Canadian Politics Redux

17980828485465

Comments

  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,715
    polaris_x said:

    liberals could have ensured we would never see an ahole conservative PM ever again ... but as usual - they punted it ...

    How's that? What could Liberals have done about someone deciding to run for the Conservative leadership?
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • dignin
    dignin Posts: 9,478
    PJ_Soul said:

    polaris_x said:

    liberals could have ensured we would never see an ahole conservative PM ever again ... but as usual - they punted it ...

    How's that? What could Liberals have done about someone deciding to run for the Conservative leadership?
    Proportional representation.
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,715
    dignin said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    polaris_x said:

    liberals could have ensured we would never see an ahole conservative PM ever again ... but as usual - they punted it ...

    How's that? What could Liberals have done about someone deciding to run for the Conservative leadership?
    Proportional representation.
    You think that would have guaranteed that no Conservative leader ever became PM again or kept O'Leary from the Conservative leadership?
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • dignin
    dignin Posts: 9,478
    PJ_Soul said:

    dignin said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    polaris_x said:

    liberals could have ensured we would never see an ahole conservative PM ever again ... but as usual - they punted it ...

    How's that? What could Liberals have done about someone deciding to run for the Conservative leadership?
    Proportional representation.
    You think that would have guaranteed that no Conservative leader ever became PM again or kept O'Leary from the Conservative leadership?
    Not my case to make, I just think that's what polaris was referring to.
  • polaris_x
    polaris_x Posts: 13,559
    PJ_Soul said:

    dignin said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    polaris_x said:

    liberals could have ensured we would never see an ahole conservative PM ever again ... but as usual - they punted it ...

    How's that? What could Liberals have done about someone deciding to run for the Conservative leadership?
    Proportional representation.
    You think that would have guaranteed that no Conservative leader ever became PM again or kept O'Leary from the Conservative leadership?
    thanks dignin for representing during my absence ...

    I specifically put asshole conservative PM because I do think there can be a shift to a moderate Conservative party in the future which wouldn't preclude it from winning an election under any format ...

    i do think if the liberals went ahead with some form of proportional representation, which the all party committee recommended, it would prevent a person like O'leary or even a Harper from ever becoming PM ... the only way Harper was PM for so long was due to vote splitting amongst the centre and left parties ... that would essentially be negated under a new voting system ...
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,715
    polaris_x said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    dignin said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    polaris_x said:

    liberals could have ensured we would never see an ahole conservative PM ever again ... but as usual - they punted it ...

    How's that? What could Liberals have done about someone deciding to run for the Conservative leadership?
    Proportional representation.
    You think that would have guaranteed that no Conservative leader ever became PM again or kept O'Leary from the Conservative leadership?
    thanks dignin for representing during my absence ...

    I specifically put asshole conservative PM because I do think there can be a shift to a moderate Conservative party in the future which wouldn't preclude it from winning an election under any format ...

    i do think if the liberals went ahead with some form of proportional representation, which the all party committee recommended, it would prevent a person like O'leary or even a Harper from ever becoming PM ... the only way Harper was PM for so long was due to vote splitting amongst the centre and left parties ... that would essentially be negated under a new voting system ...
    I dunno, maybe. I would at least like to give Canadians that much credit. :confounded: I do support electoral reform... It wasn't one of my huge issues during the election, but I do support it. BC actually had a referendum for provincial electoral reform at one point in the 2000s, but it failed - the BC citizens narrowly voted against it. Though, there were some valid concerns that it failed because they way the fucking Liberal government worded it and campaigned against it made it too complicated for a lot of people to even really understand. Meanwhile, the yes side did a poor job of simplifying and clarifying.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • polaris_x
    polaris_x Posts: 13,559
    PJ_Soul said:

    polaris_x said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    dignin said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    polaris_x said:

    liberals could have ensured we would never see an ahole conservative PM ever again ... but as usual - they punted it ...

    How's that? What could Liberals have done about someone deciding to run for the Conservative leadership?
    Proportional representation.
    You think that would have guaranteed that no Conservative leader ever became PM again or kept O'Leary from the Conservative leadership?
    thanks dignin for representing during my absence ...

    I specifically put asshole conservative PM because I do think there can be a shift to a moderate Conservative party in the future which wouldn't preclude it from winning an election under any format ...

    i do think if the liberals went ahead with some form of proportional representation, which the all party committee recommended, it would prevent a person like O'leary or even a Harper from ever becoming PM ... the only way Harper was PM for so long was due to vote splitting amongst the centre and left parties ... that would essentially be negated under a new voting system ...
    I dunno, maybe. I would at least like to give Canadians that much credit. :confounded: I do support electoral reform... It wasn't one of my huge issues during the election, but I do support it. BC actually had a referendum for provincial electoral reform at one point in the 2000s, but it failed - the BC citizens narrowly voted against it. Though, there were some valid concerns that it failed because they way the fucking Liberal government worded it and campaigned against it made it too complicated for a lot of people to even really understand. Meanwhile, the yes side did a poor job of simplifying and clarifying.
    same thing happened in ontario re: electoral reform referendum

    similar to the US - there is like 30% of the population who will always vote conservative regardless of who's name is on the ballot ... under our current voting system - it means someone like O'Leary will always have a chance ... especially if disenfranchisement with Liberals continues ...
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,715
    Yup. Well, let's just hope someone is making sure he stays on his meds for the rest of his life. Good luck to him.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • Now now TB.
    His name is Will Baker.
    He is all cured up now and deserves a second chance at life.
    Will you volunteer to sit beside him on a bus to test his mental state?
    I hope everyone asks themselves this question.
  • I'm actually speechless. Some are going to say Canada rocks and this is great news. I don't like this.

