49 year old man has sex with a 14 year old girl - no rape charges...
Comments
-
dontloseyourheat wrote:But the guy wasn't purposely taking a risk. The girl said she was 19, why would the guy have any reason not to believe her? It's not like he never inquired about her age. Short of checking her ID, there's not much he could do.
How is picking up sexual encounters on the internet not taking a risk?
I'm not saying that people shouldn't do it but let's face it, if you're going to be picking up people on the internet you'd want to be DAMN SURE of what and who you're dealing with. That doesn't just apply to men looking for sex but also to women. TO anyone, for any circumstance really.
And quite apart from that, given how the law operates in this day and age, particularly with regard to underage sex, I'd have thought the smart thing to do would be to be bloody certain of who you are dealing with.
Let's be honest, could you see yourself getting into the situation he finds himself in? Because I know I can't.NOPE!!!
*~You're IT Bert!~*
Hold on to the thread
The currents will shift0 -
RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:14 year old girl trolling the internet advertising sex on a bondage fetish site?
Rape is an unwilling act right?
http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=9A.44.079There's a light when my baby's in my arms0 -
comebackgirl wrote:There just has to be an absence of consent - someone below a certain age (which varies from state to state) is not considered able to consent. Looks like in WA this would qualify as rape.
http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=9A.44.079
Thank you.
I can't believe it's still a blurry issue for some people.NOPE!!!
*~You're IT Bert!~*
Hold on to the thread
The currents will shift0 -
comebackgirl wrote:There just has to be an absence of consent - someone below a certain age (which varies from state to state) is not considered able to consent. Looks like in WA this would qualify as rape.
http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=9A.44.079i have wished for so long, how i wish for you today
JEFFREY ROSS ROGERS 1975-2002
9.10.98 NYC / 8.23.00 JONES BEACH /4.30.03 UNIONDALE / 7.9.03 NYC /5.12.06 ALBANY/ 6.1.06 E.RUTHEFORD/ 6.3.06 E. RUTHEFORD/ CAMDEN 6.19.08/ NYC 6.24.08/ NYC 6.25.08/ HARTFORD 6.27.08/ CHICAGO 8.24.09/ PHILLY 10.31.09/ HARTFORD 5.15.10/ NEWARK 5.18.10/ NYC 5.20.10/ CHICAGO 7.19.13/ BROOKLYN 10.18.13/ BROOKLYN 10.19.13/ HARTFORD 10.25.13/ NYC 9.26.15/ 4.8.16 FT. LAUDERDALE/ 4.9.16 MIAMI / 5.1.16 NYC/ 5.2.16 NYC / 8.5.16 BOSTON / 8.7.16 BOSTON/ 8.20.18 CHICAGO/ 9.2.18 BOSTON/ 9.4.18 BOSTON/ 9.18.21 ASBURY PARK
finally, FUCK TICKETMASTER0 -
angryyoungman wrote:yeah but to play devil's advocate he was misled about her age
doesn't matter. if he's that horny, go to a hooker. worst case senario: he spends the night in the clink and pays a fine. with what he did here, he's facing far worse."Have you ever.........pooped a balloon?"
~D.K.S.0 -
angryyoungman wrote:yeah but to play devil's advocate he was misled about her ageThere's a light when my baby's in my arms0
-
Regardless of what they look like with clothes on, I still think a 50 year old man could tell the difference between a 14 year old and a 19 year old when he has a 14 year old girl standing naked in front of him. Just my opinion.★ 1995 - Brisbane ★ 1998 - Brisbane ★ 2003 - Brisbane ★ 2006 - Brisbane ★
★ 2009 - Sydney, Brisbane, Auckland, Christchurch ★
★ 2011 - EV Newcastle, Melbourne 1, Melbourne 2 ★0 -
comebackgirl wrote:There just has to be an absence of consent - someone below a certain age (which varies from state to state) is not considered able to consent. Looks like in WA this would qualify as rape.
http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=9A.44.079
I'm guessing from her behavior patterns (which are highly abnormal), this is probably not the first time she's had sex with an older man. Father, Uncle, strangers for money? All of the above? Sad but probably true.
Lack of consent is one thing. Writing up an internet ad on a fetish site soliciting sex with older men seems pretty deliberate. I not saying it's ok, it just does not exactly fall within the classifications of no consent regardless of the lack of morals and judgment in her partners.Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")0 -
RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:Lack of consent is one thing. Writing up an internet ad on a fetish site soliciting sex with older men seems pretty deliberate. I not saying it's ok, it just does not exactly fall within the classifications of no consent regardless of the lack of morals and judgment in her partners.
She could have stripped naked and thrown herself at him and it would still be considered rape. The issue is that according to the law, it doesn't matter what she says or does because she's not viewed as old enough to make that decision. The concept is similar to the idea that a 5-year-old can't legally give consent because, regardless of whether she agrees to or solicits sex, she's not old enough to make that decision.0 -
scb wrote:She could have stripped naked and thrown herself at him and it would still be considered rape. The issue is that according to the law, it doesn't matter what she says or does because she's not viewed as old enough to make that decision. The concept is similar to the idea that a 5-year-old can't legally give consent because, regardless of whether she agrees to or solicits sex, she's not old enough to make that decision.
