If it meant 900000 people still being alive yes....
but that would then mean millions more living in fear and eventually death. the US invaded and they were now free to start killing each other in the name of religion. you dont see a problem with that? I'm not trying to justify the US invasion or say we are not to blame for the problems there. its just not as cut and dry as you say.
what will Iraq look like 10 years from now? is it possible to be a thriving peaceful place? All US troops are set to leave by 2011. I'm willing to bet Iraq will be a peaceful place by then and beyond.
what would Iraq look like if saddam stayed in power? maybe he would be dead and one of his nice sons become president. paving the way for 30 more years of fear and death.
but that would then mean millions more living in fear and eventually death. the US invaded and they were now free to start killing each other in the name of religion. you dont see a problem with that? I'm not trying to justify the US invasion or say we are not to blame for the problems there. its just not as cut and dry as you say.
what will Iraq look like 10 years from now? is it possible to be a thriving peaceful place? All US troops are set to leave by 2011. I'm willing to bet Iraq will be a peaceful place by then and beyond.
what would Iraq look like if saddam stayed in power? maybe he would be dead and one of his nice sons become president. paving the way for 30 more years of fear and death.
Maybe the death of Sadaam would have led to a revolution and the people of Iraq would have decided their own faith. Not some armchair quarterback over here in the states.
Im not playing god with 1 persons life based on your assumptions
Maybe the death of Sadaam would have led to a revolution and the people of Iraq would have decided their own faith. Not some armchair quarterback over here in the states.
maybe. but based on previous attempts at revolution, I'd say its a long shot. I'd even say people feared saddams sons more then saddam himself. they were some brutal fuckers.
Im not playing god with 1 persons life based on your assumptions
cant go back and change what happen. life in Iraq has forever changed. now its time to think of the possible outcomes for Iraq's future. can Iraq be fully united one day? can Iraq live in a society based on freedom? I'd like to think so.
I keep hearing this and it just doesnt sound right to me. Iraqis "knew how to stay alive" Iraqis "knew how to avoid the wrath of saddam" thats not a good way to live. i'm not justifiing the invasion but to go on living like that is wrong. maybe now that the cycle of broken, ALL Iraqis can live in peace.......sometime down the road.
No, it wasn't a good way to live. There are a lot of shitty places to live in this world. Remember, this invasion was purportedly to find the WMD and save the free world. When that didn't pan out, it became about "spreading democracy." BTW - the cycle is FAR from broken.
As bad as it was, yes. There's 4000 years of bad blood over there - it is inane to think we can step in and "decide" to change it. We say we're all worried about Iran, yet we set Iraq up to be, more or less, absorbed by Iran.
what will Iraq look like 10 years from now? is it possible to be a thriving peaceful place? All US troops are set to leave by 2011. I'm willing to bet Iraq will be a peaceful place by then and beyond.
Anything is possible, but the Sunni/Shite divide is not going anywhere. And we're never truly leaving. This war was about oil and oil will be the only tangible proof that we ever "won" this war. I don't think we'll ever truly "give back" Iraq to its people. :mad:
If I had known then what I know now...
Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
VIC 07
EV LA1 08
Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
Columbus 10
EV LA 11
Vancouver 11
Missoula 12
Portland 13, Spokane 13
St. Paul 14, Denver 14
No, it wasn't a good way to live. There are a lot of shitty places to live in this world. Remember, this invasion was purportedly to find the WMD and save the free world. When that didn't pan out, it became about "spreading democracy." BTW - the cycle is FAR from broken.
As bad as it was, yes. There's 4000 years of bad blood over there - it is inane to think we can step in and "decide" to change it. We say we're all worried about Iran, yet we set Iraq up to be, more or less, absorbed by Iran.
eh, I'm more optimistic I guess. you cant deny that sunni-shitte violence has dramtically declined in recent months..
Anything is possible, but the Sunni/Shite divide is not going anywhere. And we're never truly leaving. This war was about oil and oil will be the only tangible proof that we ever "won" this war. I don't think we'll ever truly "give back" Iraq to its people. :mad:
we may never leave completely, no. but we will remove combat troops, and tanks, etc etc. we arent going to be there in the current state forever. 2011 to be exact.
