What the hell happen in Virginia??
Comments
-
I looked further into it. The US is by far the worst for gun deaths in the economic leaders of the world, and it 12th in the world overall, only beaten out in places where gang crime is raging out of control and/or where there is war and ongoing extreme conflict. So Mexico and Colombia, Brazil and Panama beat them because of the drug cartels (in all cases most deaths are within the criminal gangs). Panama specifically has basically no gun regulation btw, and same with several of the others listed btwn and apparently the citizens of Panama are begging for it. Where there are regulations the deaths are almost completely restricted to criminal activity). Swasiland beat the US, as does South Africa, the Phillipines, and some other third world countries that I can't recall.
But the US still beats all of those strife - ridden developing nations that should never share a list with a country like the USA in terms of violence and crime but do anyway (and any American should be horrified by just that): the US beats the pants off of all other countries in the world when it comes to school shootings.
I would say that one thing that this all tells us is that population has absolutely nothing to do with gun deaths. It is ALL about culture and about a lot of people being out of control within a nation. That the USA is one of those nations, considering it's relative privilege and wealth and position in the world and relative political and economic stability and high standard of living, is absolutely mind boggling, and totally indefensible.Post edited by PJ_Soul onWith all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
You've said something here that begs repeating: it 'seems' that many of the US gun deaths are average joes. While Mexico features several deaths of the grotesque variety... from what I can gather... these deaths are cartel related and victims most often are gang members or police officers.PJ_Soul said:I looked further into it. The US is by far the worst for gun deaths in the economic leaders of the world, and it 12th in the world overall, only beaten out in places where gang crime is raging out of control and/or where there is war and ongoing extreme conflict. So Mexico and Colombia, Brazil and Panama beat them because of the drug cartels (in all cases most deaths are within the criminal gangs). Panama specifically has basically no gun regulation btw, and smae with severalmof the others losted btw. Where there are regulations the deaths are almost completely restricted to criminal activity). Swasiland beat the US, as does South Africa, the Phillipines, and some other third world countries that I can't recall.
But the US still beats all of those strife - ridden developing nations that should never share a list with a country like the USA in terms of violence and crime but do anyway (and any American should be horrified by just that): the US beats the pants off of all other countries in the world when it comes to school shootings.
While it definitely has its share of gang violence contributing to a large portion of its 20,000 gun homicides per annum... the US yields countless cases where neighbours are shooting their neighbours (so to speak). I'm not sure other countries exhibit the same trait to the same degree.
I feel this is because the US is the most armed country in the world per capita. It's number one and echoing which Dimi said in a post about 10 back... more guns=more deaths by guns.
Period."My brain's a good brain!"0 -
The US is an economic leader but also has piss poor social programs and the biggest gap between poor and rich.PJ_Soul said:I looked further into it. The US is by far the worst for gun deaths in the economic leaders of the world, and it 12th in the world overall, only beaten out in places where gang crime is raging out of control and/or where there is war and ongoing extreme conflict. So Mexico and Colombia, Brazil and Panama beat them because of the drug cartels (in all cases most deaths are within the criminal gangs). Panama specifically has basically no gun regulation btw, and same with several of the others listed btwn and apparently the citizens of Panama are begging for it. Where there are regulations the deaths are almost completely restricted to criminal activity). Swasiland beat the US, as does South Africa, the Phillipines, and some other third world countries that I can't recall.
But the US still beats all of those strife - ridden developing nations that should never share a list with a country like the USA in terms of violence and crime but do anyway (and any American should be horrified by just that): the US beats the pants off of all other countries in the world when it comes to school shootings.
I would say that one thing that this all tells us is that population has absolutely nothing to do with gun deaths. It is ALL about culture and about a lot of people being out of control within a nation. That the USA is one of those nations, considering it's relative privilege and wealth and position in the world and relative political and economic stability and high standard of living, is absolutely mind boggling, and totally indefensible.
We let our insane/mental people roam the streets(they aren't the ones doing the shootings I know that)
We have the worst vacation practices compared to other "developed" countries, maternity laws, etc. etc.
I believe all these factors have a significant impact on a culture.
0 -
That he was fired from a job and police had to be there and the building had to be cleared when he cleaned out his desk? The lawsuits he filed for discrimination? The several complaints to HR?tempo_n_groove said:
Question?Last-12-Exit said:
Of course they wouldn't have helped. The background checks don't do enough. But they can. This guy could have been stopped from legally buying a gun.mcgruff10 said:interesting: By Dave Boyer - The Washington Times - Friday, August 28, 2015
The White House conceded Friday that new gun regulations probably wouldn’t have prevented the gunman who murdered two television journalists in southwestern Virginia this week.
