Off the deep end... (U.S. pulls out of Paris Agreement)

24567

Comments

  • HesCalledDyer
    HesCalledDyer Maryland Posts: 16,498
    Kat said:
    He's doing it so you won't be talking about Russia. 
    It has far-reaching consequences for sure but it has a purpose for him and he couldn't care less what it does to the country. I firmly believe this. :(


    You're definitely not alone in that thought.
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,759
    edited June 2017
    Kat said:
    He's doing it so you won't be talking about Russia. 
    It has far-reaching consequences for sure but it has a purpose for him and he couldn't care less what it does to the country. I firmly believe this. :(


    You're definitely not alone in that thought.
    Definitely not. However, I don't really think he wouldn't have done this if the Russia issue didn't exist.... Is there something suggesting that he would not have withdrawn from the Paris Agreement if the whole Russia thing never happened? Trump has been blowing hot air about how climate change is a myth for a very long time now, and that was kind of part of his platform during his campaign, and his ridiculous decision seems illogically related to his crazy version of "America first" and "making America great again". So, while I'm sure he is very aware of the relatively great timing of this, I don't have a reason to think the Russia problem actually dictated this decision in the long run. I mean, pretty much every cuckoo bananas thing that Trump does acts as a distraction from the Russia problem.
    Post edited by PJ_Soul on
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • brianlux
    brianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 43,669
    Kat said:
    He's doing it so you won't be talking about Russia. 
    It has far-reaching consequences for sure but it has a purpose for him and he couldn't care less what it does to the country. I firmly believe this. :(


    I agree, he couldn't care less what this does to the country or the whole world for that matter. 

    But regarding Russia, here is where I have been having some difficulty.  I haven't read anything that looks like solid proof that Russia interfered with the presidential election.  I wish I could say I have because a lot of people I very much respect believe it to be true.  In saying all this, some of you will assume I'm reading too much right wing propaganda.  Actually, no, my doubts come from reading multiple sources including some that are left leaning, i.e. Kunstler, NY Times, even Obama.  I think it is harmful to talk with dead certainty about this yet with no sure proof to back it up.

    OK, so now I've made some of you angry.  Discuss with me, even argue if you have to, but don't hate me!  I'm sorry!  :frowning:
    "It's a sad and beautiful world"
    -Roberto Benigni

  • EdsonNascimento
    EdsonNascimento Posts: 5,531

    There was no requirements of this agreement. He could have accomplished the same exact thing by not doing anything with regard to the actual agreement. At least he is up front about what he is doing. But, you folks should all learn the actual facts of what's going on rather than using red herrings. You are actually playing right into what Trump is trying to do (and it is not to divert from Russia - the media is adept at handling multiple things when they have axes to grind). However, you're focused on an agreement that had no real effect.

    If anything, it has brought more attention to the topic. However, the US can still do what it wants to do (As it could within the agreement), Companies can still do what they want to do (Aside from what the US gov't regulates them to do).  And BTW, the formal exit coincides with the next election. So, he's done you a favor.  He's removed us from an agreement that has no requirements to do anything, thus bringing the issue into the light for a time now, and then if the candidates of the time see fit could be a central component of a Presidential campaign.  What's not to like about that if this is your issue?

    So, the removal from the agreement has no real impact.  The actions related to it do, but as I said - he could have done that with the agreement still in place. 

    I mean - how stupid that Elon Musk leaves his advisory board b/c of this - so, now he will have more to say in the Trump Administration?   The fact is Musk didn't need to be on that committee anyway, so this was probably just a convenient out for him. But, folks have gone completely nuts reacting to stuff that has no meaning.

    I'm sure most of you still believe your Queen when she says her loss had everything to do with everyone and everything else except her.....

    Sorry. The world doesn't work the way you tell it to.
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,759
    brianlux said:
    Kat said:
    He's doing it so you won't be talking about Russia. 
    It has far-reaching consequences for sure but it has a purpose for him and he couldn't care less what it does to the country. I firmly believe this. :(


    I agree, he couldn't care less what this does to the country or the whole world for that matter. 