Maybe the death of Sadaam would have led to a revolution and the people of Iraq would have decided their own faith. Not some armchair quarterback over here in the states.
EXACTLY!!!!! How would any sovereign country feel when an outside country comes in to "decide" what is best for them?
eh, I'm more optimistic I guess. you cant deny that sunni-shitte violence has dramtically declined in recent months..
No, I can't. But it's kind of like the old "are you still beating your wife?" question. After watching 60 Minutes I was just struck, again, by what a mess we made with an unnecessary war. In my mind, Bush and his cronies should be held accountable but I'm enough of a realist to accept that it will never happen.
I do appreciate your rational arguments. We, at least, seem to have some common ground. Maybe Washington should try the "common ground" approach.
If I had known then what I know now...
Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
VIC 07
EV LA1 08
Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
Columbus 10
EV LA 11
Vancouver 11
Missoula 12
Portland 13, Spokane 13
St. Paul 14, Denver 14
EXACTLY!!!!! How would any sovereign country feel when an outside country comes in to "decide" what is best for them?
No, I can't. But it's kind of like the old "are you still beating your wife?" question. After watching 60 Minutes I was just struck, again, by what a mess we made with an unnecessary war. In my mind, Bush and his cronies should be held accountable but I'm enough of a realist to accept that it will never happen.
I do appreciate your rational arguments. We, at least, seem to have some common ground. Maybe Washington should try the "common ground" approach.
no we should have never "decided" for them but we did. cant go back and change it ya know.
the kurds lived in peace? shittes lived in peace? people who disagreed with saddam lived in peace? you cant be serious
i said a relative peace - compared to now, it was fantastic ... they may not have been happy but they had food, water and could live their lives ... what do they got now? ... they've been bombed back 2 centuries ... what was once one of the jewels of the middle east full of culture and modernism is now another wreckage of air raids and depleted uranium ...
best and worst thing ever to happen to iraq was when they nationalized their oil ... they were able to put money into roads, school, water treatment plants but they should have known the west wouldn't sit still ... and now they have thier oil back on the blood of innocent people ...
no we should have never "decided" for them but we did. cant go back and change it ya know.
I just wish Bush and his architects of the war would say "We fucked up - BAD." It'll never ever happen but to continue to assert it was the right thing to do is inane. :mad:
I also wish Obama and/or McCain would say it because we all know it's true!
If I had known then what I know now...
Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
VIC 07
EV LA1 08
Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
Columbus 10
EV LA 11
Vancouver 11
Missoula 12
Portland 13, Spokane 13
St. Paul 14, Denver 14
i said a relative peace - compared to now, it was fantastic ... they may not have been happy but they had food, water and could live their lives ... what do they got now? ... they've been bombed back 2 centuries ... what was once one of the jewels of the middle east full of culture and modernism is now another wreckage of air raids and depleted uranium ...
best and worst thing ever to happen to iraq was when they nationalized their oil ... they were able to put money into roads, school, water treatment plants but they should have known the west wouldn't sit still ... and now they have thier oil back on the blood of innocent people ...
but you cant go back and change it. and the kurds? its they are living in paradise compared to saddam. its going to take many years for Iraq to be better then they were before the invasion. no question about that. I believe they are on the track now. its going to take time.
but you cant go back and change it. and the kurds? its they are living in paradise compared to saddam. its going to take many years for Iraq to be better then they were before the invasion. no question about that. I believe they are on the track now. its going to take time.
You do know that any proof that Saddam gassed the kurds all by himself is fairly poor. Infact it is well known that the Kurds were caught in the crossfire of the Iran/Iraq war. A war that the US was involved in of course.
Where do you think the Chem weapons came from?
Also some tests that were done shows that some of the chemical weapons used on the kurds were infact weapons Iran had, not Iraq.
You do know that any proof that Saddam gassed the kurds all by himself is fairly poor. Infact it is well known that the Kurds were caught in the crossfire of the Iran/Iraq war. A war that the US was involved in of course.
