Blank Discussion Topic

Options
1…158159161163164…350

Comments

  • mfc2006
    mfc2006 HTOWN Posts: 37,491
    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    Illegal or not, the information is true. By definition, a leak is true.

    I agree with that.
    What would you say if leaked military details on upcoming operations were suddenly laid bare because of the "god blessed whistleblowers"?
    Keeping a country safe relies on internal integrity that is the Presidents inner circles job.
    You guys on one hand want the POTUS to fail from leaks yet you believe certain things should not be disclosed.
    Make up your mind.

    Is this an all or nothing scenario for you? How about whistleblowers are an asset until their whistleblowing endangers lives? Obviously leaks about political corruption and leaks about military operations should not be viewed with the same lenses.
    Yes.
    Until they endanger lives is not a reason to consider them an asset.
    Why can't they be viewed in the same lenses? If the very same "god blessed whistleblowers" demurring certain facts about corrupt people in cabinet they should be doing it about military ops as well. You wouldn't want corrupt people planning those operations would you.
    At any rate Americans are naïve as well to think that their country is not conversing directly/indirectly w/ Russia to gather intelligence.
    Asset until they endanger lives, that's a good one.
    This can't be a serious point.
    BTW - the military officers plan missions. The POTUS doesn't.
    I know but the POTUS approves or not of the mission though.
    So if any planners are corrupt/security risk they should also be outed.

    Which is precisely what is happening.....Flynn, for example.
    I LOVE MUSIC.
    www.cluthelee.com
    www.cluthe.com
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,450
    mrussel1 said:

    HughFreakingDillon said:

    Tiki said:

    Trump loved leaks before he hated them

    the irony.
    "hack her emails, russia!"
    "the real scandal here is that classified information is illegally given out by "intelligence" like candy"
    Really? Does Trump oriented hypocrisy surprise anyone? Do we really think he has a moral compass?
    no, it doesn't. no, we don't.
    Hugh Freaking Dillon is currently out of the office, returning sometime in the fall




  • mfc2006
    mfc2006 HTOWN Posts: 37,491
    DeVos can't even spell compass....
    I LOVE MUSIC.
    www.cluthelee.com
    www.cluthe.com
  • PJfanwillneverleave1
    PJfanwillneverleave1 Posts: 12,885
    mrussel1 said:

    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    Illegal or not, the information is true. By definition, a leak is true.

    I agree with that.
    What would you say if leaked military details on upcoming operations were suddenly laid bare because of the "god blessed whistleblowers"?
    Keeping a country safe relies on internal integrity that is the Presidents inner circles job.
    You guys on one hand want the POTUS to fail from leaks yet you believe certain things should not be disclosed.
    Make up your mind.

    Is this an all or nothing scenario for you? How about whistleblowers are an asset until their whistleblowing endangers lives? Obviously leaks about political corruption and leaks about military operations should not be viewed with the same lenses.
    Yes.
    Until they endanger lives is not a reason to consider them an asset.
    Why can't they be viewed in the same lenses? If the very same "god blessed whistleblowers" demurring certain facts about corrupt people in cabinet they should be doing it about military ops as well. You wouldn't want corrupt people planning those operations would you.
    At any rate Americans are naïve as well to think that their country is not conversing directly/indirectly w/ Russia to gather intelligence.
    Asset until they endanger lives, that's a good one.
    This can't be a serious point.
    BTW - the military officers plan missions. The POTUS doesn't.
    I know but the POTUS approves or not of the mission though.
    So if any planners are corrupt/security risk they should also be outed.

    Your defense of the administration's lies to the American public are weak. You better flip back over to Fox or Twitter to tighten up these arguments. The story is the lying. It's not the leaking.
    Not sure where that twitter comment is coming from. I post the tweets because that is what your very own POTUS is putting out there daily for the rest of the world to interpret not because I agree with them. Your interpretation is not the end all be all.
    I've said from the beginning pay attention to his tweets.

    Perhaps being confronted with this info about Flynn the POTUS would not talk about it in public until all the facts were verified.
    Like not talking about a case that is before the courts.
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,879
    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    Illegal or not, the information is true. By definition, a leak is true.

    I agree with that.
    What would you say if leaked military details on upcoming operations were suddenly laid bare because of the "god blessed whistleblowers"?
    Keeping a country safe relies on internal integrity that is the Presidents inner circles job.
    You guys on one hand want the POTUS to fail from leaks yet you believe certain things should not be disclosed.
    Make up your mind.

