Why all the killing?

1235

Comments

  • what dreams
    what dreams Posts: 1,761
    brianlux said:

    brianlux said:

    brianlux said:

    ^^^ Good question, G, and an unsettling prospect.

    A customer came in the store and asked if we had the new book about people hating cop. I told him we are all used and hadn't seen anything like that recently. He kind of grunted and walked out. I sincerely felt sorry for the guy. He looked depressed and angry. I wondered what he was thinking, how he felt, what his take on things were.

    I did some research on that book and found indications that it sounds rather divisive. One article seems to infer that it goes so far as to blames Obama for what is going on (sounds familiar?)

    http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/437610/war-cops-comes-dallas

    So my question is, Why are so many so rigorously trying to make everything so (excuse the expression) black and white? Why such great effort to divide us? And what can be gained from that?


    I recently saw the author of this book interviewed on C-Span. She provided an interesting statistical analysis on inner city crime, and I would be interested in learning more by reading the book. I'm always interested in alternative viewpoints, and I try my best not to think about them through a left/right lens. I know that I came to see the problem of inner city law enforcement more complexly by listening to her. The black interviewer spent the hour trying to corner the white her into admitting she's a racist, and it bothers me that people can't have a discussion without it always coming down to this. Why can't it be possible that the author as a sociologist is trying to understand crime in America?

    Why can't white people be genuinely concerned about fixing inner city neighborhoods? To do that, don't we have to have an honest assessment of the problem?

    Why do white liberals say they want to make black lives better, but when they travel to cities like Chicago for concerts, they warn others to stay away from black neighborhoods? How do we help fix those neighborhoods if we're too damned scared to go in them? If we're too scared to even go in them, how can we expect law enforcement to do it perfectly?

    How has the War on Poverty contributed to the breakdown of the black family and the black middle class? What social decline has the black community experienced since integration?

    I don't ask these last two questions because I'm racist and want to justify reinstituting Jim Crow in America. I ask because I have heard snippets from African American studies scholars suggesting that economically and socially, black families are worse off now than they were when they had to rely on themselves. I just truly want to know more about this and how we might use what we know historically to improve their situation now. Why do we think that in order to save black people, they need white solutions?

    That last question seems particularly important. My hunch is that the black community actually does not want white solutions but rather fewer obstacles from outside their community, the biggest being that of racial profiling (of which Wikipedia says: "According to the America Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) '"Racial Profiling" refers to the discriminatory practice by law enforcement officials of targeting individuals for suspicion of crime based on the individual's race, ethnicity, religion or national origin.")

    I agree that's not what they want. But my next question is that if the statistics already show that 95% or more of the violent crimes in a neighborhood are committed by black and brown people, and 95% or more of the neighborhood is minority, whom do the police profile? I just ask. I don't imply anything in the question but I recognize the dilemma.

    I do think generic descriptions have minimal value, but the police have to start somewhere. For example, I would be described as a 5'4", 140 lb, fair skinned Caucasian female with shoulder length salt and pepper hair and brown eyes. That's not going to get any cop very far, but it would at least eliminate the tall, blue-eyed blonds.

    This point reminds me of that one character with the bushy pony tail in season 4 of The Wire. His drug dealing leader kept telling him to chop his pony tail off because it was too easy to identify him, and he eventually did as he got deeper into his street life. (I'm terrible with remembering character names).

    It appears to me that the real problem with the profiling is not that black or brown people of similar descriptions get stopped in a neighborhood where just about everyone is black or brown. The problem is how the stop is conducted. Which takes us back where we started . . .
    There is a lot of evidence that shows racial profiling exists. Good statistical info here:

    http://www.civilrights.org/publications/reports/racial-profiling2011/the-reality-of-racial.html

    I'm not arguing that profiling doesn't exist.

    My questions go deeper than the random stop and search bullshit. I'm concerned with the hard core crime problem in urban areas. How do we deal with the fact that in NY, for example, African Americans make up 30% of the population but are responsible for about 80% of the violent crimes? How do we catch those violent criminals if we don't consider the unfortunate data and maybe have witnesses who can provide general descriptions but not names?

    I'm just asking questions. I didn't think answers and debates were required or desired in this thread.
  • brianlux
    brianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 43,663

    brianlux said:

    brianlux said:

    brianlux said:

    ^^^ Good question, G, and an unsettling prospect.

