How many girls experiment. ?

13567

Comments

  • Linda
    Linda Posts: 1,656
    Trailer wrote:
    Judging by the lack of bars that have musical acts in Malibu.... I take it you were at the Malibu Inn?


    now if Trailer was a girl.......:D
    i'm not happy yet.....
  • Trailer
    Trailer Posts: 1,431
    PJPixie wrote:
    Yep, they're closing it down. Saturday night was lights out. It was an all star night too. We got some Taylor Hawkins and Nate Mendel (sp) from the FOO FIGHTERS. STUART EFFING COPELAND from the POLICE took a seat at the drums (unbelievable!!!) and PINK finished the night with FREE FALLIN' by Tom Petty. Pretty good night I'd say!

    First the Dume Room... and now Malibu Inn!:mad: Of course I'm up in SF when these places are having their closing parties.:mad::mad:

    That sounds like a sick show though.. congrats on the good night!:D:cool:
    Whoa, chill bro... you know you can't raise your voice like that when the lion's here.
  • norm
    norm Posts: 31,146
    PJPixie wrote:
    Yep, they're closing it down. Saturday night was lights out. It was an all star night too. We got some Taylor Hawkins and Nate Mendel (sp) from the FOO FIGHTERS. STUART EFFING COPELAND from the POLICE took a seat at the drums (unbelievable!!!) and PINK finished the night with FREE FALLIN' by Tom Petty. Pretty good night I'd say!


    goddamnit!! i wish i liked going out...i miss so many cool things :( :D
  • EvilMerlin
    EvilMerlin Posts: 1,865
    cutback wrote:
    goddamnit!! i wish i liked going out...i miss so many cool things :( :D

    I'll take you out on the town big boy! ;)

    You should go out! Let's go out for my welcome home to CA party! :p I know Pixie is down...let's see if we can get that sister of her's to go out too! :p
  • PJPixie
    PJPixie Posts: 3,026
    EvilMerlin wrote:
    I'll take you out on the town big boy! ;)

    You should go out! Let's go out for my welcome home to CA party! :p I know Pixie is down...let's see if we can get that sister of her's to go out too! :p


    I'm sure she'll go!
    The best use of Life is Love.
    The best expression of Love is Time.
    The best time to Love is Now.


    I'm never as good as when you're there.........
  • failedpersephone
    failedpersephone Posts: 3,424
    There have been many sexuality terms thrown about here - first of all bisexuality is an ongoing sexual attraction to both genders.

    experimentation or temporary sexual attraction to same gender doesn't fall under bisexual...i like the term bi-curious, but that's just me.

    now to answer for myself the original intention of the thread;

    I believe that sexuality and one's attraction to gender can be fluid for many people...this can be evidenced with the level of experimentation that occurs in a free society...

    However, much of the modern instinct to "experiment" is based more on titillating partners, than it is based on how one feels at the moment. therefore, it is necessary for me to stress that in my opinion if you "can" have sexual experiences with the same sex - but do not particularly seek them out for any personal gratification reasoning...that is just self-objectifying.

    I personally have had 4 sexual encounters with women, I did not enjoy the texture, taste, and emotion that I experienced. I have had singular experiences twice, and one group setting style experience.

    it is my opinion, based on these experiences, that women are soft, and too moist. I didn't like what it felt like.

    But I can see the positive side - ie., what is enthralling for men...however that is for a different thread...hahaha
    IF YOU WANT A PLATE OF MY BEEF SWELLINGTON, YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TO PAY THE COVERCHARGE.
  • EvilMerlin
    EvilMerlin Posts: 1,865
    failedpersephone wrote:
    There have been many sexuality terms thrown about here - first of all bisexuality is an ongoing sexual attraction to both genders.

    experimentation or temporary sexual attraction to same gender doesn't fall under bisexual...i like the term bi-curious, but that's just me.

    now to answer for myself the original intention of the thread;

    I believe that sexuality and one's attraction to gender can be fluid for many people...this can be evidenced with the level of experimentation that occurs in a free society...

    However, much of the modern instinct to "experiment" is based more on titillating partners, than it is based on how one feels at the moment. therefore, it is necessary for me to stress that in my opinion if you "can" have sexual experiences with the same sex - but do not particularly seek them out for any personal gratification reasoning...that is just self-objectifying.

    I personally have had 4 sexual encounters with women, I did not enjoy the texture, taste, and emotion that I experienced. I have had singular experiences twice, and one group setting style experience.

    it is my opinion, based on these experiences, that women are soft, and too moist. I didn't like what it felt like.

