Donald Trump
Comments
-
No.HughFreakingDillon said:let's be objective here: if the tables were turned, and it was Trump and the GOP that had funded this dossier, not Clinton, wouldn't you all still be screaming "Collusion!"?0 -
lol, ok.dignin said:
No.HughFreakingDillon said:let's be objective here: if the tables were turned, and it was Trump and the GOP that had funded this dossier, not Clinton, wouldn't you all still be screaming "Collusion!"?
I respectfully disagree. I find that, as unfit as Trump is, and as corrupt as his admin is, I still think, no matter what, people would treat the same situation with higher scrutiny with Trump than with Clinton.Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 -
I'm not sure that rings true. I mean, I think Clinton is always held up to far greater scrutiny than Trump and friends. But also, a dossier full of facts isn't the same as colluding to change the results of an election. Just using the term collusion kind of puts this dossier in the same ballpark as Trump's collusion with Russia, and I don't think these two things belong in the same ballpark together.HughFreakingDillon said:
lol, ok.dignin said:
No.HughFreakingDillon said:let's be objective here: if the tables were turned, and it was Trump and the GOP that had funded this dossier, not Clinton, wouldn't you all still be screaming "Collusion!"?
I respectfully disagree. I find that, as unfit as Trump is, and as corrupt as his admin is, I still think, no matter what, people would treat the same situation with higher scrutiny with Trump than with Clinton.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
PJ_Soul said:
I'm not sure that rings true. I mean, I think Clinton is always held up to far greater scrutiny than Trump and friends. But also, a dossier full of facts isn't the same as colluding to change the results of an election. Just using the term collusion kind of puts this dossier in the same ballpark as Trump's collusion with Russia, and I don't think these two things belong in the same ballpark together.HughFreakingDillon said:
lol, ok.dignin said:
No.HughFreakingDillon said:let's be objective here: if the tables were turned, and it was Trump and the GOP that had funded this dossier, not Clinton, wouldn't you all still be screaming "Collusion!"?
I respectfully disagree. I find that, as unfit as Trump is, and as corrupt as his admin is, I still think, no matter what, people would treat the same situation with higher scrutiny with Trump than with Clinton.Hiring a firm to dig up dirt on Trump's shady dealings in Russia is not quite the same thing as accepting a meeting from the Kremlin's representatives which promised damaging info on Clinton. One is knowingly colluding with representatives from a foreign government, the other is opposition research through a private company.....which, I believe happens all the time.
www.myspace.com0 -
And here’s the thing, why would a campaign hire oppo research specifically as it relates to Russia? Because it was “rumored” or “whispered” or because lips were flapping about trump’s sexual preferences while in Moscow for the miss universe pageant? We’re not talking about hookers and blow in Atlantic City for a reason. So Hillary just decides to tell the DNC to get her dirt on trump and Russia, I don’t care, make it up if you have to? Problem for Trump is, you can’t mske this shit up.The Juggler said:PJ_Soul said:
I'm not sure that rings true. I mean, I think Clinton is always held up to far greater scrutiny than Trump and friends. But also, a dossier full of facts isn't the same as colluding to change the results of an election. Just using the term collusion kind of puts this dossier in the same ballpark as Trump's collusion with Russia, and I don't think these two things belong in the same ballpark together.HughFreakingDillon said:
lol, ok.dignin said:
No.HughFreakingDillon said:let's be objective here: if the tables were turned, and it was Trump and the GOP that had funded this dossier, not Clinton, wouldn't you all still be screaming "Collusion!"?
I respectfully disagree. I find that, as unfit as Trump is, and as corrupt as his admin is, I still think, no matter what, people would treat the same situation with higher scrutiny with Trump than with Clinton.Hiring a firm to dig up dirt on Trump's shady dealings in Russia is not quite the same thing as accepting a meeting from the Kremlin's representatives which promised damaging info on Clinton. One is knowingly colluding with representatives from a foreign government, the other is opposition research through a private company.....which, I believe happens all the time.
