Are YOU happy with Obama?

1…68101112

Comments

  • brandon10
    brandon10 Posts: 1,114
    mb262200 wrote:

    WHERE HAVE I NOT ANSWERED YOUR QUESTION?


    You avoided multiple questions of mine. Either because you have no answer or because you are afraid of my belittling your answers.

    So I pose this question to you or anyone who could possibly support the war in Iraq for the reasons you described earlier. If it was so imperitive to invade Iraq to get rid of Saddam because he was cruel and may or may not had WMD's, why then is it not also imperitive to invade North korea or China? :?: :?: Both are just as bad as Iraq(if not worse) and both actually have WMD's.

    Plaese enlighten me. I'd like to know why it was worth the trillions and trillions of dollars and counless lives to remove Saddam when there are far worse dictators throughout the world??

    When you are done with that question you can start telling me why insurance companies are such a wonderfull thing to have. And all the great things they do for the health care industry in the United States???

    Or you can just keep skirting the questions because you are persicuted or you hate me...sorry, dislike me. :roll:
  • Cosmo
    Cosmo Posts: 12,225
    mb262200 wrote:
    Well first of all, you hold Bush responsible for not"intervening", so in your world I would hold my wife responsible for not stopping you.
    ...
    What the fuck???
    In the example... I am Bush... taking a shit in your house. Your wife are the people complaining about me... taking a shit and leaving it with her to deal with. You... are YOU... who thinks I should not be held responsible for the shit I left and that you stupid wife just needs to deal with the shit on her feet.
    Do you even know how logic works?
    ...
    Oh... and... answer, please. Where is the re-post or the repeat of the answer you claim to have given me?
    Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
    Hail, Hail!!!
  • OnTheEdge
    OnTheEdge Posts: 1,300
    brandon10 wrote:
    mb262200 wrote:

    WHERE HAVE I NOT ANSWERED YOUR QUESTION?


    You avoided multiple questions of mine. Either because you have no answer or because you are afraid of my belittling your answers.

    So I pose this question to you or anyone who could possibly support the war in Iraq for the reasons you described earlier. If it was so imperitive to invade Iraq to get rid of Saddam because he was cruel and may or may not had WMD's, why then is it not also imperitive to invade North korea or China? :?: :?: Both are just as bad as Iraq(if not worse) and both actually have WMD's.

    Plaese enlighten me. I'd like to know why it was worth the trillions and trillions of dollars and counless lives to remove Saddam when there are far worse dictators throughout the world??

    When you are done with that question you can start telling me why insurance companies are such a wonderfull thing to have. And all the great things they do for the health care industry in the United States???

    Or you can just keep skirting the questions because you are persicuted or you hate me...sorry, dislike me. :roll:

    I wasn't skirting your questions...I was simply ignoring you, the first time you ever commented on one of my posts you call me a racist....you judge me too quick so I left it at that. Maybe Kim Jung does deserve some extreme attention someday but the fact that you think there are worst dictators then Sadam is very inacurate.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYlhHxl66cQ
  • inmytree
    inmytree Posts: 4,741
    mb262200 wrote:
    I thought you never used the word "hate"...I see you only use forms of the word "hate"...

    hip hip hypocrite...




    I knew you were going to come back with that when I wrote. I guess I should have said I HARDLY ever use the word.....because yes....I HATE SADAM. So now i'm a hypocrite??? UUUUUGGGHHHH, The Insanity can drive me crazy sometimes...I hate it! Saying I hate somebody pretty much means if they were dying I wouldn't give a shit....there are very few people on the planet that I hate, Obama is not one of them.

    :yawn:
  • OnTheEdge
    OnTheEdge Posts: 1,300
    Cosmo wrote:
    mb262200 wrote:
    Well first of all, you hold Bush responsible for not"intervening", so in your world I would hold my wife responsible for not stopping you.
    ...
    What the fuck???
    In the example... I am Bush... taking a shit in your house. Your wife are the people complaining about me... taking a shit and leaving it with her to deal with. You... are YOU... who thinks I should not be held responsible for the shit I left and that you stupid wife just needs to deal with the shit on her feet.
    Do you even know how logic works?
    ...
    Oh... and... answer, please. Where is the re-post or the repeat of the answer you claim to have given me?

