Police shooting in North Charleston
Regardless of the answers, this story won't be in the news long. The evidence is clear. Even without the video, it would be hard not to press charges on the cop. 8 shots in the back is hard thing to defend. I've been hearing for years the problems with the police in North Charleston. The mayor has pushed this on the back burner several times in the past few years. This is not the first time a cop here has killed someone.
Comments
-
Its disgusting
Its murder
That ex-cop can now go spend the rest of his life, rotting in prison.Take me piece by piece.....
Till there aint nothing left worth taking away from me.....0 -
I need to know the skin color of the people involved before I can give an educated opinion.if you think what I believe is stupid, bizarre, ridiculous or outrageous.....it's ok, I think I had a brain tumor when I wrote that.0
-
Guessgoingtoverona said:I need to know the skin color of the people involved before I can give an educated opinion.
0 -
That press conference said nothing.0
-
It really is disturbing that the cop shot 8 times. Once he made the decision to shoot, was 3 not enough? There obviously was no danger to the cop or the public.0
-
thats unfortunategoingtoverona said:I need to know the skin color of the people involved before I can give an educated opinion.
0 -
The victim's brother spoke so eloquently, so calmly, and made a point of acknowledging the officers who do good work.
Class act.0 -
Yeah saw that total class ...hedonist said:The victim's brother spoke so eloquently, so calmly, and made a point of acknowledging the officers who do good work.
Class act.jesus greets me looks just like me ....0 -
I have yet to hear anyone ask or anyone say why they were about 2 blocks away from the original traffic stop in the first place.0
-
The guy who shot the video said that before he started recording, the cop was tasing Scott and had him on the ground and had control of him. As scott was getting up, he started recording and we saw the rest.0
-
Heard part of this on my ride home. Just watched the video. Agreed Last 12. I haven't heard/read the whole story - why was he stopped? Does the police not run anymore? Danger?Oh please let it rain today.
Those that can be trusted can change their mind.0 -
He was stopped for a broken tail light from what I've heard. I still haven't heard or read much more than that.FoxyRedLa said:Heard part of this on my ride home. Just watched the video. Agreed Last 12. I haven't heard/read the whole story - why was he stopped? Does the police not run anymore? Danger?
0 -
Hmmm....how do you end up outside your vehicle for that kind of a traffic stop? We'll prolly never hear why he asked him to exit the vehicle and so on.Oh please let it rain today.
Those that can be trusted can change their mind.0 -
According to the mayor, there is a second video that has not been released yet. It's the officers dash cam. That should shed some light on that question.0
-
I wonder whats the delay in releasing this video. Unless it's gonna be bad as well.Last-12-Exit said:According to the mayor, there is a second video that has not been released yet. It's the officers dash cam. That should shed some light on that question.
0 -
The video seems to corroborate that account. After several viewings I thought I saw (really not clear enough to be anything close to sure) victim on the ground as the camera shakes around as recorder gets in position... What is clear is that the cops drops/throws the taser down and then pulls his gun as the victim "runs" away. I use the quotes because he is not sprinting, and looks to my (not expert) eyes to be moving like someone might after being tased and getting up to run away.Last-12-Exit said:The guy who shot the video said that before he started recording, the cop was tasing Scott and had him on the ground and had control of him. As scott was getting up, he started recording and we saw the rest.
Did he assault the cop? Maybe he did, it's hard to tell... But does 8 shots to the back and tampering with the scene corroborate tthe claim that the officer feared for his life, or does it lend credence to the idea that this victim was the one afraid for his life??
I can easily see it being a case of the guy assaults (to some degree) the officer and the officer overreacts by shooting him in the back.
I can just as easily see this as a case of a man being harassed by an officer, trying to stand up for his legal rights, being met with a taser for insolence, and trying to get away in (rightful) fear for his life.Monkey Driven, Call this Living?0 -
We wouldn't have seen the cell phone video had the attorneys for Scott's family not released it. I'm sure SLED has plans to release the dash cam video once the case against the officer is made. It may not even be released until the trial. I would think if they release it to soon, the mighty Andy Savage could say it effected the jury pool.badbrains said:
I wonder whats the delay in releasing this video. Unless it's gonna be bad as well.Last-12-Exit said:According to the mayor, there is a second video that has not been released yet. It's the officers dash cam. That should shed some light on that question.
0 -
EIGHT shots. In the back. That's what I can't get my head around.rgambs said:
The video seems to corroborate that account. After several viewings I thought I saw (really not clear enough to be anything close to sure) victim on the ground as the camera shakes around as recorder gets in position... What is clear is that the cops drops/throws the taser down and then pulls his gun as the victim "runs" away. I use the quotes because he is not sprinting, and looks to my (not expert) eyes to be moving like someone might after being tased and getting up to run away.Last-12-Exit said:The guy who shot the video said that before he started recording, the cop was tasing Scott and had him on the ground and had control of him. As scott was getting up, he started recording and we saw the rest.
Did he assault the cop? Maybe he did, it's hard to tell... But does 8 shots to the back and tampering with the scene corroborate tthe claim that the officer feared for his life, or does it lend credence to the idea that this victim was the one afraid for his life??
I can easily see it being a case of the guy assaults (to some degree) the officer and the officer overreacts by shooting him in the back.
I can just as easily see this as a case of a man being harassed by an officer, trying to stand up for his legal rights, being met with a taser for insolence, and trying to get away in (rightful) fear for his life.
I don't believe the man was armed, either, correct?
0 -
Correct, unarmed. It's pretty brutal... The thing that gets me about these videos is that the victim never dies right away. The guy lays there slowly passing away and they just watch him die. In this case, when the next cop arrives, he rushes over and gives aid with clearly visible compassion... I can more easily understand the shooting itself (heat of the moment and all that) than the inactivity and total passivity as the victims life drains away.hedonist said:
EIGHT shots. In the back. That's what I can't get my head around.rgambs said:
The video seems to corroborate that account. After several viewings I thought I saw (really not clear enough to be anything close to sure) victim on the ground as the camera shakes around as recorder gets in position... What is clear is that the cops drops/throws the taser down and then pulls his gun as the victim "runs" away. I use the quotes because he is not sprinting, and looks to my (not expert) eyes to be moving like someone might after being tased and getting up to run away.Last-12-Exit said:The guy who shot the video said that before he started recording, the cop was tasing Scott and had him on the ground and had control of him. As scott was getting up, he started recording and we saw the rest.
Did he assault the cop? Maybe he did, it's hard to tell... But does 8 shots to the back and tampering with the scene corroborate tthe claim that the officer feared for his life, or does it lend credence to the idea that this victim was the one afraid for his life??
I can easily see it being a case of the guy assaults (to some degree) the officer and the officer overreacts by shooting him in the back.
I can just as easily see this as a case of a man being harassed by an officer, trying to stand up for his legal rights, being met with a taser for insolence, and trying to get away in (rightful) fear for his life.
I don't believe the man was armed, either, correct?Monkey Driven, Call this Living?0 -
I thought I read somewhere he ran from the traffic stop possibly due to unpaid child support warrants. That is what led them to that field. Certainly not deserving of being shot.Last-12-Exit said:
He was stopped for a broken tail light from what I've heard. I still haven't heard or read much more than that.FoxyRedLa said:Heard part of this on my ride home. Just watched the video. Agreed Last 12. I haven't heard/read the whole story - why was he stopped? Does the police not run anymore? Danger?
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.9K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 275 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help