    But regarding Russia, here is where I have been having some difficulty.  I haven't read anything that looks like solid proof that Russia interfered with the presidential election.  I wish I could say I have because a lot of people I very much respect believe it to be true.  In saying all this, some of you will assume I'm reading too much right wing propaganda.  Actually, no, my doubts come from reading multiple sources including some that are left leaning, i.e. Kunstler, NY Times, even Obama.  I think it is harmful to talk with dead certainty about this yet with no sure proof to back it up.

    OK, so now I've made some of you angry.  Discuss with me, even argue if you have to, but don't hate me!  I'm sorry!  :frowning:
    That is why they are investigating it and having people testify. To gather evidence/proof. Most people strongly believe (or know but can't say yet) that all that happened... but we're all still waiting for the investigation to play out.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • EdsonNascimento
    EdsonNascimento Posts: 5,531
    edited June 2017
    PJ_Soul said:
    Embarrassing. Trump is screwing America over with this one. Just in terms of foreign relations, this is idiotic, but it's also a huge mistake economically and socially, long term. Trump has essentially declared that America is no longer interested in moving forward with the rest of the world, let alone interested in being an international leader. This decision is incredibly isolating for the US.


    How has he screwed over the US? 

    If the US is isolated and not an international leader anymore by doing this, then shouldn't it not matter?   You guys need to focus on the issue and not the person. 

    Post edited by EdsonNascimento on
    Sorry. The world doesn't work the way you tell it to.
  • RYME
    RYME Wisconsin Posts: 1,904
    edited June 2017
    I've got some ocean front property in Arizona, from my front door you can see the sea.  I've got some ocean front property in Arizona, I hope they throw the Golden Gate in free. ;)
    Post edited by RYME on
  • brianlux
    brianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 43,669

    There was no requirements of this agreement. He could have accomplished the same exact thing by not doing anything with regard to the actual agreement. At least he is up front about what he is doing. But, you folks should all learn the actual facts of what's going on rather than using red herrings. You are actually playing right into what Trump is trying to do (and it is not to divert from Russia - the media is adept at handling multiple things when they have axes to grind). However, you're focused on an agreement that had no real effect.

    If anything, it has brought more attention to the topic. However, the US can still do what it wants to do (As it could within the agreement), Companies can still do what they want to do (Aside from what the US gov't regulates them to do).  And BTW, the formal exit coincides with the next election. So, he's done you a favor.  He's removed us from an agreement that has no requirements to do anything, thus bringing the issue into the light for a time now, and then if the candidates of the time see fit could be a central component of a Presidential campaign.  What's not to like about that if this is your issue?

    So, the removal from the agreement has no real impact.  The actions related to it do, but as I said - he could have done that with the agreement still in place. 

    I mean - how stupid that Elon Musk leaves his advisory board b/c of this - so, now he will have more to say in the Trump Administration?   The fact is Musk didn't need to be on that committee anyway, so this was probably just a convenient out for him. But, folks have gone completely nuts reacting to stuff that has no meaning.

    I'm sure most of you still believe your Queen when she says her loss had everything to do with everyone and everything else except her.....

    An impressive argument, Edison.  If you're correct (and your logic seems solid to me) this could turn into an unintentional plus for environmental concerns and we'd do well to take a plus in that regard just about any way we can get it.
    "It's a sad and beautiful world"
    -Roberto Benigni

  • brianlux
    brianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 43,669
    The other thing to remember in all this is that the Paris Agreement itself is not enough to stem anthropogenic global warming.  This gets into a long and elaborate scientific discussion but there's still plenty of good information to back this on NOAA, ucsusa.org, 350.org and realclimate.org, all solidly science based sites.
    "It's a sad and beautiful world"
    -Roberto Benigni

  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,759
    edited June 2017
    PJ_Soul said:
    Embarrassing. Trump is screwing America over with this one. Just in terms of foreign relations, this is idiotic, but it's also a huge mistake economically and socially, long term. Trump has essentially declared that America is no longer interested in moving forward with the rest of the world, let alone interested in being an international leader. This decision is incredibly isolating for the US.