In a lot of states it's 16, some even 14. If she said she was older...ouch. Tough call. Not my cup of tea, but some girls do look and act much older and more experienced than than what they are. A picture would probably clear up a lot of disagreement. There's always that one case that leaves everyone's heads spinning...
http://www.ageofconsent.com/ageofconsent.htmProgress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")0 -
RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:Lack of consent is one thing. Writing up an internet ad on a fetish site soliciting sex with older men seems pretty deliberate. I not saying it's ok, it just does not exactly fall within the classifications of no consent regardless of the lack of morals and judgment in her partners.
i agree.
seems like im gonna have to reevaluate some of my adolescent behaviour to determine whether or not i was violated within or outside the law. or violated the laws myself.hear my name
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say0 -
ZiggyStar wrote:Regardless of what they look like with clothes on, I still think a 50 year old man could tell the difference between a 14 year old and a 19 year old when he has a 14 year old girl standing naked in front of him. Just my opinion.
I disagree, plenty of girls have developed a woman's body by the age of 14, I would say the give away would be how old they look facially, but again, some girls when they have make up on can look a lot older. One of my sister's friends is 22 and frequently gets mistaken for being a school girl because she's petite and looks so young in the face. I also had a mate at school who had a full grown beard at the age of 14 and he had no trouble getting served for alcohol in the supermarket.
I also remember being down the pub a few years ago, and one of my mates pointed out a girl at the bar and asked how old I thought she was. I said about 18 - she was pretty tall and curvy and facially looked to be that age. My mate then told me this girl was in his sister's class at school - she was 13!!!
I'm not saying this guy isn't a creepy pervert for whatever reasons, I'm just saying that it is perfectly possible for a 14 year old to pass as a 19 year old, and if this guy honestly believed she was that age then I don't think he did anything wrong.0 -
I posted this earlier but it's a link to a similar case, complete with a pic of the 13 yr old. http://www.wftv.com/news/16348047/detail.html
The age of consent law is in place because before that age, children cannot make educated decisions.
Because she is too young to make a good decision, it's not her fault that she whored her self out, it's the guy that should be punished...I think that is messed up logic.
If anything her parents should be the ones doing time. Normal 14 year olds don't have sex with 49 yr old strangers."Don't lose your inner heat...ever" - EV 5/13/060 -
dontloseyourheat wrote:I posted this earlier but it's a link to a similar case, complete with a pic of the 13 yr old. http://www.wftv.com/news/16348047/detail.html
The age of consent law is in place because before that age, children cannot make educated decisions.
Because she is too young to make a good decision, it's not her fault that she whored her self out, it's the guy that should be punished...I think that is messed up logic.
If anything her parents should be the ones doing time. Normal 14 year olds don't have sex with 49 yr old strangers.
So now by your definition she's at fault because she's not normal?
Fuck me I hope you never have female children.
NORMAL 49 year old men don't pick up women of any age on the internet, fuck them, pass them over to their partner and then when it's discovered they've done the wrong thing use a piss poor excuse to get themselves off.
NORMAL 49 year old men know the laws of their state when it comes to the age of consent and as an adult are more particular about how they go about procuring sex.
But let's keep blaming the child shall we?
Oh and your inclusion of the link with a child's photograph is offensive and creepy in the extreme.NOPE!!!
*~You're IT Bert!~*
Hold on to the thread
The currents will shift0 -
RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:14 year old girl trolling the internet advertising sex on a bondage fetish site?
Rape is an unwilling act right?
Yes, but in the eyes of the law, this is Statutary rape, which is different. Sex with a minor. I say also screw these girls who lie about their age to snare these guys in the first place. You may be a minor so you are old enough to know what you are doing. I know that sounds mean but that's how I feel.0 -
Jeanie wrote:So now by your definition she's at fault because she's not normal?
Fuck me I hope you never have female children.
NORMAL 49 year old men don't pick up women of any age on the internet, fuck them, pass them over to their partner and then when it's discovered they've done the wrong thing use a piss poor excuse to get themselves off.
NORMAL 49 year old men know the laws of their state when it comes to the age of consent and as an adult are more particular about how they go about procuring sex.
But let's keep blaming the child shall we?
Oh and your inclusion of the link with a child's photograph is offensive and creepy in the extreme.
Whoa take it easy...
Yes blame the child because she is the one lying about her age in order to have sex with older men.
A 14 year old should know that doing so is wrong and would have consequences.
But also blame the parents. I think with good parenting, this wouldn't have happened.
I don't understand how the fact that they met on the internet has anything to do with it.
If two people met at a bar, had sex and then it turns out the girl is 14, are you still going to blame the guy?
