The Confederacy - Erasing History
Comments
-
Enkidu said:Are there any other southerners here? I'm almost afraid to post. I was born and raised in VA - my family's been in VA since the 1600s. There is a lot of pride in VA history and family - there's a lot of stuff that sucks though. The fact that there was a white high school (yes, Robert E. Lee) and a black high school (yes, Booker T. Washington) into the 1960s. A black and a white cemetery. A black and a white funeral home. I was very lucky to be raised by a liberal family who pointed out that those things were bad.
I don't think tearing down statues does anything. It seems like a slippery slope to me. If you tear down a Robert E. Lee statue, do you tear down a statue of Jefferson? (Yep, I went to UVa, too.)
I'd like to hear from other southerners about how they feel. I'm fascinated by history and I don't think erasing it is the answer. Put a statue of Robert E. Lee in a museum and explain what he did. Teach the true story of Jefferson at UVa - how he did great things, but he also raped his slaves. But erasing things shouldn't make them disappear. We need to learn from past mistakes, don't we?
In case it's not clear, I don't think the south should have won the Civil War and I hate the Alt-Right and it makes me puke to think that Richard Spencer and Jason Kessler (the guy who organized the C'ville rally) both went to UVa.
0 -
mcgruff10 said:JC29856 said:Enkidu said:Are there any other southerners here? I'm almost afraid to post. I was born and raised in VA - my family's been in VA since the 1600s. There is a lot of pride in VA history and family - there's a lot of stuff that sucks though. The fact that there was a white high school (yes, Robert E. Lee) and a black high school (yes, Booker T. Washington) into the 1960s. A black and a white cemetery. A black and a white funeral home. I was very lucky to be raised by a liberal family who pointed out that those things were bad.
I don't think tearing down statues does anything. It seems like a slippery slope to me. If you tear down a Robert E. Lee statue, do you tear down a statue of Jefferson? (Yep, I went to UVa, too.)
I'd like to hear from other southerners about how they feel. I'm fascinated by history and I don't think erasing it is the answer. Put a statue of Robert E. Lee in a museum and explain what he did. Teach the true story of Jefferson at UVa - how he did great things, but he also raped his slaves. But erasing things shouldn't make them disappear. We need to learn from past mistakes, don't we?
In case it's not clear, I don't think the south should have won the Civil War and I hate the Alt-Right and it makes me puke to think that Richard Spencer and Jason Kessler (the guy who organized the C'ville rally) both went to UVa.
I'm not a southerner but I know that 260,000 people died, 110,000 were civilians, most Southern statues were erected by 1920 and I'm guessing that some if not most were to honor and memorialize those lost.0 -
Hey, here's an idea!! Wonder why we don't have one of these?
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/12/06/opinion/sunday/america-needs-a-national-slavery-monument.html
0 -
For once the City of Baltimore does the right thing
Baltimore Removes Confederate Statues One Day After Voting On Issue http://n.pr/2vIftKz
0 -
Smellyman said:Enkidu said:Are there any other southerners here? I'm almost afraid to post. I was born and raised in VA - my family's been in VA since the 1600s. There is a lot of pride in VA history and family - there's a lot of stuff that sucks though. The fact that there was a white high school (yes, Robert E. Lee) and a black high school (yes, Booker T. Washington) into the 1960s. A black and a white cemetery. A black and a white funeral home. I was very lucky to be raised by a liberal family who pointed out that those things were bad.
I don't think tearing down statues does anything. It seems like a slippery slope to me. If you tear down a Robert E. Lee statue, do you tear down a statue of Jefferson? (Yep, I went to UVa, too.)
I'd like to hear from other southerners about how they feel. I'm fascinated by history and I don't think erasing it is the answer. Put a statue of Robert E. Lee in a museum and explain what he did. Teach the true story of Jefferson at UVa - how he did great things, but he also raped his slaves. But erasing things shouldn't make them disappear. We need to learn from past mistakes, don't we?
In case it's not clear, I don't think the south should have won the Civil War and I hate the Alt-Right and it makes me puke to think that Richard Spencer and Jason Kessler (the guy who organized the C'ville rally) both went to UVa.Post edited by JC29856 on0 -
JC29856 said:Hey, here's an idea!! Wonder why we don't have one of these?