Where do you think the Chem weapons came from?
Also some tests that were done shows that some of the chemical weapons used on the kurds were infact weapons Iran had, not Iraq.
so saddam didnt gas the kurds? is that what your saying?
So enough of this saddam gassed his own people on purpose shit. Next thing you will tell me that Iraq attacked Kuwait for no reason at all.
saddam invaded Kuwait to steal their oil, avoid paying his debt, and because he was a sociopath who thought he would rule the entire middle east. that qualify as reasons.
actually this is plenty of proof saddam gassed the kurds. I bet you couldnt provide one sliver of evidence to the contrary.
saddam invaded Kuwait to steal their oil, avoid paying his debt, and because he was a sociopath who thought he would rule the entire middle east. that qualify as reasons.
U think so?...Please do a search yourself and see the large amount of articles,news stories and information on this subject. iran/iraq war.
Also look up directional drilling.
This is all old news to me, I don't have the time to debate it with you..Sorry.
spyguy you seem to think that this U.S. invasion was in the best interest of the Iraqi people. of course, I doubt that you've ever even spoken to an Iraqi.
Iraqis are far worse now, during the occupation, than they were during Saddam's control. 1.2 million people are dead DUE TO THE U.S. INVASION. that does not mean that the U.S. has killed 1.2 million people violently, it means that due to this invasion, people were killed. it could mean people having no houses because they were bombed, so they live on the streets, catch diseases, and die, etc.
not only did 1.2 million people die, but 3 million Iraqis were displaced and are now seeking refuge in other countries. Under Saddam's control, we NEVER saw 3 million Iraqis seeking to live in other countries, like we are witnessing now. And, of course, the U.S., the occupier, only accepts like 4000 Iraqi refugees. 4000 out of 3 million.
Your job to paint a picture that one day, due to this invasion, Iraqis will be able to enjoy all the freedoms of strip clubs, bars, and hookers is ridiculous.
"BUT PEOPLE LIVED IN FEAR!"
what the fuck do you think they're living in now??
so saddam didnt gas the kurds? is that what your saying?
Whether he did or didn't is immaterial. We were there for WMD, remember? And now, as last night's 60 Minutes showed, our soldiers have to make up their own reasons why they're there. Some still think it's because of 911. They're just "following orders" and end up getting caught up in shit like killing civilians. There are generations of Kurds, Sunnis and Shites who will never forgive the US for invading their country, no matter what the supposed reason :mad:
If I had known then what I know now...
Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
VIC 07
EV LA1 08
Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
Columbus 10
EV LA 11
Vancouver 11
Missoula 12
Portland 13, Spokane 13
St. Paul 14, Denver 14
actually this is plenty of proof saddam gassed the kurds. I bet you couldnt provide one sliver of evidence to the contrary.
saddam invaded Kuwait to steal their oil, avoid paying his debt, and because he was a sociopath who thought he would rule the entire middle east. that qualify as reasons.
the most senior cia guy in iraq at the time of the gassing who was first there determined that the iranians gassed the kurds ...
as for your assertation about kuwait - i find it funny that you keep asking me if i'm serious or nuts ...
spyguy you seem to think that this U.S. invasion was in the best interest of the Iraqi people. of course, I doubt that you've ever even spoken to an Iraqi.
Iraqis are far worse now, during the occupation, than they were during Saddam's control. 1.2 million people are dead DUE TO THE U.S. INVASION. that does not mean that the U.S. has killed 1.2 million people violently, it means that due to this invasion, people were killed. it could mean people having no houses because they were bombed, so they live on the streets, catch diseases, and die, etc.
not only did 1.2 million people die, but 3 million Iraqis were displaced and are now seeking refuge in other countries. Under Saddam's control, we NEVER saw 3 million Iraqis seeking to live in other countries, like we are witnessing now. And, of course, the U.S., the occupier, only accepts like 4000 Iraqi refugees. 4000 out of 3 million.
Your job to paint a picture that one day, due to this invasion, Iraqis will be able to enjoy all the freedoms of strip clubs, bars, and hookers is ridiculous.