    A customer came in the store and asked if we had the new book about people hating cop. I told him we are all used and hadn't seen anything like that recently. He kind of grunted and walked out. I sincerely felt sorry for the guy. He looked depressed and angry. I wondered what he was thinking, how he felt, what his take on things were.

    I did some research on that book and found indications that it sounds rather divisive. One article seems to infer that it goes so far as to blames Obama for what is going on (sounds familiar?)

    http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/437610/war-cops-comes-dallas

    So my question is, Why are so many so rigorously trying to make everything so (excuse the expression) black and white? Why such great effort to divide us? And what can be gained from that?


    I recently saw the author of this book interviewed on C-Span. She provided an interesting statistical analysis on inner city crime, and I would be interested in learning more by reading the book. I'm always interested in alternative viewpoints, and I try my best not to think about them through a left/right lens. I know that I came to see the problem of inner city law enforcement more complexly by listening to her. The black interviewer spent the hour trying to corner the white her into admitting she's a racist, and it bothers me that people can't have a discussion without it always coming down to this. Why can't it be possible that the author as a sociologist is trying to understand crime in America?

    Why can't white people be genuinely concerned about fixing inner city neighborhoods? To do that, don't we have to have an honest assessment of the problem?

    Why do white liberals say they want to make black lives better, but when they travel to cities like Chicago for concerts, they warn others to stay away from black neighborhoods? How do we help fix those neighborhoods if we're too damned scared to go in them? If we're too scared to even go in them, how can we expect law enforcement to do it perfectly?

    How has the War on Poverty contributed to the breakdown of the black family and the black middle class? What social decline has the black community experienced since integration?

    I don't ask these last two questions because I'm racist and want to justify reinstituting Jim Crow in America. I ask because I have heard snippets from African American studies scholars suggesting that economically and socially, black families are worse off now than they were when they had to rely on themselves. I just truly want to know more about this and how we might use what we know historically to improve their situation now. Why do we think that in order to save black people, they need white solutions?

    That last question seems particularly important. My hunch is that the black community actually does not want white solutions but rather fewer obstacles from outside their community, the biggest being that of racial profiling (of which Wikipedia says: "According to the America Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) '"Racial Profiling" refers to the discriminatory practice by law enforcement officials of targeting individuals for suspicion of crime based on the individual's race, ethnicity, religion or national origin.")

    I agree that's not what they want. But my next question is that if the statistics already show that 95% or more of the violent crimes in a neighborhood are committed by black and brown people, and 95% or more of the neighborhood is minority, whom do the police profile? I just ask. I don't imply anything in the question but I recognize the dilemma.

    I do think generic descriptions have minimal value, but the police have to start somewhere. For example, I would be described as a 5'4", 140 lb, fair skinned Caucasian female with shoulder length salt and pepper hair and brown eyes. That's not going to get any cop very far, but it would at least eliminate the tall, blue-eyed blonds.

    This point reminds me of that one character with the bushy pony tail in season 4 of The Wire. His drug dealing leader kept telling him to chop his pony tail off because it was too easy to identify him, and he eventually did as he got deeper into his street life. (I'm terrible with remembering character names).

    It appears to me that the real problem with the profiling is not that black or brown people of similar descriptions get stopped in a neighborhood where just about everyone is black or brown. The problem is how the stop is conducted. Which takes us back where we started . . .
    There is a lot of evidence that shows racial profiling exists. Good statistical info here:

    http://www.civilrights.org/publications/reports/racial-profiling2011/the-reality-of-racial.html

    I'm not arguing that profiling doesn't exist.

    My questions go deeper than the random stop and search bullshit. I'm concerned with the hard core crime problem in urban areas. How do we deal with the fact that in NY, for example, African Americans make up 30% of the population but are responsible for about 80% of the violent crimes? How do we catch those violent criminals if we don't consider the unfortunate data and maybe have witnesses who can provide general descriptions but not names?

    I'm just asking questions. I didn't think answers and debates were required or desired in this thread.
    Yeah, I did set it up that way didn't I, LOL!

    So your questions bring a few to my mind as well: I wonder if we who are not were black or brown could become black or brown- if random stop and search would seem merely like bullshit or down right scary harassment?