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/12/06/opinion/sunday/america-needs-a-national-slavery-monument.html
http://freedomcenter.org/
http://whitneyplantation.com/
_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
mickeyrat said:JC29856 said:Hey, here's an idea!! Wonder why we don't have one of these?
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/12/06/opinion/sunday/america-needs-a-national-slavery-monument.html
http://freedomcenter.org/
http://whitneyplantation.com/
Post edited by mickeyrat on_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
mickeyrat said:mickeyrat said:JC29856 said:Hey, here's an idea!! Wonder why we don't have one of these?
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/12/06/opinion/sunday/america-needs-a-national-slavery-monument.html
http://freedomcenter.org/
http://whitneyplantation.com/
0 -
There's two arguments that keep coming up that I don't agree with.
1. The argument that what losing country has statues displayed about the war in another country.
That might be true with most wars, but this is different. The civil war was all America, on both sides. History writes it as 600,000 Americans dead. They can divide it into which side they fought on, but still over half a million Americans died. So it isn't a foreign country. What country would you propose a memorial to those fallen soldiers be if not in the southern US?
2. They were traitors/lost the war so why have memorials.
Winning or losing has nothing to do with the sacrifice many made. The average soldier wasn't a traitor. They didn't car about slavery and were forced to fight for a cause and war they didn't care about. I even saw someone say the only heroes of the south were the conscientious objectors. Really? That probably wasn't even a phrase back then. You'd get shot or hung for treason or desertion if you didn't fight. Some compared the confederate soldier statue to Germany putting up statues of Hitler. Not even close. I'm not sure if they exist, but I would have zero issue with Germany putting up memorials and statues of fallen German soldiers of WWII who were forced to fight and give up their lives for someone else's cause.
Lastly, if you're so against the South and shame anyone for remembering their fallen, who do you support, the North? You mean, the part that still didn't declare blacks a full human and paid them much less? The side that holds the deadly a huge success, you know the march that went from Atlanta to Savannah that raped and killed everyone in their path. So we need to remember that side, and forget the South?
It was a horrible time for our country, and lots of horrible things happened. But we can still remember the fallen, on both sides.0 -
mace1229 said:There's two arguments that keep coming up that I don't agree with.
1. The argument that what losing country has statues displayed about the war in another country.
That might be true with most wars, but this is different. The civil war was all America, on both sides. History writes it as 600,000 Americans dead. They can divide it into which side they fought on, but still over half a million Americans died. So it isn't a foreign country. What country would you propose a memorial to those fallen soldiers be if not in the southern US?
2. They were traitors/lost the war so why have memorials.
Winning or losing has nothing to do with the sacrifice many made. The average soldier wasn't a traitor. They didn't car about slavery and were forced to fight for a cause and war they didn't care about. I even saw someone say the only heroes of the south were the conscientious objectors. Really? That probably wasn't even a phrase back then. You'd get shot or hung for treason or desertion if you didn't fight. Some compared the confederate soldier statue to Germany putting up statues of Hitler. Not even close. I'm not sure if they exist, but I would have zero issue with Germany putting up memorials and statues of fallen German soldiers of WWII who were forced to fight and give up their lives for someone else's cause.
Lastly, if you're so against the South and shame anyone for remembering their fallen, who do you support, the North? You mean, the part that still didn't declare blacks a full human and paid them much less? The side that holds the deadly a huge success, you know the march that went from Atlanta to Savannah that raped and killed everyone in their path. So we need to remember that side, and forget the South?
It was a horrible time for our country, and lots of horrible things happened. But we can still remember the fallen, on both sides.will myself to find a home, a home within myself
we will find a way, we will find our place0 -
Degeneratefk said:mace1229 said:There's two arguments that keep coming up that I don't agree with.
1. The argument that what losing country has statues displayed about the war in another country.
That might be true with most wars, but this is different. The civil war was all America, on both sides. History writes it as 600,000 Americans dead. They can divide it into which side they fought on, but still over half a million Americans died. So it isn't a foreign country. What country would you propose a memorial to those fallen soldiers be if not in the southern US?
