I don't know if I'm missing something or if I'm not up new internet terms or whatever but, what is with the two commas that you use in every post?
I don't want to sound mean and Im not making fun or your grammar, but is there a reason for this?
Everytime a comma is needed you use two of them. I don't get it.
I was taught a month ago to bide my time and take it slow, but then I learned just yesterday to rush and never waste a day. Now I'm convinced the whole day long that all I've learned is always wrong. Things are true that I forget, but no one taught that to me yet
This could be our ticket to easy street...picture the logo under the slogan being the World Series trophy with 4 of the pennants replaced by asterisks.
26 to 7 and getting smaller all the time. Plus, pretty soon a lot of those championships are going to seem such a distant memory.
Think of all the children seven and under who have never gotten to see a Yankees championship. Such a tradgedy. This is where the world is heading, and Yankees fans are doing great at swallowing the bitter pill as this ridiculous thread and its posts points out.
papi is just a big guy
he's 6'4" and 230 accoring to red sox roster page
both my brothers are 6'4' 230 and they're not on the juice
and my best friend is 6'6" about 260 and he's not juicing either
when you get older you metabolism changes
plus as DH i'm sure he's prob more into strength training than cardio
i love the guy but we all know he's not runner
26 to 7 and getting smaller all the time. Plus, pretty soon a lot of those championships are going to seem such a distant memory.
Think of all the children seven and under who have never gotten to see a Yankees championship. Such a tradgedy. This is where the world is heading, and Yankees fans are doing great at swallowing the bitter pill as this ridiculous thread and its posts points out.
year 2000 clap clap clap-clap-clap
boston had people on social security who never saw one lol
Well considering Ortiz's injury is different than McGwire and Giambi's, I'd keep trying.
McGwire and Giambi both suffered from patellar tendonitis which is one of the more common new injuries in the steroids era.
Injuries that were rarely problems before baseball’s steroid era were now almost common: patellar tendonitis, strained rib cages (oblique strains), torn hamstrings, ruptured Achilles tendons, and torn rotator cuffs. These injuries occur when (oversized) muscles rip away from ligaments and joints that can no longer accommodate them.
Ortiz had arthroscopic surgery to repair a torn meniscus.
At least get the injuries right if you're going to try and besmirch Ortiz.
As someone who has torn their meniscus twice playing football and rugby, it's not a fun injury.
Don't believe everything you're told. Of course they're not gonna say it's patellar tendonitis. If they did, veeryone would now he did roids. (Which he himself pretty much admitted in a roundabout way) Time will tell. If it's what they're saying, then there should be little to no lingering effects. If it's Giambi knee, then it'll bother him for the rest of his career.
Don't believe everything you're told. Of course they're not gonna say it's patellar tendonitis. If they did, veeryone would now he did roids. (Which he himself pretty much admitted in a roundabout way) Time will tell. If it's what they're saying, then there should be little to no lingering effects. If it's Giambi knee, then it'll bother him for the rest of his career.
If that is the case and the Red Sox do not want to say any of their players have patellar tendonitis, then why did the Red Sox say Manny was out with patellar tendonitis at the end of 2006. Why didn't they call it a torn meniscus then?
If that is the case and the Red Sox do not want to say any of their players have patellar tendonitis, then why did the Red Sox say Manny was out with patellar tendonitis at the end of 2006. Why didn't they call it a torn meniscus then?
its manny being a filthy bastard from washington heights
He's gotten progressively bigger, and he is a big man. Talk about jealousy. Why dont you take a look at his baseball cards year after year and check out the difference.
There's more evidence against Ortiz (The pictures I posted) than there is against clemens or Pettitte.
A pitcher would take roids for a different reason than a postion player would. Hence the look of the two players would be different even if they were both taking the same roid.
A pitcher would want to have longer stamina in their legs and shoulders and be able to generate more tourque. And also be able to recover faster after pitching sessions. A position player would want to develop their upper body, forearms, and biceps to generate more pop off their bat.
This is your notice that there is a problem with your signature. Please remove it.
Admin
Social awareness does not equal political activism!
5/23/2011- An utter embarrassment... ticketing failures too many to list.
That's kinda my point too. Everyone's acting like yesterdays names are the complete list. It's a major problem, every team has big names doing it. More than 100 players failed a steroid test in 2003, a test they knew was coming. If less than 5% failed, there would have been no steroid test after that. And tehy still failed by the boatload. Today, there probably are less players using steroids. Because tehy've all moved on to HGH.
Comments
EVERYONE ASKS,,,I JUST LIKE COMMA;s
no reason
people type small ... i use extra comma's
Fair enough.
Think of all the children seven and under who have never gotten to see a Yankees championship. Such a tradgedy. This is where the world is heading, and Yankees fans are doing great at swallowing the bitter pill as this ridiculous thread and its posts points out.
year 2000 clap clap clap-clap-clap
he's 6'4" and 230 accoring to red sox roster page
both my brothers are 6'4' 230 and they're not on the juice
and my best friend is 6'6" about 260 and he's not juicing either
when you get older you metabolism changes
plus as DH i'm sure he's prob more into strength training than cardio
i love the guy but we all know he's not runner
Ok, you've intrigued me. Please tell me how Andy Pettitte allegedly taking HGH in 2002 helped the Yankees win the WS in 2000.
