of course football is about turnovers.... but it's widely known that you can play an entire game without any turnovers, and you might still lose.
but i agree.... 5 picks.... blowout for cowboys. but just cause he had this terrible game it doesn't mean he'll keep it up. he was the second highest rated quarterback next to brady.... don't forget. not until monday night's game.
5 picks and a fumble ... and yet he still led that last drive
i didn't realize he was a free agent... wow
i normally just talk out of my ass before games... and i was thinking that romo was like grossman ... but after reading the article on espn that was sucking romo's nuts... i see that he's got some talent
5 picks and a fumble ... and yet he still led that last drive
i didn't realize he was a free agent... wow
i normally just talk out of my ass before games... and i was thinking that romo was like grossman ... but after reading the article on espn that was sucking romo's nuts... i see that he's got some talent
but i'm sure belichick will be ready for him
as will my pals A. Thomas and gang
i recognize patriots are a great team.... i've seen their stats in the past 5 years.... it's very impressive. and considering that they've been around longer and playing together longer, odds are against the cowboys on this one.
i think romo got lucky in being in a very hyped up team.... even when cowboys had losing seasons people still talked about their games. but i think he's getting the recognition he deserves for the moment. 3 straight 300+ yards (being the only qb in cowboys history to do that), 13 tds still second in the league behind brady.... just his second season as a starter being undrafted and replacing the starting quarter just under a year ago that's quite something. so give the dude a shot on this one.
some cowboys fans, myself included, recognize that patriots are a better team but it's good to know that the cowboys have a legitimate shot at still winning. that's the whole point of competing and the whole point of watching the games. it's not a given patriots will smother the cowboys.
This isn't the land of opportunity, it's the land of competition.
and now this year, they're undefeated and facing an undeafeted team just like last year it's a bit funny to think that the pats will smother and dominate the cowboys.
i recognize patriots are a great team.... i've seen their stats in the past 5 years.... it's very impressive. and considering that they've been around longer and playing together longer, odds are against the cowboys on this one.
i think romo got lucky in being in a very hyped up team.... even when cowboys had losing seasons people still talked about their games. but i think he's getting the recognition he deserves for the moment. 3 straight 300+ yards (being the only qb in cowboys history to do that), 13 tds still second in the league behind brady.... just his second season as a starter being undrafted and replacing the starting quarter just under a year ago that's quite something. so give the dude a shot on this one.
some cowboys fans, myself included, recognize that patriots are a better team but it's good to know that the cowboys have a legitimate shot at still winning. that's the whole point of competing and the whole point of watching the games. it's not a given patriots will smother the cowboys.
last year, this year, next year, years schmeers.... it's not a given pats will dominate the cowboys. and i'm not concluding cowboys will win. i believe pats will most likely win. but come on... do you have to be that completely biased?
This isn't the land of opportunity, it's the land of competition.
dude.... you take it too seriously. here's what really matters. the game is this sunday... both teams are undefeated... both teams are leaders in both offense and defense... both have two of the best quarterbacks.
but if you'd like for me to go into your mindset well, here it goes. let's use common sense for a bit.
people said of the cowbys the only reason why they're undefeated until now is because they hadn't faced anyone challenging. so we said, the same can be said about the pats and the colts. and it's true. that goes to say that all these 3 teams are good teams.
another thing nfc's record is 37-39 afc's 39-37.... so yeah nfc sucks by two games.
see what i'm saying? there's lots of holes in your arguments... it's very very biased... and lacks common sense.
This isn't the land of opportunity, it's the land of competition.
last year, this year, next year, years schmeers.... it's not a given pats will dominate the cowboys. and i'm not concluding cowboys will win. i believe pats will most likely win. but come on... do you have to be that completely biased?
another thing nfc's record is 37-39 afc's 39-37.... so yeah nfc sucks by two games. .
i get 12-10 as of the monday nighter but i dont know what your counting
btw
1997 sb winner afc
1998 sb winner afc
1999 sb winner nfc
2000 sb winner afc
2001 sb winner afc
2002 sb winner nfc
2003 sb winner afc
2004 sb winner afc
2005 sb winner afc
2006 sb winner afc
the AFC has been dominating the NFC for the past several seasons, winning 8 of the last 10 Super Bowls and pro bowls.
hey whats the nfc's record against the afc this year last year the year before?
