US to Pakistan: "We will bomb you back to the stone age"
Options

darkcrow
Posts: 1,102
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060921/pl_afp/usattackspakistan_060921194310
NEW YORK (AFP) - The United States threatened to bomb Pakistan "back to the stone age" in 2001 unless it cooperated in the US-led war on terror, President Pervez Musharraf said in an interview.
Musharraf, whose support for the US-led invasion of Afghanistan was instrumental in the fall of the hardline Taliban regime after the September 11, 2001 attacks, said the threat came from former deputy secretary of state Richard Armitage.
The Pakistani leader said the comments were delivered to his intelligence director, according to selected transcripts of the interview with CBS television's "60 Minutes" investigative news programme due to be broadcast Sunday.
"The intelligence director told me that (Armitage) said, 'Be prepared to be bombed. Be prepared to go back to the stone age'," Musharraf said.
"I think it was a very rude remark," Musharraf says in the interview. "One has to think and take actions in the interests of the nation, and that's what I did."
Shortly after the September 11 attacks, Pakistan abandoned its support for the Taliban, which was sheltering Al-Qaeda leaders, and became a front-line ally in the US-led "war on terror."
Pakistan has arrested several senior Al-Qaeda members including Khalid Sheikh Mohammad, the alleged mastermind of the 2001 attacks.
The South Asian country has also deployed around 80,000 troops on the rugged border with Afghanistan to hunt pro-Taliban and Al-Qaeda linked militants who sneaked into the area after fleeing the US-led invasion of Afghanistan.
Armitage's alleged threat also demanded that Pakistan turn over border posts and bases for the US military to use in the war in Afghanistan, which ended with the Taliban regime's collapse in late 2001.
Other "ludicrous" demands required Pakistan to suppress domestic expressions of support for militant attacks on US targets, according to the CBS, which produces 60 Minutes.
"If somebody's expressing views, we cannot curb the expression of views," it quoted Musharraf as saying.
In the interview, Musharraf also reveals an embarrassing episode in which former CIA director George Tenet confronted him in 2003 with proof that Pakistan's top nuclear scientist was passing secrets to Libya, Iran and North Korea.
Abdul Qadeer Khan, held as hero in Pakistan for helping to make the country a nuclear power, admitted giving away nuclear secrets in a televised confession in February 2004, exposing a global black market in nuclear technology.
"He (Tenet) took his briefcase out, passed me some papers. It was a centrifuge design with all its numbers and signatures of Pakistan. It was the most embarrassing moment," Musharraf says.
It was only then, he says, that he realised that not only had blueprints been leaked, but that centrifuges themselves -- a crucial technology needed to enrich uranium to weapons grade -- were being passed on, CBS said.
Musharraf denies that anyone in the government or military was aware of the leak.
He pardoned Khan the same month, but the ailing scientist has since lived under virtual house arrest in a leafy diplomatic sector in Islamabad and makes no public appearances.
NEW YORK (AFP) - The United States threatened to bomb Pakistan "back to the stone age" in 2001 unless it cooperated in the US-led war on terror, President Pervez Musharraf said in an interview.
Musharraf, whose support for the US-led invasion of Afghanistan was instrumental in the fall of the hardline Taliban regime after the September 11, 2001 attacks, said the threat came from former deputy secretary of state Richard Armitage.
The Pakistani leader said the comments were delivered to his intelligence director, according to selected transcripts of the interview with CBS television's "60 Minutes" investigative news programme due to be broadcast Sunday.
"The intelligence director told me that (Armitage) said, 'Be prepared to be bombed. Be prepared to go back to the stone age'," Musharraf said.
"I think it was a very rude remark," Musharraf says in the interview. "One has to think and take actions in the interests of the nation, and that's what I did."
Shortly after the September 11 attacks, Pakistan abandoned its support for the Taliban, which was sheltering Al-Qaeda leaders, and became a front-line ally in the US-led "war on terror."
Pakistan has arrested several senior Al-Qaeda members including Khalid Sheikh Mohammad, the alleged mastermind of the 2001 attacks.
The South Asian country has also deployed around 80,000 troops on the rugged border with Afghanistan to hunt pro-Taliban and Al-Qaeda linked militants who sneaked into the area after fleeing the US-led invasion of Afghanistan.