    How has he screwed over the US? 

    If the US is isolated and not an international leader anymore by doing this, then shouldn't it not matter?   You guys need to focus on the issue and not the person. 

    I am focusing on the issue and not the person, and said what the issues are. I'm not sure how you figured from that post that I was focusing on the person and not the issue.... Anyway, it matters that the US is becoming isolated and is not an international leader anymore. That is the whole point. America has a HUGE impact on the world's economy and its politics, so it becoming isolated is kind of a big deal. I would think that most Americans wouldn't be interested in America becoming isolationist while it basically rejects the next major global industry in favour of oil and coal. Also, it matters because the USA is the second biggest polluter on the face of the planet, so it not being on board with this is troubling on an environmental level that effects everyone on the planet. Yeah, it matters. You seem to think that Trump and friends will actually start doing some environmentally responsible stuff whether they are a part of this agreement or not.... where'd you get that idea?? I haven't seen anything suggesting that. There is meaning behind the rejection of the agreement. More actions will follow this one. Finally, just on a political/foreign relations level, it matter for America economically. This will almost certainly reduce investment in America.
    Post edited by PJ_Soul on
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • EdsonNascimento
    EdsonNascimento Posts: 5,531
    PJ_Soul said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    Embarrassing. Trump is screwing America over with this one. Just in terms of foreign relations, this is idiotic, but it's also a huge mistake economically and socially, long term. Trump has essentially declared that America is no longer interested in moving forward with the rest of the world, let alone interested in being an international leader. This decision is incredibly isolating for the US.


    How has he screwed over the US? 

    If the US is isolated and not an international leader anymore by doing this, then shouldn't it not matter?   You guys need to focus on the issue and not the person. 

    I am focusing on the issue and not the person, and said what the issues are. I'm not sure how you figured from that post that I was focusing on the person and not the issue.... Anyway, it matters that the US is becoming isolated and is not an international leader anymore. That is the whole point. America has a HUGE impact on the world's economy and its politics, so it becoming isolated is kind of a big deal. I would think that most Americans wouldn't be interested in America becoming isolationist while it basically rejects the next major global industry in favour of oil and coal. Also, it matters because the USA is the second biggest polluter on the face of the planet, so it not being on board with this is troubling on an environmental level that effects everyone on the planet. Yeah, it matters. You seem to think that Trump and friends will actually start doing some environmentally responsible stuff whether they are a part of this agreement or not.... where'd you get that idea?? I haven't seen anything suggesting that. There is meaning behind the rejection of the agreement. More actions will follow this one. Finally, just on a political/foreign relations level, it matter for America economically. This will almost certainly reduce investment in America.

    How is this isolating the US?
    Sorry. The world doesn't work the way you tell it to.
  • EdsonNascimento
    EdsonNascimento Posts: 5,531
    brianlux said:
    The other thing to remember in all this is that the Paris Agreement itself is not enough to stem anthropogenic global warming.  This gets into a long and elaborate scientific discussion but there's still plenty of good information to back this on NOAA, ucsusa.org, 350.org and realclimate.org, all solidly science based sites.


    I will go a step further and say the Agreement did NOTHING, Zero, Nada. Any country could do whatever it wanted at any time and not be in violation of the Agreement. An Agreement with no substance, as with most things Obama did.  High on style. Low on substance.

    The rest of what you say is the key to getting things done. And when folks like Musk, et. al figure out a way to make non-coal based energies financially efficient, we will have the first major step in our solution.  A bunch of Diplomats patting themselves on the back, but doing nothing does exactly that - nothing.

    Be worried about how much investment countries make in research of real, efficient solutions. Not how good their leaders think they look shaking hands. 