White House press secretary Josh Earnest said it appears that a proposal championed by President Obama to require background checks on purchases at gun shows “would not have applied in this particular case.”
What would would have been a "red flag" in the background check for this guy? Just Curious?
If background checks could be detailed, this could have prevented him from legally buying that gun.0 -
You are tip toeing into very dangerous territory with said background checks.Last-12-Exit said:
That he was fired from a job and police had to be there and the building had to be cleared when he cleaned out his desk? The lawsuits he filed for discrimination? The several complaints to HR?tempo_n_groove said:
Question?Last-12-Exit said:
Of course they wouldn't have helped. The background checks don't do enough. But they can. This guy could have been stopped from legally buying a gun.mcgruff10 said:interesting: By Dave Boyer - The Washington Times - Friday, August 28, 2015
The White House conceded Friday that new gun regulations probably wouldn’t have prevented the gunman who murdered two television journalists in southwestern Virginia this week.
White House press secretary Josh Earnest said it appears that a proposal championed by President Obama to require background checks on purchases at gun shows “would not have applied in this particular case.”
What would would have been a "red flag" in the background check for this guy? Just Curious?
If background checks could be detailed, this could have prevented him from legally buying that gun.
If I got slandered by someone and it goes on a "report" then I can't own a gun?
Everything you just listed can then be used against you.0 -
No, I didn't say that. But if you take all of those things, does that not equal one red flag?tempo_n_groove said:
You are tip toeing into very dangerous territory with said background checks.Last-12-Exit said:
That he was fired from a job and police had to be there and the building had to be cleared when he cleaned out his desk? The lawsuits he filed for discrimination? The several complaints to HR?tempo_n_groove said:
Question?Last-12-Exit said:
Of course they wouldn't have helped. The background checks don't do enough. But they can. This guy could have been stopped from legally buying a gun.mcgruff10 said:interesting: By Dave Boyer - The Washington Times - Friday, August 28, 2015
The White House conceded Friday that new gun regulations probably wouldn’t have prevented the gunman who murdered two television journalists in southwestern Virginia this week.
White House press secretary Josh Earnest said it appears that a proposal championed by President Obama to require background checks on purchases at gun shows “would not have applied in this particular case.”
What would would have been a "red flag" in the background check for this guy? Just Curious?
If background checks could be detailed, this could have prevented him from legally buying that gun.
If I got slandered by someone and it goes on a "report" then I can't own a gun?
Everything you just listed can then be used against you.0 -
Right on.tempo_n_groove said:
The US is an economic leader but also has piss poor social programs and the biggest gap between poor and rich.
We let our insane/mental people roam the streets(they aren't the ones doing the shootings I know that)
We have the worst vacation practices compared to other "developed" countries, maternity laws, etc. etc.
I believe all these factors have a significant impact on a culture.
Please, Pearl Jam, consider a Benaroya Hall vinyl reissue! http://community.pearljam.com/discussion/148993/please-pearl-jam-consider-a-vinyl-benaroya-hall-re-issue0 -
In Hindsight, yes.Last-12-Exit said:
No, I didn't say that. But if you take all of those things, does that not equal one red flag?tempo_n_groove said:
You are tip toeing into very dangerous territory with said background checks.Last-12-Exit said:
That he was fired from a job and police had to be there and the building had to be cleared when he cleaned out his desk? The lawsuits he filed for discrimination? The several complaints to HR?tempo_n_groove said:
Question?Last-12-Exit said:
Of course they wouldn't have helped. The background checks don't do enough. But they can. This guy could have been stopped from legally buying a gun.mcgruff10 said:interesting: By Dave Boyer - The Washington Times - Friday, August 28, 2015
The White House conceded Friday that new gun regulations probably wouldn’t have prevented the gunman who murdered two television journalists in southwestern Virginia this week.
White House press secretary Josh Earnest said it appears that a proposal championed by President Obama to require background checks on purchases at gun shows “would not have applied in this particular case.”
What would would have been a "red flag" in the background check for this guy? Just Curious?
If background checks could be detailed, this could have prevented him from legally buying that gun.
If I got slandered by someone and it goes on a "report" then I can't own a gun?
Everything you just listed can then be used against you.
For everyone, no.
I don't have a formula for a thorough enough background check. That would scare way too many people.