    And this: Why is there so much violent crime in black neighborhoods? Is it because blacks hate their own kind or is it because lack of opportunity leads to lack of self respect and/or poverty which leads to violence?
    "It's a sad and beautiful world"
    -Roberto Benigni

  • hedonist
    hedonist Posts: 24,524
    I've been watching an ep of Beyond Scared Straight - punkass kids thrust into the prison environment with the hope they'll have the shit scared straight out of them. Not just "black or brown" - a whole cornucopia of colors.

    Seems much of it comes from environment, lack of structure, lack of guidance (despite attempts of the parent[s]). Many components, no way an either/or situation.

    (sorry if I should've somehow posted this as a question)




  • brianlux
    brianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 43,663
    hedonist said:

    I've been watching an ep of Beyond Scared Straight - punkass kids thrust into the prison environment with the hope they'll have the shit scared straight out of them. Not just "black or brown" - a whole cornucopia of colors.

    Seems much of it comes from environment, lack of structure, lack of guidance (despite attempts of the parent[s]). Many components, no way an either/or situation.

    (sorry if I should've somehow posted this as a question)

    I've always been under the impression that prison turns criminals into more hardened criminals, not less. Is something going on there that I'm not aware of?

    Oh and this: let's officially drop the "requirement" to ask questions here (though I still encourage the notion that asking the right questions can do a lot to leading to the best solutions). That was a statement. :wink:

    "It's a sad and beautiful world"
    -Roberto Benigni

  • hedonist
    hedonist Posts: 24,524
    brianlux said:

    hedonist said:

    I've been watching an ep of Beyond Scared Straight - punkass kids thrust into the prison environment with the hope they'll have the shit scared straight out of them. Not just "black or brown" - a whole cornucopia of colors.

    Seems much of it comes from environment, lack of structure, lack of guidance (despite attempts of the parent[s]). Many components, no way an either/or situation.

    (sorry if I should've somehow posted this as a question)

    I've always been under the impression that prison turns criminals into more hardened criminals, not less. Is something going on there that I'm not aware of?

    Oh and this: let's officially drop the "requirement" to ask questions here (though I still encourage the notion that asking the right questions can do a lot to leading to the best solutions). That was a statement. :wink:

    Yes, that's the point of the process in this case as I mentioned above - swear I think I'm speaking clearly but apparently not? The program is try and to curb the road they're on.

    (though note that prison also punishes criminals - and if a rapist or murderer or pedo is hardened [how can that even be done?] in the process, so be it).
  • brianlux
    brianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 43,663
    hedonist said:

    brianlux said:

    hedonist said:

    I've been watching an ep of Beyond Scared Straight - punkass kids thrust into the prison environment with the hope they'll have the shit scared straight out of them. Not just "black or brown" - a whole cornucopia of colors.

    Seems much of it comes from environment, lack of structure, lack of guidance (despite attempts of the parent[s]). Many components, no way an either/or situation.

    (sorry if I should've somehow posted this as a question)

    I've always been under the impression that prison turns criminals into more hardened criminals, not less. Is something going on there that I'm not aware of?

    Oh and this: let's officially drop the "requirement" to ask questions here (though I still encourage the notion that asking the right questions can do a lot to leading to the best solutions). That was a statement. :wink:

    Yes, that's the point of the process in this case as I mentioned above - swear I think I'm speaking clearly but apparently not? The program is try and to curb the road they're on.

    (though note that prison also punishes criminals - and if a rapist or murderer or pedo is hardened [how can that even be done?] in the process, so be it).
    I think I understood your post. I just find it hard to believe that prisons today lead criminals away from crime. I'm just not convinced "rehabilitation" in prisons is a reality. Maybe that has changed in some prisons. I'd be interested in reading more about that.

    I listened to a guest lecture by a high ranking prison official at a college in the early 2000's. He told us that in his opinion prison never have nor ever will be the best place to stop crime. He strongly advocated for the idea that crime is stopped before it develops- while children are developing. He recommended that this is where our focus should be.
    "It's a sad and beautiful world"
    -Roberto Benigni

  • brianlux said:

    hedonist said:

    brianlux said:

    hedonist said:

    I've been watching an ep of Beyond Scared Straight - punkass kids thrust into the prison environment with the hope they'll have the shit scared straight out of them. Not just "black or brown" - a whole cornucopia of colors.

    Seems much of it comes from environment, lack of structure, lack of guidance (despite attempts of the parent[s]). Many components, no way an either/or situation.