    ...
    Don't get off subject... do you believe that a person should be held responsible for their actions and the consequences of their actions... no matter how well intended they were?
    I don't care what justification or rationale you try to tie to those decisions... the decision to divert military resources from afghanistan towards Iraq was Bush's decision... right?

    of course I believe a person should be held resposible for their actions....when they break the law, not when he does something I do not agree with. Yes it was Bush's decision...never said it wasn't


    Did you miss this or something? For fuck sakes dude....you say you blame Bush for not "intervening". Here is a fucking example for you...if someone murders somebody do you hold the murderer responsible or the cop for not stopping it fast enough? Are you aware of how stupid that sounds. YES YES YES YES YES a person should be held responsible for there fucking actions YES YES YES!!!!!!!!!!Bush did not intervene and stop the so called meltdown, get the fuck over it! All i'm saying when I bring up Obama is , how does that justify spending a trillion fucking dollars that has done ABSOLUTELY NOTHING for jobs or the economy? IT FUCKING DOESN"T....that is how logic works!!!!!! If you want to get nasty then fuck it, i'll get nasty.
  • OnTheEdge
    OnTheEdge Posts: 1,300
    inmytree wrote:
    mb262200 wrote:
    I thought you never used the word "hate"...I see you only use forms of the word "hate"...

    hip hip hypocrite...




    I knew you were going to come back with that when I wrote. I guess I should have said I HARDLY ever use the word.....because yes....I HATE SADAM. So now i'm a hypocrite??? UUUUUGGGHHHH, The Insanity can drive me crazy sometimes...I hate it! Saying I hate somebody pretty much means if they were dying I wouldn't give a shit....there are very few people on the planet that I hate, Obama is not one of them.

    :yawn:

    well, if you're so bored why don't you try getting into a debate and saying something intelligent.
  • OnTheEdge
    OnTheEdge Posts: 1,300
    Probably get banned for all the F-Bombs but fuck it.....bunch of fucking wack jobs on here any way. By the way, how many of your so called miracle democrats have quit or retired now.....kinda like there running for there lives isn't it. I would say it should tell you something but most the fucking people on here wouldn't see it anyway....too busy blaming Bush while our president destroys all the real values of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
  • inmytree
    inmytree Posts: 4,741
    mb262200 wrote:
    inmytree wrote:
    mb262200 wrote:
    I thought you never used the word "hate"...I see you only use forms of the word "hate"...

    hip hip hypocrite...




    I knew you were going to come back with that when I wrote. I guess I should have said I HARDLY ever use the word.....because yes....I HATE SADAM. So now i'm a hypocrite??? UUUUUGGGHHHH, The Insanity can drive me crazy sometimes...I hate it! Saying I hate somebody pretty much means if they were dying I wouldn't give a shit....there are very few people on the planet that I hate, Obama is not one of them.

    :yawn:

    well, if you're so bored why don't you try getting into a debate and saying something intelligent.

    what debate...?
  • OnTheEdge
    OnTheEdge Posts: 1,300
    brandon10 wrote:
    mb262200 wrote:

    WHERE HAVE I NOT ANSWERED YOUR QUESTION?


    You avoided multiple questions of mine. Either because you have no answer or because you are afraid of my belittling your answers.

    So I pose this question to you or anyone who could possibly support the war in Iraq for the reasons you described earlier. If it was so imperitive to invade Iraq to get rid of Saddam because he was cruel and may or may not had WMD's, why then is it not also imperitive to invade North korea or China? :?: :?: Both are just as bad as Iraq(if not worse) and both actually have WMD's.

    Plaese enlighten me. I'd like to know why it was worth the trillions and trillions of dollars and counless lives to remove Saddam when there are far worse dictators throughout the world??

    When you are done with that question you can start telling me why insurance companies are such a wonderfull thing to have. And all the great things they do for the health care industry in the United States???

    Or you can just keep skirting the questions because you are persicuted or you hate me...sorry, dislike me. :roll:

    About your health care question....it was only 10 or 15 years ago and americas health care was very affordable to almost all companies. In the course of 10 years my ins went from $10 to $150.That's not that far away where we can't set some regulations on the ins companies and bring that back. Our government wants us to believe that it is a lost cause and that they have to take it over. Just my opinion. Please don't belittle me :roll:
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 24,405
    mb262200 wrote:

    About your health care question....it was only 10 or 15 years ago and americas health care was very affordable to almost all companies. In the course of 10 years my ins went from $10 to $150.That's not that far away where we can't set some regulations on the ins companies and bring that back. Our government wants us to believe that it is a lost cause and that they have to take it over. Just my opinion. Please don't belittle me :roll:

    will you ever wake the fuck up? if you would listen for one fucking second you would know that the public option is DEAD ON ARRIVAL! there will be no public option, so THE GOVERNMENT IS NOT TAKING OVER HEALTH CARE!! period, end of discussion. i do not know how that can be made more clear unless i put it in braille or something. read the newspaper for once please.

