SUCCESS!!! Nuke test is SUCCESS!!!

245

Comments

  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    chiefojibwa wrote:
    once again, for those of you who refuse to listen...

    the bush adminstration does NOT equal america. never has.

    NEVER WILL.


    just wondering how north koreas nuke test is america's fault
  • robbie
    robbie Posts: 883
    jlew24asu wrote:
    thanks for the good laugh this morning. how do you have any idea if bush is sleeping. and where do you get your info that this is all AMERICA'S fault? your pure hatred for america gets in the way of trying to think.

    i know he was sleeping because while this was unfolding the presidents/prime ministers of south korea, japan, and china all came out with public statements while W was nowhere to be found...again. i state that it is all the fault of the bush administration because it is. this is another effect of the iraq war. THAT IS WHAT NORTH KOREA IS SAYING. when they saw the united states go into iraq and topple the government they knew the same would happen to them if they did not acquire the bomb. they decided not to let what happened to saddam happen to them. it is exactly what they are saying. who should we blame? they, like the rest of the world realise that the united states under the bush administration is a rabid dog. an over aggressive war mongering, insane world bully. when a country like the united states puts you on its hit list, you either wait to be overthrown, or do something about it. they did something about it. YES Ill is insane, and the world is in i BAD situation with his country having the bomb, but he would not have it without the cowboy antics and intimidation of george w. bush, or the iraq war. im not making this shit up, NORTH KOREA IS AND HAS BEEN STATING THIS AS THE REASON. the reason they kicked out weapons inspectors, the reason they fired back up their plants, the reason they tested their missile systems, the reason for this nuke test,.... at every step they have openly stated it was because of fear of the bush policy. how can you attack me for stating FACT? that son of a bitch bush has you believing the war in iraq has made the world a SAFER place with his war, while all the war has done is turned a dictatorship into a TERRORIST STATE, given NORTH KOREA A NUKE, emboldened IRAN to acquire a nuke, and most likely started a nuclear arms race throughout northeast asia. why bdo you believe north korea is doing this???? wait...let me guess..... because they hate our freedom? oh, and there is NOTHING we can or are going to do about this.......iran WILL take note of that.
  • Puck78
    Puck78 Posts: 737
    France did the same exact thing few years ago in Mururoa
    www.amnesty.org
    www.amnesty.org.uk
  • FinsburyParkCarrots
    FinsburyParkCarrots Seattle, WA Posts: 12,223
    Puck78 wrote:
    France did the same exact thing few years ago in Mururoa


    But interestingly, the tests were bigger? This North Korean test was at a sub-kiloton level. It's not confirmed, as of yet, whether this latest test was nuclear, or conventional (bar North Korean claims).

    Info on French tests:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mururoa
  • robbie
    robbie Posts: 883
    clearly i remember picking on the boy.... he seemed a harmless little fuck.....
    but we unleashed a lion.
  • farfromglorified
    farfromglorified Posts: 5,700
    robbie wrote:
    clearly i remember picking on the boy.... he seemed a harmless little fuck.....
    but we unleashed a lion.

    In a world of victims, there are no criminals, huh?
  • sonicreducer
    sonicreducer Posts: 713
    sponger wrote:
    A former Army Intelligence guy I know was telling me that there are so many US Patriot missile batteries situated on the border in S. Korea that there is just no way N. Korea could ever get an aggressively aimed missile to leave its own airspace w/o it being knocked down.

    I think the real worry is N. Korea selling the parts or the technology.

    yeah, these are the same people who let a highjacked plane crash into the pentagon. i doubt that is true.

    also, i agree with the second part.
    you're a real hooker. im gonna slap you in public.
    ~Ron Burgundy
  • Jammin909
    Jammin909 Posts: 888
    Puck78 wrote:
    France did the same exact thing few years ago in Mururoa

    Comparing France to N. Korea is like comparing Bush to Saddam.

    Anyhow, the US is only partially to blame.

    Besides further isolating N Korea and simply hoping this policy leads to the downfall of "Lil Kim", what was Bush's plan?? I dont know what S Korea, Japan, and China wanted to do but I am sure it was more complicated than just trying to starve them.

    This harsh rhetoric and lack of action is not going to do shit. All over the news today, "China condemns N Korea"..."Russia condems"..."the UN unanimously agrees"...well fucking do something about it.