    (sorry if I should've somehow posted this as a question)

    I've always been under the impression that prison turns criminals into more hardened criminals, not less. Is something going on there that I'm not aware of?

    Oh and this: let's officially drop the "requirement" to ask questions here (though I still encourage the notion that asking the right questions can do a lot to leading to the best solutions). That was a statement. :wink:

    Yes, that's the point of the process in this case as I mentioned above - swear I think I'm speaking clearly but apparently not? The program is try and to curb the road they're on.

    (though note that prison also punishes criminals - and if a rapist or murderer or pedo is hardened [how can that even be done?] in the process, so be it).
    I think I understood your post. I just find it hard to believe that prisons today lead criminals away from crime. I'm just not convinced "rehabilitation" in prisons is a reality. Maybe that has changed in some prisons. I'd be interested in reading more about that.

    I listened to a guest lecture by a high ranking prison official at a college in the early 2000's. He told us that in his opinion prison never have nor ever will be the best place to stop crime. He strongly advocated for the idea that crime is stopped before it develops- while children are developing. He recommended that this is where our focus should be.
    Prison won't stop crime but it will surely reduce it.
  • hedonist
    hedonist Posts: 24,524
    OK, nope. This is what I was posting about to begin with!

    I'm talking about introducing kids who are on that road to the potential prison life may keep them away from it.

    Guess I don't see prison as solely for rehabilitation. Someone's doing 30 to life for a horrific crime? Yeah, not so worried about them healing as I am keeping them the hell away from good people.
  • brianlux
    brianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 43,663
    hedonist said:

    OK, nope. This is what I was posting about to begin with!

    I'm talking about introducing kids who are on that road to the potential prison life may keep them away from it.

    Guess I don't see prison as solely for rehabilitation. Someone's doing 30 to life for a horrific crime? Yeah, not so worried about them healing as I am keeping them the hell away from good people.

    OK, I see! Yeah, that might be a good tactic. I think the other side of that is nurturing and loving kids and helping them feel confident and safe.
    "It's a sad and beautiful world"
    -Roberto Benigni

  • oftenreading
    oftenreading Victoria, BC Posts: 12,856
    Unfortunately, all the evidence that we have on so called scared straight programs is that they don't work. They do not reduce the risk that those youth will go on to commit more crime; in fact, where they have any effect it is the opposite.

    As much as the "tough on crime" people hate to admit it, we already have good evidence for how to reduce criminal recidivism, and it does not include longer, harsher sentences.
    my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
  • hedonist
    hedonist Posts: 24,524
    Yeah, within the "recaps" at the end of the show, there are many whose paths haven't changed; in fact, there was one young man who was killed shortly after. But, there are a handful where it seems, at least, they saw the light.
  • my2hands
    my2hands Posts: 17,117
    deagator3 said:



    Now, how many violent, high risk altercations do police officers have every year? I'd imagine the majority of those end peacefully. Sometimes the officers have no choice, and yes, sometimes the officers make mistakes and a tragedy occurs. You are dealing with high risk, high stress situations; human error will play a factor. But unfortunately that doesn't fit into a inflammatory narrative.

    bingo
  • pjalive21
    pjalive21 St. Louis, MO Posts: 2,818
    lack of understanding of others, lack of compassion, lacking the value of life, not respecting one another
  • JWPearl
    JWPearl Posts: 19,893
    It's bc people get off on it now
    It's a passion
  • catefrances
    catefrances Posts: 29,003
    brianlux said:

    We all have reactions to, and most of us have opinions with regard to the many various killings that are the subject of all the numerous reports we've read and seemingly endless threads we posted on here. But maybe instead of simply responding, perhaps it is time to start asking the right question, some of the answers to which might lead to solutions. Good detective work, good science, good research, all start with asking the right questions. So let's see some good questions that might lead to some useful answers as to how to lessen all the killing going on, not just in Dallas, not just in the US, but all over.

    Here's the question that came to my mind today:

    If black people in America were not being killed without reason by some (emphasis some) law enforcement officers or killed when other measures could have been taken first, would the tragic shooting deaths of five police officers who we're just doing their job in Dallas on 7/7/16 have occurred? (Don't read between the lines. I'm just asking the question.)

    brianlux said:

    We all have reactions to, and most of us have opinions with regard to the many various killings that are the subject of all the numerous reports we've read and seemingly endless threads we posted on here. But maybe instead of simply responding, perhaps it is time to start asking the right question, some of the answers to which might lead to solutions. Good detective work, good science, good research, all start with asking the right questions. So let's see some good questions that might lead to some useful answers as to how to lessen all the killing going on, not just in Dallas, not just in the US, but all over.

