Multiple Fatalities- Ariana Grande Concert
Comments
-
If infowars gets white house credentials then The Onion, National Lampoon, and Funny Or Die should get them as well.my2hands said:InfoWars has White House press credentials?
Lol0 -
Bentleyspop said:
If infowars gets white house credentials then The Onion, National Lampoon, and Funny Or Die should get them as well.my2hands said:InfoWars has White House press credentials?
Lol
except Inforwars is actually pretty dangerous...talk about fake news LOL
0 -
Halifax2TheMax said:
If you didn't catch the Frontline piece on Steve Bannon last night on PBS, you should.my2hands said:InfoWars has White House press credentials?
Lol
I love Frontline... definitely need to check this out
0 -
Bannon and his ideology are scary shit. Bringing on the apocalypse because it's some sort of natural progression. At least he lost his seat at the security council.my2hands said:Halifax2TheMax said:
If you didn't catch the Frontline piece on Steve Bannon last night on PBS, you should.my2hands said:InfoWars has White House press credentials?
Lol
I love Frontline... definitely need to check this out09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
Calling someone a name or categorizing them means you have no response to my statement. Not agreeing with Feminism does not make one a chauvinist in the slightest. I pointed out their hypocrisy by stating the obvious.PJ_Soul said:
So you're literally making no point at all. Got it. Well, except maybe the point that you're a chauvinist.dmaradona10 said:
More aggressive than passive. Point is, they won't.PJ_Soul said:
Well that is quite the passive aggressive statement against feminists.dmaradona10 said:Make no mistake, this was an attack targeting UK female teenagers. When will the Feminists come out and protest with their pink pussy hats??Las Cruces, NM Pan Am Center September 14, 1995
Albuquerque, NM Tingley Coliseum July 7, 1998
New York City, NY MSG May 20, 2010
Eddie Vedder Solo Albuquerque, NM November 9, 2012
Wrigley Field July 19, 2013
LA Nov. 23: 24, 2013
Denver 10-22-140 -
The obvious? You didn't point out anything, let alone something obvious, and yes, "not agreeing with feminism" does in fact mean that you're a chauvinist. If you don't realize that saying you don't agree with feminism = you don't agree with the fight for equal rights for women and the rejection of female subjugation, then at best, you have absolutely no idea what feminists really are, so you've decided to direct aggressive sentiment towards women for something you don't even understand at all. How in the world you got to 'feminists are hypocrites because a terrorist attacked an Ariana Grande concert and they aren't all out in pink hats' is completely beyond me. Doesn't make any sense at all.dmaradona10 said:
Calling someone a name or categorizing them means you have no response to my statement. Not agreeing with Feminism does not make one a chauvinist in the slightest. I pointed out their hypocrisy by stating the obvious.PJ_Soul said:
So you're literally making no point at all. Got it. Well, except maybe the point that you're a chauvinist.dmaradona10 said:
More aggressive than passive. Point is, they won't.PJ_Soul said:
Well that is quite the passive aggressive statement against feminists.dmaradona10 said:Make no mistake, this was an attack targeting UK female teenagers. When will the Feminists come out and protest with their pink pussy hats??
