big papi with twins then with sox

245

Comments

  • NY PJ1
    NY PJ1 Posts: 9,533
    The Champ wrote:
    Looking at the first pic again, he looks way more muscular. In the second pic, he simply looks fatter with less muscle..Horrible example, and it proves itself wrong..sorry to burst the Yankee bubble on this one..


    guy the mets are non-existant
  • chromiam
    chromiam Posts: 4,114
    NY PJ1 wrote:
    guy the mets are non-existant

    That's because big papi ate them...
    This is your notice that there is a problem with your signature. Please remove it.

    Admin

    Social awareness does not equal political activism!

    5/23/2011- An utter embarrassment... ticketing failures too many to list.
  • The Champ
    The Champ Posts: 4,063
    NY PJ1 wrote:
    guy the mets are non-existant

    As is the evidence to validate the argument in this thread..
    'I want to hurry home to you
    put on a slow, dumb show for you
    and crack you up
    so you can put a blue ribbon on my brain
    god I'm very, very frightening
    and I'll overdo it'
  • NY PJ1
    NY PJ1 Posts: 9,533
    chromiam wrote:
    That's because big papi ate them...


    yea i know,,he just got fat .... riiight
  • NY PJ1
    NY PJ1 Posts: 9,533
    The Champ wrote:
    As is the evidence to validate the argument in this thread..


    2nd class bud
    the quicker u come to terms with that ,,the better off you will be
  • Solat13
    Solat13 Posts: 6,996
    The Champ wrote:
    How does Ortiz look like he's on the juice? It looks like the fucker simply got fat, thus the knees take a beating, obviously. Am I alone in thinking that he doesn't look any more muscular, just looks like he ate too many fucking burgers and shit?

    Well, in one of the the Red Sox 04 WS dvds, they had a segment of cooking with Big Papi and if he eats the way he cooked in the segment most nights, it's no surprise he has gained a lot of weight now that he has more money.
    - Busted down the pretext
    - 8/28/98
    - 9/2/00
    - 4/28/03, 5/3/03, 7/3/03, 7/5/03, 7/6/03, 7/9/03, 7/11/03, 7/12/03, 7/14/03
    - 9/28/04, 9/29/04, 10/1/04, 10/2/04
    - 9/11/05, 9/12/05, 9/13/05, 9/30/05, 10/1/05, 10/3/05
    - 5/12/06, 5/13/06, 5/27/06, 5/28/06, 5/30/06, 6/1/06, 6/3/06, 6/23/06, 7/22/06, 7/23/06, 12/2/06, 12/9/06
    - 8/2/07, 8/5/07
    - 6/19/08, 6/20/08, 6/22/08, 6/24/08, 6/25/08, 6/27/08, 6/28/08, 6/30/08, 7/1/08
    - 8/23/09, 8/24/09, 9/21/09, 9/22/09, 10/27/09, 10/28/09, 10/30/09, 10/31/09
    - 5/15/10, 5/17/10, 5/18/10, 5/20/10, 5/21/10, 10/23/10, 10/24/10
    - 9/11/11, 9/12/11
    - 10/18/13, 10/21/13, 10/22/13, 11/30/13, 12/4/13
  • The Champ
    The Champ Posts: 4,063
    NY PJ1 wrote:
    2nd class bud
    the quicker u come to terms with that ,,the better off you will be

    I came to terms with it years ago. Isn't it common knowledge, or what planet have you been on?? Anyway, I guess it's an easy response when you can't logically defend my comments regarding the topic of this thread..
    'I want to hurry home to you
    put on a slow, dumb show for you
    and crack you up
    so you can put a blue ribbon on my brain
    god I'm very, very frightening
    and I'll overdo it'
  • NY PJ1
    NY PJ1 Posts: 9,533
    The Champ wrote:
    I came to terms with it years ago. Isn't it common knowledge, or what planet have you been on?? Anyway, I guess it's an easy response when you can't logically defend my comments regarding the topic of this thread..


