Donald Trump

BS44325 said:

The Juggler said:

PJ_Soul said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

my2hands said:

No tapes...

Just another Trump lie

How is it a lie?  Not once did President Trump say this was true.

He said he might have Comey tapes. That was a lie. He knew perfectly well that he didn't have any when he said that. The man is a fucking moron. He thinks it is appropriate to "bluff" the American public. I suspect he does it just for shits and giggles.

Shits and giggles or attempting to intimidate Comey? The latter is probably something Mueller is looking into.

The president is so stupid.

Maybe. His "tapes" comment triggered Comey admitting that he did in fact tell Trump on three separate occasions that he was not under investigation. Trump had been trying to get that fact into the public for months but nobody believed. People claimed that was a lie and the memo showed it to be true. It also unveiled Comey himself to be both a leaker and a liar. The problem with the "tapes" tweet though is that it lead to the appointment of the special prosecutor. If the special prosecutor comes up with nothing though then the "tapes" tweet might turnout to be a brilliant move. Electorally it has already been demonstrated that the "tapes" tweet or special prosecutor is having zero impact on the GOP to win elections. To many of you label things you don't understand "stupid". This is not for you. Never was for you.

Tiki said:

BS44325 said:

The Juggler said:

PJ_Soul said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

my2hands said:

No tapes...

Just another Trump lie

How is it a lie?  Not once did President Trump say this was true.

He said he might have Comey tapes. That was a lie. He knew perfectly well that he didn't have any when he said that. The man is a fucking moron. He thinks it is appropriate to "bluff" the American public. I suspect he does it just for shits and giggles.

Shits and giggles or attempting to intimidate Comey? The latter is probably something Mueller is looking into.

The president is so stupid.

Maybe. His "tapes" comment triggered Comey admitting that he did in fact tell Trump on three separate occasions that he was not under investigation. Trump had been trying to get that fact into the public for months but nobody believed. People claimed that was a lie and the memo showed it to be true. It also unveiled Comey himself to be both a leaker and a liar. The problem with the "tapes" tweet though is that it lead to the appointment of the special prosecutor. If the special prosecutor comes up with nothing though then the "tapes" tweet might turnout to be a brilliant move. Electorally it has already been demonstrated that the "tapes" tweet or special prosecutor is having zero impact on the GOP to win elections. To many of you label things you don't understand "stupid". This is not for you. Never was for you.

Thanks!   We didn't know what was happening.   I was so confused before and now I feel so relieved.  

I do like the Ed quote there, but holy cow bro...

Halifax2TheMax said:

gimmesometruth27 said:

BS44325 said:

gimmesometruth27 said:

The Juggler said:

BS44325 said:

Tiki said:

Nobody's condoning shooting people.  I'm going to go out on a limb and say we all think that's bad.  

I agree but there are very mainstream liberals who, while not condoning it, have suggested that Scalise had it coming based on his voting record. That sentiment is quite distasteful and harms democrats via association in swing districts. 

You are making shit up. What "mainstream liberal" said he had a bullet coming?

not one. not a single one. if one of them had, it would have been all over fox news and the alt right internet. there would have been so much pressure on them they would have had to resign their seat.

can we please stop making up bullshit and putting it in the mouths of "mainstream liberals"? 

Not a single one?

http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jun/16/jim-devine-dem-strategist-defends-huntrepublicans-/

"mainstream liberal" implies that the person in question has name recognition. i am a liberal and i have a working knowledge of pollsters, strategists, and operatives. i have never heard of this person. if i haven't heard of them, they aren't mainstream. regardless, this person is an idiot and i condemn what they said.

got anything from sources other than the washington times?? that paper is a joke.

Not to mention that the article he linked quotes the local head of the democrat party, clearly another mainstream liberal activist with household name recognition dismissing and condemning party stalwart Devine, the next strategist to occupy the White House. 

Bentleyspop said:

Gern Blansten said:

I cannot believe how stupid this tRump is.  Now he is patting himself on the back for the "tapes" tweet, saying that he forced Comey to change his story....yet he said Comey lied.....I don't understand this fuckhead.

He's  a troll and he's  trolling America

HesCalledDyer said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

gimmesometruth27 said:

BS44325 said:

gimmesometruth27 said:

The Juggler said:

BS44325 said:

Tiki said:

Nobody's condoning shooting people.  I'm going to go out on a limb and say we all think that's bad.  

I agree but there are very mainstream liberals who, while not condoning it, have suggested that Scalise had it coming based on his voting record. That sentiment is quite distasteful and harms democrats via association in swing districts. 

You are making shit up. What "mainstream liberal" said he had a bullet coming?

not one. not a single one. if one of them had, it would have been all over fox news and the alt right internet. there would have been so much pressure on them they would have had to resign their seat.

can we please stop making up bullshit and putting it in the mouths of "mainstream liberals"? 

Not a single one?

http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jun/16/jim-devine-dem-strategist-defends-huntrepublicans-/

"mainstream liberal" implies that the person in question has name recognition. i am a liberal and i have a working knowledge of pollsters, strategists, and operatives. i have never heard of this person. if i haven't heard of them, they aren't mainstream. regardless, this person is an idiot and i condemn what they said.

got anything from sources other than the washington times?? that paper is a joke.