0 -
tempo_n_groove said:
The US is an economic leader but also has piss poor social programs and the biggest gap between poor and rich.PJ_Soul said:I looked further into it. The US is by far the worst for gun deaths in the economic leaders of the world, and it 12th in the world overall, only beaten out in places where gang crime is raging out of control and/or where there is war and ongoing extreme conflict. So Mexico and Colombia, Brazil and Panama beat them because of the drug cartels (in all cases most deaths are within the criminal gangs). Panama specifically has basically no gun regulation btw, and same with several of the others listed btwn and apparently the citizens of Panama are begging for it. Where there are regulations the deaths are almost completely restricted to criminal activity). Swasiland beat the US, as does South Africa, the Phillipines, and some other third world countries that I can't recall.
But the US still beats all of those strife - ridden developing nations that should never share a list with a country like the USA in terms of violence and crime but do anyway (and any American should be horrified by just that): the US beats the pants off of all other countries in the world when it comes to school shootings.
I would say that one thing that this all tells us is that population has absolutely nothing to do with gun deaths. It is ALL about culture and about a lot of people being out of control within a nation. That the USA is one of those nations, considering it's relative privilege and wealth and position in the world and relative political and economic stability and high standard of living, is absolutely mind boggling, and totally indefensible.
We let our insane/mental people roam the streets(they aren't the ones doing the shootings I know that)
We have the worst vacation practices compared to other "developed" countries, maternity laws, etc. etc.
I believe all these factors have a significant impact on a culture.The USA still has a very high quality of life compared to most countries, and the huge gap in wealth isn't because everyone is poor. It's because the rich are so dammed rich. I know the middle class is shrinking, but Americans still live in much greater comfort and luxury than most. I also believe that you are fooling yourself about the social support etc etc if you're comparing to the rest of the world. Sure, some first world nations beat the US there. But there are hundreds of countries thst are way worse, and only 11 of them have more gun deaths than the US.
I really do think you're just trying to make excuses here. The obvious distinction in the US is a very unique obsession with guns. Not all the other stuff you're bringing up. And i son's think the things you mention can be used to explain that obsession either. I think what explains the obsession is YEEEEEEE HAAAAAAW! U-S-A!! The 2nd Amendment, Whoohoo! From my cold dead hands! .... if you get what I mean. Gun culture.
Post edited by PJ_Soul onWith all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
That list up above that someone posted. Look at all those countries and tell me which one has worse social practices than the US…PJ_Soul said:tempo_n_groove said:
The US is an economic leader but also has piss poor social programs and the biggest gap between poor and rich.PJ_Soul said:I looked further into it. The US is by far the worst for gun deaths in the economic leaders of the world, and it 12th in the world overall, only beaten out in places where gang crime is raging out of control and/or where there is war and ongoing extreme conflict. So Mexico and Colombia, Brazil and Panama beat them because of the drug cartels (in all cases most deaths are within the criminal gangs). Panama specifically has basically no gun regulation btw, and same with several of the others listed btwn and apparently the citizens of Panama are begging for it. Where there are regulations the deaths are almost completely restricted to criminal activity). Swasiland beat the US, as does South Africa, the Phillipines, and some other third world countries that I can't recall.
But the US still beats all of those strife - ridden developing nations that should never share a list with a country like the USA in terms of violence and crime but do anyway (and any American should be horrified by just that): the US beats the pants off of all other countries in the world when it comes to school shootings.
I would say that one thing that this all tells us is that population has absolutely nothing to do with gun deaths. It is ALL about culture and about a lot of people being out of control within a nation. That the USA is one of those nations, considering it's relative privilege and wealth and position in the world and relative political and economic stability and high standard of living, is absolutely mind boggling, and totally indefensible.
We let our insane/mental people roam the streets(they aren't the ones doing the shootings I know that)
We have the worst vacation practices compared to other "developed" countries, maternity laws, etc. etc.
I believe all these factors have a significant impact on a culture.The USA still has a very high quality of life compared to most countries, and the huge gap in wealth isn't because everyone is poor. It's because the rich are so dammed rich. I know the middle class is shrinking, but Americans still live in much greater comfort and luxury than most. I also believe that you are fooling yourself about the social support etc etc if you're comparing to the rest of the world. Sure, some first world nations beat the US there. But there are hundreds of countries thst are way worse, and only 11 of them have more gun deaths than the US.
