Intolerant radical liberals getting worried

2456711

Comments

  • comebackgirl
    comebackgirl Posts: 9,885
    brianlux wrote:
    brianlux wrote:
    It cracks me how some people who label themselves conservative have a problem with Prius (or should I say, Prii?) The Prius is much more conservation oriented than, say, a Ford F250. Conservatives should love the Prius- the best car out there for conserving non-renewable resources. In fact, one of the most (politically) conservative people I know drives a Prius. He's no fool- he knows gas will just keep going up.
    Now I'm having visions of usamamasan1 driving down a dark lonely road in his Heavy (not sure what that is...but assuming it's a big truck?)...in his rearview mirror he catches sight of a Prius following closely behind him. He continues on and when he glances in the mirror again he sees the horizon is covered with Priuses (Prii?). He tries to accelerate...but his Heavy is just to heavy. Suddenly he's surrounded and comes to a stop. He looks around him and sees the drivers of the Priuses (Prii?) are all wearing Romney masks. The first driver gets out, tears off his mask and his identity is revealed: PoD! As Bu$hleaguer starts playing in the background the other drivers get out and slowly reveal their identities: whygohome, brianlux, Zoso, CBG, PJ_Soul, Drowned Out, Catefrances, Chadwick, Snakeduck, Peacefrompaul, Binaural Jam, G under P, Redrock, Gimmie, Byrnzie, Cliffy, Thirty Bills, etc etc. They all break out into dance...something out of West Side Story or the Thriller video. It's a dance off! Usamamasan1 reveals he has some formidable dance moves, but he is just outdone. He is danced into submission...his WOOT is weakened...he must succumb...he gives in a drives off in a Prius of his own...Bu$hleaguer blasting from the speakers :wave:

    Sounds like you must be having too much fun already this week end, comebackgirl! :lol::lol::lol: I love it!
    :lol: My brain is fried...and I'm sick of the same election battle being hashed out in the same way with just different words :crazy: Let the fun begin!

    BOOT!

    292d8df1b6a349c9b1fa507faf3fe257.image.120x150.jpg
    tumblr_mg4nc33pIX1s1mie8o1_400.gif

    "I need your strength for me to be strong...I need your love to feel loved"
  • comebackgirl
    comebackgirl Posts: 9,885
    pandora wrote:
    Enough excuses Barry

    There is no excuse for the $5.5 trillion in new debt over the last four years. Or for the 23 million people struggling for work. Or for the record number of Americans living in poverty. We all know this cat is one and done.

    Emoticon
    It is true...

    Obama backers don't seem to want to hear just how bad things are...
    they can't cause they are going to rehire no matter how bad it is.

    :wtf:
    Sounds like you've finally decided not to rehire
    tumblr_mg4nc33pIX1s1mie8o1_400.gif

    "I need your strength for me to be strong...I need your love to feel loved"
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 24,405
    pandora wrote:
    Enough excuses Barry

    There is no excuse for the $5.5 trillion in new debt over the last four years. Or for the 23 million people struggling for work. Or for the record number of Americans living in poverty. We all know this cat is one and done.

    Emoticon
    It is true...

    Obama backers don't seem to want to hear just how bad things are...
    they can't cause they are going to rehire no matter how bad it is.

    :wtf:
    and there you go. thank you for proving what i have been saying for weeks. more proof that you are going to vote for romney. there is no more faux waffling because you just essentially stated as such.

    i don't care who you vote for, just please stop with the "i'm so torn" routine. it is getting old.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • comebackgirl
    comebackgirl Posts: 9,885
    Serious topic.

    Eva Longoria is taking back an offensive retweet against GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney.
    The “Desperate Housewives” actress, who is co-chair in the Obama campaign, retweeted one of her followers on Wednesday, who called Romney a “tw*t” referring to a derogative name for a female private part.
    “I have no idea why any woman/minority can vote for Romney. You have to be stupid to vote for such a racist/misogynistic tw*t,” the tweet read.


    Getting worried!
    What part is serious? The part about you being chased by someone in a Prius or the part about somebody tweeting about a tw*t? :think:
    tumblr_mg4nc33pIX1s1mie8o1_400.gif

    "I need your strength for me to be strong...I need your love to feel loved"
  • pandora
    pandora Posts: 21,855
    pandora wrote:
    Enough excuses Barry

    There is no excuse for the $5.5 trillion in new debt over the last four years. Or for the 23 million people struggling for work. Or for the record number of Americans living in poverty. We all know this cat is one and done.