Not to mention that the article he linked quotes the local head of the democrat party, clearly another mainstream liberal activist with household name recognition dismissing and condemning party stalwart Devine, the next strategist to occupy the White House. 

So much stew...

http://circa.com/politics/government/democratic-party-official-caught-saying-he-was-glad-steve-scalise-got-shot

Why does this keep happening?

Ask Ted Nugent.

BS44325 said:

HesCalledDyer said:

BS44325 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

gimmesometruth27 said:

BS44325 said:

gimmesometruth27 said:

The Juggler said:

BS44325 said:

Tiki said:

Nobody's condoning shooting people.  I'm going to go out on a limb and say we all think that's bad.  

I agree but there are very mainstream liberals who, while not condoning it, have suggested that Scalise had it coming based on his voting record. That sentiment is quite distasteful and harms democrats via association in swing districts. 

You are making shit up. What "mainstream liberal" said he had a bullet coming?

not one. not a single one. if one of them had, it would have been all over fox news and the alt right internet. there would have been so much pressure on them they would have had to resign their seat.

can we please stop making up bullshit and putting it in the mouths of "mainstream liberals"? 

Not a single one?

http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jun/16/jim-devine-dem-strategist-defends-huntrepublicans-/

"mainstream liberal" implies that the person in question has name recognition. i am a liberal and i have a working knowledge of pollsters, strategists, and operatives. i have never heard of this person. if i haven't heard of them, they aren't mainstream. regardless, this person is an idiot and i condemn what they said.

got anything from sources other than the washington times?? that paper is a joke.

Not to mention that the article he linked quotes the local head of the democrat party, clearly another mainstream liberal activist with household name recognition dismissing and condemning party stalwart Devine, the next strategist to occupy the White House. 

So much stew...

http://circa.com/politics/government/democratic-party-official-caught-saying-he-was-glad-steve-scalise-got-shot

Why does this keep happening?

Ask Ted Nugent.

I will as soon as I get a response from Johnny Depp

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/3865684/johnny-depp-donald-trump-glastonbury-2017/

BS44325 said:

The Juggler said:

PJ_Soul said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

my2hands said:

No tapes...

Just another Trump lie

How is it a lie?  Not once did President Trump say this was true.

He said he might have Comey tapes. That was a lie. He knew perfectly well that he didn't have any when he said that. The man is a fucking moron. He thinks it is appropriate to "bluff" the American public. I suspect he does it just for shits and giggles.

Shits and giggles or attempting to intimidate Comey? The latter is probably something Mueller is looking into.

The president is so stupid.

Maybe. His "tapes" comment triggered Comey admitting that he did in fact tell Trump on three separate occasions that he was not under investigation. Trump had been trying to get that fact into the public for months but nobody believed. People claimed that was a lie and the memo showed it to be true. It also unveiled Comey himself to be both a leaker and a liar. The problem with the "tapes" tweet though is that it lead to the appointment of the special prosecutor. If the special prosecutor comes up with nothing though then the "tapes" tweet might turnout to be a brilliant move. Electorally it has already been demonstrated that the "tapes" tweet or special prosecutor is having zero impact on the GOP to win elections. To many of you label things you don't understand "stupid". This is not for you. Never was for you.

BS44325 said:

Smellyman said:

Meanwhile

Barack Obama

4 hrs ·

Our politics are divided. They have been for a long time. And while I know that division makes it difficult to listen to Americans with whom we disagree, that’s what we need to do today.

I recognize that repealing and replacing the Affordable Care Act has become a core tenet of the Republican Party. Still, I hope that our Senators, many of whom I know well, step back and measure what’s really at stake, and consider that the rationale for action, on health care or any other issue, must be something more than simply undoing something that Democrats did.

We didn’t fight for the Affordable Care Act for more than a year in the public square for any personal or political gain – we fought for it because we knew it would save lives, prevent financial misery, and ultimately set this country we love on a better, healthier course.

The Rest here

Amazing how we went from eloquent statesman to buffoon

 A real statesman would act like George W Bush and not interfere.

The Juggler said:

BS44325 said:

Smellyman said:

Meanwhile

Barack Obama

4 hrs ·

Our politics are divided. They have been for a long time. And while I know that division makes it difficult to listen to Americans with whom we disagree, that’s what we need to do today.

I recognize that repealing and replacing the Affordable Care Act has become a core tenet of the Republican Party. Still, I hope that our Senators, many of whom I know well, step back and measure what’s really at stake, and consider that the rationale for action, on health care or any other issue, must be something more than simply undoing something that Democrats did.

We didn’t fight for the Affordable Care Act for more than a year in the public square for any personal or political gain – we fought for it because we knew it would save lives, prevent financial misery, and ultimately set this country we love on a better, healthier course.

The Rest here

Amazing how we went from eloquent statesman to buffoon

 A real statesman would act like George W Bush and not interfere.

He acted like a statesman because his successor acted like one too. In fact every president in the history has acted like a statesman with the exception of the idiot who holds he office currently.