Post edited by PJ_Soul onWith all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
But why only call out feminists? Why not call out anyone who has protested? You are the one who categorized and now when called on it are trying to use it in your defense. It doesn't work that way. Maybe don't isolate your ridicule to a feminist group and then someone will challenge you non-categorically.dmaradona10 said:
Calling someone a name or categorizing them means you have no response to my statement. Not agreeing with Feminism does not make one a chauvinist in the slightest. I pointed out their hypocrisy by stating the obvious.PJ_Soul said:
So you're literally making no point at all. Got it. Well, except maybe the point that you're a chauvinist.dmaradona10 said:
More aggressive than passive. Point is, they won't.PJ_Soul said:
Well that is quite the passive aggressive statement against feminists.dmaradona10 said:Make no mistake, this was an attack targeting UK female teenagers. When will the Feminists come out and protest with their pink pussy hats??It's a hopeless situation...0 -
Name calling gets you nowhere, grow up. Your opinion makes you absent-minded of the facts of how third-wave feminism is an obvious push for more than just "equal rights" for women and that they turn a blind eye to the plight of women in Islamic countries and now being targeted in Europe. Are you saying I don't understand it, because I'm a man? How precious. Makes perfect sense, they pick and choose their battles, and it's not even the right one.PJ_Soul said:
The obvious? You didn't point out anything, let alone something obvious, and yes, "not agreeing with feminism" does in fact mean that you're a chauvinist. If you don't realize that saying you don't agree with feminism = you don't agree with the fight for equal rights for women and the rejection of female subjugation, then at best, you have absolutely no idea what feminists really are, so you've decided to direct aggressive sentiment towards women for something you don't even understand at all. How in the world you got to 'feminists are hypocrites because a terrorist attacked an Ariana Grande concert and they aren't all out in pink hats' is completely beyond me. Doesn't make any sense at all.dmaradona10 said:
Calling someone a name or categorizing them means you have no response to my statement. Not agreeing with Feminism does not make one a chauvinist in the slightest. I pointed out their hypocrisy by stating the obvious.PJ_Soul said:
So you're literally making no point at all. Got it. Well, except maybe the point that you're a chauvinist.dmaradona10 said:
More aggressive than passive. Point is, they won't.PJ_Soul said:
Well that is quite the passive aggressive statement against feminists.dmaradona10 said:Make no mistake, this was an attack targeting UK female teenagers. When will the Feminists come out and protest with their pink pussy hats??Las Cruces, NM Pan Am Center September 14, 1995
Albuquerque, NM Tingley Coliseum July 7, 1998
New York City, NY MSG May 20, 2010
Eddie Vedder Solo Albuquerque, NM November 9, 2012
Wrigley Field July 19, 2013
LA Nov. 23: 24, 2013
Denver 10-22-140 -
Name calling, lol. You are presenting yourself as a chauvinist but don't want to be called one. Too bad for you.dmaradona10 said:
Name calling gets you nowhere, grow up. Your opinion makes you absent-minded of the facts of how third-wave feminism is an obvious push for more than just "equal rights" for women and that they turn a blind eye to the plight of women in Islamic countries and now being targeted in Europe. Are you saying I don't understand it, because I'm a man? How precious. Makes perfect sense, they pick and choose their battles, and it's not even the right one.PJ_Soul said:
The obvious? You didn't point out anything, let alone something obvious, and yes, "not agreeing with feminism" does in fact mean that you're a chauvinist. If you don't realize that saying you don't agree with feminism = you don't agree with the fight for equal rights for women and the rejection of female subjugation, then at best, you have absolutely no idea what feminists really are, so you've decided to direct aggressive sentiment towards women for something you don't even understand at all. How in the world you got to 'feminists are hypocrites because a terrorist attacked an Ariana Grande concert and they aren't all out in pink hats' is completely beyond me. Doesn't make any sense at all.dmaradona10 said:
Calling someone a name or categorizing them means you have no response to my statement. Not agreeing with Feminism does not make one a chauvinist in the slightest. I pointed out their hypocrisy by stating the obvious.PJ_Soul said:
So you're literally making no point at all. Got it. Well, except maybe the point that you're a chauvinist.dmaradona10 said:
More aggressive than passive. Point is, they won't.PJ_Soul said:
Well that is quite the passive aggressive statement against feminists.dmaradona10 said:Make no mistake, this was an attack targeting UK female teenagers. When will the Feminists come out and protest with their pink pussy hats??