    Emoticon
    It is true...

    Obama backers don't seem to want to hear just how bad things are...
    they can't cause they are going to rehire no matter how bad it is.

    :wtf:
    and there you go. thank you for proving what i have been saying for weeks. more proof that you are going to vote for romney. there is no more faux waffling because you just essentially stated as such.

    i don't care who you vote for, just please stop with the "i'm so torn" routine. it is getting old.
    you really have a problem with this, it is just eating at you huh ;)

    I just posted in another that people like Obama... me too.

    This post is about how shocked I am by those who do not consider
    not voting down party lines even when the job has been less than satisfactory.

    And no I still don't know which button is being pushed,
    but you can neither believe that or understand it so why don't relieve yourself
    of this dutiful watch :lol:
  • pandora
    pandora Posts: 21,855
    pandora wrote:
    Enough excuses Barry

    There is no excuse for the $5.5 trillion in new debt over the last four years. Or for the 23 million people struggling for work. Or for the record number of Americans living in poverty. We all know this cat is one and done.

    Emoticon
    It is true...

    Obama backers don't seem to want to hear just how bad things are...
    they can't cause they are going to rehire no matter how bad it is.

    :wtf:
    Sounds like you've finally decided not to rehire


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m30mG3JK ... ure=fvwrel ;)
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 24,405
    pandora wrote:
    pandora wrote:
    It is true...

    Obama backers don't seem to want to hear just how bad things are...
    they can't cause they are going to rehire no matter how bad it is.

    :wtf:
    and there you go. thank you for proving what i have been saying for weeks. more proof that you are going to vote for romney. there is no more faux waffling because you just essentially stated as such.

    i don't care who you vote for, just please stop with the "i'm so torn" routine. it is getting old.
    you really have a problem with this, it is just eating at you huh ;)

    I just posted in another that people like Obama... me too.

    This post is about how shocked I am by those who do not consider
    not voting down party lines even when the job has been less than satisfactory.

    And no I still don't know which button is being pushed,
    but you can neither believe that or understand it so why don't relieve yourself
    of this dutiful watch :lol:
    no buy it is annoying to see the one undecided voter on here seemingly asking for attention.

    please stop with the waffling. this is 2 threads this afternoon that you essentially stated as such..
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • pandora
    pandora Posts: 21,855
    no buy it is annoying to see the one undecided voter on here seemingly asking for attention.

    please stop with the waffling. this is 2 threads this afternoon that you essentially stated as such..
    attention please...
    I post my opinion like anyone else and it seems you're the only one paying attention ;)

    I will not stop till the button is pushed ...
    but it certainly seems you'd like me to vote Red
    wonder why?
  • whygohome
    whygohome Posts: 2,305
    pandora wrote:
    Enough excuses Barry

    There is no excuse for the $5.5 trillion in new debt over the last four years. Or for the 23 million people struggling for work. Or for the record number of Americans living in poverty. We all know this cat is one and done.

    Emoticon
    It is true...

    Obama backers don't seem to want to hear just how bad things are...
    they can't cause they are going to rehire no matter how bad it is.

    :wtf:

    So, you would rather be losing 750,000 jobs per month instead of gaining 125,000-200,000?
    You would rather be dealing with a recession where 8.5 million jobs were lost, instead of a recovery where 5 million have been regained?


    "Excuses":
    1. Republicans in Congress: "It is our main goal to make President Obama a one-term president"
    2. Failed Republican trickle-down policies in effect for 12 years: where are the jobs?
    3. Wall St. is doing very well--Nasdaq hit record highs this year, DOW near pre-Recession levels, S&P projected to hit record levels by the end of the year
    4. CEO pay is UP; middle-class pay is down. The same trend for 30 years. Where are the jobs due tot he Republican policies?
    5. 93% of all income gained since the recession has gone to the top 1%. WAIT for the trickle-down, peasants. WAIT!
    6. Oh yeah---a recession that began under a Republican administration
    7. Oh yeah--TWO WARS
    8. Cry baby multi-millionaire/multi-billionaireCEOs: viewtopic.php?f=13&t=196650&hilit=+super

    Excuses.....just excuses
  • comebackgirl
    comebackgirl Posts: 9,885
    pandora wrote:
    pandora wrote:
    It is true...

