Formula 1---AET---Thread

Options
2456726

Comments

  • MrBrian
    MrBrian Posts: 2,672
    Button is a good driver, but Honda is just soooo far behind. well look, even Toyota who has the highest F1 spending bill still can't catch teams like Ferrari,McLaren or even BMW.
  • MrBrian
    MrBrian Posts: 2,672
    oh yeah, Let's hope Massa does'nt loses his cool and throws himself off track again haha!
  • Housing Jim
    Housing Jim Posts: 644
    well, that was a pretty exciting qualifying session. I think that today will actually be more exciting than tomorrow, Spain is that kind of circuit...not too much opportunity to overtake.

    No real change at the top which is a little dissapointing.....Massa's last lap was pretty amazing though
    A democracy on paper, apparently well ordered, regularly subverted by irrational chaos.

    Manchester - 4/6/2000
    London - 20/4/2006
    Dublin - 23/8/2006
    London - 18/6/2007
    New York City - 24/6/2008
    New York City - 25/6/2008 - we will be "what is up" New York
    Manchester - 18/8/2009
    Manchester - 20/6/2012
    Leeds - 6/7/2014
    London - 18/6/2018
  • Housing Jim
    Housing Jim Posts: 644
    Apart from the first corner drama and a few unintentional pit lane f**k ups, that was pretty much the race your expect from the Spanish Grand Prix.

    Not bad but they really need to do some further modifications to that track to make this venue a little more interesting.

    Shame about Kimi but another great show from Hamilton :)
    A democracy on paper, apparently well ordered, regularly subverted by irrational chaos.

    Manchester - 4/6/2000
    London - 20/4/2006
    Dublin - 23/8/2006
    London - 18/6/2007
    New York City - 24/6/2008
    New York City - 25/6/2008 - we will be "what is up" New York
    Manchester - 18/8/2009
    Manchester - 20/6/2012
    Leeds - 6/7/2014
    London - 18/6/2018
  • MrBrian
    MrBrian Posts: 2,672
    Yeah, a pretty basic race. But I gotta say that Alonso raced like the champion he is, he had some major under body damage and he still drove that car fast.

    Monaco next! oh I loooove Monaco.
  • Housing Jim
    Housing Jim Posts: 644
    MrBrian wrote:

    Monaco next! oh I loooove Monaco.

    Monaco can go either way. It'll either be a straight forward parade or a tension filled, incident packed spectacular like last year.

    Got to wonder about the reliability on that Ferrari though.....would be awful if the car just "breaks down" on the last corner in qualifying again :rolleyes:
    A democracy on paper, apparently well ordered, regularly subverted by irrational chaos.

    Manchester - 4/6/2000
    London - 20/4/2006
    Dublin - 23/8/2006
    London - 18/6/2007
    New York City - 24/6/2008
    New York City - 25/6/2008 - we will be "what is up" New York
    Manchester - 18/8/2009
    Manchester - 20/6/2012
    Leeds - 6/7/2014
    London - 18/6/2018
  • MrBrian
    MrBrian Posts: 2,672
    Monaco can go either way. It'll either be a straight forward parade or a tension filled, incident packed spectacular like last year.

    Got to wonder about the reliability on that Ferrari though.....would be awful if the car just "breaks down" on the last corner in qualifying again :rolleyes:

    I think people were too hard on Schmuacher after that, he made a mistake. Heat of the moment kinda thing.

    He also raced one of the greatest races ever at Monaco that sunday, he came from pit lane to...5th? I think. On a non passing track like Monaco, that's special driving, great driving.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCJt9lGmxFM

    But i'm a huge MS fan, so I forgive easily.
  • Housing Jim
    Housing Jim Posts: 644
    MrBrian wrote:
    I think people were too hard on Schmuacher after that, he made a mistake. Heat of the moment kinda thing.

    He also raced one of the greatest races ever at Monaco that sunday, he came from pit lane to...5th? I think. On a non passing track like Monaco, that's special driving, great driving.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCJt9lGmxFM

    But i'm a huge MS fan, so I forgive easily.

    he was one of the dirtiest players in the game though......any time he thought he could do anything for an advantage he would take it. Most of the time there was nothing really wrong with what he'd do, you know, hanging about when the cars were weighed after qualifying to see how much fuel was in them, it was resourceful if nothing else.....I just think he pushed his luck with the Monaco incident and it did back fire on him.