    Is this an all or nothing scenario for you? How about whistleblowers are an asset until their whistleblowing endangers lives? Obviously leaks about political corruption and leaks about military operations should not be viewed with the same lenses.
    Yes.
    Until they endanger lives is not a reason to consider them an asset.
    Why can't they be viewed in the same lenses? If the very same "god blessed whistleblowers" demurring certain facts about corrupt people in cabinet they should be doing it about military ops as well. You wouldn't want corrupt people planning those operations would you.
    At any rate Americans are naïve as well to think that their country is not conversing directly/indirectly w/ Russia to gather intelligence.
    Asset until they endanger lives, that's a good one.
    This can't be a serious point.
    BTW - the military officers plan missions. The POTUS doesn't.
    I know but the POTUS approves or not of the mission though.
    So if any planners are corrupt/security risk they should also be outed.

    Your defense of the administration's lies to the American public are weak. You better flip back over to Fox or Twitter to tighten up these arguments. The story is the lying. It's not the leaking.
    Not sure where that twitter comment is coming from. I post the tweets because that is what your very own POTUS is putting out there daily for the rest of the world to interpret not because I agree with them. Your interpretation is not the end all be all.
    I've said from the beginning pay attention to his tweets.

    Perhaps being confronted with this info about Flynn the POTUS would not talk about it in public until all the facts were verified.
    Like not talking about a case that is before the courts.
    He said he was unaware of it. A non lying president would have said "We're reviewing x, I don't want to comment at this time, but we will shortly". Or better yet, fire the guy as soon as you learned (18 days ago) that he lied to the VP. Or better yet, don't instruct him to lie to the VP., Or better yet, be a normal human being with a conscience.
  • PJfanwillneverleave1
    PJfanwillneverleave1 Posts: 12,885
    mfc2006 said:

    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    Illegal or not, the information is true. By definition, a leak is true.

    I agree with that.
    What would you say if leaked military details on upcoming operations were suddenly laid bare because of the "god blessed whistleblowers"?
    Keeping a country safe relies on internal integrity that is the Presidents inner circles job.
    You guys on one hand want the POTUS to fail from leaks yet you believe certain things should not be disclosed.
    Make up your mind.

    Is this an all or nothing scenario for you? How about whistleblowers are an asset until their whistleblowing endangers lives? Obviously leaks about political corruption and leaks about military operations should not be viewed with the same lenses.
    Yes.
    Until they endanger lives is not a reason to consider them an asset.
    Why can't they be viewed in the same lenses? If the very same "god blessed whistleblowers" demurring certain facts about corrupt people in cabinet they should be doing it about military ops as well. You wouldn't want corrupt people planning those operations would you.
    At any rate Americans are naïve as well to think that their country is not conversing directly/indirectly w/ Russia to gather intelligence.
    Asset until they endanger lives, that's a good one.
    This can't be a serious point.
    BTW - the military officers plan missions. The POTUS doesn't.
    I know but the POTUS approves or not of the mission though.
    So if any planners are corrupt/security risk they should also be outed.

    Which is precisely what is happening.....Flynn, for example.
    Do you believe President Trump asked for his resignation?
  • Halifax2TheMax
    Halifax2TheMax Posts: 42,041
    Trump's DOL nominee withdraws. Trump's week just keeps getting worse. And its only hump day. Can't say I blame the guy.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • mfc2006
    mfc2006 HTOWN Posts: 37,491
    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    mfc2006 said:

    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    Illegal or not, the information is true. By definition, a leak is true.

    I agree with that.
    What would you say if leaked military details on upcoming operations were suddenly laid bare because of the "god blessed whistleblowers"?
    Keeping a country safe relies on internal integrity that is the Presidents inner circles job.
    You guys on one hand want the POTUS to fail from leaks yet you believe certain things should not be disclosed.
    Make up your mind.

    Is this an all or nothing scenario for you? How about whistleblowers are an asset until their whistleblowing endangers lives? Obviously leaks about political corruption and leaks about military operations should not be viewed with the same lenses.
    Yes.
    Until they endanger lives is not a reason to consider them an asset.
    Why can't they be viewed in the same lenses? If the very same "god blessed whistleblowers" demurring certain facts about corrupt people in cabinet they should be doing it about military ops as well. You wouldn't want corrupt people planning those operations would you.
    At any rate Americans are naïve as well to think that their country is not conversing directly/indirectly w/ Russia to gather intelligence.
    Asset until they endanger lives, that's a good one.
    This can't be a serious point.
    BTW - the military officers plan missions. The POTUS doesn't.
    I know but the POTUS approves or not of the mission though.
    So if any planners are corrupt/security risk they should also be outed.

    Which is precisely what is happening.....Flynn, for example.
    Do you believe President Trump asked for his resignation?
    Whether he did or not is irrelevant to the counterpoint I made to your point. When you said "So if any planners are corrupt/security risk they should also be outed."