And you just confirmed that you don't know much of anything about feminism, and NO, absolutely not because you're a man. That you assumed that is yet more proof you don't know what you're talking about. It's because of your own words here in this thread. Your gross bias is obvious in everything you just wrote.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
PJ_Soul said:
Name calling, lol. You are presenting yourself as a chauvinist but don't want to be called one. Too bad for you.dmaradona10 said:
Name calling gets you nowhere, grow up. Your opinion makes you absent-minded of the facts of how third-wave feminism is an obvious push for more than just "equal rights" for women and that they turn a blind eye to the plight of women in Islamic countries and now being targeted in Europe. Are you saying I don't understand it, because I'm a man? How precious. Makes perfect sense, they pick and choose their battles, and it's not even the right one.PJ_Soul said:
The obvious? You didn't point out anything, let alone something obvious, and yes, "not agreeing with feminism" does in fact mean that you're a chauvinist. If you don't realize that saying you don't agree with feminism = you don't agree with the fight for equal rights for women and the rejection of female subjugation, then at best, you have absolutely no idea what feminists really are, so you've decided to direct aggressive sentiment towards women for something you don't even understand at all. How in the world you got to 'feminists are hypocrites because a terrorist attacked an Ariana Grande concert and they aren't all out in pink hats' is completely beyond me. Doesn't make any sense at all.dmaradona10 said:
Calling someone a name or categorizing them means you have no response to my statement. Not agreeing with Feminism does not make one a chauvinist in the slightest. I pointed out their hypocrisy by stating the obvious.PJ_Soul said:
So you're literally making no point at all. Got it. Well, except maybe the point that you're a chauvinist.dmaradona10 said:
More aggressive than passive. Point is, they won't.PJ_Soul said:
Well that is quite the passive aggressive statement against feminists.dmaradona10 said:Make no mistake, this was an attack targeting UK female teenagers. When will the Feminists come out and protest with their pink pussy hats??
And you just confirmed that you don't know much of anything about feminism, and NO, absolutely not because you're a man. That you assumed that is yet more proof you don't know what you're talking about. It's because of your own words here in this thread. Your gross bias is obvious in everything you just wrote.
You can call me whatever you want, I don't care. The point is your argument is weak when you turn to ad hom attacks. Three time and you have not stated how I am a "chauvinist." You have no proof of anything but your absent-minded view of Feminism and the world. Now I am biased? Ok dude, weak sauce once again. If you are going to debate, then stick to the facts and not trying to define people as "biased" or "Chauvanist" it exposes your foolishness.PJ_Soul said:
Name calling, lol. You are presenting yourself as a chauvinist but don't want to be called one. Too bad for you.dmaradona10 said:
Name calling gets you nowhere, grow up. Your opinion makes you absent-minded of the facts of how third-wave feminism is an obvious push for more than just "equal rights" for women and that they turn a blind eye to the plight of women in Islamic countries and now being targeted in Europe. Are you saying I don't understand it, because I'm a man? How precious. Makes perfect sense, they pick and choose their battles, and it's not even the right one.PJ_Soul said:
The obvious? You didn't point out anything, let alone something obvious, and yes, "not agreeing with feminism" does in fact mean that you're a chauvinist. If you don't realize that saying you don't agree with feminism = you don't agree with the fight for equal rights for women and the rejection of female subjugation, then at best, you have absolutely no idea what feminists really are, so you've decided to direct aggressive sentiment towards women for something you don't even understand at all. How in the world you got to 'feminists are hypocrites because a terrorist attacked an Ariana Grande concert and they aren't all out in pink hats' is completely beyond me. Doesn't make any sense at all.dmaradona10 said:
Calling someone a name or categorizing them means you have no response to my statement. Not agreeing with Feminism does not make one a chauvinist in the slightest. I pointed out their hypocrisy by stating the obvious.PJ_Soul said:
So you're literally making no point at all. Got it. Well, except maybe the point that you're a chauvinist.dmaradona10 said:
More aggressive than passive. Point is, they won't.PJ_Soul said:
Well that is quite the passive aggressive statement against feminists.dmaradona10 said:Make no mistake, this was an attack targeting UK female teenagers. When will the Feminists come out and protest with their pink pussy hats??