    But like you said, he drove an absolute blinder the following day and gave us one hell of a race.....I think he was/is a great driver and I would have liked to see him leave with the world championship as i think he did deserve it last year....his comeback after the beginning of the season was tremendous.

    I can easily see Alonso starting to play dirty if things don't keep going his way......you know, unscrewing Hamilton's wheelnut when no ones looking or something lol
    A democracy on paper, apparently well ordered, regularly subverted by irrational chaos.

    Manchester - 4/6/2000
    London - 20/4/2006
    Dublin - 23/8/2006
    London - 18/6/2007
    New York City - 24/6/2008
    New York City - 25/6/2008 - we will be "what is up" New York
    Manchester - 18/8/2009
    Manchester - 20/6/2012
    Leeds - 6/7/2014
    London - 18/6/2018
  • MrBrian
    MrBrian Posts: 2,672
    I can easily see Alonso starting to play dirty if things don't keep going his way......you know, unscrewing Hamilton's wheelnut when no ones looking or something lol

    haha! yeah maybe,
    --

    Rememberm Senna also had his share of dirty tricks.
  • Rygar
    Rygar Posts: 8,711
    http://uk.reuters.com/article/wtMostRead/idUKSP27033520070914

    McLaren loses their 2007 Constructor's points and is fined $100 million for having Ferrari technical documents in their possession.
    Oops!
  • can someone explain to me how they are gonna charge someone 100million dollars(insert Dr. Evil Laughter here)
    mean people suck!
    but nice people sw****w

  • Rygar
    Rygar Posts: 8,711
    can someone explain to me how they are gonna charge someone 100million dollars(insert Dr. Evil Laughter here)

    Sounds like they won't come near it, but considering the fact McLaren has a budget of over 400mil per season, what's 1/4 of it?
  • RW
    RW Posts: 97
    The full text of the decision is very interesting. Especially the part about email exchanges between de la Rosa and Alonso. Cheaters!

    http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/14092007/58/season-2007-fia-s-mclaren-verdict.html

    3.5 On 21 March 2007 at 09.57 Mr. de la Rosa wrote to Coughlan in the following terms:

    "Hi Mike, do you know the Red Car's Weight Distribution? It would be important for us to know so that we could try it in the simulator. Thanks in advance, Pedro.

    p.s. I will be in the simulator tomorrow."

    3.6 In his evidence given to the WMSC, Mr. de la Rosa confirmed that Coughlan replied by text message with precise details of Ferrari's weight distribution. 3.7 On 25 March 2007 at 01.43 Mr. de la Rosa sent an e-mail to Fernando Alonso which sets out Ferrari's weight distribution to two decimal places on each of Ferrari's two cars as set up for the Australian Grand Prix.

    3.8 Mr. Alonso replied to this e-mail on 25 March 2007 at 12.31 (they were in different time zones). His e-mail includes a section headed "Ferrari" in which he says "its weight distribution surprises me; I don't know either if it's 100% reliable, but at least it draws attention". The e-mail continues with a discussion of how McLaren's weight distribution compares with Ferrari's.

    3.9 Mr. de la Rosa replied on 25 March 2007 13.02 stating the following:

    "All the information from Ferrari is very reliable. It comes from Nigel Stepney, their former chief mechanic I don't know what post he holds now. He's the same person who told us in Australia that Kimi was stopping in lap 18. He's very friendly with Mike Coughlan, our Chief Designer, and he told him that."

    3.10 Mr. de la Rosa's e-mail to Coughlan specifically stated that he wished to receive Ferrari's weight distribution for the purposes of testing it in the simulator the following day ("It would be important for us to know so that we could try it in the simulator").

    Mr. de la Rosa explained to the WMSC at the meeting of 13 September 2007 that when Coughlan responded with the precise details in question, he (de la Rosa) decided that the weight distribution was so different to the McLaren car set up that it would not, in fact, be tested in the simulator.

