Should there be recounts in MI, PA and WI?

24567…11

Comments

  • vaggar99
    vaggar99 San Diego USA Posts: 3,431
    Yes
    ^^^i would be doing this democracy a disservice to move on with this psycho even for a fraction of second.
  • mickeyrat
    mickeyrat Posts: 44,503
    Yes
    g under p said:

    I would ONLY want to see a recount just to make sure there was not ANY hacking from the Russia or anyone else. Other than that I don't like recalls what's do is done, move on with PE Trump and his administration.

    Peace

    Thats what these computer scientists are focused on. Select counties in those 3 states that still use hackable voting machines.
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • vaggar99
    vaggar99 San Diego USA Posts: 3,431
    Yes
    3.17 million
  • vaggar99
    vaggar99 San Diego USA Posts: 3,431
    Yes
    3.3 million
  • vaggar99
    vaggar99 San Diego USA Posts: 3,431
    Yes
    3.4 million
  • ledvedderman
    ledvedderman Posts: 7,762
    You know you can edit a post, right? To update the dollar figure of an absolutely worthless attempt to have an impact.
    E8toX.gif

    http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
  • vaggar99
    vaggar99 San Diego USA Posts: 3,431
    Yes
    ^^^its not...gathering data points...
    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1i-F2Z42ZrNj_vcM2zXBn1SLwCEvuExww5kt9njIUXGw/edit?usp=sharing
  • vaggar99
    vaggar99 San Diego USA Posts: 3,431
    Yes
    4 million
  • polaris_x
    polaris_x Posts: 13,559
    edited November 2016
    Yes
    I find it interesting how so many people are disinterested when the possibility of electoral fraud is committed ... I guess I shouldn't be shocked considering that electoral fraud occurred prior to the election through manipulation of voter registration lists but still ...

    edit: I should qualify that I don't think there was any hacking done and that this election was, amongst other things, a vote against the establishment ...
    Post edited by polaris_x on
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,692
    vaggar99 said:

    ^^^help us Canada. You've had two weeks to laugh at our expense. Now save us from ourselves

    Oh trust me, we're not laughing.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • ledvedderman
    ledvedderman Posts: 7,762
    There was absolutely hacking done of the voter registration system in Illinois from a foreign agent. I can say that with 10000% certainty.
    E8toX.gif

    http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
  • Degeneratefk
    Degeneratefk Posts: 3,123
    No
    As much as I hate the thought of a trump presidency, it's over. What exactly is this going to accomplish? Let's say discrepancies are found, then what? Do you think trump is just going to hand over the white house? It's a losing battle.
    will myself to find a home, a home within myself
    we will find a way, we will find our place
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,692
    Degeneratefk said:

    As much as I hate the thought of a trump presidency, it's over. What exactly is this going to accomplish? Let's say discrepancies are found, then what? Do you think trump is just going to hand over the white house? It's a losing battle.

    Well, if they found that Trump actually won because of election fraud, and that Clinton actually should have won, then yeah, I'd imagine that he's have to leave office. Right?? One would hope that they would do an audit before inauguration day though. Fuck, I can't even imagine what a scandal that would be if it happened (not that I think it will).
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • vaggar99
    vaggar99 San Diego USA Posts: 3,431
    Yes
    ^^^maybe, but it's probably gonna be more complicated than that i'm thinking
  • bootlegger10
    bootlegger10 Posts: 16,256
    I couldn't care less about doing a recount or not. I don't see any harm in it. If the winner changes so be it. I don't know why the liberals were crying so much about Trump challenging an election. It makes them look pretty damn silly and hypocritical right now.
  • vaggar99
    vaggar99 San Diego USA Posts: 3,431
    Yes
    ^^^we only cry because our ears are open
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,509
    bootlegger10 said:

    I couldn't care less about doing a recount or not. I don't see any harm in it. If the winner changes so be it. I don't know why the liberals were crying so much about Trump challenging an election. It makes them look pretty damn silly and hypocritical right now.

    they weren't crying. it was a ridiculous statement at the time as there were no grounds to make that statement at the time. there are now. i'd be saying the same if it were reversed. it's not about getting trump out. it's about having the person in office who was lawfully elected. if it's him, which i'm sure it is, congratulations.
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • bootlegger10
    bootlegger10 Posts: 16,256
    HughFreakingDillon said:

    bootlegger10 said:

    I couldn't care less about doing a recount or not. I don't see any harm in it. If the winner changes so be it. I don't know why the liberals were crying so much about Trump challenging an election. It makes them look pretty damn silly and hypocritical right now.

    they weren't crying. it was a ridiculous statement at the time as there were no grounds to make that statement at the time. there are now. i'd be saying the same if it were reversed. it's not about getting trump out. it's about having the person in office who was lawfully elected. if it's him, which i'm sure it is, congratulations.
    Why was it ridiculous? Did Trump say he was going to challenge it? Nope. Trump was smart in not ruling out whether to question the results until after the election when you could actually determine if there may have been something to actually challenge (i.e., what the libs are doing now). That was a reasonable position to take (and one the libs should have taken so they didn't look like the giant hypocrites that they do now). It is completely stupid to say "I won't challenge the election" a month out when you have no idea what could happen on election day. But libs cried wolf.
  • vaggar99
    vaggar99 San Diego USA Posts: 3,431
    edited November 2016
    Yes
    ^^^actually he said he would not concede. different thing altogether. its already happened Hillary conceded on election night. always happens that way.
    Post edited by vaggar99 on
  • vaggar99
    vaggar99 San Diego USA Posts: 3,431
    Yes
    4.5 million goal reached!! New target is 7 million.
    https://jillstein.nationbuilder.com/recount#_=_

Categories