Would you prefer we lose the war in Iraq?

1246714

Comments

  • RainDog
    RainDog Posts: 1,824
    Wouldn't the first step to "winning" the war on terror be to admit that maybe we shouldn't have helped create terrorism in the first place? Sort of like having to stand in front of a group of people and say:

    "Hi. I'm the United States of America, and I'm addicted to terrorism. It started out as all fun and games - a little political influence here, a little military influence there; but then it escalated into something.....something I lost control of. I think I started to realize that I had a problem when one morning I awoke with a massive pain in my eastern seaboard. But I didn't fully realize. No, as usual, I felt a little, you know, 'hair of the dog' would help me out - but that turned into an ongoing bender I'm not sure I'll ever recover from. It was good time at first - imbibing a few deaths here and there - but now it seems I just don't feel myself without having dozens, sometimes hundreds, of deaths a day. A couple in the morning, a few to get me through lunch - and by evening, all bets are off. I really feel like I need help - I can't beat this on my own. But, my actions of late - as a result of this addiction - have alienated me from most of my friends. I don't know where to turn."
  • thankyougrandma
    thankyougrandma Posts: 1,182
    RainDog wrote:
    Wouldn't the first step to "winning" the war on terror be to admit that maybe we shouldn't have helped create terrorism in the first place? Sort of like having to stand in front of a group of people and say:

    "Hi. I'm the United States of America, and I'm addicted to terrorism. It started out as all fun and games - a little political influence here, a little military influence there; but then it escalated into something.....something I lost control of. I think I started to realize that I had a problem when one morning I awoke with a massive pain in my eastern seaboard. But I didn't fully realize. No, as usual, I felt a little, you know, 'hair of the dog' would help me out - but that turned into an ongoing bender I'm not sure I'll ever recover from. It was good time at first - imbibing a few deaths here and there - but now it seems I just don't feel myself without having dozens, sometimes hundreds, of deaths a day. A couple in the morning, a few to get me through lunch - and by evening, all bets are off. I really feel like I need help - I can't beat this on my own. But, my actions of late - as a result of this addiction - have alienated me from most of my friends. I don't know where to turn."

    like a medic/drug company who'd spread a disease they have the cure/medic for...
    "L'homme est né libre, et partout il est dans les fers"
    -Jean-Jacques Rousseau
  • eddies grrl
    eddies grrl Posts: 509
    MLC2006 wrote:
    I'm looking out for this person by telling them how ignorant they look claiming that the military doesn't do anything for them. .

    "you WANT me on that wall, you NEED me on that wall...!" :D

    ok, calm down there jack nicholson. that was a movie. and he was still found guilty, let's remember. the ends do not justify the means.

    the military is supposed to protect its citizens from attack. it's not the military's job to forcibly impose our brand of government on sovereign nations, thus embroiling us- and many of its citizens- in an escalating pissing contest with insurgent rebels. they fucked up, the military leaders- not the soldiers- so i don't think they can be trusted to figure out a way to end it. i think it's time to take the toys away from the overzealous kids and let some grown-ups take control now.
    Life is the riddle
    Of which we're caught in the middle.
    A couple of lucky ones
    Tangled up in too much love
    ~cowboy junkies
  • eddies grrl
    eddies grrl Posts: 509
    what the fuck happened to osama bin laden? you remember, the terrorist guy? the one who masterminded 9/11?

    i haven't heard the bushies mention him in a long time. are he & georgie buddies now, maybe osama sends him post cards from the riviera, "wish you were here", that sort of thing?
    Life is the riddle
    Of which we're caught in the middle.
    A couple of lucky ones
    Tangled up in too much love
    ~cowboy junkies
  • keeponrockin
    keeponrockin Posts: 7,446
    Ya, I think we need to get Osama. How is it that Canada is the main force in Afganistan right now.
    Believe me, when I was growin up, I thought the worst thing you could turn out to be was normal, So I say freaks in the most complementary way. Here's a song by a fellow freak - E.V
  • thankyougrandma
    thankyougrandma Posts: 1,182
    Ya, I think we need to get Osama. How is it that Canada is the main force in Afganistan right now.

    We're not, only a small portion of the military in Afghan. are from Canada, like 2000 out of 25000 soldiers, mostly from OTAN forces and USA forces, our PM is a douche for making us believe we were the leaders in Afghanistan, we're not, our soldiers are puppets right now, it's sad really...
    "L'homme est né libre, et partout il est dans les fers"
    -Jean-Jacques Rousseau
  • Eliot Rosewater
    Eliot Rosewater Posts: 2,659
    Pegasus wrote:
    I don't care we loose, as long as the ordinary Iraqi people win...they didn't have a choice.

    I'm not for withdrawal btw.
    I was dead against going there in the first place, but once we created the mess, we have to clean it up..not sure how though...but then that's what they should have thought about before going..
    looking very bleak indeed for the Iraqis.