09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
Halifax2TheMax said:
And here’s the thing, why would a campaign hire oppo research specifically as it relates to Russia? Because it was “rumored” or “whispered” or because lips were flapping about trump’s sexual preferences while in Moscow for the miss universe pageant? We’re not talking about hookers and blow in Atlantic City for a reason. So Hillary just decides to tell the DNC to get her dirt on trump and Russia, I don’t care, make it up if you have to? Problem for Trump is, you can’t mske this shit up.The Juggler said:PJ_Soul said:
I'm not sure that rings true. I mean, I think Clinton is always held up to far greater scrutiny than Trump and friends. But also, a dossier full of facts isn't the same as colluding to change the results of an election. Just using the term collusion kind of puts this dossier in the same ballpark as Trump's collusion with Russia, and I don't think these two things belong in the same ballpark together.HughFreakingDillon said:
lol, ok.dignin said:
No.HughFreakingDillon said:let's be objective here: if the tables were turned, and it was Trump and the GOP that had funded this dossier, not Clinton, wouldn't you all still be screaming "Collusion!"?
I respectfully disagree. I find that, as unfit as Trump is, and as corrupt as his admin is, I still think, no matter what, people would treat the same situation with higher scrutiny with Trump than with Clinton.Hiring a firm to dig up dirt on Trump's shady dealings in Russia is not quite the same thing as accepting a meeting from the Kremlin's representatives which promised damaging info on Clinton. One is knowingly colluding with representatives from a foreign government, the other is opposition research through a private company.....which, I believe happens all the time.
We'll know all this and more as soon as Bobby and his team finish up....www.myspace.com0 -
Exactly.The Juggler said:Halifax2TheMax said:
And here’s the thing, why would a campaign hire oppo research specifically as it relates to Russia? Because it was “rumored” or “whispered” or because lips were flapping about trump’s sexual preferences while in Moscow for the miss universe pageant? We’re not talking about hookers and blow in Atlantic City for a reason. So Hillary just decides to tell the DNC to get her dirt on trump and Russia, I don’t care, make it up if you have to? Problem for Trump is, you can’t mske this shit up.The Juggler said:PJ_Soul said:
I'm not sure that rings true. I mean, I think Clinton is always held up to far greater scrutiny than Trump and friends. But also, a dossier full of facts isn't the same as colluding to change the results of an election. Just using the term collusion kind of puts this dossier in the same ballpark as Trump's collusion with Russia, and I don't think these two things belong in the same ballpark together.HughFreakingDillon said:
lol, ok.dignin said:
No.HughFreakingDillon said:let's be objective here: if the tables were turned, and it was Trump and the GOP that had funded this dossier, not Clinton, wouldn't you all still be screaming "Collusion!"?
I respectfully disagree. I find that, as unfit as Trump is, and as corrupt as his admin is, I still think, no matter what, people would treat the same situation with higher scrutiny with Trump than with Clinton.Hiring a firm to dig up dirt on Trump's shady dealings in Russia is not quite the same thing as accepting a meeting from the Kremlin's representatives which promised damaging info on Clinton. One is knowingly colluding with representatives from a foreign government, the other is opposition research through a private company.....which, I believe happens all the time.
We'll know all this and more as soon as Bobby and his team finish up....09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
And we all know it’s not about a PTape.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
Well right. I mean, building the dossier is basically doing a private investigation into bad shit Trump was doing. I'm not actually sure why anyone is bothered by this, and I know that collusion is not the right term to use. Another false equivalency being built by the right.The Juggler said:PJ_Soul said:
I'm not sure that rings true. I mean, I think Clinton is always held up to far greater scrutiny than Trump and friends. But also, a dossier full of facts isn't the same as colluding to change the results of an election. Just using the term collusion kind of puts this dossier in the same ballpark as Trump's collusion with Russia, and I don't think these two things belong in the same ballpark together.HughFreakingDillon said:
lol, ok.dignin said:
No.HughFreakingDillon said:let's be objective here: if the tables were turned, and it was Trump and the GOP that had funded this dossier, not Clinton, wouldn't you all still be screaming "Collusion!"?