2. They were traitors/lost the war so why have memorials.
Winning or losing has nothing to do with the sacrifice many made. The average soldier wasn't a traitor. They didn't car about slavery and were forced to fight for a cause and war they didn't care about. I even saw someone say the only heroes of the south were the conscientious objectors. Really? That probably wasn't even a phrase back then. You'd get shot or hung for treason or desertion if you didn't fight. Some compared the confederate soldier statue to Germany putting up statues of Hitler. Not even close. I'm not sure if they exist, but I would have zero issue with Germany putting up memorials and statues of fallen German soldiers of WWII who were forced to fight and give up their lives for someone else's cause.
Lastly, if you're so against the South and shame anyone for remembering their fallen, who do you support, the North? You mean, the part that still didn't declare blacks a full human and paid them much less? The side that holds the deadly a huge success, you know the march that went from Atlanta to Savannah that raped and killed everyone in their path. So we need to remember that side, and forget the South?
It was a horrible time for our country, and lots of horrible things happened. But we can still remember the fallen, on both sides.Post edited by mace1229 on0 -
mace1229 said:There's two arguments that keep coming up that I don't agree with.
1. The argument that what losing country has statues displayed about the war in another country.
That might be true with most wars, but this is different. The civil war was all America, on both sides. History writes it as 600,000 Americans dead. They can divide it into which side they fought on, but still over half a million Americans died. So it isn't a foreign country. What country would you propose a memorial to those fallen soldiers be if not in the southern US?
2. They were traitors/lost the war so why have memorials.
Winning or losing has nothing to do with the sacrifice many made. The average soldier wasn't a traitor. They didn't car about slavery and were forced to fight for a cause and war they didn't care about. I even saw someone say the only heroes of the south were the conscientious objectors. Really? That probably wasn't even a phrase back then. You'd get shot or hung for treason or desertion if you didn't fight. Some compared the confederate soldier statue to Germany putting up statues of Hitler. Not even close. I'm not sure if they exist, but I would have zero issue with Germany putting up memorials and statues of fallen German soldiers of WWII who were forced to fight and give up their lives for someone else's cause.
Lastly, if you're so against the South and shame anyone for remembering their fallen, who do you support, the North? You mean, the part that still didn't declare blacks a full human and paid them much less? The side that holds the deadly a huge success, you know the march that went from Atlanta to Savannah that raped and killed everyone in their path. So we need to remember that side, and forget the South?
It was a horrible time for our country, and lots of horrible things happened. But we can still remember the fallen, on both sides.
They were traitors and committed treason as soon as they took up arms and fought under a different flag. The minute they did that, they were no longer fellow citizens. The side that fought under the Stars and Stripes was the side that was fighting for my country. The other side were enemies of the state. I support the side that represented my country and flag."I'll use the magic word - let's just shut the fuck up, please." EV, 04/13/080 -
jeffbr said:They were traitors and committed treason as soon as they took up arms and fought under a different flag. The minute they did that, they were no longer fellow citizens. The side that fought under the Stars and Stripes was the side that was fighting for my country. The other side were enemies of the state. I support the side that represented my country and flag.
But they had no choice. The vast majority of the confederate army didn't own slaves and didn't care to fight in this war. Okay, they fit the legal definition of treason by taking up arms and fighting under another flag. But what other choice was there? Be hung by the south for refusing to fight? They were mostly poor farmers. The large wealthy families who didn't have to fight were the ones who benefited from slavery and wanted the war, and forced the poor citizens to do their fighting for them.
All I'm trying to say is much of that army didn't want to be there or believe in what they were fighting for. I agree, I also support the side with the stars and stripes and those who fought against it were enemies of the state. But that doesn't mean we can't recognize the sacrifice of the worst time in our history and memorialize those who fell on both sides.
As with many wars, the only difference between two opposing soldiers is where they were born.0 -
jeffbr said:mace1229 said:There's two arguments that keep coming up that I don't agree with.
1. The argument that what losing country has statues displayed about the war in another country.
That might be true with most wars, but this is different. The civil war was all America, on both sides. History writes it as 600,000 Americans dead. They can divide it into which side they fought on, but still over half a million Americans died. So it isn't a foreign country. What country would you propose a memorial to those fallen soldiers be if not in the southern US?