    Mr de la Rosa says that thereafter he regarded the information as unimportant. It seems highly unlikely to the WMSC that a test driver would take a decision of this sort on his own. It also is not clear why, if Mr. de la Rosa regarded this information as unimportant, he would still convey and discuss it with Mr. Alonso some days later in his e-mail exchange of 25th March.

    Mr. de la Rosa's evidence also makes clear that there was no reluctance or hesitation about testing the Ferrari information for potential benefit, but only that on this occasion he says that there was a technical reason not to do so.

    3.11 McLaren's Chief Engineer Mr. Lowe gave clear evidence that decisions relating to simulator testing would normally involve a number of engineering and other staff (as would running the tests themselves). It seems highly unlikely that decisions about what would be run in the simulator would by taken by a test driver on his own.

    flexible wing and aero balance

    3.12 In the same e-mail exchange of 25 March 2007, Mr. de la Rosa states that tests had been carried out on a flexible rear wing which Mr. de la Rosa says is "a copy of the system we think Ferrari uses". The Ferrari car's precise aero balance at 250 kph is also identified. While it is conceivable that the former item could have been copied from observation of the Ferrari car, it is clear from the context of the exchange (it being part of the information that Mr. de la Rosa describes as being "very reliable" because it comes from Stepney) that the latter item is confidential to Ferrari and that it was passed to Mr. de la Rosa by Coughlan, who got it from Stepney.

    tyre gas

    3.13 Mr de la Rosa's e-mail to Mr. Alonso on 25 March 2007 at 01.43 identified a gas that Ferrari uses to inflate its tyres to reduce the internal temperature and blistering. The e-mail concludes with a statement (in relation to the gas) that "we'll have to try it, it's easy!".

    3.14 Mr Alonso replied at 12.31 that it is "very important" that McLaren test the gas that Ferrari uses in its tyres as "they have something different from the rest", and "not only this year. there is something else and this may be the key; let's hope we can test it during this test, and that we can make it a priority!".

    3.15 Mr. de la Rosa replied on 25 March 2007 13.02 stating the following: I agree 100% that we must test the [tyre gas] thing very soon.

    3.16 Although the e-mail exchange between Mr. Alonso and Mr. de la Rosa makes clear that they both were enthusiastic about trying the gas apparently used by Ferrari in its tyres, Mr de la Rosa's evidence to the WMSC was that he, on his own, decided to explore with a Bridgestone engineer whether the McLaren team should try this gas.

    He states that he had no other conversations with any other specialist staff within McLaren. His evidence is that the Bridgestone engineer in question doubted whether the gas would confer an advantage upon McLaren. According to Mr de la Rosa, without further consultation with anyone else at McLaren, and despite the fact that this had apparently been successfully used at Ferrari, the idea was dropped and no actual attempt was made to test the gas in the tyres used by McLaren.

    3.17 It seems unlikely to the WMSC that a test driver would engage in such consultations on his own without discussing it any further with anyone else at the team. It also seems unlikely that a decision on whether to pursue the matter further would be taken by a test driver on his own. Finally, Mr de la Rosa's evidence makes clear that there was no reluctance or hesitation about using the Ferrari information, but only that on this occasion it was concluded that there would be no advantage in doing so.

    braking system

    3.18 On 12 April 2007 at 12.25 Mr. de la Rosa wrote to Mr. Coughlan and asked "can you explain me as much as you can, Ferrari's braking system with the [reference to detailed technical information]? Are they adjusting from inside the cockpit...?"

    3.19 After a number of exchanges about whether a description would be too complicated to articulate by e-mail, Mr. Coughlan replies on 14 April 2007 at 14.40 with a technical description which purports to be a description of the principles underpinning the Ferrari braking system.

    Ferrari have confirmed that the description given is an accurate (though incomplete) description of the principles of its braking system. Coughlan concludes with a statement that "we are looking at something similar". This latter statement strongly suggests that the McLaren system was being worked on from a position of knowledge of the details of the Ferrari system, which, even if the Ferrari system not being directly copied, must be more advantageous to McLaren than designing a system without such knowledge.