    Here's the question that came to my mind today:

    If black people in America were not being killed without reason by some (emphasis some) law enforcement officers or killed when other measures could have been taken first, would the tragic shooting deaths of five police officers who we're just doing their job in Dallas on 7/7/16 have occurred? (Don't read between the lines. I'm just asking the question.)


    I think so.
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • catefrances
    catefrances Posts: 29,003

    Why can't we all just get along?

    because when it comes down to it, we humans are just like every other predator on this planet. we prey on the weak and vulnerable and we pretend we above animalistic urges we try so hard to repress. we like to think were above the actions of the rest of the animal kingdom we label savage, barbaric, horrifying. but the way I see it, we are so much worse. I like to think we know better, but deep down I know we are a lost cause. in the west we offer condolences when our brethren in paris or nice or London become the victims of so called terrorism yet when the same actions happen in Istanbul or we justify it in our minds as somehow understandable afterall thats what those countries are like, right? theyre not like us, right? somehow we cant seem to identify with every other human on the planet, just a select few. I don't know why that is, but I see it as a massive liability. I see our collective amnesia about our shared history as a liability too. our so called democratic governments that we allegedly elect to act in our names continually act in a manner that is detrimental to not only the people who elected them but to the rest of the planet as well and quite possibly the universe. we get so excited when a new planet is discovered that we may one colonise as if we have this desperate need to leave this one and fuck up another. I see capitalism as both the carrot dangled in front of the nose of the donkeys and as a chance for so much good yet failing to deliver on the promise. I see monarchy as the most ridiculous form of governance in the history of mankind and I see theocracies as a blight on the soul of all humanity. if history has shown us anything it is that mankind cannot get along.. we never have. the first time a human picked up a weapon and whacked his mate over head for what was no doubt a stupid and probably selfish reason was the moment the race of man was doomed. we are a violent species. we will continue to be a violent species and no amount of soul searching or logical thinking will change that. we are selfish, we are loud, we are destructive, we are our own worst enemy, we are this planets worse enemy. we are so myopic that when we speak of the destruction of the planet what we are really trying to speak of is the extinction of the human species yet we can not bring ourselves to say that lest we acknowledge our own place in that destruction.
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,473

    Why can't we all just get along?

    because when it comes down to it, we humans are just like every other predator on this planet. we prey on the weak and vulnerable and we pretend we above animalistic urges we try so hard to repress. we like to think were above the actions of the rest of the animal kingdom we label savage, barbaric, horrifying. but the way I see it, we are so much worse. I like to think we know better, but deep down I know we are a lost cause. in the west we offer condolences when our brethren in paris or nice or London become the victims of so called terrorism yet when the same actions happen in Istanbul or we justify it in our minds as somehow understandable afterall thats what those countries are like, right? theyre not like us, right? somehow we cant seem to identify with every other human on the planet, just a select few. I don't know why that is, but I see it as a massive liability. I see our collective amnesia about our shared history as a liability too. our so called democratic governments that we allegedly elect to act in our names continually act in a manner that is detrimental to not only the people who elected them but to the rest of the planet as well and quite possibly the universe. we get so excited when a new planet is discovered that we may one colonise as if we have this desperate need to leave this one and fuck up another. I see capitalism as both the carrot dangled in front of the nose of the donkeys and as a chance for so much good yet failing to deliver on the promise. I see monarchy as the most ridiculous form of governance in the history of mankind and I see theocracies as a blight on the soul of all humanity. if history has shown us anything it is that mankind cannot get along.. we never have. the first time a human picked up a weapon and whacked his mate over head for what was no doubt a stupid and probably selfish reason was the moment the race of man was doomed. we are a violent species. we will continue to be a violent species and no amount of soul searching or logical thinking will change that. we are selfish, we are loud, we are destructive, we are our own worst enemy, we are this planets worse enemy. we are so myopic that when we speak of the destruction of the planet what we are really trying to speak of is the extinction of the human species yet we can not bring ourselves to say that lest we acknowledge our own place in that destruction.
    :clap:
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • Go Beavers
    Go Beavers Posts: 9,559