"BUT PEOPLE LIVED IN FEAR!"
what the fuck do you think they're living in now??
not true. I absolutely do not think it was in their best interest. but it happened. cant take it back now, so time to find some silver lining.
And the story gets murkier: immediately after the battle the United States Defense Intelligence Agency investigated and produced a classified report, which it circulated within the intelligence community on a need-to-know basis. That study asserted that it was Iranian gas that killed the Kurds, not Iraqi gas.
The agency did find that each side used gas against the other in the battle around Halabja. The condition of the dead Kurds' bodies, however, indicated they had been killed with a blood agent -- that is, a cyanide-based gas -- which Iran was known to use. The Iraqis, who are thought to have used mustard gas in the battle, are not known to have possessed blood agents at the time.
These facts have long been in the public domain but, extraordinarily, as often as the Halabja affair is cited, they are rarely mentioned. A much-discussed article in The New Yorker last March did not make reference to the Defense Intelligence Agency report or consider that Iranian gas might have killed the Kurds. On the rare occasions the report is brought up, there is usually speculation, with no proof, that it was skewed out of American political favoritism toward Iraq in its war against Iran.
Whether he did or didn't is immaterial. We were there for WMD, remember? And now, as last night's 60 Minutes showed, our soldiers have to make up their own reasons why they're there. Some still think it's because of 911. They're just "following orders" and end up getting caught up in shit like killing civilians. There are generations of Kurds, Sunnis and Shites who will never forgive the US for invading their country, no matter what the supposed reason :mad:
well all we can do is move forward. its obvious invading Iraq was wrong but now what? time to pick up and pieces and try and give something that Iraq has never had. a free country. its a long shot but why focus on the negatives, they cant be changed. want to have bush tried for war crimes? ok fine go for it. wont change anything
not true. I absolutely do not think it was in their best interest. but it happened. cant take it back now, so time to find some silver lining.
That is so fucked up!! It's like you're saying "it is what it is, get over it." Tell that to the hundreds of thousands who have died. Are you in the 23% who approve of Bush's performance? Truly, the dude should be put on trial for war crimes (as should have Saddam). :mad:
well all we can do is move forward. its obvious invading Iraq was wrong but now what? time to pick up and pieces and try and give something that Iraq has never had. a free country. its a long shot but why focus on the negatives, they cant be changed. want to have bush tried for war crimes? ok fine go for it. wont change anything
True, I guess. Iraq may or may not have a free country. It won't be because we tell them to.
And yeah, I would like to see Bush on trial. It won't bring anyone back but at least he won't be chilling in Crawford and getting hefty appearance fees from "his people." :mad:
If I had known then what I know now...
Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
VIC 07
EV LA1 08
Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
Columbus 10
EV LA 11
Vancouver 11
Missoula 12
Portland 13, Spokane 13
St. Paul 14, Denver 14
in my estimation - everything ... you basically said saddam was a mad man bent on ruling the middle east ... is there anyone else on this board who thinks this or even think it is remotely possible?
Comments
but that would then mean millions more living in fear and eventually death. the US invaded and they were now free to start killing each other in the name of religion. you dont see a problem with that? I'm not trying to justify the US invasion or say we are not to blame for the problems there. its just not as cut and dry as you say.
what will Iraq look like 10 years from now? is it possible to be a thriving peaceful place? All US troops are set to leave by 2011. I'm willing to bet Iraq will be a peaceful place by then and beyond.
what would Iraq look like if saddam stayed in power? maybe he would be dead and one of his nice sons become president. paving the way for 30 more years of fear and death.
Maybe the death of Sadaam would have led to a revolution and the people of Iraq would have decided their own faith. Not some armchair quarterback over here in the states.
Im not playing god with 1 persons life based on your assumptions
maybe. but based on previous attempts at revolution, I'd say its a long shot. I'd even say people feared saddams sons more then saddam himself. they were some brutal fuckers.
cant go back and change what happen. life in Iraq has forever changed. now its time to think of the possible outcomes for Iraq's future. can Iraq be fully united one day? can Iraq live in a society based on freedom? I'd like to think so.