    Here's the next guy to get a full release:

    http://www.thespec.com/news-story/7124489-freedom-granted-to-man-who-beheaded-passenger-on-greyhound-bus/

    To this point in time, he hasn't been a model patient. Soon though, he'll do the right things and we can grant him a full release too. I realize he killed his three children and that's pretty awful, but I'm not so sure it's worse than beheading, mutilating, and cannibalizing some random guy you've know for 3 seconds on a bus.

    And I have to say it: the voice was telling him to kill McLean. Was it telling him to cut him to pieces, eat him, place chunks of him in his pockets, and basically bask in the blood?

    This is dumb.
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,715

    Now now TB.
    His name is Will Baker.
    He is all cured up now and deserves a second chance at life.
    Will you volunteer to sit beside him on a bus to test his mental state?
    I hope everyone asks themselves this question.
    Why are you being so snarky about it? Geez.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • rustneversleeps
    rustneversleeps The Motel of Lost Companions Posts: 2,209

    Now now TB.
    His name is Will Baker.
    He is all cured up now and deserves a second chance at life.
    Will you volunteer to sit beside him on a bus to test his mental state?
    I hope everyone asks themselves this question.
    hahaha... what a joke.
  • rustneversleeps
    rustneversleeps The Motel of Lost Companions Posts: 2,209

    I'm actually speechless. Some are going to say Canada rocks and this is great news. I don't like this.

    Here's the next guy to get a full release:

    http://www.thespec.com/news-story/7124489-freedom-granted-to-man-who-beheaded-passenger-on-greyhound-bus/

    To this point in time, he hasn't been a model patient. Soon though, he'll do the right things and we can grant him a full release too. I realize he killed his three children and that's pretty awful, but I'm not so sure it's worse than beheading, mutilating, and cannibalizing some random guy you've know for 3 seconds on a bus.

    And I have to say it: the voice was telling him to kill McLean. Was it telling him to cut him to pieces, eat him, place chunks of him in his pockets, and basically bask in the blood?

    This is dumb.

    i feel for sensible Canadians like yourself 30. the apathy toward scum like this ridiculous.
  • PJfanwillneverleave1
    PJfanwillneverleave1 Posts: 12,885
    edited February 2017
    PJ_Soul said:

    Now now TB.
    His name is Will Baker.
    He is all cured up now and deserves a second chance at life.
    Will you volunteer to sit beside him on a bus to test his mental state?
    I hope everyone asks themselves this question.
    Why are you being so snarky about it? Geez.
    I've asked myself this question.
    Have you?

    edit - And to clarify I meant the original question. Will you volunteer to sit beside him on a bus to test his mental state?
    Post edited by PJfanwillneverleave1 on
  • I'm actually speechless. Some are going to say Canada rocks and this is great news. I don't like this.

    Here's the next guy to get a full release:

    http://www.thespec.com/news-story/7124489-freedom-granted-to-man-who-beheaded-passenger-on-greyhound-bus/

    To this point in time, he hasn't been a model patient. Soon though, he'll do the right things and we can grant him a full release too. I realize he killed his three children and that's pretty awful, but I'm not so sure it's worse than beheading, mutilating, and cannibalizing some random guy you've know for 3 seconds on a bus.

    And I have to say it: the voice was telling him to kill McLean. Was it telling him to cut him to pieces, eat him, place chunks of him in his pockets, and basically bask in the blood?

    This is dumb.

    i feel for sensible Canadians like yourself 30. the apathy toward scum like this ridiculous.
    It's nonsense for sure.

    I don't think I would describe the prevailing sentiment as apathetic as much as I would describe it as... I don't even know what term to use.

    It's pure nonsense.

    The second case I submitted was a case in my area. The f**king idiot father killed his kids in grotesque fashion because he was mad at his ex. He fled into the mountain and a trapper found him. I wished he'd have shot him.