    i am trying to help you, because as an outside observer, i can tell you that you are making yourself look like a damn fool by holding on to these contentions that the government is taking over healthcare and that presidents and people are not responsible for their actions. like bush should not be blamed for anything, when everything today is a DIRECT result of his policies. you are not answering the questions from cosmo or brandon and a few others, yet you resort to name calling, which you have a tendency to do on here more and more frequently. you did it to me the other day. name calling and anger and frustration is a sign of a lost debate, or a feeble mind. by the way, feel free to drop f-bombs all you want, i think the mods have stopped monitoring this forum years ago...
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 24,405
    mb262200 wrote:

    well, if you're so bored why don't you try getting into a debate and saying something intelligent.

    i have not seen you state anything of substance in your last 15 posts.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 24,405
    its fun to blame bush for all of this, because he was a fucking moron. if you wanted to get technical, the blame lies with the people that voted for him, and the 5 memebers of the supreme court who gave him the job in the first place....but the situation is what it is. obama is continuing bush's policies and i will hold him accountable in the next election, but it is too early to tell what the man is going to do. obma blames bush in public to tell the people that he inherited a shit sandwich and that it is going to take time to make things better. how soon the conservatives forgot how we got here....but then again, obama is continuing some of bush's horribly failed policies, so who is worse,the guy who screwed up initially, or the guy who continues the screw ups of the predecessor?
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 24,405
    mb262200 wrote:
    Probably get banned for all the F-Bombs but fuck it.....bunch of fucking wack jobs on here any way. By the way, how many of your so called miracle democrats have quit or retired now.....kinda like there running for there lives isn't it. I would say it should tell you something but most the fucking people on here wouldn't see it anyway....too busy blaming Bush while our president destroys all the real values of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
    what exactly are the real values of the united states of america??
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • Cosmo
    Cosmo Posts: 12,225
    mb262200 wrote:
    Did you miss this or something? For fuck sakes dude....you say you blame Bush for not "intervening". Here is a fucking example for you...if someone murders somebody do you hold the murderer responsible or the cop for not stopping it fast enough? Are you aware of how stupid that sounds. YES YES YES YES YES a person should be held responsible for there fucking actions YES YES YES!!!!!!!!!!Bush did not intervene and stop the so called meltdown, get the fuck over it! All i'm saying when I bring up Obama is , how does that justify spending a trillion fucking dollars that has done ABSOLUTELY NOTHING for jobs or the economy? IT FUCKING DOESN"T....that is how logic works!!!!!! If you want to get nasty then fuck it, i'll get nasty.
    ...
    My gosh... THAT was one of the most comical rants I have ever read!!! Really... funny, funny stuff.
    It's not even worth going over facts with you... such as the almost one trillion dollars spent on Iraq... the 90 or so billion that just disappeared over there... or the fact that the initial bail out of Wall Street was done in the final months of 2008, 4 months prior to Obama taking the oath of office. I won't argue facts with you because facts are wasted on you... you don't seem to believe in facts and rely on opinion instead.
    You seem to be able to get over the fact that Bush's failures to rein in out of control banking practices lead to the meltdown of 2007/2008... which resulted in the situaton that exists today....and all you can ever come up with is the opinion that President Obama is destroying America. You just cannot see the fact that stimulus spending would not have to be an option... if the economy wasn't so fucked up. You are a funny, funny boy.
    And that murderer stuff... classic. I can always rely of the lowest I.Q. in the house to fall back on the murderer analogy... it always seems to come to the murderer analogy. I was waiting for it... but, seriously... i thought it would make an appearance much earlier.
    Thanx again.
    Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
    Hail, Hail!!!
  • Cosmo
    Cosmo Posts: 12,225
    mb262200 wrote:
    Probably get banned for all the F-Bombs but fuck it.....bunch of fucking wack jobs on here any way. By the way, how many of your so called miracle democrats have quit or retired now.....kinda like there running for there lives isn't it. I would say it should tell you something but most the fucking people on here wouldn't see it anyway....too busy blaming Bush while our president destroys all the real values of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
    ...
    I really need to know... what real values of the United States Of America is President Obama destroying? Help me out... Freedom of Speech? Freedom of the Press? Right to Bear Arms? Right to avoid self-incrimination? What?
    Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
    Hail, Hail!!!
  • OnTheEdge
    OnTheEdge Posts: 1,300
    gimmesometruth27 wrote:
    mb262200 wrote:

    About your health care question....it was only 10 or 15 years ago and americas health care was very affordable to almost all companies. In the course of 10 years my ins went from $10 to $150.That's not that far away where we can't set some regulations on the ins companies and bring that back. Our government wants us to believe that it is a lost cause and that they have to take it over. Just my opinion. Please don't belittle me :roll:

    will you ever wake the fuck up? if you would listen for one fucking second you would know that the public option is DEAD ON ARRIVAL! there will be no public option, so THE GOVERNMENT IS NOT TAKING OVER HEALTH CARE!! period, end of discussion. i do not know how that can be made more clear unless i put it in braille or something. read the newspaper for once please.

    i am trying to help you, because as an outside observer, i can tell you that you are making yourself look like a damn fool by holding on to these contentions that the government is taking over healthcare and that presidents and people are not responsible for their actions. like bush should not be blamed for anything, when everything today is a DIRECT result of his policies. you are not answering the questions from cosmo or brandon and a few others, yet you resort to name calling, which you have a tendency to do on here more and more frequently. you did it to me the other day. name calling and anger and frustration is a sign of a lost debate, or a feeble mind. by the way, feel free to drop f-bombs all you want, i think the mods have stopped monitoring this forum years ago...

    You have your opinion and I have mine.....Obama supports single payer health care.....this is just a stepping stone for him/them.
  • OnTheEdge
    OnTheEdge Posts: 1,300
    gimmesometruth27 wrote:
    mb262200 wrote:
    Probably get banned for all the F-Bombs but fuck it.....bunch of fucking wack jobs on here any way. By the way, how many of your so called miracle democrats have quit or retired now.....kinda like there running for there lives isn't it. I would say it should tell you something but most the fucking people on here wouldn't see it anyway....too busy blaming Bush while our president destroys all the real values of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
    what exactly are the real values of the united states of america??

    Really doesn't suprise me that a liberal needs to ask this question.
  • Anon
    Anon Posts: 11,175
    I'm somewhat inclined to agree with that last statement. But I've since learned it is not polite to make fun of liberals.

    However we should all step back and pin the failure of the economy on one person, but not Obama or Bush.

    Blame Barney Frank.
  • brandon10
    brandon10 Posts: 1,114
    mb262200 wrote:
    gimmesometruth27 wrote:
    mb262200 wrote:
    Probably get banned for all the F-Bombs but fuck it.....bunch of fucking wack jobs on here any way. By the way, how many of your so called miracle democrats have quit or retired now.....kinda like there running for there lives isn't it. I would say it should tell you something but most the fucking people on here wouldn't see it anyway....too busy blaming Bush while our president destroys all the real values of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
    what exactly are the real values of the united states of america??

    Really doesn't suprise me that a liberal needs to ask this question.

    Help me please? I'm just a stupid liberal. Please tell me what the real values of the U.S.A. are? And exactly how is our president destroying them?? Maybe you can change my ways.
  • otter
    otter Posts: 772
    If someone does not buy insurance or pay the income tax fine that person will be eventually arrested and put in jail thus losing their freedom. How is that not a government take over?
    gimmesometruth27 wrote:
    mb262200 wrote:

    About your health care question....it was only 10 or 15 years ago and americas health care was very affordable to almost all companies. In the course of 10 years my ins went from $10 to $150.That's not that far away where we can't set some regulations on the ins companies and bring that back. Our government wants us to believe that it is a lost cause and that they have to take it over. Just my opinion. Please don't belittle me :roll:

    will you ever wake the fuck up? if you would listen for one fucking second you would know that the public option is DEAD ON ARRIVAL! there will be no public option, so THE GOVERNMENT IS NOT TAKING OVER HEALTH CARE!! period, end of discussion. i do not know how that can be made more clear unless i put it in braille or something. read the newspaper for once please.

    i am trying to help you, because as an outside observer, i can tell you that you are making yourself look like a damn fool by holding on to these contentions that the government is taking over healthcare and that presidents and people are not responsible for their actions. like bush should not be blamed for anything, when everything today is a DIRECT result of his policies. you are not answering the questions from cosmo or brandon and a few others, yet you resort to name calling, which you have a tendency to do on here more and more frequently. you did it to me the other day. name calling and anger and frustration is a sign of a lost debate, or a feeble mind. by the way, feel free to drop f-bombs all you want, i think the mods have stopped monitoring this forum years ago...
    I found my place......and it's alright

Categories