Obama Says He's Had Enough!
g under p
Surfing The far side of THE Sombrero Galaxy Posts: 18,200
He Quits His Church After Yet Another Controversy.
Was he pressured to do this and even if he wasn't which church does he choose to attend if ANY?
Peace
Was he pressured to do this and even if he wasn't which church does he choose to attend if ANY?
Peace
*We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti
*MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
.....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti
*The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)
*MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
.....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti
*The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
GOOD ONE. I think you're better comedian than a drummer.
Peace
*MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
.....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti
*The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)
Oh, snap!!!!
(That WAS good ...)
No need to worry, Fox News will handle that request quite well.
Peace
*MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
.....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti
*The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)
no.
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
-Oscar Wilde
But he's talked about it for so long now. Surely it's not all *GASP* empty rhetoric? From a politician?!?! :eek:
Change we can believe in = oh yeah, I meant same old shit
Not that any of it matters...as long as the sound bytes are catchy and charisma is flowing.
what's funny is how the lefties around here bitched in 04 about people saying how they liked Bush because he was 'down to earth' and he was 'a guy you'd like to have a beer with'. Now that it's their candidate...charisma is all you need, apparently. Sing us that next pretty fairy tale.
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
-Oscar Wilde
Meanwhile, the Republicans are running a candidate who thinks he's a Democrat. It's like the bizzaro election!!!
for the least they could possibly do
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
But Obama's part of the Demmiecrat party, so it's okay to like him for whatever reasons they can find. It's as if the two Bush tenures were part of some huge door-in-the-face technique to make every politician ever seem palatable by comparison.
funny ppl demonize bush now (and rightly so) and yet...so much of the 2 party's policies are the same. why just bush/cheney???? the foreign policies are almost exactly identical! you hear very little criticism about clinton other than getting a blow job then lying about it under oath. how the democrats have this image as an opposition party is beyond me
change we can believe in...until after election day, then we can all go back to bitching about the 2 party's being worthless and ineffectual
powered by naivety
he had a voice that was strong and loud and
i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
eager to identify with
someone above the crowd
someone who seemed to feel the same
someone prepared to lead the way
haven't you heard???? he's the 2nd coming of bush!!! mcbush, mcwar, 100 years of war....:rolleyes:
he had a voice that was strong and loud and
i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
eager to identify with
someone above the crowd
someone who seemed to feel the same
someone prepared to lead the way
Foresight and hindsight don't seem to have much relevance in politics. It's all about what sounds good now - that's why Bush being out of office is a good thing, and electing someone who talks a good game with very little to back it up seems like the best idea in the world.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
no doubt. they say nader should instead be elected to the senate before running for president...but look at obama! he went to court and had everyone else thrown off the ballot or kept going to court until they dropped out...then he goes to washington, supports all the hawks, misses almost 1/2 of the votes in the senate...so nader's long resume isn't good enough, but obama winning an uncontested race and pretty much doing nothing but go on a nonstop media tour is somehow better?
he had a voice that was strong and loud and
i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
eager to identify with
someone above the crowd
someone who seemed to feel the same
someone prepared to lead the way
except for the more than 1/4 of a million dollars he's recieved from a single nuclear power company
http://jischinger.wordpress.com/2008/02/24/obama%E2%80%99s-money-cartel/
http://forums.pearljam.com/showthread.php?t=275309
on top of all the other corporate and lobbyist money he's taken in
what direction is he going that is the right one? lying about taking money and giving jobs to lobbyists?
if ya want a step in the right direction:
http://forums.pearljam.com/showthread.php?t=286746
http://forums.pearljam.com/showthread.php?t=283448
http://forums.pearljam.com/showthread.php?t=275309
he had a voice that was strong and loud and
i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
eager to identify with
someone above the crowd
someone who seemed to feel the same
someone prepared to lead the way
and
http://forums.pearljam.com/showpost.php?p=5409414&postcount=21
he had a voice that was strong and loud and
i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
eager to identify with
someone above the crowd
someone who seemed to feel the same
someone prepared to lead the way
Wow! Wouldn't want to meet that guy in a dark alley. Surprised there aren't horns.
"These seven Wall Street firms are (in order of money given): Goldman Sachs, UBS AG, Lehman Brothers, JP Morgan Chase, Citigroup, Morgan Stanley and Credit Suisse. There is also a large hedge fund, Citadel Investment Group, which is a major source of fee income to Wall Street. There are five large corporate law firms that are also registered lobbyists; and one is a corporate law firm that is no longer a registered lobbyist but does legal work for Wall Street. The cumula*tive total of these 14 contributors through February 1, 2008, was $2,872,128, and we’re still in the primary season."
According to what I've heard (too lazy to look it up) Obama has recieved 100 million(guessing sort of) in donations. I wouldn't call that being in the pocket of lobbyists. I believe that is McCain's job. Obama's average donation is around $100 dollars and he's winning. What more do you want from a candidate. The truth? Kucinich tried that and he lost. Nader isn't a viable candidate but he belongs somewhere in government. Hillary is McCain lite and McCain is Bush. I guess I don't see what the problem is.
ummmm yeah, i want the truth, why don't you?? you're ok w/ being lied to? it's not about 'winning' it's about standing up for what's right. sorry, i'm putting my foot down and i'm not just gonna roll over and give in to a faux opposition party
nader isn't viable b/c ppl are too chickenshit to vote for him, which i'm not.
he has lied, he lied about a pharmaceutical lobbyist being the chair of his election campaign in new hampshire.
he went from 'lobbyists won't have a job in my white house!!!' to 'lobbyists won't dominate my whitehouse!!'
among other things
but if you're ok w/ that, then by all means...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/10/AR2008041004045.html?hpid=topnews&loc=interstitialskip
Big Donors Among Obama's Grass Roots
'Bundlers' Have a Voice in Campaign
he had a voice that was strong and loud and
i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
eager to identify with
someone above the crowd
someone who seemed to feel the same
someone prepared to lead the way
http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta
Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
Serious question. Who would you choose?
http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta
Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
i choose nader/gonzalez.
and if not them i would write in kucinich, b/c the only way i can possibly waste my vote is to throw it away on someone who i know is lying to my face. i'm not gonna vote against somebody, as you are w/ mccain, i'm voting FOR somebody
you are limiting yourself, not our country. as long as you keep in line NOTHING will change. you have more than those 3 choices. we will never have progress or see any substantial form of change as long as we just shrug and give in and say 'i guess that's the best we can do....' the only way to affect change is to demand it and stand behind it, you can't do it half assed.
by this logic rosa parks should've just gotten up, right?
he had a voice that was strong and loud and
i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
eager to identify with
someone above the crowd
someone who seemed to feel the same
someone prepared to lead the way
http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta
Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
Good post, totally agree with you.
Obama continues to disassociate himself with all of these controversies claiming that they don't represent who he really is or what he believes in. The problem is that he hasn't shown us who he ACTUALLY is or what he believes in. How can he expect us to not judge him by his associates when he has given us nothing else to judge him by? Who the fuck is this guy? He has hardly any experience, has been involved in numerous (I will admit, somewhat overblown) controversies, associates himself with some very "interesting" people, and basically claims to believe (although he would highly resent this statement) the same stuff as Hilary, who, in my opinion, has MUCH more experience and personal conviction than him. How he got so popular is mind boggling...
-Reagan
said aid aid aid
he had a voice that was strong and loud and
i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
eager to identify with
someone above the crowd
someone who seemed to feel the same
someone prepared to lead the way