Anything is possible, but the Sunni/Shite divide is not going anywhere. And we're never truly leaving. This war was about oil and oil will be the only tangible proof that we ever "won" this war. I don't think we'll ever truly "give back" Iraq to its people. :mad:
Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
VIC 07
EV LA1 08
Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
Columbus 10
EV LA 11
Vancouver 11
Missoula 12
Portland 13, Spokane 13
St. Paul 14, Denver 14
eh, I'm more optimistic I guess. you cant deny that sunni-shitte violence has dramtically declined in recent months..
we may never leave completely, no. but we will remove combat troops, and tanks, etc etc. we arent going to be there in the current state forever. 2011 to be exact.
EXACTLY!!!!! How would any sovereign country feel when an outside country comes in to "decide" what is best for them?
No, I can't. But it's kind of like the old "are you still beating your wife?" question. After watching 60 Minutes I was just struck, again, by what a mess we made with an unnecessary war. In my mind, Bush and his cronies should be held accountable but I'm enough of a realist to accept that it will never happen.
I do appreciate your rational arguments. We, at least, seem to have some common ground. Maybe Washington should try the "common ground" approach.
Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
VIC 07
EV LA1 08
Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
Columbus 10
EV LA 11
Vancouver 11
Missoula 12
Portland 13, Spokane 13
St. Paul 14, Denver 14
no ... i'm not nuts - are you?
the country was non-secular as in the gov't and military contained members from all religions - people lived together in relative peace ...
the kurds lived in peace? shittes lived in peace? people who disagreed with saddam lived in peace? you cant be serious
no we should have never "decided" for them but we did. cant go back and change it ya know.
i said a relative peace - compared to now, it was fantastic ... they may not have been happy but they had food, water and could live their lives ... what do they got now? ... they've been bombed back 2 centuries ... what was once one of the jewels of the middle east full of culture and modernism is now another wreckage of air raids and depleted uranium ...
best and worst thing ever to happen to iraq was when they nationalized their oil ... they were able to put money into roads, school, water treatment plants but they should have known the west wouldn't sit still ... and now they have thier oil back on the blood of innocent people ...
I just wish Bush and his architects of the war would say "We fucked up - BAD." It'll never ever happen but to continue to assert it was the right thing to do is inane. :mad:
I also wish Obama and/or McCain would say it because we all know it's true!
Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
VIC 07
EV LA1 08
Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
Columbus 10
EV LA 11
Vancouver 11
Missoula 12
Portland 13, Spokane 13
St. Paul 14, Denver 14
but you cant go back and change it. and the kurds? its they are living in paradise compared to saddam. its going to take many years for Iraq to be better then they were before the invasion. no question about that. I believe they are on the track now. its going to take time.
You do know that any proof that Saddam gassed the kurds all by himself is fairly poor. Infact it is well known that the Kurds were caught in the crossfire of the Iran/Iraq war. A war that the US was involved in of course.
Where do you think the Chem weapons came from?
Also some tests that were done shows that some of the chemical weapons used on the kurds were infact weapons Iran had, not Iraq.
so saddam didnt gas the kurds? is that what your saying?
I'm saying that not enough proof exists that he did, So how can one use it as a reason for war? It's not a game you know.
The rest of my post is pretty clear I think.
---
So enough of this saddam gassed his own people on purpose shit. Next thing you will tell me that Iraq attacked Kuwait for no reason at all.
actually this is plenty of proof saddam gassed the kurds. I bet you couldnt provide one sliver of evidence to the contrary.
saddam invaded Kuwait to steal their oil, avoid paying his debt, and because he was a sociopath who thought he would rule the entire middle east. that qualify as reasons.
U think so?...Please do a search yourself and see the large amount of articles,news stories and information on this subject. iran/iraq war.
Also look up directional drilling.
This is all old news to me, I don't have the time to debate it with you..Sorry.
I'll be sure to do that. but its a well known fact that saddam was 100% responsible for using chemical weapons on the kurds. have a nice day
Was not my intention,
Prove it.
