18 Ways To Become A Liberal

Ahnimus · March 2007

ThumbingMyWay32 wrote:

Yep, this is what it usually comes to.

So, I guess you aren't God.

The answer to 10^100 is a Googolplex

A woodchuck could chuck 71 butt-cords of wood if a woodchuck could chuck wood.

Your statement appears to try to diffuse my direct questioning of the discussion. You seem to want to only stifle any debate of the topic.

Or maybe it's a question only of how many times you can post useless hollow comments before being considered a troll.

prism · March 2007

Ahnimus wrote:

Oh wait, does this mean you are God. So very nice to meet you God. Since you are omniscient, can you tell me what the term is for 10^100?

I'd also like to know; How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?

hahahahahaha

farfromglorified · March 2007

Ahnimus wrote:

The answer to 10^100 is a Googolplex

10^100 is called googol.

A googolplex is 10^10^100.

Ahnimus · March 2007

farfromglorified wrote:

10^100 is called googol.

A googolplex is 10^10^100.

Did you look that up on Conservapedia?

You are correct, but I have a feeling you didn't really know that. So I still don't think you are God.

soulsinging · March 2007

is THAT the liberal platform? fuck, NOW what do i do?

i think my issue with conservatives as they're too "glass if half empty" whereas the liberals are more "glass is half full," and im really trying to be an optimist. but the conservatives look for differences, the liberals for similarities. liberals are like "so, you're gay? well hey, we all still like sex right? high five!" whereas the conservatives are more: "you're not gay? ok. hate terrorists? ok. love america? check. you want comprehensive sex ed taught to HIGH SCHOOLERS? i knew you were an evil pinko god-hating, baby-murdering liberal!"

Ahnimus · March 2007

soulsinging wrote:

is THAT the liberal platform? fuck, NOW what do i do?

i think my issue with conservatives as they're too "glass if half empty" whereas the liberals are more "glass is half full," and im really trying to be an optimist. but the conservatives look for differences, the liberals for similarities. liberals are like "so, you're gay? well hey, we all still like sex right? high five!" whereas the conservatives are more: "you're not gay? ok. hate terrorists? ok. love america? check. you want comprehensive sex ed taught to HIGH SCHOOLERS? i knew you were an evil pinko god-hating, baby-murdering liberal!"

Haha, man I like that. Good dramatization

boxwine_in_hell · March 2007

he still stands wrote:

My opinion follows....

1. You have to be against capital punishment, but support abortion on
demand.

2. You have to believe that businesses create oppression and governments
create prosperity.

3. You have to believe that guns in the hands of law-abiding citizens
are more of a threat than U.S. Nuclear weapons technology in the hands
of Iran or Chinese and North Korean communists.

4. You have to believe that there was no art before federal funding.

5. You have to believe that global temperatures are less affected by
cyclical changes in the earth's climate and more affected by soccer moms
driving SUV's.

6. You have to believe that gender roles are artificial, but being
homosexual is natural.

7. You have to believe that the AIDS virus is spread by a lack of
federal funding.

8. You have to believe that the same teacher who can't teach 4th-graders
how to read is somehow qualified to teach those same kids about sex.

9. You have to believe that hunters don't care about nature, but PETA
activists do.

10. You have to believe that self-esteem is more important than actually
doing something to earn it.

11. You have to believe that Mel Gibson spent $25 million of his own
money to make "The Passion of the Christ" for financial gain only.

12. You have to believe the NRA is bad because it supports certain parts
of the Constitution, while the ACLU is good because it supports certain
parts of the Constitution.

13. You have to believe that taxes are too low, but ATM fees are too
high.

14. You have to believe that Margaret Sanger and Gloria Steinem are more
important to American history than Thomas Jefferson, Gen. Robert E. Lee,
and Thomas Edison.

15. You have to believe that standardized tests are racist, but racial
quotas and set-asides are not.

16. You have to believe that the only reason socialism hasn't worked
anywhere it's been tried is because the right people haven't been in
charge.

17. You have to believe that homosexual parades displaying drag queens
and transvestites should be constitutionally protected, and manger
scenes at Christmas should be illegal.

18. You have to believe that this message is a part of a vast,
right-wing conspiracy.

WOW! What I find to be the most troubling about this is that the conservative-minded individual who authored it had the "ability" to group these topics in a simple to understand black and white manner. They are, no doubt, one of the people that marvel at our current Executive branch's ability. I guess in a conservative world this list is not an example of prejudice and misunderstanding, just the clear wisdom that comes with viewing Fox News, listening to Rush or O'Reilly and knowing that GWB is on track because he gets his advice "from a higher power".

While the conservatives who read it look up who “Margaret Sanger and Gloria Steinem" are (as if they would), maybe they can look up "ethnocentrism" too.

How is it that other nations are not kidnapping these great conservative minds and putting them to use? I guess we're lucky! The least these other nations should do is see the path, join the march to victory and salvation! Our mighty 231 year old country sure could teach these places a lesson or two!

Finally, only a conservative list would include the term "you have to" at the beginning of every statement! As a non-conservative, I know we promote individual thought!

I didn't know the VP was a PJ fan.

farfromglorified · March 2007

Ahnimus wrote:

Did you look that up on Conservapedia?

No, and if I had I wouldn't really have put much stock into that agenda-driven site's presentation of "objective fact".

You are correct, but I have a feeling you didn't really know that.

I have a feeling you're wrong.

So I still don't think you are God.