And if you believe Mike Piazza was not on roids, I've got a bridge I'd like to sell you
boston had people on social security who never saw one lol
I don't this guy weighs 218
http://www.viewimages.com/Search.aspx?mid=275192&epmid=2&partner=Google
I also don't think this guy:
http://cache.viewimages.com/xc/275202.jpg?v=1&c=ViewImages&k=2&d=17A4AD9FDB9CF1934A2752006EF5F0ED3E09D61C0AD2207A284831B75F48EF45
weighs 12 pounds less than this guy:
http://www.beloblog.com/ProJo_Blogs/SoxBlog/archives/ortiz19.JPG
Don't believe everything you're told. Of course they're not gonna say it's patellar tendonitis. If they did, veeryone would now he did roids. (Which he himself pretty much admitted in a roundabout way) Time will tell. If it's what they're saying, then there should be little to no lingering effects. If it's Giambi knee, then it'll bother him for the rest of his career.
the 1st picture says it all
No I believe Mike Pizza was on it too....hmmm pizzzaa (Say this like Homer). Now I'm starving!
If that is the case and the Red Sox do not want to say any of their players have patellar tendonitis, then why did the Red Sox say Manny was out with patellar tendonitis at the end of 2006. Why didn't they call it a torn meniscus then?
- 8/28/98
- 9/2/00
- 4/28/03, 5/3/03, 7/3/03, 7/5/03, 7/6/03, 7/9/03, 7/11/03, 7/12/03, 7/14/03
- 9/28/04, 9/29/04, 10/1/04, 10/2/04
- 9/11/05, 9/12/05, 9/13/05, 9/30/05, 10/1/05, 10/3/05
- 5/12/06, 5/13/06, 5/27/06, 5/28/06, 5/30/06, 6/1/06, 6/3/06, 6/23/06, 7/22/06, 7/23/06, 12/2/06, 12/9/06
- 8/2/07, 8/5/07
- 6/19/08, 6/20/08, 6/22/08, 6/24/08, 6/25/08, 6/27/08, 6/28/08, 6/30/08, 7/1/08
- 8/23/09, 8/24/09, 9/21/09, 9/22/09, 10/27/09, 10/28/09, 10/30/09, 10/31/09
- 5/15/10, 5/17/10, 5/18/10, 5/20/10, 5/21/10, 10/23/10, 10/24/10
- 9/11/11, 9/12/11
- 10/18/13, 10/21/13, 10/22/13, 11/30/13, 12/4/13
its manny being a filthy bastard from washington heights
03: http://imagecache2.allposters.com/images/pic/PHO/AAGB004~David-Ortiz-2003-American-League-Championship-Series-Game-1-Home-Run-Posters.jpg
97: http://www.sportscardfun.com/David-Ortiz-rookie-card.jpg
Some time with the twins: http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/images/38305000/jpg/_38305899_ortiz_getty300.jpg
This made me laugh out loud!!!!
LOL. fact!
2. You gonna tell me there's a 115 lb difference in the 2 photos?
haha total fact
http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/images/features/allstar/allstar_recaps/allstar_1986.jpg
http://blog.ticketcity.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/clemens_aaa.jpg
You do realize that the Arod Mariners picture was probably taken when he was 17 or 18 right?
so it's okay that he starte dtaking them in Minnesota?
hes just old and likes to eat
the Ortiz pictures span about 4-5 years. The Clemens pictures span 20 or more years
it was in every clubhouse ,, and u know that a high amount said wtf
some did more than others but a whole hell of alot tried it
A pitcher would take roids for a different reason than a postion player would. Hence the look of the two players would be different even if they were both taking the same roid.
A pitcher would want to have longer stamina in their legs and shoulders and be able to generate more tourque. And also be able to recover faster after pitching sessions. A position player would want to develop their upper body, forearms, and biceps to generate more pop off their bat.
Admin
Social awareness does not equal political activism!
5/23/2011- An utter embarrassment... ticketing failures too many to list.
Ok, sorry. I didn't know the pic I used was from 2007.
That Ortiz picture is from 98 when he was a minor leaguer.
This would be a picture of Ortiz 6 years after your first picture:
http://www.viewimages.com/Search.aspx?mid=275192&epmid=2&partner=Google
http://www.viewimages.com/Search.aspx?mid=275192&epmid=2&partner=Google
- 8/28/98
- 9/2/00
- 4/28/03, 5/3/03, 7/3/03, 7/5/03, 7/6/03, 7/9/03, 7/11/03, 7/12/03, 7/14/03
- 9/28/04, 9/29/04, 10/1/04, 10/2/04
- 9/11/05, 9/12/05, 9/13/05, 9/30/05, 10/1/05, 10/3/05
- 5/12/06, 5/13/06, 5/27/06, 5/28/06, 5/30/06, 6/1/06, 6/3/06, 6/23/06, 7/22/06, 7/23/06, 12/2/06, 12/9/06
- 8/2/07, 8/5/07
- 6/19/08, 6/20/08, 6/22/08, 6/24/08, 6/25/08, 6/27/08, 6/28/08, 6/30/08, 7/1/08
- 8/23/09, 8/24/09, 9/21/09, 9/22/09, 10/27/09, 10/28/09, 10/30/09, 10/31/09
- 5/15/10, 5/17/10, 5/18/10, 5/20/10, 5/21/10, 10/23/10, 10/24/10
- 9/11/11, 9/12/11
- 10/18/13, 10/21/13, 10/22/13, 11/30/13, 12/4/13