    3.20 The e-mail exchange between Mr. de la Rosa and Mr. Alonso dated 25 March 2007 at 01.43 also describes some aspects of the McLaren braking system and states that "with the information that we have, we believe Ferrari has a similar system" and goes on to describe highly specific elements of the Ferrari system (which cannot be set out here for confidentiality reasons but which clearly demonstrate knowledge of Ferrari's confidential information). stopping strategy

    3.21 As mentioned above, Mr. de la Rosa's e-mail on 25 March 2007 13.02 stated "all the information from Ferrari is very reliable. It comes from Nigel Stepney, their former chief mechanic I don't know what post he holds now. He's the same person who told us in Australia that Kimi was stopping in lap 18. He's very friendly with Mike Coughlan, our Chief Designer, and he told him that.

    3.22 The evidence before the WMSC is that Mr. Räikkönen (Kimi) actually stopped at lap 19 at the Australian GP. However, the fact remains that Mr de la Rosa cited this information as a reason to believe that Stepney was a reliable source of information. This strongly suggests that McLaren had at least taken account of this information in determining its own strategy.

    3.23 The evidence before the WMSC also demonstrates that Stepney had fed information through Coughlan regarding which lap one or more of the Ferrari drivers would stop at during the Bahrain Grand Prix. McLaren has sought to discredit the significance of this information as it proved in the end to be inaccurate.

    However, the evidence before the WMSC was that the safety car had been deployed early in the race making it likely that stopping strategies would be adjusted. This deployment of the safety car could not have been known in advance of the race and the fact that the stoppage predictions proved inaccurate does not mean that McLaren had not considered and taken account of the information that had been received in determining its own strategy before the race.

    3.24 In any case, as there is no legitimate context in which another teams' stopping strategy would be revealed to McLaren in advance, there is very clear evidence that both drivers knew that they were receiving unauthorised and confidential Ferrari information. To the WMSC's knowledge, no effort was taken to report or stem this flow.
  • MrBrian
    MrBrian Posts: 2,672
    Well that was a fun season :)
  • Rygar
    Rygar Posts: 8,711
    MrBrian wrote:
    Well that was a fun season :)

    Yup! Only 143 days till the next one, hahaha!
    I'm ready to get tix for the Montreal GP, first ever live F1 race!
  • Get_Right
    Get_Right Posts: 14,108
    great season
    bit dissapointed hamilton couldnt make history, but what an exciting finish to a very exciting season

    hot rookie
    Kimi in red
    Alonso in mercedes
    Cheating
    Championship down to the wire

    Looking forward to next season!
  • MrBrian
    MrBrian Posts: 2,672
    Get_Right wrote:
    great season
    bit dissapointed hamilton couldnt make history, but what an exciting finish to a very exciting season

    hot rookie
    Kimi in red
    Alonso in mercedes
    Cheating
    Championship down to the wire

    Looking forward to next season!

    I hope BMW can improve their car enough to really go after Ferrari and Mclaren/mercedes next season.

    I'm curious to see where Alonso goes, if he does end up leaving.
  • MrBrian
    MrBrian Posts: 2,672
    Rygar wrote:
    Yup! Only 143 days till the next one, hahaha!
    I'm ready to get tix for the Montreal GP, first ever live F1 race!

    I'll also probably be in Montreal for that race next year. I can't wait to here those cars in person haha!
  • Rygar
    Rygar Posts: 8,711
    MrBrian wrote:
    I hope BMW can improve their car enough to really go after Ferrari and Mclaren/mercedes next season.

    I'm curious to see where Alonso goes, if he does end up leaving.

    I read that rumors are hinting at back to Renault, although I don't think he wants to.
    Toyota is going to need a replacement for the lesser Schumacher, and no doubt BMW, Williams and Honda would like a two-time champion racing for them.
  • Rygar
    Rygar Posts: 8,711
    MrBrian wrote:
    I'll also probably be in Montreal for that race next year. I can't wait to here those cars in person haha!

    Me too.
    I checked today and tickets aren't on sale for anything past the first four races yet. I imagine they'll sell out really fast though, leaving us poor chumps sitting on a straight away or something.