2. They were traitors/lost the war so why have memorials.
Winning or losing has nothing to do with the sacrifice many made. The average soldier wasn't a traitor. They didn't car about slavery and were forced to fight for a cause and war they didn't care about. I even saw someone say the only heroes of the south were the conscientious objectors. Really? That probably wasn't even a phrase back then. You'd get shot or hung for treason or desertion if you didn't fight. Some compared the confederate soldier statue to Germany putting up statues of Hitler. Not even close. I'm not sure if they exist, but I would have zero issue with Germany putting up memorials and statues of fallen German soldiers of WWII who were forced to fight and give up their lives for someone else's cause.
Lastly, if you're so against the South and shame anyone for remembering their fallen, who do you support, the North? You mean, the part that still didn't declare blacks a full human and paid them much less? The side that holds the deadly a huge success, you know the march that went from Atlanta to Savannah that raped and killed everyone in their path. So we need to remember that side, and forget the South?
It was a horrible time for our country, and lots of horrible things happened. But we can still remember the fallen, on both sides.
REPLY
They were traitors and committed treason as soon as they took up arms and fought under a different flag. The minute they did that, they were no longer fellow citizens. The side that fought under the Stars and Stripes was the side that was fighting for my country. The other side were enemies of the state. I support the side that represented my country and flag.
0 -
JC29856 said:jeffbr said:mace1229 said:There's two arguments that keep coming up that I don't agree with.
1. The argument that what losing country has statues displayed about the war in another country.
That might be true with most wars, but this is different. The civil war was all America, on both sides. History writes it as 600,000 Americans dead. They can divide it into which side they fought on, but still over half a million Americans died. So it isn't a foreign country. What country would you propose a memorial to those fallen soldiers be if not in the southern US?
2. They were traitors/lost the war so why have memorials.
Winning or losing has nothing to do with the sacrifice many made. The average soldier wasn't a traitor. They didn't car about slavery and were forced to fight for a cause and war they didn't care about. I even saw someone say the only heroes of the south were the conscientious objectors. Really? That probably wasn't even a phrase back then. You'd get shot or hung for treason or desertion if you didn't fight. Some compared the confederate soldier statue to Germany putting up statues of Hitler. Not even close. I'm not sure if they exist, but I would have zero issue with Germany putting up memorials and statues of fallen German soldiers of WWII who were forced to fight and give up their lives for someone else's cause.
Lastly, if you're so against the South and shame anyone for remembering their fallen, who do you support, the North? You mean, the part that still didn't declare blacks a full human and paid them much less? The side that holds the deadly a huge success, you know the march that went from Atlanta to Savannah that raped and killed everyone in their path. So we need to remember that side, and forget the South?
It was a horrible time for our country, and lots of horrible things happened. But we can still remember the fallen, on both sides.
REPLY
They were traitors and committed treason as soon as they took up arms and fought under a different flag. The minute they did that, they were no longer fellow citizens. The side that fought under the Stars and Stripes was the side that was fighting for my country. The other side were enemies of the state. I support the side that represented my country and flag."I'll use the magic word - let's just shut the fuck up, please." EV, 04/13/080 -
mace1229 said:There's two arguments that keep coming up that I don't agree with.
1. The argument that what losing country has statues displayed about the war in another country.
That might be true with most wars, but this is different. The civil war was all America, on both sides. History writes it as 600,000 Americans dead. They can divide it into which side they fought on, but still over half a million Americans died. So it isn't a foreign country. What country would you propose a memorial to those fallen soldiers be if not in the southern US?
2. They were traitors/lost the war so why have memorials.
Winning or losing has nothing to do with the sacrifice many made. The average soldier wasn't a traitor. They didn't car about slavery and were forced to fight for a cause and war they didn't care about. I even saw someone say the only heroes of the south were the conscientious objectors. Really? That probably wasn't even a phrase back then. You'd get shot or hung for treason or desertion if you didn't fight. Some compared the confederate soldier statue to Germany putting up statues of Hitler. Not even close. I'm not sure if they exist, but I would have zero issue with Germany putting up memorials and statues of fallen German soldiers of WWII who were forced to fight and give up their lives for someone else's cause.