    To that point, I stated that's what happened with Flynn. Hence, your point is irrelevant to my response.
    I LOVE MUSIC.
    www.cluthelee.com
    www.cluthe.com
  • PJfanwillneverleave1
    PJfanwillneverleave1 Posts: 12,885
    mfc2006 said:

    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    mfc2006 said:

    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    mrussel1 said:

    Illegal or not, the information is true. By definition, a leak is true.

    I agree with that.
    What would you say if leaked military details on upcoming operations were suddenly laid bare because of the "god blessed whistleblowers"?
    Keeping a country safe relies on internal integrity that is the Presidents inner circles job.
    You guys on one hand want the POTUS to fail from leaks yet you believe certain things should not be disclosed.
    Make up your mind.

    Is this an all or nothing scenario for you? How about whistleblowers are an asset until their whistleblowing endangers lives? Obviously leaks about political corruption and leaks about military operations should not be viewed with the same lenses.
    Yes.
    Until they endanger lives is not a reason to consider them an asset.
    Why can't they be viewed in the same lenses? If the very same "god blessed whistleblowers" demurring certain facts about corrupt people in cabinet they should be doing it about military ops as well. You wouldn't want corrupt people planning those operations would you.
    At any rate Americans are naïve as well to think that their country is not conversing directly/indirectly w/ Russia to gather intelligence.
    Asset until they endanger lives, that's a good one.
    This can't be a serious point.
    BTW - the military officers plan missions. The POTUS doesn't.
    I know but the POTUS approves or not of the mission though.
    So if any planners are corrupt/security risk they should also be outed.

    Which is precisely what is happening.....Flynn, for example.
    Do you believe President Trump asked for his resignation?
    Whether he did or not is irrelevant to the counterpoint I made to your point. When you said "So if any planners are corrupt/security risk they should also be outed."

    To that point, I stated that's what happened with Flynn. Hence, your point is irrelevant to my response.
    okie dokie then
  • ikiT
    ikiT USA Posts: 11,059
    so much losing
    Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 06132018
  • my2hands
    my2hands Posts: 17,117
    is America Great Again yet???
  • josevolution
    josevolution Posts: 31,558
    Is the swamp drained yet ?
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • rssesq
    rssesq Fairfield County Posts: 3,299
    u guys still in here jawin? lmao;
    I'm off to the DR for some golfin and night putting.
    Peace
  • my2hands
    my2hands Posts: 17,117
    rssesq said:

    u guys still in here jawin? lmao;
    I'm off to the DR for some golfin and night putting.
    Peace

    I thought it was all about 'Merica, kid?

    Keep that $ in the states
  • vaggar99
    vaggar99 San Diego USA Posts: 3,431
    you can't treat my girlfriend this way Joe
    http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheats/2017/02/15/morning-joe-bans-kellyanne-conway.html?via=desktop&source=copyurl
  • PJfanwillneverleave1
    PJfanwillneverleave1 Posts: 12,885
    vaggar99 said:

    you can't treat my girlfriend this way Joe
    http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheats/2017/02/15/morning-joe-bans-kellyanne-conway.html?via=desktop&source=copyurl

    Honest question.
    Do you think anyone cares?
    or is this just media drivel
  • vaggar99
    vaggar99 San Diego USA Posts: 3,431
    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    vaggar99 said:

    you can't treat my girlfriend this way Joe
    http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheats/2017/02/15/morning-joe-bans-kellyanne-conway.html?via=desktop&source=copyurl

    Honest question.
    Do you think anyone cares?
    or is this just media drivel
    what that she's my girlfriend? i can prove it.
  • PJfanwillneverleave1
    PJfanwillneverleave1 Posts: 12,885
    vaggar99 said:

    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    vaggar99 said:

    you can't treat my girlfriend this way Joe
    http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheats/2017/02/15/morning-joe-bans-kellyanne-conway.html?via=desktop&source=copyurl

    Honest question.
    Do you think anyone cares?
    or is this just media drivel
    what that she's my girlfriend? i can prove it.
    funny guy :lol:
  • vaggar99
    vaggar99 San Diego USA Posts: 3,431
    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    vaggar99 said:

    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    vaggar99 said:

    you can't treat my girlfriend this way Joe
    http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheats/2017/02/15/morning-joe-bans-kellyanne-conway.html?via=desktop&source=copyurl

    Honest question.
    Do you think anyone cares?
    or is this just media drivel
    what that she's my girlfriend? i can prove it.
    funny guy :lol:
    that Mika is going down. she will pay for fake news.
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/02/15/morning-joe-has-blacklisted-kellyanne-conway-and-thats-not-all/?utm_term=.33b022dce436&wpisrc=nl_most&wpmm=1
  • PJfanwillneverleave1
    PJfanwillneverleave1 Posts: 12,885
    edited February 2017
    What's wrong with this latest tweet? It needs a picture. I see no harm. Good for President Trump
    https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump
This discussion has been closed.

Categories