And you just confirmed that you don't know much of anything about feminism, and NO, absolutely not because you're a man. That you assumed that is yet more proof you don't know what you're talking about. It's because of your own words here in this thread. Your gross bias is obvious in everything you just wrote.Las Cruces, NM Pan Am Center September 14, 1995
Albuquerque, NM Tingley Coliseum July 7, 1998
New York City, NY MSG May 20, 2010
Eddie Vedder Solo Albuquerque, NM November 9, 2012
Wrigley Field July 19, 2013
LA Nov. 23: 24, 2013
Denver 10-22-140 -
well, in the same way that if someone were to say they are against the civil rights movement would make them a racist.dmaradona10 said:PJ_Soul said:
Name calling, lol. You are presenting yourself as a chauvinist but don't want to be called one. Too bad for you.dmaradona10 said:
Name calling gets you nowhere, grow up. Your opinion makes you absent-minded of the facts of how third-wave feminism is an obvious push for more than just "equal rights" for women and that they turn a blind eye to the plight of women in Islamic countries and now being targeted in Europe. Are you saying I don't understand it, because I'm a man? How precious. Makes perfect sense, they pick and choose their battles, and it's not even the right one.PJ_Soul said:
The obvious? You didn't point out anything, let alone something obvious, and yes, "not agreeing with feminism" does in fact mean that you're a chauvinist. If you don't realize that saying you don't agree with feminism = you don't agree with the fight for equal rights for women and the rejection of female subjugation, then at best, you have absolutely no idea what feminists really are, so you've decided to direct aggressive sentiment towards women for something you don't even understand at all. How in the world you got to 'feminists are hypocrites because a terrorist attacked an Ariana Grande concert and they aren't all out in pink hats' is completely beyond me. Doesn't make any sense at all.dmaradona10 said:
Calling someone a name or categorizing them means you have no response to my statement. Not agreeing with Feminism does not make one a chauvinist in the slightest. I pointed out their hypocrisy by stating the obvious.PJ_Soul said:
So you're literally making no point at all. Got it. Well, except maybe the point that you're a chauvinist.dmaradona10 said:
More aggressive than passive. Point is, they won't.PJ_Soul said:
Well that is quite the passive aggressive statement against feminists.dmaradona10 said:Make no mistake, this was an attack targeting UK female teenagers. When will the Feminists come out and protest with their pink pussy hats??
And you just confirmed that you don't know much of anything about feminism, and NO, absolutely not because you're a man. That you assumed that is yet more proof you don't know what you're talking about. It's because of your own words here in this thread. Your gross bias is obvious in everything you just wrote.
You can call me whatever you want, I don't care. The point is your argument is weak when you turn to ad hom attacks. Three time and you have not stated how I am a "chauvinist." You have no proof of anything but your absent-minded view of Feminism and the world. Now I am biased? Ok dude, weak sauce once again. If you are going to debate, then stick to the facts and not trying to define people as "biased" or "Chauvanist" it exposes your foolishness.PJ_Soul said:
Name calling, lol. You are presenting yourself as a chauvinist but don't want to be called one. Too bad for you.dmaradona10 said:
Name calling gets you nowhere, grow up. Your opinion makes you absent-minded of the facts of how third-wave feminism is an obvious push for more than just "equal rights" for women and that they turn a blind eye to the plight of women in Islamic countries and now being targeted in Europe. Are you saying I don't understand it, because I'm a man? How precious. Makes perfect sense, they pick and choose their battles, and it's not even the right one.PJ_Soul said:
The obvious? You didn't point out anything, let alone something obvious, and yes, "not agreeing with feminism" does in fact mean that you're a chauvinist. If you don't realize that saying you don't agree with feminism = you don't agree with the fight for equal rights for women and the rejection of female subjugation, then at best, you have absolutely no idea what feminists really are, so you've decided to direct aggressive sentiment towards women for something you don't even understand at all. How in the world you got to 'feminists are hypocrites because a terrorist attacked an Ariana Grande concert and they aren't all out in pink hats' is completely beyond me. Doesn't make any sense at all.dmaradona10 said:
Calling someone a name or categorizing them means you have no response to my statement. Not agreeing with Feminism does not make one a chauvinist in the slightest. I pointed out their hypocrisy by stating the obvious.PJ_Soul said:
So you're literally making no point at all. Got it. Well, except maybe the point that you're a chauvinist.dmaradona10 said:
More aggressive than passive. Point is, they won't.PJ_Soul said:
Well that is quite the passive aggressive statement against feminists.dmaradona10 said:Make no mistake, this was an attack targeting UK female teenagers. When will the Feminists come out and protest with their pink pussy hats??