Armitage's alleged threat also demanded that Pakistan turn over border posts and bases for the US military to use in the war in Afghanistan, which ended with the Taliban regime's collapse in late 2001.
Other "ludicrous" demands required Pakistan to suppress domestic expressions of support for militant attacks on US targets, according to the CBS, which produces 60 Minutes.
"If somebody's expressing views, we cannot curb the expression of views," it quoted Musharraf as saying.
In the interview, Musharraf also reveals an embarrassing episode in which former CIA director George Tenet confronted him in 2003 with proof that Pakistan's top nuclear scientist was passing secrets to Libya, Iran and North Korea.
Abdul Qadeer Khan, held as hero in Pakistan for helping to make the country a nuclear power, admitted giving away nuclear secrets in a televised confession in February 2004, exposing a global black market in nuclear technology.
"He (Tenet) took his briefcase out, passed me some papers. It was a centrifuge design with all its numbers and signatures of Pakistan. It was the most embarrassing moment," Musharraf says.
It was only then, he says, that he realised that not only had blueprints been leaked, but that centrifuges themselves -- a crucial technology needed to enrich uranium to weapons grade -- were being passed on, CBS said.
Musharraf denies that anyone in the government or military was aware of the leak.
He pardoned Khan the same month, but the ailing scientist has since lived under virtual house arrest in a leafy diplomatic sector in Islamabad and makes no public appearances.
DOWNLOAD THE LATEST ISSUE OF The Last Reel: http://www.mediafire.com/?jdsqazrjzdt
http://www.myspace.com/thelastreel http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=19604327965
http://www.myspace.com/thelastreel http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=19604327965
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
-
it wouldnt be such a big deal, they are still in the stone age0
-
jlew24asu wrote:it wouldnt be such a big deal, they are still in the stone age
i guess you dont care much for human life?DOWNLOAD THE LATEST ISSUE OF The Last Reel: http://www.mediafire.com/?jdsqazrjzdt
http://www.myspace.com/thelastreel http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=196043279650 -
"The intelligence director told me that (Armitage) said, 'Be prepared to be bombed. Be prepared to go back to the stone age'," Musharraf said.
So, this entire non-story is based on hearsay. Wonderful.0 -
jsand wrote:"The intelligence director told me that (Armitage) said, 'Be prepared to be bombed. Be prepared to go back to the stone age'," Musharraf said.
So, this entire non-story is based on hearsay. Wonderful.
this isnt just some guy... it was the intelligence director... i think that holds a bit of weight. would you say it was hearsay if the head of the cia told bush china threatened to bomb the usa unless they supported their war on a countrY??DOWNLOAD THE LATEST ISSUE OF The Last Reel: http://www.mediafire.com/?jdsqazrjzdt
http://www.myspace.com/thelastreel http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=196043279650 -
darkcrow wrote:this isnt just some guy... it was the intelligence director... i think that holds a bit of weight. would you say it was hearsay if the head of the cia told bush china threatened to bomb the usa unless they supported their war on a countrY??
Oh. "The" intelligence director. Now I feel better.0 -
The intelligence director's alleged response to Armitage:
"Oh, yeah ... Well ... YOUR MOM! ..."
On a more serious note, this story is entirely plausible. I mean, the government of this country is secular, but the populace most assuredly is not. Pakistan's government would probably require more than a little arm twisting. Not to mention Pakistan's own status as a storehouse of fundamentalist types, some of whom are terrorists or terrorist sympathizers themselves. The U.S. choose to apply diplomatic pressure, rather than invade Pakistan as well ... I don't doubt that the governments' hands were tied in this case.0 -
jsand wrote:So, this entire non-story is based on hearsay. Wonderful.
Like the entire basis for the Iraq war? Someone said they had mobile weapon labs, someone said Saddam met with Al Quada, someone said they were developing nuclear weapons....My whole life
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln0 -
blackredyellow wrote:Like the entire basis for the Iraq war? Someone said they had mobile weapon labs, someone said Saddam met with Al Quada, someone said they were developing nuclear weapons....
