Options

Killer cow emissions: Why isn't anyone raising a stink?

halvhalv Posts: 678
edited October 2007 in A Moving Train
Post edited by Unknown User on
«1

Comments

  • Options
    jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    is there anyway to stop it?
  • Options
    godpt3godpt3 Posts: 1,020
    why hasn't anybody done anything about it???


    Because the problem isn't that significant. In fact, this was easily debunked more than 15 years ago. Compared to the damage caused by man, cows are just a drop in the bucket.



    The real question is, why isn't anybody working to do more population control in Africa? Not only do you reduce poverty and hunger, you also reduce the production of greenhouse gasses.
    "If all those sweet, young things were laid end to end, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised."
    —Dorothy Parker

    http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/6902/conspiracytheoriesxt6qt8.jpg
  • Options
    halvhalv Posts: 678
    By not eating meat, or at least drastically reducing your consumption you can help in a big way.
  • Options
    jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    halv wrote:
    By not eating meat, or at least drastically reducing your consumption you can help in a big way.

    sorry, I love steak. fart on cows.
  • Options
    halvhalv Posts: 678
    godpt3 wrote:
    why hasn't anybody done anything about it???


    Because the problem isn't that significant. In fact, this was easily debunked more than 15 years ago. Compared to the damage caused by man, cows are just a drop in the bucket.



    The real question is, why isn't anybody working to do more population control in Africa? Not only do you reduce poverty and hunger, you also reduce the production of greenhouse gasses.

    That's your word against all the scientists and specialists working for the United Nations Food and Agriculture organisation. Not to mention other top scientists from around the world. No offense, but I'll take their word for it.
  • Options
    If the world is so delicate that cow farts can destroy it, we were fucked from the start. I'm not gonna lose any sleep over this.
  • Options
    godpt3godpt3 Posts: 1,020
    halv wrote:
    That's your word against all the scientists and specialists working for the United Nations Food and Agriculture organisation. Not to mention other top scientists from around the world. No offense, but I'll take their word for it.

    I'm not saying cows don't produce methane, I'm saying that, in the grand scheme of things, the problem is overstated. Did you know that the Space Shuttle also causes ozone loss? It's true. Every launch releases tons of aluminum particles into the atmosphere from the rocket boosters. But is it a significant cause of greenhouse gasses? Absolutely not.
    "If all those sweet, young things were laid end to end, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised."
    —Dorothy Parker

    http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/6902/conspiracytheoriesxt6qt8.jpg
  • Options
    ledveddermanledvedderman Posts: 7,755
    jlew24asu wrote:
    sorry, I love steak. fart on cows.

    I too love steak...then they cause me to create my own hazard to the environment.
  • Options
    godpt3godpt3 Posts: 1,020
    halv wrote:
    By not eating meat, or at least drastically reducing your consumption you can help in a big way.

    Good. Then we can have the Brazilians tear up even more rainforests so they can produce even greater quantities of genetically-engineered soybeans.
    "If all those sweet, young things were laid end to end, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised."
    —Dorothy Parker

    http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/6902/conspiracytheoriesxt6qt8.jpg
  • Options
    These problems are really just symptoms of human overpopulation.

    Until someone solves the problem of there being too many people on the planet, all of these problems are irrelevent.
  • Options
    godpt3godpt3 Posts: 1,020
    MrSmith wrote:
    Until someone solves the problem of there being too many people on the planet, all of these problems are irrelevent.

    Voluntary Human Extinction Movement:
    http://www.vhemt.org/
    "If all those sweet, young things were laid end to end, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised."
    —Dorothy Parker

    http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/6902/conspiracytheoriesxt6qt8.jpg
  • Options
    jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    I too love steak...then they cause me to create my own hazard to the environment.

    aint that the truth. speaking of, I had some steak tacos for lunch.
  • Options
    jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    godpt3 wrote:
    Voluntary Human Extinction Movement:
    http://www.vhemt.org/

    that world has gone mad I tell ya, mad.
  • Options
    godpt3 wrote:
    Voluntary Human Extinction Movement:
    http://www.vhemt.org/

    Yes, EVERYONE should do this, except me
  • Options
    godpt3godpt3 Posts: 1,020
    MrSmith wrote:
    Yes, EVERYONE should do this, except me

    Don't worry... as long as the Pope's still Catholic you don't have anything to worry about. :(
    "If all those sweet, young things were laid end to end, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised."
    —Dorothy Parker

    http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/6902/conspiracytheoriesxt6qt8.jpg
  • Options
    godpt3godpt3 Posts: 1,020
    halv wrote:
    That's your word against all the scientists and specialists working for the United Nations Food and Agriculture organisation. Not to mention other top scientists from around the world. No offense, but I'll take their word for it.