    im not here for a debate

    does it burn u alittle more to know that the 2000 yanks were on roids? ;)

    if only timo would have taken some he would of scored lol
  • FnCircus
    FnCircus Posts: 439
    NY PJ1 wrote:
    nah he has just gotten bigger :eek: gimme a break
    they're all on juice lol
    everyone except Curt Schilling........just ask him.
  • NY PJ1
    NY PJ1 Posts: 9,533
    F'n_Circus wrote:
    everyone except Curt Schilling........just ask him.


    their's another guy ,,

    ketchup sock
  • Anon
    Anon Posts: 11,175
    NY PJ1 wrote:
    just checking u out ,,cause ive never seen u b4

    wow.
    here you go.

    http://www.toothpastefordinner.com/010203/internet-detective.gif
  • NY PJ1
    NY PJ1 Posts: 9,533
    Pj_Gurl wrote:


    that wasnt that funny


    amt is waiting ....
  • The Champ
    The Champ Posts: 4,063
    NY PJ1 wrote:
    im not here for a debate

    does it burn u alittle more to know that the 2000 yanks were on roids? ;)

    if only timo would have taken some he would of scored lol

    They asked John Franko on wfan this morning how he felt about the fact that 1/3 of the 2000 Yanks were on the juice..Yeah, it does burn a bit..
    'I want to hurry home to you
    put on a slow, dumb show for you
    and crack you up
    so you can put a blue ribbon on my brain
    god I'm very, very frightening
    and I'll overdo it'
  • The Champ
    The Champ Posts: 4,063
    Solat13 wrote:
    Well, in one of the the Red Sox 04 WS dvds, they had a segment of cooking with Big Papi and if he eats the way he cooked in the segment most nights, it's no surprise he has gained a lot of weight now that he has more money.

    Yeah, definitely looks like he likes to eat..
    'I want to hurry home to you
    put on a slow, dumb show for you
    and crack you up
    so you can put a blue ribbon on my brain
    god I'm very, very frightening
    and I'll overdo it'
  • Poncier
    Poncier Posts: 17,933
    Pj_Gurl wrote:
    Oh snap.
    NYPJ1 pwned.
    This weekend we rock Portland
  • Love the petulance of New York these days. I thought Boston was supposed to be the disgruntled sports town?

    What's the matter? Do all your teams suck? Ohhh that's right....they do.
    9/7/98, 8/3/00, 9/4/00, 4/15/03, 7/1/03, 9/28/04, 9/29/04, 5/24/06, 5/25/06, 6/17/08, 6/22/08, 6/28/08, 6/30/08, 5/17/10, 10/15/13, 10/16/13.
  • NY PJ1
    NY PJ1 Posts: 9,533
    Poncier wrote:
    Oh snap.
    NYPJ1 pwned.



    oh snap
  • NY PJ1
    NY PJ1 Posts: 9,533
    Love the petulance of New York these days. I thought Boston was supposed to be the disgruntled sports town?

    What's the matter? Do all your teams suck? Ohhh that's right....they do.


    u were for 90 years
  • Poncier
    Poncier Posts: 17,933
    The Champ wrote:
    They asked John Franko on wfan this morning how he felt about the fact that 1/3 of the 2000 Yanks were on the juice..Yeah, it does burn a bit..
    Well at least the 86 Mets won't need an asterisk. Yanks will have to go back to the 70's for any non-asterisk championships.

    I just got an great T-shirt idea:

    "26-****= 22 legitimate championships."
    This weekend we rock Portland
  • Poncier
    Poncier Posts: 17,933
    Love the petulance of New York these days. I thought Boston was supposed to be the disgruntled sports town?

    What's the matter? Do all your teams suck? Ohhh that's right....they do.
    The Giants are slightly above mediocre.
    This weekend we rock Portland