becos the women around here dont hate me enough already
Comments
-
surferdude wrote:Smart girls are so damn hot!!!!"The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr
http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta
Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!0 -
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.0 -
Jeanie wrote:I'm not sure I understand what you are saying here, sorry.
I see those stereotypes as "scripts". People use scripts when they are unaware of the fullness of the situation. We use a shortcut to gloss over what we don't understand.
I have studied transactional analysis for years. It's the branch of psychology that deals with interpersonal relationships, including power dynamics. It's the branch that came up with the concept of these "scripts". It's normal that we use these scripts in order to rationalize our experiences. It's where we are at. We are not perfect all knowing beings, nor will we be in the near future. We can't know everything at any one time.
However, I don't buy that a few "leaders" are in control of us, or of the system and how we act each day, because that is unempowering besides being unrealistic. I realize our experience that we are powerless is real, but it's not accurate in actuality. It's a consequence of our mindset and how we choose to think. Many of us make these choices unconsciously. Once we recognize this, we realize we can change the way we think and uncover greater degrees of power.
I understand many will not make that shift, and will continue to live life based on their perceptions. This is the problem Ahnimus is always referring to. It's fair game for people to make those choices. I cannot support, though, when people use their personal perceptions for justification to absolve themselves of accountability for their choices, or to unfairly blame or hold one sex accountable. Again, this is exactly the problem that guys like Ahnimus and surferdude get so frustrated by. It's sexism and prejudice, and it's not realistic."The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr
http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta
Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!0 -
gue_barium wrote:I am a blessed one."The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr
http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta
Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!0 -
angelica wrote:Considering the millions and billions of people in our societies, we've got many people contributing to the stereotypes and roles on all kind of levels. For example, in terms of men and sexual assault, I saw some stereotypes in this thread alone.
I see those stereotypes as "scripts". People use scripts when they are unaware of the fullness of the situation. We use a shortcut to gloss over what we don't understand.
I have studied transactional analysis for years. It's the branch of psychology that deals with interpersonal relationships, including power dynamics. It's the branch that came up with the concept of these "scripts". It's normal that we use these scripts in order to rationalize our experiences. It's where we are at. We are not perfect all knowing beings, nor will we be in the near future. We can't know everything at any one time.
However, I don't buy that a few "leaders" are in control of us, or of the system and how we act each day, because that is unempowering besides being unrealistic. I realize our experience that we are powerless is real, but it's not accurate in actuality. It's a consequence of our mindset and how we choose to think. Many of us make these choices unconsciously. Once we recognize this, we realize we can change the way we think and uncover greater degrees of power.
I understand many will not make that shift, and will continue to live life based on their perceptions. This is the problem Ahnimus is always referring to. It's fair game for people to make those choices. I cannot support, though, when people use their personal perceptions for justification to absolve themselves of accountability for their choices, or to unfairly blame or hold one sex accountable. Again, this is exactly the problem that guys like Ahnimus and surferdude get so frustrated by. It's sexism and prejudice, and it's not realistic.
You had it going til you got here:angelica wrote:It's normal that we use these scripts in order to rationalize our experiences. It's where we are at. We are not perfect all knowing beings, nor will we be in the near future. We can't know everything at any one time.
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.0 -
gue_barium wrote:Sounds personal.
You had it going til you got here:"The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr
http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta
Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!0 -
angelica wrote:Considering the millions and billions of people in our societies, we've got many people contributing to the stereotypes and roles on all kind of levels. For example, in terms of men and sexual assault, I saw some stereotypes in this thread alone.
I see those stereotypes as "scripts". People use scripts when they are unaware of the fullness of the situation. We use a shortcut to gloss over what we don't understand.
I have studied transactional analysis for years. It's the branch of psychology that deals with interpersonal relationships, including power dynamics. It's the branch that came up with the concept of these "scripts". It's normal that we use these scripts in order to rationalize our experiences. It's where we are at. We are not perfect all knowing beings, nor will we be in the near future. We can't know everything at any one time.
However, I don't buy that a few "leaders" are in control of us, or of the system and how we act each day, because that is unempowering besides being unrealistic. I realize our experience that we are powerless is real, but it's not accurate in actuality. It's a consequence of our mindset and how we choose to think. Many of us make these choices unconsciously. Once we recognize this, we realize we can change the way we think and uncover greater degrees of power.