    But I can see the positive side - ie., what is enthralling for men...however that is for a different thread...hahaha

    I must applaud you that 47 posts into this thread, you still made a serious, intuitive, helpful post. Good on you! :)
  • stargirl69
    stargirl69 Posts: 6,387
    Ok.....I'll step up to the plate.Pit name a clue ;D. I have and I would again,if the opportunity came along and the timing was right but it wouldn't be a permenant choice.
    Most of my girl friends did.
    Teen/early 20's girls spend a lot of time sharing beds/cuddling etc ;D.
    “There should be a place where only the things you want to happen, happen”
  • failedpersephone
    failedpersephone Posts: 3,424
    EvilMerlin wrote:
    I must applaud you that 47 posts into this thread, you still made a serious, intuitive, helpful post. Good on you! :)
    always keep 'em guessing....that's what I always say...I like to see people butt cheeks to the wind on how I am going to respond to threads.


    so, EvilMerlin - you are (if memory serves me) a REALLY tall dude in my old stomping grounds of Orange County California...my guess is you have been the bed and or table to a few girls on top?? no??

    when two girls are goin' at it...poppin' the bean (if you will) it has been my experience (alluded to in my more thoughtful post) that it is more moisture...

    where do you stand on that?
    IF YOU WANT A PLATE OF MY BEEF SWELLINGTON, YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TO PAY THE COVERCHARGE.
  • PJPixie
    PJPixie Posts: 3,026
    failedpersephone wrote:
    always keep 'em guessing....that's what I always say...I like to see people butt cheeks to the wind on how I am going to respond to threads.


    so, EvilMerlin - you are (if memory serves me) a REALLY tall dude in my old stomping grounds of Orange County California...my guess is you have been the bed and or table to a few girls on top?? no??

    when two girls are goin' at it...poppin' the bean (if you will) it has been my experience (alluded to in my more thoughtful post) that it is more moisture...

    where do you stand on that?

    I love this post! In my opinion: POST OF THE YEAR!!!
    The best use of Life is Love.
    The best expression of Love is Time.
    The best time to Love is Now.


    I'm never as good as when you're there.........
  • mca47
    mca47 Posts: 13,337
    If I was a chick I'd totally be into chicks.



    :D



    ...Yep
  • EvilMerlin
    EvilMerlin Posts: 1,865
    failedpersephone wrote:
    always keep 'em guessing....that's what I always say...I like to see people butt cheeks to the wind on how I am going to respond to threads.


    so, EvilMerlin - you are (if memory serves me) a REALLY tall dude in my old stomping grounds of Orange County California...my guess is you have been the bed and or table to a few girls on top?? no??

    when two girls are goin' at it...poppin' the bean (if you will) it has been my experience (alluded to in my more thoughtful post) that it is more moisture...

    where do you stand on that?

    Male biology is that more moisture = better. It's instilled to the hetero male brain. However, I can hop out of my body and see where you stand on that same level. What I produce, the majority of the time is not what I seek. However I have had interest in experiecing the process of making what I produce, just out of my curiosity from acting on it in an outside perspective, but not because it is what I seek, just what I'd want to know at that time. So I stand on what I hope is the same ground that you have graced me with.

    And your two replies is definitely why I like to engage replies with you. :D
  • failedpersephone
    failedpersephone Posts: 3,424
    EvilMerlin wrote:
    Male biology is that more moisture = better. It's instilled to the hetero male brain. However, I can hop out of my body and see where you stand on that same level. What I produce, the majority of the time is not what I seek. However I have had interest in experiecing the process of making what I produce, just out of my curiosity from acting on it in an outside perspective, but not because it is what I seek, just what I'd want to know at that time. So I stand on what I hope is the same ground that you have graced me with.

    And your two replies is definitely why I like to engage replies with you. :D

    absolutely the Male of the species requires more natural lubricant for completion of their sexual experience! That is a very real truism, and on the same token - friction produces moisture in the Female...therefore, when there are two (or more, you lucky devil) females, the moisture level is pretty high...and if (for the sake of this debate) you happen to be a sober, completely hetero female, the moisture level will reach an uncomfortable level. That being said, I did not have a problem with the female performance ON me, with the exception of one (who was just an all around inattentive sexual partner) but I also did not get the level of gratification that I expected...namely - they did not have forceful tongues. but, it was a very small selection of society, and I am in NO WAY implying that my small experiment group would reflect upon us all.

    I, personally would like to think that I do know how to use my tongue, except my memory requires me to remain truthful. and, I did not like the taste.

    we haven't even approached the scent (better term, don't you think that the maybe more descriptive "funk" ??)
    IF YOU WANT A PLATE OF MY BEEF SWELLINGTON, YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TO PAY THE COVERCHARGE.
  • EvilMerlin
    EvilMerlin Posts: 1,865
    failedpersephone wrote:
    absolutely the Male of the species requires more natural lubricant for completion of their sexual experience! That is a very real truism, and on the same token - friction produces moisture in the Female...therefore, when there are two (or more, you lucky devil) females, the moisture level is pretty high...and if (for the sake of this debate) you happen to be a sober, completely hetero female, the moisture level will reach an uncomfortable level. That being said, I did not have a problem with the female performance ON me, with the exception of one (who was just an all around inattentive sexual partner) but I also did not get the level of gratification that I expected...namely - they did not have forceful tongues. but, it was a very small selection of society, and I am in NO WAY implying that my small experiment group would reflect upon us all.