    Russia wont bc they are the energy suppliers, China wont bc of trade... The UN wont bc they need one million different countries to actually agree when it's in their immediate financial interest not to act.
    The less you know, the more you believe.
  • dkst0426
    dkst0426 Posts: 523
    robbie wrote:
    i know he was sleeping because while this was unfolding the presidents/prime ministers of south korea, japan, and china all came out with public statements while W was nowhere to be found...again. i state that it is all the fault of the bush administration because it is. this is another effect of the iraq war. THAT IS WHAT NORTH KOREA IS SAYING. when they saw the united states go into iraq and topple the government they knew the same would happen to them if they did not acquire the bomb. they decided not to let what happened to saddam happen to them. it is exactly what they are saying. who should we blame? they, like the rest of the world realise that the united states under the bush administration is a rabid dog. an over aggressive war mongering, insane world bully. when a country like the united states puts you on its hit list, you either wait to be overthrown, or do something about it. they did something about it. YES Ill is insane, and the world is in i BAD situation with his country having the bomb, but he would not have it without the cowboy antics and intimidation of george w. bush, or the iraq war. im not making this shit up, NORTH KOREA IS AND HAS BEEN STATING THIS AS THE REASON. the reason they kicked out weapons inspectors, the reason they fired back up their plants, the reason they tested their missile systems, the reason for this nuke test,.... at every step they have openly stated it was because of fear of the bush policy. how can you attack me for stating FACT? that son of a bitch bush has you believing the war in iraq has made the world a SAFER place with his war, while all the war has done is turned a dictatorship into a TERRORIST STATE, given NORTH KOREA A NUKE, emboldened IRAN to acquire a nuke, and most likely started a nuclear arms race throughout northeast asia. why bdo you believe north korea is doing this???? wait...let me guess..... because they hate our freedom? oh, and there is NOTHING we can or are going to do about this.......iran WILL take note of that.
    It'd be nice if you used paragraphs every once in a while. Every good opportunistic anti-Bush posts deserves to be at least read.
  • binauralsounds
    binauralsounds Posts: 1,357
    On a side note....

    As of 1 p.m. South Korea detects suspicious activities in and around another nuke test site. Another possible test may be underway.

    And for the record, Kim wants to be congratulated on their success. HAHAHAHAHAH
  • my2hands
    my2hands Posts: 17,117
    brain of c wrote:
    don't worry, the u s is on it.

    after training my little brother years ago to translate Korean, and sending him there every other year since then.........the usa is so worried about Korea that they sent him to iraq.





    what the fuck.


    3 letters

    O-I-L
  • sonicreducer
    sonicreducer Posts: 713
    my2hands wrote:
    3 letters

    O-I-L

    no, no, no,... you've got it all wrong man. it's eight so we can L-I-B-E-R-A-T-E!

    the only thing we've liberated is more terrorists.
    you're a real hooker. im gonna slap you in public.
    ~Ron Burgundy
  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    my2hands wrote:
    3 letters

    O-I-L


    which sucks more. bush going after oil or the fact that america needs oil to survive. for me the latter.
  • binauralsounds
    binauralsounds Posts: 1,357
    sonicreducer wrote:
    no, no, no,... you've got it all wrong man. it's eight so we can L-I-B-E-R-A-T-E!

    the only thing we've liberated is more terrorists.

    no no no... you have it all wrong.. it's ten letters! The ten letters everyone laughs at and says it doesn't exist....

    Axis Of Evil

    :D:D
  • my2hands
    my2hands Posts: 17,117
    binauralsounds wrote:
    no no no... you have it all wrong.. it's ten letters! The ten letters everyone laughs at and says it doesn't exist....

    Axis Of Evil

    :D:D


    you keep buying that

    this administration is very bad at "whack a mole"

    iraq had bb guns and water pistols = invasion

    north korea is testing nukes = sanctions

    i wonder what the difference is? let me think abou that for a few minutes ;)

    i was talking to a good friend i work with who was a marine for 8 years and is applying for "private security" and he admits without hesitation that this is all about the oil and energy reserves...
  • binauralsounds
    binauralsounds Posts: 1,357
    my2hands wrote:
    you keep buying that

    this administration is very bad at "whack a mole"

    iraq had bb guns and water pistols = invasion

    north korea is testing nukes = sanctions

    i wonder what the difference is? let me think abou that for a few minutes ;)

    i was talking to a good friend i work with who was a marine for 8 years and is applying for "private security" and he admits without hesitation that this is all about the oil and energy reserves...

    ok
  • farfromglorified
    farfromglorified Posts: 5,700
    my2hands wrote:
    you keep buying that

    this administration is very bad at "whack a mole"

    iraq had bb guns and water pistols = invasion

    north korea is testing nukes = sanctions

    i wonder what the difference is? let me think abou that for a few minutes ;)

    i was talking to a good friend i work with who was a marine for 8 years and is applying for "private security" and he admits without hesitation that this is all about the oil and energy reserves...

    The difference is not oil. The difference is a war we could win compared with a war we could not win.
  • Jammin909
    Jammin909 Posts: 888
    my2hands wrote:

    iraq had bb guns and water pistols = invasion

    north korea is testing nukes = sanctions

    scratches head...
    The less you know, the more you believe.
  • robbie
    robbie Posts: 883
    farfromglorified wrote:
    The difference is not oil. The difference is a war we could win compared with a war we could not win.


    which one is the war we can win?
  • sonicreducer
    sonicreducer Posts: 713
    farfromglorified wrote:
    The difference is not oil. The difference is a war we could win compared with a war we could not win.

    i don't think we could win either. i don't get it, as usual,...
    you're a real hooker. im gonna slap you in public.
    ~Ron Burgundy

Categories