And you just confirmed that you don't know much of anything about feminism, and NO, absolutely not because you're a man. That you assumed that is yet more proof you don't know what you're talking about. It's because of your own words here in this thread. Your gross bias is obvious in everything you just wrote.
Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 -
Oh, the irony.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
the bomber was born in the UK.unsung said:
Stop importing them. This person waited for children to be released from inside according to witnesses. Children.HughFreakingDillon said:
so tell us, how do you solve it?unsung said:Quick...change your facebook profile pics, that'll solve it.
Stop being lovey dovey over people that wish to do us harm.Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 -
Born in the UK. Father left to go back to Libya...kid spend 3 weeks in Libya just before proving without a shadow of a doubt that he is a cowardly piece of shit. Let's not pretend this is a UK thing....in fact I don;t think its even a country thing,HughFreakingDillon said:
the bomber was born in the UK.unsung said:
Stop importing them. This person waited for children to be released from inside according to witnesses. Children.HughFreakingDillon said:
so tell us, how do you solve it?unsung said:Quick...change your facebook profile pics, that'll solve it.
Stop being lovey dovey over people that wish to do us harm.hippiemom = goodness0 -
Well, since we don't know if you are a man or not, and since it didn't come up in the argument, I'm guessing that's not the reason for PJSoul's opinion.dmaradona10 said:
Name calling gets you nowhere, grow up. Your opinion makes you absent-minded of the facts of how third-wave feminism is an obvious push for more than just "equal rights" for women and that they turn a blind eye to the plight of women in Islamic countries and now being targeted in Europe. Are you saying I don't understand it, because I'm a man? How precious. Makes perfect sense, they pick and choose their battles, and it's not even the right one.PJ_Soul said:
The obvious? You didn't point out anything, let alone something obvious, and yes, "not agreeing with feminism" does in fact mean that you're a chauvinist. If you don't realize that saying you don't agree with feminism = you don't agree with the fight for equal rights for women and the rejection of female subjugation, then at best, you have absolutely no idea what feminists really are, so you've decided to direct aggressive sentiment towards women for something you don't even understand at all. How in the world you got to 'feminists are hypocrites because a terrorist attacked an Ariana Grande concert and they aren't all out in pink hats' is completely beyond me. Doesn't make any sense at all.dmaradona10 said:
Calling someone a name or categorizing them means you have no response to my statement. Not agreeing with Feminism does not make one a chauvinist in the slightest. I pointed out their hypocrisy by stating the obvious.PJ_Soul said:
So you're literally making no point at all. Got it. Well, except maybe the point that you're a chauvinist.dmaradona10 said:
More aggressive than passive. Point is, they won't.PJ_Soul said:
Well that is quite the passive aggressive statement against feminists.dmaradona10 said:Make no mistake, this was an attack targeting UK female teenagers. When will the Feminists come out and protest with their pink pussy hats??
And how do you make the leap from an Ariana Grande concert being bombed to feminist needing to protest in pussy hats or they don't support Muslim women's rights? If there was a shred of logic to that, maybe we could actually discuss it. What would you say the appropriate hat would have been to protest against the EODM concert bombing?my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0 -
let's not pretend it's an immigrant problem. most attacks since 9/11 have been perpetrated by citizens of the country they attacked.cincybearcat said:
Born in the UK. Father left to go back to Libya...kid spend 3 weeks in Libya just before proving without a shadow of a doubt that he is a cowardly piece of shit. Let's not pretend this is a UK thing....in fact I don;t think its even a country thing,HughFreakingDillon said:
the bomber was born in the UK.unsung said:
Stop importing them. This person waited for children to be released from inside according to witnesses. Children.HughFreakingDillon said:
so tell us, how do you solve it?unsung said:Quick...change your facebook profile pics, that'll solve it.