    Sorry. The world doesn't work the way you tell it to.
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,759
    PJ_Soul said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    Embarrassing. Trump is screwing America over with this one. Just in terms of foreign relations, this is idiotic, but it's also a huge mistake economically and socially, long term. Trump has essentially declared that America is no longer interested in moving forward with the rest of the world, let alone interested in being an international leader. This decision is incredibly isolating for the US.


    How has he screwed over the US? 

    If the US is isolated and not an international leader anymore by doing this, then shouldn't it not matter?   You guys need to focus on the issue and not the person. 

    I am focusing on the issue and not the person, and said what the issues are. I'm not sure how you figured from that post that I was focusing on the person and not the issue.... Anyway, it matters that the US is becoming isolated and is not an international leader anymore. That is the whole point. America has a HUGE impact on the world's economy and its politics, so it becoming isolated is kind of a big deal. I would think that most Americans wouldn't be interested in America becoming isolationist while it basically rejects the next major global industry in favour of oil and coal. Also, it matters because the USA is the second biggest polluter on the face of the planet, so it not being on board with this is troubling on an environmental level that effects everyone on the planet. Yeah, it matters. You seem to think that Trump and friends will actually start doing some environmentally responsible stuff whether they are a part of this agreement or not.... where'd you get that idea?? I haven't seen anything suggesting that. There is meaning behind the rejection of the agreement. More actions will follow this one. Finally, just on a political/foreign relations level, it matter for America economically. This will almost certainly reduce investment in America.

    How is this isolating the US?
    By being the only nation in the world besides Syria and Nicaragua to join in on this global agreement that entails international cooperation, which leads to international collaboration, and clear paths to mutually beneficial investing and trade. Also, it is a massive symbol in general for Trump's unwillingness to work with the rest of the world in good faith. This on top of all his NATO stuff, bitching out Germany for its cars, and the list goes on and on. This refusal to get on board with what every other country in the world knows is a good idea is like icing on the uncooperative cake. And I think we all know that it's not a matter of Trump and friends knowing better than every other government on the face of the planet besides Syria and Nicaragua. It's not like Trump and Friends have wonderful, enlightened ideas that will outsmart everyone else who signed the agreement. I dunno, sometimes I get the impression that there is a group of people who actually think that Trump is on to something brilliant or smart or something .... but to me and, it seems, most of the planet, that seems patently ridiculous. America has literally become a dangerous laughing stock to the world because of its new government. I don't see how one can't see just that as isolating, let alone the refusal to sign the Paris agreement.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • EdsonNascimento
    EdsonNascimento Posts: 5,531
    brianlux said:

    There was no requirements of this agreement. He could have accomplished the same exact thing by not doing anything with regard to the actual agreement. At least he is up front about what he is doing. But, you folks should all learn the actual facts of what's going on rather than using red herrings. You are actually playing right into what Trump is trying to do (and it is not to divert from Russia - the media is adept at handling multiple things when they have axes to grind). However, you're focused on an agreement that had no real effect.

    If anything, it has brought more attention to the topic. However, the US can still do what it wants to do (As it could within the agreement), Companies can still do what they want to do (Aside from what the US gov't regulates them to do).  And BTW, the formal exit coincides with the next election. So, he's done you a favor.  He's removed us from an agreement that has no requirements to do anything, thus bringing the issue into the light for a time now, and then if the candidates of the time see fit could be a central component of a Presidential campaign.  What's not to like about that if this is your issue?

    So, the removal from the agreement has no real impact.  The actions related to it do, but as I said - he could have done that with the agreement still in place. 

    I mean - how stupid that Elon Musk leaves his advisory board b/c of this - so, now he will have more to say in the Trump Administration?   The fact is Musk didn't need to be on that committee anyway, so this was probably just a convenient out for him. But, folks have gone completely nuts reacting to stuff that has no meaning.

    I'm sure most of you still believe your Queen when she says her loss had everything to do with everyone and everything else except her.....

    An impressive argument, Edison.  If you're correct (and your logic seems solid to me) this could turn into an unintentional plus for environmental concerns and we'd do well to take a plus in that regard just about any way we can get it.