2003 sb winner afc
2004 sb winner afc
2005 sb winner afc
2006 sb winner afc
the AFC has been dominating the NFC for the past several seasons, winning 7 of the last 10 Super Bowls and pro bowls.
yeah kinda like eastern vs western conf. in the nba. i hear you.
This isn't the land of opportunity, it's the land of competition.
dude.... you take it too seriously. here's what really matters. the game is this sunday... both teams are undefeated... both teams are leaders in both offense and defense... both have two of the best quarterbacks.
but if you'd like for me to go into your mindset well, here it goes. let's use common sense for a bit.
people said of the cowbys the only reason why they're undefeated until now is because they hadn't faced anyone challenging. so we said, the same can be said about the pats and the colts. and it's true. that goes to say that all these 3 teams are good teams.
another thing nfc's record is 37-39 afc's 39-37.... so yeah nfc sucks by two games.
see what i'm saying? there's lots of holes in your arguments... it's very very biased... and lacks common sense.
How can you say the Colts havent faced anybody good? They have beaten 3 teams with a winning record including Tennessee, who the Colts are the only team to beat so far, and the Titans might have the best D in football. The Pats on the other hand are 5-0 against teams with a combined record of 7-17. In saying all that, I think the Colts and Pats are clearly the 2 teams to beat right now, with Indy barely getting the nod simply because they have been just as impressive as the Pats, but have beaten better teams.
How can you say the Colts havent faced anybody good? They have beaten 3 teams with a winning record including Tennessee, who the Colts are the only team to beat so far, and the Titans might have the best D in football. The Pats on the other hand are 5-0 against teams with a combined record of 7-17. In saying all that, I think the Colts and Pats are clearly the 2 teams to beat right now, with Indy barely getting the nod simply because they have been just as impressive as the Pats, but have beaten better teams.
ok.... colts have faced the titans which are a good defensive team. i'll give them. still.... cowboys are the 3rd best team in the league.
This isn't the land of opportunity, it's the land of competition.
ok.... colts have faced the titans which are a good defensive team. i'll give them. still.... cowboys are the 3rd best team in the league.
Well at this point I think you are correct. But I think it is way to early to be determining who the best teams in the league are already. Based on past history, and how they are playing so far this year, the Colts and Pats have to be at the top. Dallas has certainly been impressive, but you cant sleep on Pittsburgh either, and SD is still very talented, though they got off to a slow start. And the Titans, who I mentioned earlier, are capable of beating any team any week. If they get their running game going, they will be extremely tough. There are 6-8 teams that are capable of making and winning the superbowl. The Pats and Colts are the favorites, and Dallas is the favorite from the NFC, but it is far from being a 3 team race.
Well at this point I think you are correct. But I think it is way to early to be determining who the best teams in the league are already. Based on past history, and how they are playing so far this year, the Colts and Pats have to be at the top. Dallas has certainly been impressive, but you cant sleep on Pittsburgh either, and SD is still very talented, though they got off to a slow start. And the Titans, who I mentioned earlier, are capable of beating any team any week. If they get their running game going, they will be extremely tough. There are 6-8 teams that are capable of making and winning the superbowl. The Pats and Colts are the favorites, and Dallas is the favorite from the NFC, but it is far from being a 3 team race.
oh, yeah definitely.... we still got the steelers and packers to talk about. good teams.
This isn't the land of opportunity, it's the land of competition.