I respectfully disagree. I find that, as unfit as Trump is, and as corrupt as his admin is, I still think, no matter what, people would treat the same situation with higher scrutiny with Trump than with Clinton.Hiring a firm to dig up dirt on Trump's shady dealings in Russia is not quite the same thing as accepting a meeting from the Kremlin's representatives which promised damaging info on Clinton. One is knowingly colluding with representatives from a foreign government, the other is opposition research through a private company.....which, I believe happens all the time.
Post edited by PJ_Soul onWith all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
so i've been working in and around the construction industry for the last couple years. I can tell you firsthand, Mexico does indeed send its best. DT does not know what he says. I wish this racist pig could be made to eat his shit.0
-
Mexicanos = Bad
Murricanos = Good
Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 061320180 -
Someone Put Up A Plaque To Mark The Spot Where Trump Bragged About Groping Women
0 -
He’s probably beaming with pridestuckinline said:Someone Put Up A Plaque To Mark The Spot Where Trump Bragged About Groping Women
I LOVE MUSIC.
www.cluthelee.com
www.cluthe.com0 -
No matter what he does he will be known as president predator , pathological liar , racist , narcissistic but never as a good president or honest president or caring president !
Hey it's easy to fight the opioids pandemic just don't start to do drugs I never did and look at me ! Idiot for the ages ...jesus greets me looks just like me ....0 -
Speaking of D.A.R.E. ing to say no to drugs... this study just came out. It doesn't surprise me in the least!josevolution said:No matter what he does he will be known as president predator , pathological liar , racist , narcissistic but never as a good president or honest president or caring president !
Hey it's easy to fight the opioids pandemic just don't start to do drugs I never did and look at me ! Idiot for the ages ...
Share with your spouses...far and wide... http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/27/health/marijuana-increased-sex/index.html0 -
I'm not comparing the two things. I'm comparing the reaction that Trump gets for doing things in relation to the reaction others get/would get for doing the same thing.PJ_Soul said:
I'm not sure that rings true. I mean, I think Clinton is always held up to far greater scrutiny than Trump and friends. But also, a dossier full of facts isn't the same as colluding to change the results of an election. Just using the term collusion kind of puts this dossier in the same ballpark as Trump's collusion with Russia, and I don't think these two things belong in the same ballpark together.HughFreakingDillon said:
lol, ok.dignin said:
No.HughFreakingDillon said:let's be objective here: if the tables were turned, and it was Trump and the GOP that had funded this dossier, not Clinton, wouldn't you all still be screaming "Collusion!"?
I respectfully disagree. I find that, as unfit as Trump is, and as corrupt as his admin is, I still think, no matter what, people would treat the same situation with higher scrutiny with Trump than with Clinton.
By and large Trump gets what he deserves, but there have been instances where I think "um....that's really not a big deal.....it's only a big deal because it's Trump".Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 -
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-responds-to-calif-billionaire-urging-impeachment/ar-AAu77xB?li=BBnb4R7
https://www.needtoimpeach.com/Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 061320180 -
That dossier? ALL TRUEBristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 061320180
-
I'd like to remind you all that I was Tiki before all of that shit in Charlottesville went down.
I actually changed my name in here (with administrative help) from thetikibomb cause I thought that was too much.
Charlottesville 2013 was my 5th PJ show, maybe 8 or nine rows up right next to Mikey, and it was amazing.
Another reason to impeach that sorry assed "so-called" President? He's down with the white Supremacists. He's BARELY a generation and a half down from being a full fledged Nazi, and it turns out that xenophobia and flat out RACISM is hard to flush down the toilet when you're in a hurry. He's truly dangerous.
and the PTAPE too.Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 061320180 -
The only thing that would make this plaque better would be an inverted flag.stuckinline said:Someone Put Up A Plaque To Mark The Spot Where Trump Bragged About Groping Women
Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 061320180
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.2K The Porch
- 279 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.3K Flea Market
- 39.3K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help