    And, BTW, what makes you think this wasn't Trump's intention? Everyone keeps forgetting that he is a Democrat at heart - other than the political correctness.  If you start looking at things he's doing through a Machiavellian prism, you might have a different view on what he's been doing.

    You can focus on the surface.  Hey, Obama perfected and lulled us into that.  But, when you begin to think of the ACTUAL ends certain things have vs. the means by which they are being done, your view on things changes a bit.

    (And, for the record, I'm not saying it is his intention. I have no idea. I haven't spoken to him, so would have no idea unlike apparently everyone else.  But, somehow he's gotten by ok in life.  That doesn't happen by accident. - But think - when he exited the Agreement, you don't think someone told him - you know, the actual exit doesn't happen until 2020 in time for the next election cycle?)

    Sorry. The world doesn't work the way you tell it to.
  • EdsonNascimento
    EdsonNascimento Posts: 5,531
    PJ_Soul said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    Embarrassing. Trump is screwing America over with this one. Just in terms of foreign relations, this is idiotic, but it's also a huge mistake economically and socially, long term. Trump has essentially declared that America is no longer interested in moving forward with the rest of the world, let alone interested in being an international leader. This decision is incredibly isolating for the US.


    How has he screwed over the US? 

    If the US is isolated and not an international leader anymore by doing this, then shouldn't it not matter?   You guys need to focus on the issue and not the person. 

    I am focusing on the issue and not the person, and said what the issues are. I'm not sure how you figured from that post that I was focusing on the person and not the issue.... Anyway, it matters that the US is becoming isolated and is not an international leader anymore. That is the whole point. America has a HUGE impact on the world's economy and its politics, so it becoming isolated is kind of a big deal. I would think that most Americans wouldn't be interested in America becoming isolationist while it basically rejects the next major global industry in favour of oil and coal. Also, it matters because the USA is the second biggest polluter on the face of the planet, so it not being on board with this is troubling on an environmental level that effects everyone on the planet. Yeah, it matters. You seem to think that Trump and friends will actually start doing some environmentally responsible stuff whether they are a part of this agreement or not.... where'd you get that idea?? I haven't seen anything suggesting that. There is meaning behind the rejection of the agreement. More actions will follow this one. Finally, just on a political/foreign relations level, it matter for America economically. This will almost certainly reduce investment in America.

    How is this isolating the US?
    By being the only nation in the world besides Syria and Nicaragua to join in on this global agreement that entails international cooperation, which leads to international collaboration, and clear paths to mutually beneficial investing and trade. Also, it is a massive symbol in general for Trump's unwillingness to work with the rest of the world in good faith. This on top of all his NATO stuff, bitching out Germany for its cars, and the list goes on and on. This refusal to get on board with what every other country in the world knows is a good idea is like icing on the uncooperative cake. And I think we all know that it's not a matter of Trump and friends knowing better than every other government on the face of the planet besides Syria and Nicaragua. It's not like Trump and Friends have wonderful, enlightened ideas that will outsmart everyone else who signed the agreement. I dunno, sometimes I get the impression that there is a group of people who actually think that Trump is on to something brilliant or smart or something .... but to me and, it seems, most of the planet, that seems patently ridiculous. America has literally become a dangerous laughing stock to the world because of its new government. I don't see how one can't see just that as isolating, let alone the refusal to sign the Paris agreement.

    So, your theory is the US will no longer be an important part of the International community?

    If yes, my follow up question is - Is that a theory you really want to stick with?

    Sorry. The world doesn't work the way you tell it to.
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,759
    edited June 2017
    PJ_Soul said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    Embarrassing. Trump is screwing America over with this one. Just in terms of foreign relations, this is idiotic, but it's also a huge mistake economically and socially, long term. Trump has essentially declared that America is no longer interested in moving forward with the rest of the world, let alone interested in being an international leader. This decision is incredibly isolating for the US.


    How has he screwed over the US? 