Stop being lovey dovey over people that wish to do us harm.Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 -
They seem to become radicalized after visiting certain countries like Syria. Maybe ban citizens from visiting these countries?HughFreakingDillon said:
let's not pretend it's an immigrant problem. most attacks since 9/11 have been perpetrated by citizens of the country they attacked.cincybearcat said:
Born in the UK. Father left to go back to Libya...kid spend 3 weeks in Libya just before proving without a shadow of a doubt that he is a cowardly piece of shit. Let's not pretend this is a UK thing....in fact I don;t think its even a country thing,HughFreakingDillon said:
the bomber was born in the UK.unsung said:
Stop importing them. This person waited for children to be released from inside according to witnesses. Children.HughFreakingDillon said:
so tell us, how do you solve it?unsung said:Quick...change your facebook profile pics, that'll solve it.
Stop being lovey dovey over people that wish to do us harm.I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 -
Ah, I get your point. Missed it at first.HughFreakingDillon said:
let's not pretend it's an immigrant problem. most attacks since 9/11 have been perpetrated by citizens of the country they attacked.cincybearcat said:
Born in the UK. Father left to go back to Libya...kid spend 3 weeks in Libya just before proving without a shadow of a doubt that he is a cowardly piece of shit. Let's not pretend this is a UK thing....in fact I don;t think its even a country thing,HughFreakingDillon said:
the bomber was born in the UK.unsung said:
Stop importing them. This person waited for children to be released from inside according to witnesses. Children.HughFreakingDillon said:
so tell us, how do you solve it?unsung said:Quick...change your facebook profile pics, that'll solve it.
Stop being lovey dovey over people that wish to do us harm.hippiemom = goodness0 -
I don't think it's quite that simple. I doubt you turn into a jihadist over your vacation. it was more likely something he had been taught for years by his relatives.mcgruff10 said:
They seem to become radicalized after visiting certain countries like Syria. Maybe ban citizens from visiting these countries?HughFreakingDillon said:
let's not pretend it's an immigrant problem. most attacks since 9/11 have been perpetrated by citizens of the country they attacked.cincybearcat said:
Born in the UK. Father left to go back to Libya...kid spend 3 weeks in Libya just before proving without a shadow of a doubt that he is a cowardly piece of shit. Let's not pretend this is a UK thing....in fact I don;t think its even a country thing,HughFreakingDillon said:
the bomber was born in the UK.unsung said:
Stop importing them. This person waited for children to be released from inside according to witnesses. Children.HughFreakingDillon said:
so tell us, how do you solve it?unsung said:Quick...change your facebook profile pics, that'll solve it.
Stop being lovey dovey over people that wish to do us harm.Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 -
I mcgruff10 said:
I don't think they get radicalized when they travel to these countries. They travel because they've been radicalized. I honestly think its the product of younger people having lots of time on their hands....24 hour news cycle....getting pissed off about things...and then using the internet to find people that agree....and then eventually weird things start to seem like good ideas. It gets normalized by their interactions with others online. Like fetishes....but with worse consequences.
They seem to become radicalized after visiting certain countries like Syria. Maybe ban citizens from visiting these countries?HughFreakingDillon said:
let's not pretend it's an immigrant problem. most attacks since 9/11 have been perpetrated by citizens of the country they attacked.cincybearcat said:
Born in the UK. Father left to go back to Libya...kid spend 3 weeks in Libya just before proving without a shadow of a doubt that he is a cowardly piece of shit. Let's not pretend this is a UK thing....in fact I don;t think its even a country thing,HughFreakingDillon said:
the bomber was born in the UK.unsung said:
Stop importing them. This person waited for children to be released from inside according to witnesses. Children.HughFreakingDillon said:
so tell us, how do you solve it?unsung said:Quick...change your facebook profile pics, that'll solve it.
Stop being lovey dovey over people that wish to do us harm.hippiemom = goodness0
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 278 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help