I understand many will not make that shift, and will continue to live life based on their perceptions. This is the problem Ahnimus is always referring to. It's fair game for people to make those choices. I cannot support, though, when people use their personal perceptions for justification to absolve themselves of accountability for their choices, or to unfairly blame or hold one sex accountable. Again, this is exactly the problem that guys like Ahnimus and surferdude get so frustrated by. It's sexism and prejudice, and it's not realistic.
I'm sorry angelica, but I don't think I've said anything in this thread that couldn't have been sorted out by simple communication. And the only thing that I have questioned is a) the validity of one lot of statistics and b) why I am being personally attacked for the views I am assumed to have.
And I'm not understanding how what you are saying here in anyway relates to my question about the role of people who do not have children.
I don't understand why in order for Ahnimus to have the views that he does, I need to be attacked. I'm certainly hoping that no one is accusing me of being either sexist or prejudiced because that is not the case.NOPE!!!
*~You're IT Bert!~*
Hold on to the thread
The currents will shift0 -
Jeanie wrote:So did we get anywhere here?
Just wondering.
Because I just feel like I'm supposed to be quiet because no one is really listening or interested in discussing ways of bringing about any real solutions or practical suggestions to the table.
And to me that would be the most important outcome.
Real suggestions, real understanding, real outcomes.
i dont want any solutions. i just want to find a woman who will admit she's happiest in the kitchen making sandwiches and babies and keeping a clean house for me to come home to0 -
angelica wrote:Please elaborate.
I think, you need to relish in your anonimity. I don't know how to tell you to do that.
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.0 -
soulsinging wrote:i dont want any solutions. i just want to find a woman who will admit she's happiest in the kitchen making sandwiches and babies and keeping a clean house for me to come home to
Well I'd consider it if you were good in bed!!
Oh!! And if you could get rid of spiders!!! :eek:NOPE!!!
*~You're IT Bert!~*
Hold on to the thread
The currents will shift0 -
Jeanie wrote:I'm sorry angelica, but I don't think I've said anything in this thread that couldn't have been sorted out by simple communication. And the only thing that I have questioned is a) the validity of one lot of statistics and b) why I am being personally attacked for the views I am assumed to have.
And I'm not understanding how what you are saying here in anyway relates to my question about the role of people who do not have children.
I don't understand why in order for Ahnimus to have the views that he does, I need to be attacked. I'm certainly hoping that no one is accusing me of being either sexist or prejudiced because that is not the case.
I definitely don't mean to in any way imply anything regarding your interaction with Ahnimus. I know personally how heavy handed his communication style can feel on the receiving end.
As for the role of people who do not have children, I can't talk about you personally, but I can say that I see women, in all manner of their interactions, taking a submissive role to men, which in turns supports the male dominant position. it's not all one or the other, but it depends on each interaction and the dynamic. For example, some times I am assertive, or equal, other times, I am submissive. Dominance/submission are two polarities--two sides--and are not the same as the equality within each individual that Ahnimus calls for. For example, I personally do this in numerous places in my life. I'm conscious of it and I do it by choice. I don't feel unempowered when I "let" my man drive. Or when he carries my groceries. He's stronger than I am. Or when he likes to walk on the outside of us, to protect me from traffic and such. I love that stuff. Just as I said earlier, I love being a mother, and cooking meals, and I'm pretty good in some other feminine roles, whether assertive or more service oriented.We all support these "imbalances". I don't think they are pathological to the degree Ahnimus might. I love the give and take. I think they are complementary.
I see women, beyond motherhood, supporting the dominance/submission cycles all the time. The thing is, we can't partake and then point the finger at men when there is fallout--which there most certainly is. Men pay the huge cost for this system and it's flaws, just as we do."The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr
http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta
Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!0 -
gue_barium wrote:I think, you need to relish in your anonimity. I don't know how to tell you to do that."The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr
http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta
Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!0 -
angelica wrote:I see those stereotypes as "scripts". People use scripts when they are unaware of the fullness of the situation. We use a shortcut to gloss over what we don't understand.
