Indifference said:

Interesting article by Donna Brazile on the Dem party https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/11/02/clinton-brazile-hacks-2016-215774

Under FEC law, an individual can contribute a maximum of $2,700 directly to a presidential campaign. But the limits are much higher for contributions to state parties and a party’s national committee.

Individuals who had maxed out their $2,700 contribution limit to the campaign could write an additional check for $353,400 to the Hillary Victory Fund—that figure represented $10,000 to each of the thirty-two states’ parties who were part of the Victory Fund agreement—$320,000—and $33,400 to the DNC. The money would be deposited in the states first, and transferred to the DNC shortly after that. Money in the battleground states usually stayed in that state, but all the other states funneled that money directly to the DNC, which quickly transferred the money to Brooklyn.

“Wait,” I said. “That victory fund was supposed to be for whoever was the nominee, and the state party races. You’re telling me that Hillary has been controlling it since before she got the nomination?”

Gary said the campaign had to do it or the party would collapse.

Elizabeth Warren and Donna Brazile both now agree the 2016 Democratic primary was rigged

benjs said:

JC29856 said:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/11/02/ex-dnc-chair-goes-at-the-clintons-alleging-hillarys-campaign-hijacked-dnc-during-primary-with-bernie-sanders/

Elizabeth Warren and Donna Brazile both now agree the 2016 Democratic primary was rigged

A few questions:
Is Brazile, racist, sexist or Russian?
Is Warren, racist, sexist or Russian?
What is Warren, a leader in the party going do about it (besides yap yap yap yap yap)?

Honestly, are you high?

You make it sound like people dispute the fact that the Primaries were clearly 'rigged' (if that's the term you'd like to use to define skewing the odds). As far as I've seen - and I'm pretty sure I've been seeing your posts at least since February 2016 - you just are here to one-up anyone who comments about a current corrupt politician, by showing an historical one. 

The difference between speaking of corruption today vs. corruption yesterday, of course, is that one has a slightly larger ability to affect change than the other. Though, to be honest, it's easier to speak about neither, since the country appears fucked either way. Too much stupid, too much pride, too much ignorance.