gay people raising children

1151618202124

Comments

  • rightondude
    rightondude Posts: 745
    Dodge what?!?!
  • angelica
    angelica Posts: 6,038
    Dodge what?!?!
    maybe I'm incorrect...it appeared that you were dodging soulsinging's question.... I'd love to hear an answer to his question if I am in fact wrong.

    What was this in regards to?: "Whaa the faa are you goin on about again????"
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
  • soulsinging
    soulsinging Posts: 13,202
    I can't see how homosexuality is healthy, especially in males. How is fecal matter + reproductive system a good thing. It's an abomination. It's disgusting. Certainly something is very wrong there. It wouldn't take much to know that playing around with fecal waste is about as backwards to the human process as you can get. The male life bearing "device" is literally inserted into human waste. 180 deg out of balance. The sex part makes me want to dry heave endlessly though.

    this is the quote im takling about. do you consider a man and woman engaging in anal sex equally dry heave inducing? something very wrong there too isnt there? and if you're talking solely about reproduction... couldnt the same be said of "reproductive system + mouth/saliva"? isnt that equally disgusting and an abomination of nature's healthy intentions for human sexuality? that's what im looking for an explanation of dude. cos i find it hard to believe you've ever turned down a hummer or that you're just as disgusted by the thought of a man having anal sex with his wife as you are of two men doing it. so there's more to your disgust with homosexuality than it simply not being natural or scientific, genetic reasons. you have other, emotional, social, or personal reasons for considering it to be wrong that has little to do with science or reproduction and likely has much much more to do with it undermining or threatening your views on masculinity and how males should behave.
  • rightondude
    rightondude Posts: 745
    I never knew a bj was now anal intercourse?
  • Collin
    Collin Posts: 4,931
    I never knew a bj was now anal intercourse?

    It is when you talk shit.:D
    THANK YOU, LOSTDAWG!


    naděje umírá poslední
  • rightondude
    rightondude Posts: 745
    Apparently so! haha :D
  • rightondude
    rightondude Posts: 745
    angelica wrote:
    maybe I'm incorrect...it appeared that you were dodging soulsinging's question.... I'd love to hear an answer to his question if I am in fact wrong.

    What was this in regards to?: "Whaa the faa are you goin on about again????"

    I still don't see the original question...
  • angelica
    angelica Posts: 6,038
    I still don't see the original question...
    Interesting.

    You didn't see this?
    rightondude? ... do you let your gf go down on your or vice versa? is it really about scientific opposition to "unnatural acts" or is it your emotional response to something you perceive as wrong and disgusting?

    More importantly, now that you see these questions, are you going to answer them?
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
  • rightondude
    rightondude Posts: 745
    see post #346
  • soulsinging
    soulsinging Posts: 13,202
    I never knew a bj was now anal intercourse?

    can you read? i didnt say it was. i said if you're talking abuot how the only natural form of sexuality is one man putting his reproductive organ into another woman's reproductive organ, then oral sex is just as unnatural and disgusting and abominable as anal sex. so why is it only anal sex between two gay men that you find disgusting and unnatural? it's obviously got nothing to do with the science of genetics.

    so why is anal sex between two men unnatural and disgusting, but oral sex or a man having anal sex with a woman are not? neither is what nature intended, as you say.
  • angelica
    angelica Posts: 6,038
    see post #346
    What post 346 tells me is that you have not answered the specific questions soulsinging asked.

    That's certainly your perogative.
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
  • rightondude
    rightondude Posts: 745
    In response to post 338 yes it does. What is unnatural? and compared to what again? What are you even trying to say?
  • angelica
    angelica Posts: 6,038
    Passive-aggression is so unbecoming of you, rightondude.;) That's okay, we'll read between the l(d)i(o)n(d)e(g)s(e)
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
  • decides2dream
    decides2dream Posts: 14,977
    In response to post 338 yes it does. What is unnatural and compared to what again? What are you even trying to say?


    maybe you were somehow missing soulsinging's point...but he was bringin you back to this:

    Originally Posted by decides2dream
    btw - the whole anal intercourse thing...seriously, is that it? there are heterosexual couples who engage in such practices...and hello, are you forgetting about lesbians? what's so horrid about them? please.


    he had referenced the said above post, was continued to be ingored...he quoted his own post, again, to see if there would be a response....i really can't see how you 'missed' it.

    just helping to clarify. ;)

    so i think the question is: if the turn-off/aborration of homosexulaity is anal sex and/or the fact that it is 'unnatural'...does not serve a purpose for reproduction...are you equally offended by hetero couples who participate in anal sex, and/or oral sex...since neither serve a purpose to procreation. soulsinging can correct me if i am wrong, but i think that's what he wants answered.
    Stay with me...
    Let's just breathe...


    I am myself like you somehow


  • rightondude
    rightondude Posts: 745
    The post makes no sense....the comparison is rediculous?!?...
  • decides2dream
    decides2dream Posts: 14,977
    The post makes no sense....the comparison is rediculous?!?...


    see post # 357. i don't think i can make it anymore clear for ya.


    what is ridiculous? comparing anal sex to anal sex?
    Stay with me...
    Let's just breathe...


    I am myself like you somehow


  • soulsinging
    soulsinging Posts: 13,202
    The post makes no sense....the comparison is rediculous?!?...

    then why is a man having anal sex with a woman ok and a man having anal sex with a man disgusting? since you're apparently ratehr dense, we'll break it up into baby steps. or perhaps you simply have no response and are trying to dodge to avoid being exposed for the simple homophobe you are.
  • rightondude
    rightondude Posts: 745
    heterosexually deviant men are now akin to being homosexual?...how are lesbians are equivalent to homosexual men?
  • decides2dream
    decides2dream Posts: 14,977
    heterosexually deviant men are now akin to being homosexual?...how are lesbians are equivalent to homosexual men?


    why is this so difficult? it is simply...what exactly is so offensive?
    two men having anal intercourse
    anal intercourse in general
    and also...homosexuality encompasses BOTH men and women...gay and lesbian...so if anal sex is the only issue.....where is the disgust or aborration in being a lesbian? question of this thread is...gay people raising children...that does actually encompass lesbians too.


    you seem rather verbose when spouting your views, but when asked direct and fair simple questions, all of a sudden quite obtuse.
    Stay with me...
    Let's just breathe...


    I am myself like you somehow