    If he had... he'd have saved us the very painful moments reading about him ruled not criminally responsible because he was mentally ill (yah... bullshit), day outings, the looming release date and various other things that have the majority of us saying, "What the f**k, man?"
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,715
    edited February 2017

    PJ_Soul said:

    Now now TB.
    His name is Will Baker.
    He is all cured up now and deserves a second chance at life.
    Will you volunteer to sit beside him on a bus to test his mental state?
    I hope everyone asks themselves this question.
    Why are you being so snarky about it? Geez.
    I've asked myself this question.
    Have you?

    edit - And to clarify I meant the original question. Will you volunteer to sit beside him on a bus to test his mental state?
    Yes, sure, at the moment. I know he's fine right now. I am not scared of schizophrenics who are being properly treated and aren't delusional. I would sit beside him and ask him about the whole thing - I'd be curious to know more about how he's feeling, how someone copes with such a situation (not that I would expect him to be happy to discuss it, lol).
    I already said, someone needs to closely monitor him to ensure that he is taking his meds as prescribed and that he's not having breaks from reality. Always. If that is being done, I don't have concerns. If it's not, I do.
    Post edited by PJ_Soul on
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • rustneversleeps
    rustneversleeps The Motel of Lost Companions Posts: 2,209
    PJ_Soul said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    Now now TB.
    His name is Will Baker.
    He is all cured up now and deserves a second chance at life.
    Will you volunteer to sit beside him on a bus to test his mental state?
    I hope everyone asks themselves this question.
    Why are you being so snarky about it? Geez.
    I've asked myself this question.
    Have you?

    edit - And to clarify I meant the original question. Will you volunteer to sit beside him on a bus to test his mental state?
    Yes, sure, at the moment. I know he's fine right now. I am not scared of schizophrenics who are being properly treated and aren't delusional. I would sit beside him and ask him about the whole thing - I'd be curious to know more about how he's feeling, how someone copes with such a situation (not that I would expect him to be happy to discuss it, lol).
    I already said, someone needs to closely monitor him to ensure that he is taking his meds as prescribed and that he's not having breaks from reality. Always. If that is being done, I don't have concerns. If it's not, I do.
    the 2nd paragraph of the article says he will no longer be monitored.

    with all due respect, how on earth do you KNOW he is fine right now? that seems absurd to say. because he changed his name and is on a pharmy cocktail?

    who really gives a shit how he copes? you believe he should be treated like a victim?
  • oftenreading
    oftenreading Victoria, BC Posts: 12,856

    PJ_Soul said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    Now now TB.
    His name is Will Baker.
    He is all cured up now and deserves a second chance at life.
    Will you volunteer to sit beside him on a bus to test his mental state?
    I hope everyone asks themselves this question.
    Why are you being so snarky about it? Geez.
    I've asked myself this question.
    Have you?

    edit - And to clarify I meant the original question. Will you volunteer to sit beside him on a bus to test his mental state?
    Yes, sure, at the moment. I know he's fine right now. I am not scared of schizophrenics who are being properly treated and aren't delusional. I would sit beside him and ask him about the whole thing - I'd be curious to know more about how he's feeling, how someone copes with such a situation (not that I would expect him to be happy to discuss it, lol).
    I already said, someone needs to closely monitor him to ensure that he is taking his meds as prescribed and that he's not having breaks from reality. Always. If that is being done, I don't have concerns. If it's not, I do.
    the 2nd paragraph of the article says he will no longer be monitored.

    with all due respect, how on earth do you KNOW he is fine right now? that seems absurd to say. because he changed his name and is on a pharmy cocktail?

    who really gives a shit how he copes? you believe he should be treated like a victim?
    He will no longer be monitored by the Review Board system. That's not the same thing as no longer being monitored at all, although I agree the article didn't explain that.
    my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
  • rustneversleeps
    rustneversleeps The Motel of Lost Companions Posts: 2,209

    PJ_Soul said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    Now now TB.
    His name is Will Baker.
    He is all cured up now and deserves a second chance at life.
    Will you volunteer to sit beside him on a bus to test his mental state?
    I hope everyone asks themselves this question.
    Why are you being so snarky about it? Geez.
    I've asked myself this question.
    Have you?

    edit - And to clarify I meant the original question. Will you volunteer to sit beside him on a bus to test his mental state?
    Yes, sure, at the moment. I know he's fine right now. I am not scared of schizophrenics who are being properly treated and aren't delusional. I would sit beside him and ask him about the whole thing - I'd be curious to know more about how he's feeling, how someone copes with such a situation (not that I would expect him to be happy to discuss it, lol).
    I already said, someone needs to closely monitor him to ensure that he is taking his meds as prescribed and that he's not having breaks from reality. Always. If that is being done, I don't have concerns. If it's not, I do.
    the 2nd paragraph of the article says he will no longer be monitored.

    with all due respect, how on earth do you KNOW he is fine right now? that seems absurd to say. because he changed his name and is on a pharmy cocktail?

    who really gives a shit how he copes? you believe he should be treated like a victim?
    He will no longer be monitored by the Review Board system. That's not the same thing as no longer being monitored at all, although I agree the article didn't explain that.
    thats good he will still be monitored then at least. who is responsible for that now? its amazing his past actions arent considered clear evidence of a significant risk. if the supreme court felt his first mutilation was clear evidence that he could again be a significant risk, he wouldnt have been granted his freedom. if i read that 1999 ruling right. how are they so sure this person is fixed?
This discussion has been closed.