    Obama backers don't seem to want to hear just how bad things are...
    they can't cause they are going to rehire no matter how bad it is.

    :wtf:
    Sounds like you've finally decided not to rehire


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m30mG3JK ... ure=fvwrel ;)
    Can't watch it...
    tumblr_mg4nc33pIX1s1mie8o1_400.gif

    "I need your strength for me to be strong...I need your love to feel loved"
  • whygohome
    whygohome Posts: 2,305
    I'm still laughing at usamamasan1 using the word "intolerant."

    Classic man, classic.
  • pandora
    pandora Posts: 21,855
    whygohome wrote:
    pandora wrote:
    Enough excuses Barry

    There is no excuse for the $5.5 trillion in new debt over the last four years. Or for the 23 million people struggling for work. Or for the record number of Americans living in poverty. We all know this cat is one and done.

    Emoticon
    It is true...

    Obama backers don't seem to want to hear just how bad things are...
    they can't cause they are going to rehire no matter how bad it is.

    :wtf:

    So, you would rather be losing 750,000 jobs per month instead of gaining 125,000-200,000?
    You would rather be dealing with a recession where 8.5 million jobs were lost, instead of a recovery where 5 million have been regained?


    "Excuses":
    1. Republicans in Congress: "It is our main goal to make President Obama a one-term president"
    2. Failed Republican trickle-down policies in effect for 12 years: where are the jobs?
    3. Wall St. is doing very well--Nasdaq hit record highs this year, DOW near pre-Recession levels, S&P projected to hit record levels by the end of the year
    4. CEO pay is UP; middle-class pay is down. The same trend for 30 years. Where are the jobs due tot he Republican policies?
    5. 93% of all income gained since the recession has gone to the top 1%. WAIT for the trickle-down, peasants. WAIT!
    6. Oh yeah---a recession that began under a Republican administration
    7. Oh yeah--TWO WARS
    8. Cry baby multi-millionaire/multi-billionaireCEOs: viewtopic.php?f=13&t=196650&hilit=+super

    Excuses.....just excuses
    that's funny the part about one term President. That is always the goal of both parties.

    I thought you were an Independent? I have only seen blue on you,
    what's up with that?
  • pandora
    pandora Posts: 21,855
    pandora wrote:
    Sounds like you've finally decided not to rehire


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m30mG3JK ... ure=fvwrel ;)
    Can't watch it...
    oh sorry ... just a buzzer button
  • pandora
    pandora Posts: 21,855
    whygohome wrote:
    I'm still laughing at usamamasan1 using the word "intolerant."

    Classic man, classic.
    Hey I see so much intolerance from some of the blues here,
    that I think it's funny when they call themselves tolerant.
    It's their way or no way... yeah that's tolerant alright :?
  • whygohome
    whygohome Posts: 2,305
    pandora wrote:
    whygohome wrote:
    I'm still laughing at usamamasan1 using the word "intolerant."

    Classic man, classic.
    Hey I see so much intolerance from some of the blues here,
    that I think it's funny when they call themselves tolerant.
    It's their way or no way... yeah that's tolerant alright :?

    I disagree. I actually see a lot of the blues defending tolerance.
  • pandora
    pandora Posts: 21,855
    whygohome wrote:
    pandora wrote:
    whygohome wrote:
    I'm still laughing at usamamasan1 using the word "intolerant."

    Classic man, classic.
    Hey I see so much intolerance from some of the blues here,
    that I think it's funny when they call themselves tolerant.
    It's their way or no way... yeah that's tolerant alright :?

    I disagree. I actually see a lot of the blues defending tolerance.
    You know I never liked that word, it implies their is something to be tolerant of,
    like the one tolerating is superior when actually we are all equals.
    Rubs me the wrong way. Yes I said rub ;)

    I prefer using the word understanding myself and I work towards that.
    I don't see a lot of blues being understanding I would have to say.
  • comebackgirl
    comebackgirl Posts: 9,885
    pandora wrote:
    whygohome wrote:
    You know I never liked that word, it implies their is something to be tolerant of,
    like the one tolerating is superior when actually we are all equals.
    Rubs me the wrong way. Yes I said rub ;)
    I prefer using the word understanding myself and I work towards that.
    I don't see a lot of blues being understanding I would have to say.
    Agreed on the word "tolerant". I prefer understanding, accepting, respecting, etc.
    tumblr_mg4nc33pIX1s1mie8o1_400.gif

    "I need your strength for me to be strong...I need your love to feel loved"
  • whygohome
    whygohome Posts: 2,305
    pandora wrote:
    whygohome wrote:
    I'm still laughing at usamamasan1 using the word "intolerant."