    Why can't we all just get along?

    because when it comes down to it, we humans are just like every other predator on this planet. we prey on the weak and vulnerable and we pretend we above animalistic urges we try so hard to repress. we like to think were above the actions of the rest of the animal kingdom we label savage, barbaric, horrifying. but the way I see it, we are so much worse. I like to think we know better, but deep down I know we are a lost cause. in the west we offer condolences when our brethren in paris or nice or London become the victims of so called terrorism yet when the same actions happen in Istanbul or we justify it in our minds as somehow understandable afterall thats what those countries are like, right? theyre not like us, right? somehow we cant seem to identify with every other human on the planet, just a select few. I don't know why that is, but I see it as a massive liability. I see our collective amnesia about our shared history as a liability too. our so called democratic governments that we allegedly elect to act in our names continually act in a manner that is detrimental to not only the people who elected them but to the rest of the planet as well and quite possibly the universe. we get so excited when a new planet is discovered that we may one colonise as if we have this desperate need to leave this one and fuck up another. I see capitalism as both the carrot dangled in front of the nose of the donkeys and as a chance for so much good yet failing to deliver on the promise. I see monarchy as the most ridiculous form of governance in the history of mankind and I see theocracies as a blight on the soul of all humanity. if history has shown us anything it is that mankind cannot get along.. we never have. the first time a human picked up a weapon and whacked his mate over head for what was no doubt a stupid and probably selfish reason was the moment the race of man was doomed. we are a violent species. we will continue to be a violent species and no amount of soul searching or logical thinking will change that. we are selfish, we are loud, we are destructive, we are our own worst enemy, we are this planets worse enemy. we are so myopic that when we speak of the destruction of the planet what we are really trying to speak of is the extinction of the human species yet we can not bring ourselves to say that lest we acknowledge our own place in that destruction.
    Some good points, but I disagree on one. I think we get along better now than at any other point in human history.
  • brianlux
    brianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 43,663

    Why can't we all just get along?

    because when it comes down to it, we humans are just like every other predator on this planet. we prey on the weak and vulnerable and we pretend we above animalistic urges we try so hard to repress. we like to think were above the actions of the rest of the animal kingdom we label savage, barbaric, horrifying. but the way I see it, we are so much worse. I like to think we know better, but deep down I know we are a lost cause. in the west we offer condolences when our brethren in paris or nice or London become the victims of so called terrorism yet when the same actions happen in Istanbul or we justify it in our minds as somehow understandable afterall thats what those countries are like, right? theyre not like us, right? somehow we cant seem to identify with every other human on the planet, just a select few. I don't know why that is, but I see it as a massive liability. I see our collective amnesia about our shared history as a liability too. our so called democratic governments that we allegedly elect to act in our names continually act in a manner that is detrimental to not only the people who elected them but to the rest of the planet as well and quite possibly the universe. we get so excited when a new planet is discovered that we may one colonise as if we have this desperate need to leave this one and fuck up another. I see capitalism as both the carrot dangled in front of the nose of the donkeys and as a chance for so much good yet failing to deliver on the promise. I see monarchy as the most ridiculous form of governance in the history of mankind and I see theocracies as a blight on the soul of all humanity. if history has shown us anything it is that mankind cannot get along.. we never have. the first time a human picked up a weapon and whacked his mate over head for what was no doubt a stupid and probably selfish reason was the moment the race of man was doomed. we are a violent species. we will continue to be a violent species and no amount of soul searching or logical thinking will change that. we are selfish, we are loud, we are destructive, we are our own worst enemy, we are this planets worse enemy. we are so myopic that when we speak of the destruction of the planet what we are really trying to speak of is the extinction of the human species yet we can not bring ourselves to say that lest we acknowledge our own place in that destruction.
    It's not hard to have these feeling and it is difficult to argue against what you say here, Cate, but I will throw out that I read somewhere that at some point in history Japan went through a 700 year period of peace and if that's true, perhaps under the right circumstances we could learn to be peaceful. Yet if we can't or won't use of big brains to figure out how to live in peace then maybe we deserve what we get which is self-annihilation (both through war and through environmental degradation). I keep pushing for the notion that with the right education we are capable of survival and peace.
    "It's a sad and beautiful world"
    -Roberto Benigni

  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,473
    "it's in your nature to destroy yourselves"
    Terminator
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.