I really do think you're just trying to make excuses here. The obvious distinction in the US is a very unique obsession with guns. Not all the other stuff you're bringing up. And i son's think the things you mention can be used to explain that obsession either. I think what explains the obsession is YEEEEEEE HAAAAAAW! U-S-A!! The 2nd Amendment, Whoohoo! From my cold dead hands! .... if you get what I mean. Gun culture.
I do agree that the US has a love for guns. No doubt about it. Never disagreed with that.
I'm also looking at it from a completely different view that everyone wants to just dismiss.
There is definitely something wrong with a society as a whole when you feel the urge to go on a killing spree.
0 -
.Post edited by Leezestarr313 onPlease, Pearl Jam, consider a Benaroya Hall vinyl reissue! http://community.pearljam.com/discussion/148993/please-pearl-jam-consider-a-vinyl-benaroya-hall-re-issue0
-
I'm curious to know how many here on the PJ forum have actually been the victim of a violent crime. I have had friends/family murdered, stabbed, raped and beaten while going through their day to day routines. Once something like that happens to you or someone you love, you realize that the police are there to solve crimes after they happen. It is not their responsibility to prevent these things, all that is required of them is to conduct an investigation and (hopefully) arrest those responsible.
The sad fact is that many American's realize that they have to be their own first-responders thus explaining the perceived need for guns for protection.
Those of you that haven't had their lives personally violated by the violent acts of other's, I envy you.
I truly wish that violence is something that becomes relegated to the past, but until then it is our responsibility as citizens of this country to determine what makes someone want to act out in violent ways in the first place.
Gun violence is a symptom of a much bigger and deeper disease that has infected our media and collective culture.
Post edited by dudeman onIf hope can grow from dirt like me, it can be done. - EV0 -
I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0
-
I am talking about the 11 countries that are worse than the US. The USA has no business being amongst those numbers.tempo_n_groove said:
That list up above that someone posted. Look at all those countries and tell me which one has worse social practices than the US…PJ_Soul said:tempo_n_groove said:
The US is an economic leader but also has piss poor social programs and the biggest gap between poor and rich.PJ_Soul said:I looked further into it. The US is by far the worst for gun deaths in the economic leaders of the world, and it 12th in the world overall, only beaten out in places where gang crime is raging out of control and/or where there is war and ongoing extreme conflict. So Mexico and Colombia, Brazil and Panama beat them because of the drug cartels (in all cases most deaths are within the criminal gangs). Panama specifically has basically no gun regulation btw, and same with several of the others listed btwn and apparently the citizens of Panama are begging for it. Where there are regulations the deaths are almost completely restricted to criminal activity). Swasiland beat the US, as does South Africa, the Phillipines, and some other third world countries that I can't recall.
But the US still beats all of those strife - ridden developing nations that should never share a list with a country like the USA in terms of violence and crime but do anyway (and any American should be horrified by just that): the US beats the pants off of all other countries in the world when it comes to school shootings.
I would say that one thing that this all tells us is that population has absolutely nothing to do with gun deaths. It is ALL about culture and about a lot of people being out of control within a nation. That the USA is one of those nations, considering it's relative privilege and wealth and position in the world and relative political and economic stability and high standard of living, is absolutely mind boggling, and totally indefensible.
We let our insane/mental people roam the streets(they aren't the ones doing the shootings I know that)
We have the worst vacation practices compared to other "developed" countries, maternity laws, etc. etc.
I believe all these factors have a significant impact on a culture.The USA still has a very high quality of life compared to most countries, and the huge gap in wealth isn't because everyone is poor. It's because the rich are so dammed rich. I know the middle class is shrinking, but Americans still live in much greater comfort and luxury than most. I also believe that you are fooling yourself about the social support etc etc if you're comparing to the rest of the world. Sure, some first world nations beat the US there. But there are hundreds of countries thst are way worse, and only 11 of them have more gun deaths than the US.
I really do think you're just trying to make excuses here. The obvious distinction in the US is a very unique obsession with guns. Not all the other stuff you're bringing up. And i son's think the things you mention can be used to explain that obsession either. I think what explains the obsession is YEEEEEEE HAAAAAAW! U-S-A!! The 2nd Amendment, Whoohoo! From my cold dead hands! .... if you get what I mean. Gun culture.
I do agree that the US has a love for guns. No doubt about it. Never disagreed with that.
I'm also looking at it from a completely different view that everyone wants to just dismiss.
