Huckabee On The Move

124

Comments

  • farfromglorified
    farfromglorified Posts: 5,700
    810wmb wrote:
    either you are for them or against them...

    Hehe...saddle up, cowboy.
    you stated you are for legal abortion..

    Absolutely, yes.
    so you support it, right?

    No. I simply have no interest in telling a woman what she can or cannot do with her body.

    Let me ask you a question: have you ever been laid?
  • 810wmb
    810wmb Posts: 849
    farfromglorified wrote:
    Hehe...saddle up, cowboy.



    Absolutely, yes.



    No. I simply have no interest in telling a woman what she can or cannot do with her body.

    Let me ask you a question: have you ever been laid?

    you stated huckabee killed babies and burned churches because he supported the wars.

    just making the point - you kill babies by supporting abortions.


    as far as getting laid........man, i'm hoping!
    i'm the meat, yer not...signed Capt Asshat
  • farfromglorified
    farfromglorified Posts: 5,700
    810wmb wrote:
    you stated huckabee killed babies and burned churches because he supported the wars.

    The activities are completely different. Huckabee is sanctioning war, saying that if he is made president he will continue it in a directly authoritative role. I have no authoritative role vis a vis abortions.
    just making the point - you kill babies by supporting abortions.

    Not the case at all. That's like saying you drown people by not draining lakes.
    as far as getting laid........man, i'm hoping!

    Best be careful. Getting laid almost always carries with it a non-zero chance for abortion and then, by the standard you're pushing here, that would also be "supporting abortion".
  • 810wmb
    810wmb Posts: 849
    farfromglorified wrote:
    The activities are completely different. Huckabee is sanctioning war, saying that if he is made president he will continue it in a directly authoritative role. I have no authoritative role vis a vis abortions.



    Not the case at all. That's like saying you drown people by not draining lakes.



    Best be careful. Getting laid almost always carries with it a non-zero chance for abortion and then, by the standard you're pushing here, that would also be "supporting abortion".

    well, i disagree, but you have figured that out...

    i support draining lakes

    i only have sex with women who are "fixed" :)
    i'm the meat, yer not...signed Capt Asshat
  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    Hicks for Huckabee! woo
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • 810wmb
    810wmb Posts: 849
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    Hicks for Huckabee! woo

    canadians for commies!!!!!!! yippie
    i'm the meat, yer not...signed Capt Asshat
  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    810wmb wrote:
    canadians for commies!!!!!!! yippie

    At least I'm a smart patriot. ;)
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • 810wmb
    810wmb Posts: 849
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    At least I'm a smart patriot. ;)

    gee roland, that post in the "Z" thread really choked me up...you felt bad for bashing the US and all...i just had to check the date....it seems you got past it :)
    i'm the meat, yer not...signed Capt Asshat
  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    810wmb wrote:
    gee roland, that post in the "Z" thread really choked me up...you felt bad for bashing the US and all...i just had to check the date....it seems you got past it :)


    Oh you'd be surprised what I am capable of. hehe
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • searchlightsoul
    searchlightsoul Posts: 583
    810wmb wrote:
    nothing wrong with any of that, except for the taxes thing

    i was joking about "being a fan of"

    Nothing wrong with creationsim if you live in the 18th century. It isn't a matter of belief, the facts are all there. The evangelists just don't want to accept the reality.

    Whats really concerning is how apathetic people have become to this type of thing. It is not acceptable for Huckabee to be this ignorant in the 21st century.
  • farfromglorified
    farfromglorified Posts: 5,700
    searchlightsoul wrote:
    Whats really concerning is how apathetic people have become to this type of thing. It is not acceptable for Huckabee to be this ignorant in the 21st century.

    Actually, what's really concerning is that people still use the word "unacceptable" relative to other people's beliefs.

    You might try putting that to the test of time.
  • gue_barium
    gue_barium Posts: 5,515
    farfromglorified wrote:
    Actually, what's really concerning is that people still use the word "unacceptable" relative to other people's beliefs.

    You might try putting that to the test of time.

    I don't know about that. Most people get past santa claus by age 5. That's 5 years in a human lifetime.
    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • Collin
    Collin Posts: 4,931
    810wmb wrote:
    i only have sex with women who are "fixed" :)

    Women who used to be men, eh?
    THANK YOU, LOSTDAWG!


    naděje umírá poslední
  • mammasan
    mammasan Posts: 5,656
    t206 wrote:
    I just dont like Huckabee for what he will do to taxes,the flat tax is a scam because you will end up paying taxes on stuff you dont pay taxes on now, like rent...and he has a history of RAISING taxes, not lowering them.

    edit: meant "fair tax" or whatever...not flat tax

    I don't know where you get your info from but with the Fair Tax you will not have to pay taxes on rent. Also you already pay taxes on everything you buy, it's called an imbedded tax. What ever taxes the manufactorer and/or distributor have to pay in order to get those goods, you purchase, on the shelves are passed on to the consumer.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • godpt3
    godpt3 Posts: 1,020
    farfromglorified wrote:
    Actually, what's really concerning is that people still use the word "unacceptable" relative to other people's beliefs.

    see, this is where political correctness completely went off the rails. We're supposed to "accept" everybody (even the idiots) and skip off into the sunset singing "Shiny, Happy People."
    "If all those sweet, young things were laid end to end, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised."
    —Dorothy Parker

    http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/6902/conspiracytheoriesxt6qt8.jpg
  • farfromglorified
    farfromglorified Posts: 5,700
    godpt3 wrote:
    see, this is where political correctness completely went off the rails.

    Not really. Where political correctness completely went off the rails is when it became unaccepting in the name of acceptance, intolerant in the name of tolerance, and violent in the name of non-violence.
    We're supposed to "accept" everybody (even the idiots) and skip off into the sunset singing "Shiny, Happy People."

    Hehe...you can do that if you'd like. However, there's a significant space in between acceptance and unacceptance known as simple indifference. To suggest that someone else's viewpoint is "unacceptable" is to really call into question your own rights to hold your own views.
  • gue_barium
    gue_barium Posts: 5,515
    farfromglorified wrote:
    Not really. Where political correctness completely went off the rails is when it became unaccepting in the name of acceptance, intolerant in the name of tolerance, and violent in the name of non-violence.



    Hehe...you can do that if you'd like. However, there's a significant space in between acceptance and unacceptance known as simple indifference. To suggest that someone else's viewpoint is "unacceptable" is to really call into question your own rights to hold your own views.

    But the original inference was of what sort of person it is holding public office. I think it is quite acceptable to find candidates unnacceptable for any number of beliefs they may hold. That's part of the process.
    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • farfromglorified
    farfromglorified Posts: 5,700
    gue_barium wrote:
    But the original inference was of what sort of person it is holding public office.

    Maybe...that's not how I read it.
  • 810wmb
    810wmb Posts: 849
    Collin wrote:
    Women who used to be men, eh?

    aren't you tolerant of all?
    i'm the meat, yer not...signed Capt Asshat
  • searchlightsoul
    searchlightsoul Posts: 583
    farfromglorified wrote:
    Actually, what's really concerning is that people still use the word "unacceptable" relative to other people's beliefs.

    You might try putting that to the test of time.

    It is not a values system which you can pick and choose, it is a scientific theory supported by evidence so you can't compare it to a belief system. No one would say for example that they 'believe' in Einsten's theory of relativity.

    I guess it makes him highly prospective as a leader that he takes faith over reason than?

Categories