    Go read up on Jeremy Rifkin. He was championing the whole "cows cause ozone loss" cause back in the early '90s. Turns out he was basically a "scientist for hire" and ended up being a schill for the oil industry.
    "If all those sweet, young things were laid end to end, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised."
    —Dorothy Parker

    http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/6902/conspiracytheoriesxt6qt8.jpg
  • Options
    halvhalv Posts: 678
    It's more than just cow farts. Read the entire article, do some research. It's land degradation, the vast amounts of waste from the 55 billions animals raised for slaughter, how livestock drink more than 50% of our freshwater, the energy and resources used to grow plants to feed to livestock when it could directly feed humans, etc etc.
  • Options
    jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    halv wrote:
    It's more than just cow farts. Read the entire article, do some research. It's land degradation, the vast amounts of waste from the 55 billions animals raised for slaughter, how livestock drink more than 50% of our freshwater, the energy and resources used to grow plants to feed to livestock when it could directly feed humans, etc etc.

    I'm sure thats probably true. maybe I wont eat steak as much. least I can u
  • Options
    AhnimusAhnimus Posts: 10,569
    I use to say the same thing about bovine flatulence.

    However, the oceans contribute much more CO2.
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • Options
    godpt3godpt3 Posts: 1,020
    jlew24asu wrote:
    I'm sure thats probably true. maybe I wont eat steak as much. least I can u

    have a nice salad. Just watch out for the e.coli.
    "If all those sweet, young things were laid end to end, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised."
    —Dorothy Parker

    http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/6902/conspiracytheoriesxt6qt8.jpg
  • Options
    jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    godpt3 wrote:
    have a nice salad. Just watch out for the e.coli.

    I like salads. steak salads
  • Options
    gue_bariumgue_barium Posts: 5,515
    I know in the American west much of the beef that is raised is more or less free range herefords. America imports copious amounts of beef from around the world.

    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • Options
    godpt3godpt3 Posts: 1,020
    gue_barium wrote:
    America imports copious amounts of beef from around the world.

    Yep. That's why the beef producers don't want you to know where your meat comes from. Country-of-origin labeling was in the 2002 farm bill, but industry lobbyists have continually managed to delay its implementation. The beef packing industry doesn't want you to know if your steak came from Argentina or not, since most consumers would automatically assume that their beef is "Made in the USA."
    "If all those sweet, young things were laid end to end, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised."
    —Dorothy Parker

    http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/6902/conspiracytheoriesxt6qt8.jpg
  • Options
    gabersgabers Posts: 2,787
    Ahnimus wrote:
    However, the oceans contribute much more CO2.

    How so? They're the biggest "carbon sink". In other words, they absorb immense amounts of CO2. Here's a link:

    http://www.environmentalsciences.homestead.com/carbonsinks.html
  • Options
    Aren't the red meat links to cancer fairly substantial?
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • Options
    Kel VarnsenKel Varnsen Posts: 1,951
    MrSmith wrote:
    These problems are really just symptoms of human overpopulation.

    Until someone solves the problem of there being too many people on the planet, all of these problems are irrelevent.


    If only there was some way to warm up the entire world so that the cold northern parts could become more livable.
  • Options
    gabersgabers Posts: 2,787
    If only there was some way to warm up the entire world so that the cold northern parts could become more livable.

    Are you joking? Have you heard anything about global warming in the news? The "cold northern parts" will most likely see the most dramatic warming. Do a little research. Polar bears are running out of habitat.
  • Options
    AhnimusAhnimus Posts: 10,569
    gabers wrote:
    How so? They're the biggest "carbon sink". In other words, they absorb immense amounts of CO2. Here's a link:

    http://www.environmentalsciences.homestead.com/carbonsinks.html

    It's kind of like the bogs that release carbon when the temperature rises. As the temp rises the ocean evaporates more carbon. I'm pretty sure I read this on the EPA but I can't find it now, so discredit it.
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • Options
    godpt3 wrote:
    The real question is, why isn't anybody working to do more population control in Africa? Not only do you reduce poverty and hunger, you also reduce the production of greenhouse gasses.

    The continent of Africa produces very little pollution given its population. Its places like N. America, Asia and Europe that are creating much of the pollution.
  • Options
    Don't forget the methane gas emitted from land fill dumps. As all the millions of tons of garbage we produce decomposes, it poisons the air we breathe.
    "When you're climbing to the top, you'd better know the way back down" MSB
Sign In or Register to comment.