    If the US is isolated and not an international leader anymore by doing this, then shouldn't it not matter?   You guys need to focus on the issue and not the person. 

    I am focusing on the issue and not the person, and said what the issues are. I'm not sure how you figured from that post that I was focusing on the person and not the issue.... Anyway, it matters that the US is becoming isolated and is not an international leader anymore. That is the whole point. America has a HUGE impact on the world's economy and its politics, so it becoming isolated is kind of a big deal. I would think that most Americans wouldn't be interested in America becoming isolationist while it basically rejects the next major global industry in favour of oil and coal. Also, it matters because the USA is the second biggest polluter on the face of the planet, so it not being on board with this is troubling on an environmental level that effects everyone on the planet. Yeah, it matters. You seem to think that Trump and friends will actually start doing some environmentally responsible stuff whether they are a part of this agreement or not.... where'd you get that idea?? I haven't seen anything suggesting that. There is meaning behind the rejection of the agreement. More actions will follow this one. Finally, just on a political/foreign relations level, it matter for America economically. This will almost certainly reduce investment in America.

    How is this isolating the US?
    By being the only nation in the world besides Syria and Nicaragua to join in on this global agreement that entails international cooperation, which leads to international collaboration, and clear paths to mutually beneficial investing and trade. Also, it is a massive symbol in general for Trump's unwillingness to work with the rest of the world in good faith. This on top of all his NATO stuff, bitching out Germany for its cars, and the list goes on and on. This refusal to get on board with what every other country in the world knows is a good idea is like icing on the uncooperative cake. And I think we all know that it's not a matter of Trump and friends knowing better than every other government on the face of the planet besides Syria and Nicaragua. It's not like Trump and Friends have wonderful, enlightened ideas that will outsmart everyone else who signed the agreement. I dunno, sometimes I get the impression that there is a group of people who actually think that Trump is on to something brilliant or smart or something .... but to me and, it seems, most of the planet, that seems patently ridiculous. America has literally become a dangerous laughing stock to the world because of its new government. I don't see how one can't see just that as isolating, let alone the refusal to sign the Paris agreement.

    So, your theory is the US will no longer be an important part of the International community?

    If yes, my follow up question is - Is that a theory you really want to stick with?

    No, that's not my theory at all. My theory is that the US is more and more an important negative and harmful part of the international community as Trump engages in isolationist measures, while I assume most would prefer for America to be a positive force that inspires other nations to collaborate with it and to invest in it. I'm under the impression that American culture and politics and its economy are at least partially built on the idea that the nation is "the leader of the free world". That label has actually had real implications inside and outside of America, in many ways. I think that Trump is doing a fairly good job of ensuring that that is no longer the case. Of course, that could work out for the best for other countries, in the long run. But I don't see any way it could work out well for America.
    Post edited by PJ_Soul on
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • Halifax2TheMax
    Halifax2TheMax Posts: 42,646
    brianlux said:
    Kat said:
    He's doing it so you won't be talking about Russia. 
    It has far-reaching consequences for sure but it has a purpose for him and he couldn't care less what it does to the country. I firmly believe this. :(


    I agree, he couldn't care less what this does to the country or the whole world for that matter. 

    But regarding Russia, here is where I have been having some difficulty.  I haven't read anything that looks like solid proof that Russia interfered with the presidential election.  I wish I could say I have because a lot of people I very much respect believe it to be true.  In saying all this, some of you will assume I'm reading too much right wing propaganda.  Actually, no, my doubts come from reading multiple sources including some that are left leaning, i.e. Kunstler, NY Times, even Obama.  I think it is harmful to talk with dead certainty about this yet with no sure proof to back it up.

