yourself. I am sick of people telling me to "shut up", or "quit whining" and "be happy". This is fucking America, bitches....0
-
Boozer wrote:Who's job is it now to stop scalping? security? 10C? Judge Judy? Do you have any ideas to permanently eliminate scalping?
Pearl Jam attempts to limit scalping via 10C- making tickets available the day of and yes, by assuring that people joining just prior to a tour kicking off do not get prime seats that they can then mark up. It's not their job to do this but it is their perogative. They are looking out for their fans. I don't think security has any fans to look out for.<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jmgphotos/sets/72157600802942672/">My Pearl Jam Photos</a>
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jmgphotos/4731512142/" title="PJ Banner2 by Mister J Photography, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1135/4731512142_258f2d6ab4_b.jpg" width="630" height="112" alt="PJ Banner2" /></a>0 -
I just don't understand how limiting your "choice seats" to one show per tour, or even leg of a tour, you are getting "screwed"? REally? Wow. And you above me to say that anyone with a high number has no say.. Really? So my voice with a number 103XXX should be heard and Mr. 267XXX should be ignored? REally?0
-
inmyrvm wrote:and here's where the just because you've been in the fanclun longer doesn't mean you're a bigger fan (because it doesn't). sorry for being 7 when they first came out. sorry my parents don't go to concerts. i just killed the seniority arguement.
Yeah, you sure did. Don't break your arm patting yourself on the back for that gem.
I'm gonna try that argument with my boss today... "I should get 6 weeks of vacation like you do, Bob. Who cares if I've only worked here 7 years instead of the 20 you've put in. Sorry I was only 15 when you started. Sorry I didn't come here and work earlier. I've earned 'em."0 -
Motown322 wrote:No, not threatened at all... post away. It's just a tired old bit. You can't please everyone. 99% of the people who want them to change the setup do so because they want better seats, but they post under the guise of "for the greater good of all the lower-number 10C members". It's no less selfish a move by them than the people around here with 10+ years into the club saying the system works fine and them getting blasted because "you must have a low number".
Don't mean to blast though...personally I think it's great for all the low numbers to have a chance at close view and I think it's great that I am pretty much guaranteed a seat in the house for any show I desire. 10C have done a amazing job with everything. But this change that has been mentioned will always peak my interest...I apologize guys.|Montreal 03|Halifax 05|St. John's 1 05|St. John's 2 05|Toronto 1 06|Toronto 2 06|NYC 1 08|NYC 2 08|Toronto 09|Hartford 10|Boston 10|Newark 10|NYC 1 10|NYC 2 10|Alpine Valley 1 11|Alpine Valley 2 11|Montreal 11|Hartford 13|Ottawa 16|Chicago 1 16|Chicago 2 16|Boston 1 18|Quebec City 22|Ottawa 22|Boston 1 24|Boston 2 24|0 -
Motown322 wrote:Yeah, you sure did. Don't break your arm patting yourself on the back for that gem.
I'm gonna try that argument with my boss today... "I should get 6 weeks of vacation like you do, Bob. Who cares if I've only worked here 7 years instead of the 20 you've put in. Sorry I was only 15 when you started. Sorry I didn't come here and work earlier. I've earned 'em."
Heh. Nice.<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jmgphotos/sets/72157600802942672/">My Pearl Jam Photos</a>
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jmgphotos/4731512142/" title="PJ Banner2 by Mister J Photography, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1135/4731512142_258f2d6ab4_b.jpg" width="630" height="112" alt="PJ Banner2" /></a>0 -
I have a pretty low number, and haven't been farther back than 8th row on the past two tours. But I agree that it's annoying to have the same people in the front couple of rows at every show. I agree that 10c members should have priority seating for one show per tour and sort of random seating for any other shows they want to go to. I'm not saying that brand new members have a shot at front row - it would go by seniority for the people who choose priority for that particular show. Doesn't the band get tired of seeing the same exact people in the front row every time? I think it's funny that some with low numbers get so defensive when we know that the really low 10C numbers are pretty darn arbitrary anyway.
The system in place now has NOT been in place for 12+ years. We used to only be able to get 10c tickets to one show per leg of the tour. We used to have block assignments, but not seat assignments. We used to have to MAIL in our ticket requests (and yes, this was in the age of the internet). So yes, things DO change. I've seen it happen.0 -
I think the whole "You get one concert to sit according to your number and the rest will be average" will take too much work. My number is 397XXX and i agree that the veteran 10C members should have better seats. You snooze, you lose. I am, however, in favor of making the seating random instead. If you're a diehard fan and attend 5-6 shows in your region, I'm sure you will get a few spectacular seats at random for at least one or two of the shows. And the others will still be good because they're 10c seats.Camden I '06, Camden II '06, Bonnaroo '08, Camden I '08, Camden II '08, Philly Spectrum II/III/IV '09, MSG I '10, MSG II '10, Made In America '12, Wrigley '13, Brooklyn II '13, Philly I '13, Philly II '13, ...0
-
You know what? I wish PJ would change to only playing GA venues. Then everyone can bitch about having to wait in line all day long and about not being able to show up early enough and about not being able to buy a poster (or doing so and having it crushed). At least you fuckers get a good seat, regardless of 10C number without having to wait all bloody day for it and being able to use the loo between the opening act and PJ without losing your spot.<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jmgphotos/sets/72157600802942672/">My Pearl Jam Photos</a>
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jmgphotos/4731512142/" title="PJ Banner2 by Mister J Photography, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1135/4731512142_258f2d6ab4_b.jpg" width="630" height="112" alt="PJ Banner2" /></a>0
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 278 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help