Whatever floats your boat. It would be nice if those of the leftist persuasion would apply the skepticism they use on anything coming from the US government on governments such as Pakistan's.0 -
jsand wrote:Whatever floats your boat. It would be nice if those of the leftist persuasion would apply the skepticism they use on anything coming from the US government on governments such as Pakistan's.
Point ...0 -
jsand wrote:Whatever floats your boat. It would be nice if those of the leftist persuasion would apply the skepticism they use on anything coming from the US government on governments such as Pakistan's.
I try not to accept anything that comes from any governement without skepticism.My whole life
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln0 -
jlew24asu wrote:for scumbag terrorists that kill non believers and rape women at will? no i dont care.
they arent exactly innocent people
the population of pakistan? the entire population of pakistan? maybe you want to rethink that... there is a difference between bombing a country back to the stone age and precision strikes againt terrorist training campsDOWNLOAD THE LATEST ISSUE OF The Last Reel: http://www.mediafire.com/?jdsqazrjzdt
http://www.myspace.com/thelastreel http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=196043279650 -
darkcrow wrote:there is a difference between bombing a country back to the stone age and precision strikes againt terrorist training campsRon: I just don't feel like going out tonight
Sammi: Wanna just break up?0 -
darkcrow wrote:the population of pakistan? the entire population of pakistan? maybe you want to rethink that... there is a difference between bombing a country back to the stone age and precision strikes againt terrorist training camps
I have faith that it would have been precision strikes. bombing back to the stone age was just an exaggeration. US does not target civillians0 -
jlew24asu wrote:I have faith that it would have been precision strikes. bombing back to the stone age was just an exaggeration. US does not target civillians
alot of parents in afghanistan and iraq who have lost their kids to american bombs would argue against that.DOWNLOAD THE LATEST ISSUE OF The Last Reel: http://www.mediafire.com/?jdsqazrjzdt
http://www.myspace.com/thelastreel http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=196043279650 -
darkcrow wrote:alot of parents in afghanistan and iraq who have lost their kids to american bombs would argue against that.
americans do not target civillians. they have dropped leaflets to warm the population. terrorsits tend to hide among civillans as well. while loss of innocent life is horrible, mistakes happen. my point is americans do not target a civillian complex and bomb it. we are only after the terrorists who killed us on 9/110 -
jlew24asu wrote:americans do not target civillians. they have dropped leaflets to warm the population. terrorsits tend to hide among civillans as well. while loss of innocent life is horrible, mistakes happen. my point is americans do not target a civillian complex and bomb it. we are only after the terrorists who killed us on 9/11
so where is osama? seriously... if someone robbed my house i dont think the police would be beating up the thief's family, they would be going after the thief.... but its all moot i guess. apparently bush doesnt think much on osama anymoreDOWNLOAD THE LATEST ISSUE OF The Last Reel: http://www.mediafire.com/?jdsqazrjzdt
http://www.myspace.com/thelastreel http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=196043279650 -
We never learn...
"The Enemy of My Enemy is My Friend". I hear that a lot over here.
If true...
Then... Saddam Hussein was the enemy of my enemy, the Ayatollah Khomeni of Iran, therefore, Saddam Hussein was my friend.
Question: Who is worse today... Saddam Hussein (Iraq) or the fundamentalist government of Iran (who is still my enemy)?
Or...
Then... Usama bin Laden was the enemy of my enemy, The Soviet Union... therefore, Usama bin Laden was my friend.
Question: Who is worse... Al Qaeda or the former Soviet Union?
...
Now... Pakistan is the enemy of my enemy, al Qaeda (which is in question because of the loyalty of the Muslim nation of Pakistan... I do not hold a lot of faith in a nation whose citizens are naming their new borns, 'Usama')... therefore, Pakistan is my friend???
We are arming and funding Pakistan today, kiddies... am i the only one who thinks this is not a really good idea?
...
Finally... the next time you utter that phrase, "The enemy of my enemy is my friend", remember how well it has worked out for us in the past. Maybe it's time to end this idiotic logic.Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
Hail, Hail!!!0 -
darkcrow wrote:so where is osama? seriously... if someone robbed my house i dont think the police would be beating up the thief's family, they would be going after the thief.... but its all moot i guess. apparently bush doesnt think much on osama anymore
im very pissed off at bush for not staying after that fuck. i wont argue with you about that.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 272 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.6K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.7K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help