    OK, so now I've made some of you angry.  Discuss with me, even argue if you have to, but don't hate me!  I'm sorry!  :frowning:


    No anger directed at you Brian but 17 of our nation's intelligence agencies are in agreement that Russia was involved in influencing our election. Read the link, its brief and informative. They don't issue stuff like this because some Obama hold overs are out to get Trump. Congress doesn't form investigative committees because a percentage of the electorate can't accept Trump. But most importantly, you don't have recusals, resignations and the level of coincidences unless there's a there, there.

    https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

    As for the Paris Climate Agreement, read the actual agreement. If no stick and no consequence of not complying, why the big show of withdrawing? What's the harm in "trying" to comply or to say we'll voluntarily "try" to comply? Why not lead the world? 4% of the earth's population and close to producing 30% of CO2. So much for our moral authority and so called leadership. I guess we'll just call the Saudis when we need help with something, like Russian or Chinese aggression? Or the Syrians.

    https://unfccc.int/files/essential_background/convention/application/pdf/english_paris_agreement.pdf

    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • Go Beavers
    Go Beavers Posts: 9,618
    brianlux said:

    There was no requirements of this agreement. He could have accomplished the same exact thing by not doing anything with regard to the actual agreement. At least he is up front about what he is doing. But, you folks should all learn the actual facts of what's going on rather than using red herrings. You are actually playing right into what Trump is trying to do (and it is not to divert from Russia - the media is adept at handling multiple things when they have axes to grind). However, you're focused on an agreement that had no real effect.

    If anything, it has brought more attention to the topic. However, the US can still do what it wants to do (As it could within the agreement), Companies can still do what they want to do (Aside from what the US gov't regulates them to do).  And BTW, the formal exit coincides with the next election. So, he's done you a favor.  He's removed us from an agreement that has no requirements to do anything, thus bringing the issue into the light for a time now, and then if the candidates of the time see fit could be a central component of a Presidential campaign.  What's not to like about that if this is your issue?

    So, the removal from the agreement has no real impact.  The actions related to it do, but as I said - he could have done that with the agreement still in place. 

    I mean - how stupid that Elon Musk leaves his advisory board b/c of this - so, now he will have more to say in the Trump Administration?   The fact is Musk didn't need to be on that committee anyway, so this was probably just a convenient out for him. But, folks have gone completely nuts reacting to stuff that has no meaning.

    I'm sure most of you still believe your Queen when she says her loss had everything to do with everyone and everything else except her.....

    An impressive argument, Edison.  If you're correct (and your logic seems solid to me) this could turn into an unintentional plus for environmental concerns and we'd do well to take a plus in that regard just about any way we can get it.


    And, BTW, what makes you think this wasn't Trump's intention? Everyone keeps forgetting that he is a Democrat at heart - other than the political correctness.  If you start looking at things he's doing through a Machiavellian prism, you might have a different view on what he's been doing.

    You can focus on the surface.  Hey, Obama perfected and lulled us into that.  But, when you begin to think of the ACTUAL ends certain things have vs. the means by which they are being done, your view on things changes a bit.

    (And, for the record, I'm not saying it is his intention. I have no idea. I haven't spoken to him, so would have no idea unlike apparently everyone else.  But, somehow he's gotten by ok in life.  That doesn't happen by accident. - But think - when he exited the Agreement, you don't think someone told him - you know, the actual exit doesn't happen until 2020 in time for the next election cycle?)

    Gotten by okay in life? You honestly think that? If not for the wealth he was was given, he would be labelled a failure by consensus definition, not to mention his repulsive personality and treatment of others. Saying he's done okay shows our infatuation with money and attributes we adhere to a person who has it. Oh, and saying the press has an ax to grind in relation to the Russia coverage is also pretty funny. 
  • brianlux
    brianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 43,669
    Edison:  I agree with PJ_Soul and the Guardian article I posted suggesting that this action will lead to isolating the U.S from much of the world.  And to verify that, all I need to do is ask anyone  of the people I know living in Europe of South America.  They already think we're bat-shit crazy for electing Trump.  We are one of only three countries who refuse to take even this small step in moving toward atmospheric carbon reduction.  It's a rather lame trio that way, IMHO.