There is definitely something wrong with a society as a whole when you feel the urge to go on a killing spree.With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
I read a quote today attributed to Mark Twain that made me think of Godfather:
As I have said before, I never had any large respect for good spelling. That is my feeling yet. Before the spelling book came with its arbitrary forms, men unconsciously revealed shades of their characters, and also added enlightening shades of expression to what they wrote by their spelling, and so it is possible that the spelling book has been a doubtful benevolence to us.
I think GF has been unconsciously revealing his character here for a long time. Mellow drama indeed.my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0 -
I think also consciously - and I appreciate it from anyone who shows themselves. It don't come easy.
GF knows where I stand, and it's reciprocated from his end.
Dude may make meat times...fuck knows I've done the same to many - but I've also come to know aspects which I find honest, thoughtful and willing to re-examine stances and laugh at himself in the process.
Anyway...mellow here. No drama. And if GF is willing to PM me his address, I shall send him one big motherfucker of a dictionary
0 -
^^^
Sorry GF but it is funny considering even your signature has a spelling errors in it.
"it dosen't matter to me what a man dose for a living you understand..
as long as his interest's don't conflict with mine".0 -
It's laughable the bias the author shows by criticizing the surveys bias.mcgruff10 said:0 -
And back to my first question... What is their population?PJ_Soul said:
I am talking about the 11 countries that are worse than the US. The USA has no business being amongst those numbers.tempo_n_groove said:
That list up above that someone posted. Look at all those countries and tell me which one has worse social practices than the US…PJ_Soul said:tempo_n_groove said:
The US is an economic leader but also has piss poor social programs and the biggest gap between poor and rich.PJ_Soul said:I looked further into it. The US is by far the worst for gun deaths in the economic leaders of the world, and it 12th in the world overall, only beaten out in places where gang crime is raging out of control and/or where there is war and ongoing extreme conflict. So Mexico and Colombia, Brazil and Panama beat them because of the drug cartels (in all cases most deaths are within the criminal gangs). Panama specifically has basically no gun regulation btw, and same with several of the others listed btwn and apparently the citizens of Panama are begging for it. Where there are regulations the deaths are almost completely restricted to criminal activity). Swasiland beat the US, as does South Africa, the Phillipines, and some other third world countries that I can't recall.
But the US still beats all of those strife - ridden developing nations that should never share a list with a country like the USA in terms of violence and crime but do anyway (and any American should be horrified by just that): the US beats the pants off of all other countries in the world when it comes to school shootings.
I would say that one thing that this all tells us is that population has absolutely nothing to do with gun deaths. It is ALL about culture and about a lot of people being out of control within a nation. That the USA is one of those nations, considering it's relative privilege and wealth and position in the world and relative political and economic stability and high standard of living, is absolutely mind boggling, and totally indefensible.
We let our insane/mental people roam the streets(they aren't the ones doing the shootings I know that)
We have the worst vacation practices compared to other "developed" countries, maternity laws, etc. etc.
I believe all these factors have a significant impact on a culture.The USA still has a very high quality of life compared to most countries, and the huge gap in wealth isn't because everyone is poor. It's because the rich are so dammed rich. I know the middle class is shrinking, but Americans still live in much greater comfort and luxury than most. I also believe that you are fooling yourself about the social support etc etc if you're comparing to the rest of the world. Sure, some first world nations beat the US there. But there are hundreds of countries thst are way worse, and only 11 of them have more gun deaths than the US.
I really do think you're just trying to make excuses here. The obvious distinction in the US is a very unique obsession with guns. Not all the other stuff you're bringing up. And i son's think the things you mention can be used to explain that obsession either. I think what explains the obsession is YEEEEEEE HAAAAAAW! U-S-A!! The 2nd Amendment, Whoohoo! From my cold dead hands! .... if you get what I mean. Gun culture.
I do agree that the US has a love for guns. No doubt about it. Never disagreed with that.
I'm also looking at it from a completely different view that everyone wants to just dismiss.
There is definitely something wrong with a society as a whole when you feel the urge to go on a killing spree.
This dance will go on forever...0 -
Don't get me wrong; no disrespect was meant to GF. In fact, I think he's on to something....hedonist said:I think also consciously - and I appreciate it from anyone who shows themselves. It don't come easy.
GF knows where I stand, and it's reciprocated from his end.
Dude may make meat times...fuck knows I've done the same to many - but I've also come to know aspects which I find honest, thoughtful and willing to re-examine stances and laugh at himself in the process.
Anyway...mellow here. No drama. And if GF is willing to PM me his address, I shall send him one big motherfucker of a dictionarymy small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.9K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help