According to the article, the girl claimed to be 19. Why wouldn't he believe her? Should he have requested a sealed birth certificate?
Oh, and sorry you got offended by a NEWS article that was relevant to the discussion at hand. People were arguing about whether or not a 14 year old can look 19 so I posted a similar NEWS story that included a picture. It's not like I was stalking her and posted a nude photo."Don't lose your inner heat...ever" - EV 5/13/060 -
dontloseyourheat wrote:Whoa take it easy...
Yes blame the child because she is the one lying about her age in order to have sex with older men.
A 14 year old should know that doing so is wrong and would have consequences.
But also blame the parents. I think with good parenting, this wouldn't have happened.
Is she lying about her age in order to actually have sex with older men?
Or is she a 14 year old girl who lacks the maturity to fully understand the implications of her actions?
Possibly like so many 14 year old children she may just have been wanting some attention not completely understanding what the outcome of her actions would entail. The internet provides this avenue for disenchanted, needy children everywhere.
The law agrees. OTHERWISE he'd not have been charged with anything.
As a parent I'm sure you are able to account for every action and conversation that your 14 year old child is involved in, right? And I'm sure as a 14 year old you never did anything wrong? Never made mistakes? Never got into ANY situation that could have completely ruined your life? I think not. The only difference between you and this girl is that she unfortunately played into the hands of a predator. And he is a predator because let's face it what are the odds that any well adjusted, mature 19 year old woman would play up to the creepy looking fuck AND agree to meet and have sex with him? You're not going to tell me that he would be unaware of this?dontloseyourheat wrote:I don't understand how the fact that they met on the internet has anything to do with it.
If two people met at a bar, had sex and then it turns out the girl is 14, are you still going to blame the guy?
According to the article, the girl claimed to be 19. Why wouldn't he believe her? Should he have requested a sealed birth certificate?
The fact they met on the internet has a lot to do with it. There's no way he'd have been able to turn her head and appeal to her, develop a rapport with her and manage to get his end in had they been in a bar. The internet is the tool he used in order to establish a connection with her. How come nobody else on the site that she posted on took up her offer? Could it be that they aren't predators? Could it be that they could tell fairly quickly that they were dealing with a child?
If two people meet in a bar, have sex and it turns out one is under age then the circumstances are different. AND the charges, IF any were laid, would have been different.
He didn't ask for clarification because he would have already known that she wasn't what she claimed to be.dontloseyourheat wrote:Oh, and sorry you got offended by a NEWS article that was relevant to the discussion at hand. People were arguing about whether or not a 14 year old can look 19 so I posted a similar NEWS story that included a picture. It's not like I was stalking her and posted a nude photo.
Yeah, and I find it offensive.
I find it offensive that a child involved in such a case can have their photo published in a news article and I find it even more offensive that people are now circulating it.
By all means post a link to a similar article but perpetuating the cycle by posting a picture is wrong. I'm sorry you can't see that.NOPE!!!
*~You're IT Bert!~*
Hold on to the thread
The currents will shift0 -
Jeanie wrote:He didn't ask for clarification because he would have already known that she wasn't what she claimed to be.
You don't know that for sure. Like I said in my previous post, plenty of 14 year olds both male and female can look much older than they are. And if he believed she was a consenting adult, no matter how fucked up the nature of what they did, if she was 19 there would have been nothing illegal and we would have just put them both down as being a pair of perverts. I think if she obviously looked no older than 14 then you would definitely have a point and I would agree with pretty much everything you have said. But unless we see what she looks like, we have no way of knowing.0 -
i love how when these stories come out, everyone piles on the guy as being a sick fuck who should be thrown in jail for the rest of his life. the girl advertised herself as a 19 year old into fetish sex. she was SHOPPING her self as if she were a free sofa with a curb alert.
someone said they've never seen a 14 year old that could pass for a 19 year old ... you don't get out much, do ya.
i'm not saying what he did was right, but dont be so quick to tie his noose.Jam out with your clam out.0 -
long red wrote:i love how when these stories come out, everyone piles on the guy as being a sick fuck who should be thrown in jail for the rest of his life. the girl advertised herself as a 19 year old into fetish sex. she was SHOPPING her self as if she were a free sofa with a curb alert.
someone said they've never seen a 14 year old that could pass for a 19 year old ... you don't get out much, do ya.
i'm not saying what he did was right, but dont be so quick to tie his noose.
Yes, I do get out quite a lot...and I'm also female and can easily pick out when a girl is underage. I think that girl in the photo looks too young for a sick fuck of a 50 year old to consider having sex with.....
My niece is 14 -- I've been to her school and seen her whole grade at assembly....some have boobs, some have curves....but they ALL look underage still in my opinion.★ 1995 - Brisbane ★ 1998 - Brisbane ★ 2003 - Brisbane ★ 2006 - Brisbane ★
★ 2009 - Sydney, Brisbane, Auckland, Christchurch ★
★ 2011 - EV Newcastle, Melbourne 1, Melbourne 2 ★0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.9K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 275 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help