    As far as the agreement doing, "NOTHING, Zero, Nada" (sound like meditation, lol) I would argue that it at least started the ball rolling.  Yes, it is a rather weak agreement but it's a starting place.  Do we really want the runner on first to step off the bag toward home plate rather than second base?

    And as far as Trumps intentions go, I'm guessing he is more focused on grabbing kitties (you catch my drift) or heading out to the links for a few rounds of golf.  And, of course, party time.  I don't take any of his political intentions seriously.  Do you? Does anyone?

    ***************************************************************************************************************

    H2M: Thanks for the links, I'll check them out.  I know you wouldn't hate on me.  :smile:



    "It's a sad and beautiful world"
    -Roberto Benigni

  • EdsonNascimento
    EdsonNascimento Posts: 5,531
    PJ_Soul said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    Embarrassing. Trump is screwing America over with this one. Just in terms of foreign relations, this is idiotic, but it's also a huge mistake economically and socially, long term. Trump has essentially declared that America is no longer interested in moving forward with the rest of the world, let alone interested in being an international leader. This decision is incredibly isolating for the US.


    How has he screwed over the US? 

    If the US is isolated and not an international leader anymore by doing this, then shouldn't it not matter?   You guys need to focus on the issue and not the person. 

    I am focusing on the issue and not the person, and said what the issues are. I'm not sure how you figured from that post that I was focusing on the person and not the issue.... Anyway, it matters that the US is becoming isolated and is not an international leader anymore. That is the whole point. America has a HUGE impact on the world's economy and its politics, so it becoming isolated is kind of a big deal. I would think that most Americans wouldn't be interested in America becoming isolationist while it basically rejects the next major global industry in favour of oil and coal. Also, it matters because the USA is the second biggest polluter on the face of the planet, so it not being on board with this is troubling on an environmental level that effects everyone on the planet. Yeah, it matters. You seem to think that Trump and friends will actually start doing some environmentally responsible stuff whether they are a part of this agreement or not.... where'd you get that idea?? I haven't seen anything suggesting that. There is meaning behind the rejection of the agreement. More actions will follow this one. Finally, just on a political/foreign relations level, it matter for America economically. This will almost certainly reduce investment in America.

    How is this isolating the US?
    By being the only nation in the world besides Syria and Nicaragua to join in on this global agreement that entails international cooperation, which leads to international collaboration, and clear paths to mutually beneficial investing and trade. Also, it is a massive symbol in general for Trump's unwillingness to work with the rest of the world in good faith. This on top of all his NATO stuff, bitching out Germany for its cars, and the list goes on and on. This refusal to get on board with what every other country in the world knows is a good idea is like icing on the uncooperative cake. And I think we all know that it's not a matter of Trump and friends knowing better than every other government on the face of the planet besides Syria and Nicaragua. It's not like Trump and Friends have wonderful, enlightened ideas that will outsmart everyone else who signed the agreement. I dunno, sometimes I get the impression that there is a group of people who actually think that Trump is on to something brilliant or smart or something .... but to me and, it seems, most of the planet, that seems patently ridiculous. America has literally become a dangerous laughing stock to the world because of its new government. I don't see how one can't see just that as isolating, let alone the refusal to sign the Paris agreement.

    So, your theory is the US will no longer be an important part of the International community?

    If yes, my follow up question is - Is that a theory you really want to stick with?

    No, that's not my theory at all. My theory is that the US is more and more an important negative and harmful part of the international community as Trump engages in isolationist measures, while I assume most would prefer for America to be a positive force that inspires other nations to collaborate with it and to invest in it. I'm under the impression that American culture and politics and its economy are at least partially built on the idea that the nation is "the leader of the free world". That label has actually had real implications inside and outside of America, in many ways. I think that Trump is doing a fairly good job of ensuring that that is no longer the case. Of course, that could work out for the best for other countries, in the long run. But I don't see any way it could work out well for America.

    But, if we are isolating ourselves, how can we have ANY part in the International Community?   I guess I don't understand what isolate means.


    Sorry. The world doesn't work the way you tell it to.