Iraqis are far worse now, during the occupation, than they were during Saddam's control. 1.2 million people are dead DUE TO THE U.S. INVASION. that does not mean that the U.S. has killed 1.2 million people violently, it means that due to this invasion, people were killed. it could mean people having no houses because they were bombed, so they live on the streets, catch diseases, and die, etc.
not only did 1.2 million people die, but 3 million Iraqis were displaced and are now seeking refuge in other countries. Under Saddam's control, we NEVER saw 3 million Iraqis seeking to live in other countries, like we are witnessing now. And, of course, the U.S., the occupier, only accepts like 4000 Iraqi refugees. 4000 out of 3 million.
Your job to paint a picture that one day, due to this invasion, Iraqis will be able to enjoy all the freedoms of strip clubs, bars, and hookers is ridiculous.
"BUT PEOPLE LIVED IN FEAR!"
what the fuck do you think they're living in now??
Whether he did or didn't is immaterial. We were there for WMD, remember? And now, as last night's 60 Minutes showed, our soldiers have to make up their own reasons why they're there. Some still think it's because of 911. They're just "following orders" and end up getting caught up in shit like killing civilians. There are generations of Kurds, Sunnis and Shites who will never forgive the US for invading their country, no matter what the supposed reason :mad:
Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
VIC 07
EV LA1 08
Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
Columbus 10
EV LA 11
Vancouver 11
Missoula 12
Portland 13, Spokane 13
St. Paul 14, Denver 14
the most senior cia guy in iraq at the time of the gassing who was first there determined that the iranians gassed the kurds ...
as for your assertation about kuwait - i find it funny that you keep asking me if i'm serious or nuts ...
not true. I absolutely do not think it was in their best interest. but it happened. cant take it back now, so time to find some silver lining.
would love to see some proof, I would be happy to stand corrected
what was I wrong about?
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article1148.htm
http://www.the7thfire.com/Politics%20and%20History/GaseousLies.htm
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9902E7DD1638F932A05752C0A9659C8B63
(from the new york times)
And the story gets murkier: immediately after the battle the United States Defense Intelligence Agency investigated and produced a classified report, which it circulated within the intelligence community on a need-to-know basis. That study asserted that it was Iranian gas that killed the Kurds, not Iraqi gas.
The agency did find that each side used gas against the other in the battle around Halabja. The condition of the dead Kurds' bodies, however, indicated they had been killed with a blood agent -- that is, a cyanide-based gas -- which Iran was known to use. The Iraqis, who are thought to have used mustard gas in the battle, are not known to have possessed blood agents at the time.
These facts have long been in the public domain but, extraordinarily, as often as the Halabja affair is cited, they are rarely mentioned. A much-discussed article in The New Yorker last March did not make reference to the Defense Intelligence Agency report or consider that Iranian gas might have killed the Kurds. On the rare occasions the report is brought up, there is usually speculation, with no proof, that it was skewed out of American political favoritism toward Iraq in its war against Iran.
well all we can do is move forward. its obvious invading Iraq was wrong but now what? time to pick up and pieces and try and give something that Iraq has never had. a free country. its a long shot but why focus on the negatives, they cant be changed. want to have bush tried for war crimes? ok fine go for it. wont change anything
No..its time to admit it was a mistake and learn from it. Instead of defending it and trying to explain it away as the US doing the Iraqis a favor.
That is so fucked up!! It's like you're saying "it is what it is, get over it." Tell that to the hundreds of thousands who have died. Are you in the 23% who approve of Bush's performance? Truly, the dude should be put on trial for war crimes (as should have Saddam). :mad:
True, I guess. Iraq may or may not have a free country. It won't be because we tell them to.
And yeah, I would like to see Bush on trial. It won't bring anyone back but at least he won't be chilling in Crawford and getting hefty appearance fees from "his people." :mad:
Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
VIC 07
EV LA1 08
Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
Columbus 10
EV LA 11
Vancouver 11
Missoula 12
Portland 13, Spokane 13
St. Paul 14, Denver 14
let me know if Mr. Brian's links aren't enough
in my estimation - everything ... you basically said saddam was a mad man bent on ruling the middle east ... is there anyone else on this board who thinks this or even think it is remotely possible?