I have studied transactional analysis for years. It's the branch of psychology that deals with interpersonal relationships, including power dynamics. It's the branch that came up with the concept of these "scripts". It's normal that we use these scripts in order to rationalize our experiences. It's where we are at. We are not perfect all knowing beings, nor will we be in the near future. We can't know everything at any one time.
i dont believe this at all. it is a short cut, but i dont think it has anything to do with rationalization. i think it has to do with saving time and effort. humans simply dont have time to perform and elaborate investigation into the background and beleifs of every human being we ever meet. it's impossible. stereotypes are a shortcut. it's why looks are important in dating... you can take a glance around a bar, glean information from people based on their dress and language and choose who to go talk to. sure, you wont always be right, but you dont have time to talk to every person in the bar one by one to find out who they are in a "non-shallow" or "non-stereotypical" way. it's a shortcut to attempting to find people with whom we have things in common and it's very useful. there is nothing wrong or unhealthy about it.
the only time it becomes problematic is when you let it become a bar to actually getting to know people or accept them... ie. you see a pretty girl in a bar, assume she's a bitchy sorority girl and blow her off before getting to know that she's a very sweet person. or you hear a woman is a feminist and assume she'll hate you and be impossible to talk to. or you see someone is black and refuse to talk to them becos you assume they're criminal. there's nothing wrong with not approaching these people in a bar based on the assumption you won't have much in common, but there is a problem with refusing to acknowledge them becos you refuse to give them a chance to prove your assumptions wrong.
stereotypes aren't inherently evil. they're very useful and beneficial human socializing concepts, as long as one recognizes that their stereotypes are only vague and general outlines, not ironclad truth that is applicable to everyone.0 -
Jeanie wrote:Well I'd consider it if you were good in bed!!
Oh!! And if you could get rid of spiders!!! :eek:
ive got both of those qualities in spades... i can kill bats too, and mice dont scare me at all. im also going to rich and soulless0 -
angelica wrote:I don't really have anything to work with here, but when you can give me some points, I'll gladly respond.
I think i spelled 'anonimity' wrong. I could be wrong. I don't know how else I could spell it.
I think, for starters, you should look that up for clarification.
Then we can continue this discussion.
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.0 -
soulsinging wrote:i dont believe this at all. it is a short cut, but i dont think it has anything to do with rationalization. i think it has to do with saving time and effort. humans simply dont have time to perform and elaborate investigation into the background and beleifs of every human being we ever meet. it's impossible. stereotypes are a shortcut. it's why looks are important in dating... you can take a glance around a bar, glean information from people based on their dress and language and choose who to go talk to. sure, you wont always be right, but you dont have time to talk to every person in the bar one by one to find out who they are in a "non-shallow" or "non-stereotypical" way. it's a shortcut to attempting to find people with whom we have things in common and it's very useful. there is nothing wrong or unhealthy about it.
the only time it becomes problematic is when you let it become a bar to actually getting to know people or accept them... ie. you see a pretty girl in a bar, assume she's a bitchy sorority girl and blow her off before getting to know that she's a very sweet person. or you hear a woman is a feminist and assume she'll hate you and be impossible to talk to. or you see someone is black and refuse to talk to them becos you assume they're criminal. there's nothing wrong with not approaching these people in a bar based on the assumption you won't have much in common, but there is a problem with refusing to acknowledge them becos you refuse to give them a chance to prove your assumptions wrong.
stereotypes aren't inherently evil. they're very useful and beneficial human socializing concepts, as long as one recognizes that their stereotypes are only vague and general outlines, not ironclad truth that is applicable to everyone."The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr
http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta
Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!0 -
gue_barium wrote:I think i spelled 'anonimity' wrong. I could be wrong. I don't know how else I could spell it.
I think, for starters, you should look that up for clarification.
Then we can continue this discussion."The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr
http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta
Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!0 -
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.0 -
angelica wrote:It sounds like we're in agreement. I'm not sure what you are "disputing".
i got the impression you were saying stereotypes were retroactive... revisionist ideas to justify past behaviors and decisions. i see them as anticipatory, an archetype used simply to predict behavior and make choices easier in day to day life. we take in so much information in a day, sometimes we need shortcuts to process it. there is nothing "rationalizing" about it. rationalizing sounds retroactive to me... like there is guilt and knowledge of wrongdoing and one is attempting to justify it. i think that more accurately describes prejudice, not stereotyping. prejudice is the kind of stereotyping i referred to that is inflexible and wrongly stubborn.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.9K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help