    I, personally would like to think that I do know how to use my tongue, except my memory requires me to remain truthful. and, I did not like the taste.

    we haven't even approached the scent (better term, don't you think that the maybe more descriptive "funk" ??)

    You've completed that first part. I have nothing else to elaborate or ask of with the moisture.

    The scent, however...Wouldn't that be of the same type with the moisture level? With some groups a scent would be produced, with others a funk. It all depends on our sample size. I do however prefer the scent, in most cases, that the moisturized area produces, to the funk, that a hardened area may produce, depending on how much you're lifting and how far back you're travelling.
  • PJPixie
    PJPixie Posts: 3,026
    EvilMerlin wrote:
    You've completed that first part. I have nothing else to elaborate or ask of with the moisture.

    The scent, however...Wouldn't that be of the same type with the moisture level? With some groups a scent would be produced, with others a funk. It all depends on our sample size. I do however prefer the scent, in most cases, that the moisturized area produces, to the funk, that a hardened area may produce, depending on how much you're lifting and how far back you're travelling.



    :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek:
    The best use of Life is Love.
    The best expression of Love is Time.
    The best time to Love is Now.


    I'm never as good as when you're there.........
  • EvilMerlin
    EvilMerlin Posts: 1,865
    PJPixie wrote:
    :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek:

    You look surprised....are you surprised that something I'd say would surprise you? ;)
  • failedpersephone
    failedpersephone Posts: 3,424
    EvilMerlin wrote:
    You've completed that first part. I have nothing else to elaborate or ask of with the moisture.

    The scent, however...Wouldn't that be of the same type with the moisture level? With some groups a scent would be produced, with others a funk. It all depends on our sample size. I do however prefer the scent, in most cases, that the moisturized area produces, to the funk, that a hardened area may produce, depending on how much you're lifting and how far back you're travelling.
    for my sample size - I selected women whom I had a modicum of attraction to (and as I do not generally feel attraction towards unhygienic individuals...) they did in fact have a scent associated with the moisture. personally it had the opposite effect on me than the effect it would have on a male. (this is where my "back sack" did NOT come in handy.;) ) after my initial experiment/experience - it occurred to me to be constantly on guard for my Ph balance, and I was extremely self conscious of my own scent. But after my 2/3 experience I slacked off on being so self conscious, and focused instead on giving my personal scent/flavor a little "zip"
    IF YOU WANT A PLATE OF MY BEEF SWELLINGTON, YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TO PAY THE COVERCHARGE.
  • FinsburyParkCarrots
    FinsburyParkCarrots Seattle, WA Posts: 12,223
    failedpersephone wrote:
    always keep 'em guessing....that's what I always say...I like to see people butt cheeks to the wind on how I am going to respond to threads.


    so, EvilMerlin - you are (if memory serves me) a REALLY tall dude in my old stomping grounds of Orange County California...my guess is you have been the bed and or table to a few girls on top?? no??

    when two girls are goin' at it...poppin' the bean (if you will) it has been my experience (alluded to in my more thoughtful post) that it is more moisture...

    where do you stand on that?

    I know how I'm standing, after reading that. :D
  • EvilMerlin
    EvilMerlin Posts: 1,865
    failedpersephone wrote:
    for my sample size - I selected women whom I had a modicum of attraction to (and as I do not generally feel attraction towards unhygienic individuals...) they did in fact have a scent associated with the moisture. personally it had the opposite effect on me than the effect it would have on a male. (this is where my "back sack" did NOT come in handy.;) ) after my initial experiment/experience - it occurred to me to be constantly on guard for my Ph balance, and I was extremely self conscious of my own scent. But after my 2/3 experience I slacked off on being so self conscious, and focused instead on giving my personal scent/flavor a little "zip"

    Can you elaborate on the 'zip?' I'm curious now.

    I have actually only come across one moisturized scent that I would classify as a funk. I went back one more time in the future just to check and it was still there. I have to say that it was not attracting me at all, and I didn't hold it against her, however I do believe it may have been out of her hands at that point.

    That is one instance where I wish I had a "back sack" :D Other than that, the scent was overwhelming enough that it lets me roam wherever I may need without any other odor intrusions to take my mind off my attraction point.
  • failedpersephone
    failedpersephone Posts: 3,424
    EvilMerlin wrote:
    Can you elaborate on the 'zip?' I'm curious now.

    I have actually only come across one moisturized scent that I would classify as a funk. I went back one more time in the future just to check and it was still there. I have to say that it was not attracting me at all, and I didn't hold it against her, however I do believe it may have been out of her hands at that point.

    That is one instance where I wish I had a "back sack" :D Other than that, the scent was overwhelming enough that it lets me roam wherever I may need without any other odor intrusions to take my mind off my attraction point.
    it's called cleanliness and a little honey dust. (ladies - don't overuse it - it can throw your natural PH balance off a bit)

    also, drinking a lot of water is good for all concerned, if you get my drift... ;)
    IF YOU WANT A PLATE OF MY BEEF SWELLINGTON, YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TO PAY THE COVERCHARGE.

Categories