Comments
5 picks and a fumble ... and yet he still led that last drive
i didn't realize he was a free agent... wow
i normally just talk out of my ass before games... and i was thinking that romo was like grossman ... but after reading the article on espn that was sucking romo's nuts... i see that he's got some talent
but i'm sure belichick will be ready for him
as will my pals A. Thomas and gang
i think romo got lucky in being in a very hyped up team.... even when cowboys had losing seasons people still talked about their games. but i think he's getting the recognition he deserves for the moment. 3 straight 300+ yards (being the only qb in cowboys history to do that), 13 tds still second in the league behind brady.... just his second season as a starter being undrafted and replacing the starting quarter just under a year ago that's quite something. so give the dude a shot on this one.
some cowboys fans, myself included, recognize that patriots are a better team but it's good to know that the cowboys have a legitimate shot at still winning. that's the whole point of competing and the whole point of watching the games. it's not a given patriots will smother the cowboys.
eww seriously
you've got problems
how irrelevant is NY now in every sport now?
its got to be sad
Toronto 2011 night 2
Hamilton 2011
London 2013
key word last year
say the pats havent played anyone
now that both teams played the same team
it doesnt matter :rolleyes:
heres what matters!
the NFC is fucking awful
Agreed with all of that.
BOS-9/28/04,9/29/04,6/28/08,6/30/08, 9/5/16, 9/7/16, 9/2/18
MTL-9/15/05, OTT-9/16/05
PHL-5/27/06,5/28/06,10/30/09,10/31/09
CHI-8/2/07,8/5/07,8/23/09,8/24/09
HTFD-6/27/08
ATX-10/4/09, 10/12/14
KC-5/3/2010,STL-5/4/2010
Bridge School-10/23/2010,10/24/2010
PJ20-9/3/2011,9/4/2011
OKC-11/16/13
SEA-12/6/13
TUL-10/8/14
but if you'd like for me to go into your mindset well, here it goes. let's use common sense for a bit.
people said of the cowbys the only reason why they're undefeated until now is because they hadn't faced anyone challenging. so we said, the same can be said about the pats and the colts. and it's true. that goes to say that all these 3 teams are good teams.
another thing nfc's record is 37-39 afc's 39-37.... so yeah nfc sucks by two games.
see what i'm saying? there's lots of holes in your arguments... it's very very biased... and lacks common sense.
against the nfc
its terrible its like juco over there
i get 12-10 as of the monday nighter but i dont know what your counting
btw
1997 sb winner afc
1998 sb winner afc
1999 sb winner nfc
2000 sb winner afc
2001 sb winner afc
2002 sb winner nfc
2003 sb winner afc
2004 sb winner afc
2005 sb winner afc
2006 sb winner afc
the AFC has been dominating the NFC for the past several seasons, winning 8 of the last 10 Super Bowls and pro bowls.
How can you say the Colts havent faced anybody good? They have beaten 3 teams with a winning record including Tennessee, who the Colts are the only team to beat so far, and the Titans might have the best D in football. The Pats on the other hand are 5-0 against teams with a combined record of 7-17. In saying all that, I think the Colts and Pats are clearly the 2 teams to beat right now, with Indy barely getting the nod simply because they have been just as impressive as the Pats, but have beaten better teams.
spurs BABY!
until this year!!
KG BITCHES!!
Well at this point I think you are correct. But I think it is way to early to be determining who the best teams in the league are already. Based on past history, and how they are playing so far this year, the Colts and Pats have to be at the top. Dallas has certainly been impressive, but you cant sleep on Pittsburgh either, and SD is still very talented, though they got off to a slow start. And the Titans, who I mentioned earlier, are capable of beating any team any week. If they get their running game going, they will be extremely tough. There are 6-8 teams that are capable of making and winning the superbowl. The Pats and Colts are the favorites, and Dallas is the favorite from the NFC, but it is far from being a 3 team race.
you might have over looked one key one matchup
does Wade vs Bill ring a bell?
back in cleveland vs buffalo days maybe
dallas' only shot is by creating turnovers
otherwise it's a laugher