    Classic man, classic.
    Hey I see so much intolerance from some of the blues here,
    that I think it's funny when they call themselves tolerant.
    It's their way or no way... yeah that's tolerant alright :?

    **edit

    I disagree. I actually see a lot of the blues defending understanding, open-mindedness, and a respect for others.
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 24,405
    pandora wrote:
    whygohome wrote:
    I'm still laughing at usamamasan1 using the word "intolerant."

    Classic man, classic.
    Hey I see so much intolerance from some of the blues here,
    that I think it's funny when they call themselves tolerant.
    It's their way or no way... yeah that's tolerant alright :?
    i don't tolerate intolerance from the republicans.

    anybody who does is just as bad as they are. actually they are worse because they are allowing it to be perpetuated.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • usamamasan1
    usamamasan1 Posts: 4,695
    A Summer of Liberal Intolerance

    WASHINGTON, D.C., October 11, 2012, (The Heritage Foundation)—As summer faded to fall, a Chicago alderman’s fury toward Chick-fil-A finally seemed to be cooling. But fall is fickle in the windy city, and Proco Joe Moreno once again is threatening to stall the chicken chain from opening in his ward.

    Moreno, Mayor Rahm (“Chicago Values”) Emanuel and other big-city officials piled on Chick-fil-A after Dan Cathy, the company’s president and COO, publicly supported the biblical definition of marriage. As they were soon reminded, though, for a public official to deny a business license because of the businessman’s marriage views would amount to unlawful discrimination against his viewpoints.

    Sadly, controversies such as the one that Moreno’s overblown comments helped create grow more frequent, and Chick-fil-A is only the most visible target. Advocates for “tolerance” increasingly push traditional ideas on marriage, family, life and faith out of public life.

    In June, sociologist Mark Regnerus at the University of Texas-Austin, became the target of a blogosphere blaze of character assassination.

    His offense? Regnerus constructed a nationally representative data set of 3,000 young adults and produced a study. It found that young people whose parents had same-sex relationships fared worse in key aspects of life compared to those from intact biological families. Never mind that his critical reviewers had judged the report an improvement over previous studies. Regnerus, like Chick-fil-A, was accused of being “anti-gay.”

    The journal Social Science Research which published his study came under attack. A complaint to the university prompted a “scientific misconduct inquiry.” The journal did an internal audit to dispel the aura of scandal spread by critics of the study’s findings looking for fault with the process. These inquiries exonerated Regnerus and the journal—but only after their credibility took a beating from the intolerant forces of tolerance. That sent a chilling message to other scholars and editors: Think twice before investigating and publishing on similar topics.

    Note the pattern of the intolerant forces of tolerance: Liberals pick a social policy fight and then frame the victim as culture war aggressor, while pitching themselves as peaceniks. Americans must not be cowed by such tactics into shuffling toward a secularist winter where public support for marriage and institutional religious freedom in matters of conscience become intolerable. Authentic tolerance is vitally important.

    On August 15, a young man walked into the Family Research Council headquarters in Washington, D.C., and fired three shots, wounding building manager Leo Johnson in the arm before being wrestled to the floor. According to authorities, the gunman said something about not liking the council’s politics. He carried 15 Chick-fil-A sandwiches and 50 rounds of ammunition in his knapsack.

    Groups across the political spectrum condemned the violent act. Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank suggested more, though. He argued that the leftist Southern Poverty Law Center, among others, had been “reckless” in labeling the conservative council a “hate group”—and so implying the research and education organization is outside the pale of legitimate debate.

    This summer, long lines of Chick-fil-A patrons similarly rebuked the intolerance of Chicago’s Moreno and Emanuel. The freedom to uphold “Chick-fil-A values” continues to draw wide support. The City of Broad Shoulders – indeed, every town in America – ought to have room for those values. They represent the very principles on which this nation was built. Surely even those who don’t celebrate them can tolerate them.

    Emoticon
This discussion has been closed.