Debate Tonight!!!!!!!

josevolution wrote:

No matter what none of these clowns are getting my vote they are totally incompetent to lead , i mean really GOP this the best you have to offer ? really ....

Have you seen their competition? This is still very winnable.

josevolution wrote:

cincybearcat wrote:

josevolution wrote:

No matter what none of these clowns are getting my vote they are totally incompetent to lead , i mean really GOP this the best you have to offer ? really ....

Have you seen their competition? This is still very winnable.

I'd rather see Obama get another shot at this than give the steering wheel to one of these fools ...Really you could see your self voting for one ....

Yes, a couple of them. I've dumped all but Mitt, Ron Paul, and John Huntsman from my list though.

mikepegg44 wrote:

josevolution wrote:

No matter what none of these clowns are getting my vote they are totally incompetent to lead , i mean really GOP this the best you have to offer ? really ....

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/po ... t-ron-paul

Calling a lack of willingness to make at least some cuts in military spending "economic suicide," Paul stated: "We have enough weapons to blow up the world about 20, 25 times. We have more weapons than all the other countries put together essentially. And we want to spend more and more, and you can't cut a penny? I mean, this is why we are at an impasse." Rep. Paul then challenged his opponents to come up with some genuine spending cuts: "I want to hear somebody up here willing to cut something, something real. This budget is in bad shape, and the financial calamity is going to be much worse than anybody ever invading this country."

"Foreign aid, it should be the easiest thing to cut. It's not authorized in the Constitution," Paul countered. "To me, foreign aid is taking money from poor people in this country and giving it to rich people in poor countries." Paul proposed a budget plan this week that would zero out foreign aid in year one,

what about these statements makes Paul a clown and unfit to lead.
what exactly do you disagree with here?

You may not like Bachmann and you may think all of the neocons are nuts...but don't throw the baby out with the bathwater...I challenge anyone to read about Paul's policies and his record and tell me he is anything like the others on that stage...

i agree with paul in this regard, but will the people whose votes really matter, the congress who will vote on his budget, go along with it? i seriously doubt it.

gimmesometruth27 wrote:

mikepegg44 wrote:

josevolution wrote:

No matter what none of these clowns are getting my vote they are totally incompetent to lead , i mean really GOP this the best you have to offer ? really ....

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/po ... t-ron-paul

Calling a lack of willingness to make at least some cuts in military spending "economic suicide," Paul stated: "We have enough weapons to blow up the world about 20, 25 times. We have more weapons than all the other countries put together essentially. And we want to spend more and more, and you can't cut a penny? I mean, this is why we are at an impasse." Rep. Paul then challenged his opponents to come up with some genuine spending cuts: "I want to hear somebody up here willing to cut something, something real. This budget is in bad shape, and the financial calamity is going to be much worse than anybody ever invading this country."

"Foreign aid, it should be the easiest thing to cut. It's not authorized in the Constitution," Paul countered. "To me, foreign aid is taking money from poor people in this country and giving it to rich people in poor countries." Paul proposed a budget plan this week that would zero out foreign aid in year one,

what about these statements makes Paul a clown and unfit to lead.
what exactly do you disagree with here?

You may not like Bachmann and you may think all of the neocons are nuts...but don't throw the baby out with the bathwater...I challenge anyone to read about Paul's policies and his record and tell me he is anything like the others on that stage...

i agree with paul in this regard, but will the people whose votes really matter, the congress who will vote on his budget, go along with it? i seriously doubt it.

I really think that he would have enough support in congress to get much of what he wants...Right now the person who would gain the most bi partisan political support for foreign policy would be Paul. More democrats would support his policies over President Obama's. At least that is my opinion. I think if Paul were to get elected, much of the reason why would be his economic plan and budget responsibility. Congress would be certainly hard pressed to disagree with him, and it would be an even harder sell to the American people as to why they disagree with someone like Paul in office consistently calling them on their bs. I just don't see him wilting like Obama has in regards to what he wants.
I think with Paul being willing to take the political heat that comes with tough decisions, they wouldn't be that disagreeable. I just don't see him making decisions solely to get re-elected like most presidents...and that alone sets him apart in my mind.

mikepegg44 wrote:

josevolution wrote:

No matter what none of these clowns are getting my vote they are totally incompetent to lead , i mean really GOP this the best you have to offer ? really ....

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/po ... t-ron-paul

Calling a lack of willingness to make at least some cuts in military spending "economic suicide," Paul stated: "We have enough weapons to blow up the world about 20, 25 times. We have more weapons than all the other countries put together essentially. And we want to spend more and more, and you can't cut a penny? I mean, this is why we are at an impasse." Rep. Paul then challenged his opponents to come up with some genuine spending cuts: "I want to hear somebody up here willing to cut something, something real. This budget is in bad shape, and the financial calamity is going to be much worse than anybody ever invading this country."

"Foreign aid, it should be the easiest thing to cut. It's not authorized in the Constitution," Paul countered. "To me, foreign aid is taking money from poor people in this country and giving it to rich people in poor countries." Paul proposed a budget plan this week that would zero out foreign aid in year one,

what about these statements makes Paul a clown and unfit to lead.
what exactly do you disagree with here?

You may not like Bachmann and you may think all of the neocons are nuts...but don't throw the baby out with the bathwater...I challenge anyone to read about Paul's policies and his record and tell me he is anything like the others on that stage...

This was my favorite moment in the debate. He made Rick Santorum look like an absolute fool.

I watched the last 45 minutes of the debate last night and it was incredibly pathetic. They are a bunch of idiots.

I agree with some of what Paul says, but for gods sake, get a fucking suit that fits.

Cliffy6745 wrote:

South of Seattle wrote:

One thing. Herman Cain, I don't want to go to your damn website and read about 9-9-9. Explain it to people, you should know how to do that since it's YOUR plan.

Dude can't explain it. No one can explain it. So state taxes aren't going to go away but you are going at add a 9% sales tax and people aren't going to pay a 17% sales tax? Possibly the easiest question of the plan if the plan made any sense.

dude, that's an orange and you just presented an apple, what the hell is wrong w/you, its all apples n oranges or ball bearings these days (fletch reference). this is seriously the gang that could not shoot straight.

brandon10 wrote:

This was my favorite moment in the debate. He made Rick Santorum look like an absolute fool.

What moment was that, the moment Rick stepped onto the stage? Rick's been doing a good job by himself, he doesn't need anyone else to help him.

"OOPS..."

WOOT!!

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/20 ... y-scrutiny