Me neither.

ThumbingMyWay32 · March 2007

Ahnimus wrote:

So, I guess you aren't God.

The answer to 10^100 is a Googolplex

A woodchuck could chuck 71 butt-cords of wood if a woodchuck could chuck wood.

Your statement appears to try to diffuse my direct questioning of the discussion. You seem to want to only stifle any debate of the topic.

Or maybe it's a question only of how many times you can post useless hollow comments before being considered a troll.

My statement merely suggested that you're a lamebrain ideologue. Did I say it? No. That would only achieve banishment back to the land of reality for the next 24 hours. And really, who wants that? I did you a fucking service diffusing your 2nd grade understanding of the American political system before you baffled even yourself. Thus, lamebrain statements deserve useless, hollow comments.

So as I said very effectively in a prior post, you were, and still are, completely wrong. Nothing more needs to be said. If that makes me a troll then I have no other choice. God isn't even real. Even liberals know that. Oh wait...

Ahnimus · March 2007

ThumbingMyWay32 wrote:

My statement merely suggested that you're a lamebrain ideologue. Did I say it? No. That would only achieve banishment back to the land of reality for the next 24 hours. And really, who wants that? I did you a fucking service diffusing your 2nd grade understanding of the American political system before you baffled even yourself. Thus, lamebrain statements deserve useless, hollow comments.

So as I said very effectively in a prior post, you were, and still are, completely wrong. Nothing more needs to be said. If that makes me a troll then I have no other choice. God isn't even real. Even liberals know that. Oh wait...

You didn't diffuse anything. If anything your statements only escalate and polarize. All you said was "You are wrong" if I can extrapolate a value from that, I'd say it's null.

ThumbingMyWay32 · March 2007

Ahnimus wrote:

You didn't diffuse anything. If anything your statements only escalate and polarize. All you said was "You are wrong" if I can extrapolate a value from that, I'd say it's null.

If anything, I don't really care. If not for myself and a few others here there would be no exchange of ideas. Or as you refer to it: Escalation and Polarization. Don't jump down my throat because I happen to jog the incessant backpatting that goes on here. And please don't insult your own intelligence by insulting mine. As philosophical as you are, I'm sure you understand that.

Ahnimus · March 2007

ThumbingMyWay32 wrote:

If anything, I don't really care. If not for myself and a few others here there would be no exchange of ideas. Or as you refer to it: Escalation and Polarization. Don't jump down my throat because I happen to jog the incessant backpatting that goes on here. And please don't insult your own intelligence by insulting mine. As philosophical as you are, I'm sure you understand that.

Huh? Tell me TMW32 is this actually going anywhere?

I've noticed that in several threads recently you've been posting in opposition to my statements without adding anything new to the conversation.

RolandTD20Kdrummer · March 2007

http://www.googolplex.com

That was an interesting list of sadfsadgdgdghfh about gawergsghfnhgm

ThumbingMyWay32 · March 2007

Ahnimus wrote:

Huh? Tell me TMW32 is this actually going anywhere?

I've noticed that in several threads recently you've been posting in opposition to my statements without adding anything new to the conversation.

Ahnimus, you were unable to handle being called out about your current perceptions of people such as myself. On top of that, you were clearly unable to rationalize your thought process any further as you subsequently questioned my mortal status, recited a tongue twister and then insulted my intelligence.

Now you ask me if this is going anywhere...

Take head to your apparent observations and ignore me if I'm frightening you.

RolandTD20Kdrummer · March 2007

http://www.getodd.com/stuf/stupid/woodchuck.html

Ahnimus · March 2007

ThumbingMyWay32 wrote:

Ahnimus, you were unable to handle being called out about your current perceptions of people such as myself. On top of that, you were clearly unable to rationalize your thought process any further as you subsequently questioned my mortal status, recited a tongue twister and then insulted my intelligence.

Since when did you prove anything?

Now you ask me if this is going anywhere...

Well, is it?

Take head to your apparent observations and ignore me if I'm frightening you.

Dude, you make me laugh. I'm amused by you, yet I'm saddened that you may not be unique.

_Crazy_Mary_ · March 2007

he still stands wrote:

My opinion follows....

1. You have to be against capital punishment, but support abortion on
demand.

Oh, I must be a liberal then! I support abortion as long as we have 18 years to decide whether or not to keep the child.

RolandTD20Kdrummer · March 2007

God is that you?.....

ThumbingMyWay32 · March 2007

Ahnimus wrote:

Since when did you prove anything?

Well, is it?

Dude, you make me laugh. I'm amused by you, yet I'm saddened that you may not be unique.

Jesus Christ! What was I trying to prove!? All I said was that you were wrong in your perceptions of people like me. Or all conservatives, if you wish to take what you said into full context.

I'm the most unique mother fucker you'd ever have the priviledge of meeting. After that, the only relevant emotion left to experience is shock.

Ahnimus · March 2007

ThumbingMyWay32 wrote:

Jesus Christ! What was I trying to prove!? All I said was that you were wrong in your perceptions of people like me. Or all conservatives, if you wish to take what you said into full context.

I'm the most unique mother fucker you'd ever have the priviledge of meeting. After that, the only relevant emotion left to experience is shock.

In-fact the two labels liberal and conservative describe exactly what we've discussed. The labels simply do not apply to most people, they represent extremist views.

I'm not interested in meeting any "mother fuckers".

18 Ways To Become A Liberal

Comments

Categories