    Can't say I feel particularly for the soldiers on the other hand; there's no draft, they have a bloody choice.
    The very least we owe the Iraqi people is a complete and immediate withdrawal. We owe such great reparations for our acts of terrorism toward the Iraqi people.

    As for, "we have to clean it up"...??? The longer we're there, the more blood we'll be cleaning up. Sure we've made a mess, but I assure you that cleaning it up is the last thing on our minds over there. We're there for occupation and control. It was an illegal invasion. It's an illegal war. It's illegal occupation. How can you suggest that we do anything but immediately withdraw all of our troops? Really, please help me understand. It's been illegal from the start and the longer we're there the more illegal it becomes and the more damage we do to the Iraqi people and to our country.
  • Eliot Rosewater
    Eliot Rosewater Posts: 2,659
    Pegasus wrote:
    Can't say I feel particularly for the soldiers on the other hand; there's no draft, they have a bloody choice.
    Very true...and I think it's a very unwise decision to join the military, as noble as jingoes make it sound. However, a good share of soldiers do come from poverty and see this as their only chance to get out of it. Plus they're often flat out lied to by recruiters....many at age 17 when they really have no clue what's going on anyway.

    But even so, our citizens and especially our soldiers should be able to trust that they won't be put in harm's way unless it's absolutely necessary. Joining the military shouldn't by any means be the Republican-Assisted-Suicide that it's turned out to be.
  • Eliot Rosewater
    Eliot Rosewater Posts: 2,659
    Abuskedti wrote:
    these people live up to their vow - and get killed.. and you enjoy the security.. and be smug abou thier sacrifice and don't even have the charactor to be greatful and supportive.
    We clearly don't enjoy the security that we had even before the illegal invasion of Iraq. You're making the false assumption that because we're at war and because troops are being killed that we have better security. It's clearly the opposite. I don't mean any disrespect to our troops because I'm sure many of them actually believe in what they're doing is a good thing but it's not. As harsh as it sounds, they're part of the problem, even if they're just pawns being ordered by King George....

    I read a couple of weeks ago about an officer who refused to go to Iraq solely based on the legality of this war. Kudos to him and I hope to see more following his example.
  • Eliot Rosewater
    Eliot Rosewater Posts: 2,659
    Abuskedti wrote:
    no my friend, it seems you have missed the fact that an obscene amount of soldiers have already died for nothing. A far more obscene amount of innocent Iraqis (all the soldiers equally innocent) have already died for nothing. We have already lost. If we come home today - and leave Iraq to the Iraqis we will have saved many many lives.

    Iraq will fight it out - a number of Iraqis will continue to die - hard to imagine at any greater rate - and they will progress into the Iraq they will want to be.

    The only victory we can achieve today or tomorrow would be to give Iraq back to the Iraqis. Everyday that passes our loss only grows.
    Best post I've read so far in this thread....even better than any of mine, lol.
  • Eliot Rosewater
    Eliot Rosewater Posts: 2,659
    know1 wrote:
    It would be hard for the U.S. to even define a win from this operation from it's own viewpoint. However, if the Iraqi people end up with significantly better lives, then there will be at least a positive out of it.
    I'm confused. Can you please define "significantly better lives" please?
  • thankyougrandma
    thankyougrandma Posts: 1,182
    Very true...and I think it's a very unwise decision to join the military, as noble as jingoes make it sound. However, a good share of soldiers do come from poverty and see this as their only chance to get out of it. Plus they're often flat out lied to by recruiters....many at age 17 when they really have no clue what's going on anyway.

    But even so, our citizens and especially our soldiers should be able to trust that they won't be put in harm's way unless it's absolutely necessary. Joining the military shouldn't by any means be the Republican-Assisted-Suicide that it's turned out to be.

    I agree that Irak is about Republican stupidity, but in the end they're just applying the "american way" by the book, it's how the USA do things, for decades now...
    "L'homme est né libre, et partout il est dans les fers"
    -Jean-Jacques Rousseau
  • Abuskedti
    Abuskedti Posts: 1,917
    We clearly don't enjoy the security that we had even before the illegal invasion of Iraq. You're making the false assumption that because we're at war and because troops are being killed that we have better security. It's clearly the opposite. I don't mean any disrespect to our troops because I'm sure many of them actually believe in what they're doing is a good thing but it's not. As harsh as it sounds, they're part of the problem, even if they're just pawns being ordered by King George....

    I read a couple of weeks ago about an officer who refused to go to Iraq solely based on the legality of this war. Kudos to him and I hope to see more following his example.

    as I have said before.. We are less safe because of this war.. but that doesn't change what the men and woman of the military volunteered to do. the fault doesn't lie with them
  • Eliot Rosewater
    Eliot Rosewater Posts: 2,659
    So you think it’s better that less American lives are lost than Iraqi lives? What makes an American more important or valuable than an Iraqi? Your opinion?