Lastly, if you're so against the South and shame anyone for remembering their fallen, who do you support, the North? You mean, the part that still didn't declare blacks a full human and paid them much less? The side that holds the deadly a huge success, you know the march that went from Atlanta to Savannah that raped and killed everyone in their path. So we need to remember that side, and forget the South?
It was a horrible time for our country, and lots of horrible things happened. But we can still remember the fallen, on both sides.
There were several factors that led to the Civil War but it is the slavery issue that will endure as the root cause. This reason alone makes it somewhat controversial to have these monuments. If you visit Berlin there are zero markers above Hitler's bunker. You could walk over it and not know. The government knew that even putting a tiny plaque marking it as Hitler's Bunker would eventually turn into a memorial for neo-nazis.
0 -
Really North Carolina? Why don't you just allow for people to shoot them?
http://www.cnn.com/2017/08/14/us/confederate-statue-pulled-down-north-carolina-trnd/index.html
Cooper said he will also urge the Legislature to defeat a bill that grants immunity from liability to motorists who strike protesters.
09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
mcgruff10 said:from the seattle times: http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/lenin-statue-is-loved-hated-and-very-fremont/
If someone said there’s a statue of Lenin in the Fremont neighborhood you’d expect it to be of John Lennon, not Vladimir.
But for a neighborhood whose motto is “De Libertas Quirkas,” the freedom to be peculiar, it’s not a surprise.
The path to Seattle from Poprad, Slovakia, for this 8-ton bronze of the Communist revolutionary occurred because Lewis Carpenter of Issaquah saw it, bought it and brought it back after the collapse of the Soviet bloc.
He died in 1994, but the family still owns it, and Jon Hegeman, with the Fremont Arts Council, says it’s still for sale for $250,000 or best offer.
The 16-foot Lenin, striding boldly and backed by flames and firearms, still evokes strong responses, though he died 91 years ago.
Lenin was responsible for untold deaths, and many equate him with Hitler and Stalin. Vandals often paint the statue’s hands blood red.
He joins more than 60 other art installations in Fremont, including the Troll, the Guidepost marking the “center of the universe,” “Waiting for the Interurban” and the Rocket.
Fremontologist and neighborhood expert Kirby Lindsay Lanay says, “I hate it in the sense it upsets people. I understand their pain. I like art that makes you feel good.”
Mike Clark with the Fremont Arts Council says, “It’s perfectly Fremont.” At first he was opposed to the statue and “now, totally indifferent. It’s super popular and part of the (Fremont) shtick.”
Lindsay Laney says, “Love him or hate him, he’s as much a part of Fremont as the rest of our art. We dress him up in a tutu for gay pride.
“Taco del Mar made a giant (tinfoil wrapped) burrito for him to hold, but it looked like a doobie.”
There are few places in America where a statue of Lenin would find a home, and now the Communist revolutionary looks out over a capitalistic commercial business district.
Hegeman says if Lenin sells, he’d like to see another statue in its place.
Imagine John Lennon.
Fremont's Lenin Statue Is Currently Under Siege By Trump Supporters and An Alt-Right Troll
"I'll use the magic word - let's just shut the fuck up, please." EV, 04/13/080 -
tempo_n_groove said:I lived in Seattle on and off for a few years and there was a statue there in 95/96 that made quite a stir. The statue is still there to my disbelief.
Take this one down next.
http://www.travelchannel.com/videos/lenin-in-seattle-0223483
Black shirt black jacket, look like typical pj fan
some protestors are beginning to leave, they seem like nice enough people. one guy is filming.Post edited by JC29856 on0 -
JC29856 said:tempo_n_groove said:I lived in Seattle on and off for a few years and there was a statue there in 95/96 that made quite a stir. The statue is still there to my disbelief.
Take this one down next.
http://www.travelchannel.com/videos/lenin-in-seattle-0223483
Black shirt black jacket, look like typical pj fan
some protestors are beginning to leave, they seem like nice enough people. one guy is filming.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.7K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help