    ‘These people volunteer to give their lives to protect what you have’

    I’m sorry, but how exactly are they ‘protecting’ you when they’re halfway across the world in another country that was NEVER any kind of threat to you?
    Damn, a lot of good posts here. I couldn't agree with you more. Despite popular belief and the nationalism being shoved down our throats, they're not "protecting" us one bit. If anything they're making us more and more of a target for the rest of the world.

    And yeah, Americans are going to say that their lives are worth more than an Iraqi life. Why? Because we're fucking brainwashed from infancy to believe that America is a chosen people and that we're better than the rest of the world. It's so fucking ridiculous. The arrogance as a nation that is instilled in us from before we can even remember is sickening.

    I attended my nephew's elementary school graduation a couple of weeks ago. The principal got up and went on and on about how lucky we are to be in America, where we can live free and grow up to be whatever we want to be. As if there aren't hundreds of other places where people can do that. We've taken our standard of living and turned it into complete and utter arrogance. We say we're better than them because they live in caves or because they have to take a shit in the sand and wipe their asses with sage brush. Maybe I'm wrong, but standard of living has nothing to do with quality of life and value of life, in my opinion.
  • Eliot Rosewater
    Eliot Rosewater Posts: 2,659
    it will be very spineless to pull out now, after fucking up the country.
    Since when is it spineless to recognize, admit, and try to correct one of the biggest mistakes in a nation's history? And by correct, I mean offering aid and reparations to the Iraqi people....not militarily and certainly not through occupying their country.
  • Eliot Rosewater
    Eliot Rosewater Posts: 2,659
    Regardless of your stance on the war, as an American you really have no other choice but to hope the U.S. wins (If you don't think it's a war, I will say, "hope the U.S. gets the job done.")

    Like it or not, Iraq has become the central proving ground in the fight against terror. Go home before the job is done, and the terrorists have won, regardless of what strides have been made.

    It would demonstrate -- again -- that tactics of fear and terror work wonders against Americans. They don't like to get their hands dirty. They don't like the smell of their own blood. You can kill a relatively small number of them, and they will lose their nerve.

    That's what it shows Al Qaeda. And that makes Al Qaeda all the more dangerous.

    We can argue that Iraq wasn't a front in the fight against terror before 2003. I can buy that. But it is the pivotal front now.
    Spoken like a true Texan.....

    Hello? The U.S. invasion of Iraq is the biggest act of terrorism in recent years. Yes, far greater terrorist act than 9/11.
  • thankyougrandma
    thankyougrandma Posts: 1,182
    there was no terrorism in Irak before the invasion...
    "L'homme est né libre, et partout il est dans les fers"
    -Jean-Jacques Rousseau
  • Eliot Rosewater
    Eliot Rosewater Posts: 2,659
    The USA won the moment they've started this stupid war without opposition
    I agree...although it's not American that won, it's the aristocratic leadership that won....the American people did not want this war and do not support it. It's what Noam Chomsky details in his newest book "Failed States".....something called a democratic deficit. It's when the policy differs so greatly from the will of the people. It's essentially dictatorship, not democracy. I'm so goddamn sick and tired of the U.S. trying to spread democracy when we can't even do it right here at home.
  • Pegasus
    Pegasus Posts: 3,754
    The very least we owe the Iraqi people is a complete and immediate withdrawal. We owe such great reparations for our acts of terrorism toward the Iraqi people.

    As for, "we have to clean it up"...??? The longer we're there, the more blood we'll be cleaning up. Sure we've made a mess, but I assure you that cleaning it up is the last thing on our minds over there. We're there for occupation and control. It was an illegal invasion. It's an illegal war. It's illegal occupation. How can you suggest that we do anything but immediately withdraw all of our troops? Really, please help me understand. It's been illegal from the start and the longer we're there the more illegal it becomes and the more damage we do to the Iraqi people and to our country.
    I wish it was true, and yes, the occupation fuels the fire...but abandonning the iraqis to their fate now would be cowardly, irresponsible and even on a purely selfish level, extremely dangerous.

    The situation might be bad now, but the minute the military pulls out, all out Civil war explodes. Genocide. And that will spill on the whole region because the war is along religious/ethnic lines, Shia-Shiite-Kurds.

    It's going to take a long time to establish a legitimate (as in not puppet) government that unites all the population..might not even be possible. Iraq has only ever existed under military rules: the Brits, Saddam, the US..

    Loads of things have to change in the way the Army is used in Iraq but leaving now is not an option.
  • thankyougrandma
    thankyougrandma Posts: 1,182
    I agree...although it's not American that won, it's the aristocratic leadership that won....the American people did not want this war and do not support it. It's what Noam Chomsky details in his newest book "Failed States".....something called a democratic deficit. It's when the policy differs so greatly from the will of the people. It's essentially dictatorship, not democracy. I'm so goddamn sick and tired of the U.S. trying to spread democracy when we can't even do it right here at home.

    sure, but since i don't feel like making all the exceptions, i say americans, but i should say the USA govt. more than americans...
    "L'homme est né libre, et partout il est dans les fers"
    -Jean-Jacques Rousseau