LOL...I killed precisely zero babies and burned exactly zero churches today. That makes zero and zero, respectively, over my entire lifetime.
Mike Huckabee, on the other hand, has played an important role in killing babies and burning churches through his continued support of American endeavors in Iraq and Afghanistan.
my post are mine, i could give a shit if i impress someone who holds your beliefs
This is actually a very healthy attitude. Unfortunately, you don't really believe it.
everyone about shit when bush got 2 in on 'em...i hope he gets more, turn some of this shit around.
I'm assuming by "got 2 in on 'em", you probably mean Supreme Court justices. Those 2 he got in, by the way, aren't likely to overturn Roe V Wade, and he's not likely to get any more in. So don't get your hopes up. And here's one that might surprise you...I think Roe V Wade should be overturned. It was a bad decision. But that doesn't mean I believe abortion should be illegal. That would be a moral contradiction.
just because you don't believe in God, but do believe in killing babies...but against the war...doesn't mean everyone is
I don't believe in God. And I don't believe in killing babies, either. And I am against the war. And I don't believe that everyone thinks the same.
unlike you, i think you should be heard..loud and clear..and voted the fuck down
I'm not really interested in votes, 810wmb. That's your game, remember:
"some people believe in those things. that's why they have elections.." -810wmb
Shouldn't the above make you feel a little silly when complaining about others voting in and imposing their morality on you? Isn't that what you're trying to do to them?
I just dont like Huckabee for what he will do to taxes,the flat tax is a scam because you will end up paying taxes on stuff you dont pay taxes on now, like rent...and he has a history of RAISING taxes, not lowering them.
i find it interesting that interesting that you find huckabee guilty because he support the war, but you don't find yourself guilty for supporting the things you so
i'm for abortions in cases of rape and if they knew without a doubt the baby would grow up like you
i find it interesting that interesting that you find huckabee guilty because he support the war, but you don't find yourself guilty for supporting the things you so
not today. i've been writing about king lear and libertarianism all day and waiting to hear the results of a loved one's brain surgery. im a bit fried. in a few minutes i get to put this place to good use and talk about hate crimes in othello and merchant of venice.
He stands for funding anti-abortion education on the federal level and eliminating federal funding for facilities that perform abortions, all the while professing that the abortion decisions should be made at the state level. That makes him objectively contradictory and, in my opinion, an idiot.
He says that he's "pro-life" and that he's "not going to be reticent about supporting laws that would help us to preserve human life", yet he loves the death penalty and seems to really dig killing Arabs. Again, objectively contradictory and, in my opinion, quite foolish.
Huckabee has stated that he wants creationism taught in schools and that he "does not necessarily buy into the traditional Darwinian theory". This is at least not necessarily contradictory, but again seems to be slightly moronic.
Finally, Huckabee is a tax-raiser and wanton spender, if his tenure in Arkansas is any indication.
No, I'm not. I didn't like Clinton and I don't like Bush. Combining them into one super-candidate doesn't strike me as a very good idea.
not today. i've been writing about king lear and libertarianism all day and waiting to hear the results of a loved one's brain surgery. im a bit fried. in a few minutes i get to put this place to good use and talk about hate crimes in othello and merchant of venice.
wow! by the way, sorry about the loved one, i hope everything turns out ok
I'm certainly for eliminating Federal funding for abortion clinics. I'm not for replacing that with Federal funding for anti-abortion "education". I'm for abortion-related decisions being made on the state level. I'm for states hopefully realizing that abortion is, for better or worse, an individual choice best made by the women in question.
I'm firmly against the death penalty, as I like to consider myself better than a murderer. I do not believe in creationism, as one cannot believe in creationism without suggesting that evidence has no bearing on conclusion. Similarly, I will not say that creationism is wrong, as I I have no evidence that firmly disproves it. I do believe in evolution, as there is much evidentiary support for it as a theory. That said, I'm quite sure there are many mysteries in this universe that man does not understand.
I do not believe in taxing people against their will, nor do I believe it to be wise to increase governmental spending at rates greater than incomes.
Perhaps most importantly, I do not believe that anyone, of any political persuasion, will find a correct answer in a contradiction.
That's what I believe, vis a vis the issues at hand.
i respect the fact that those are your beliefs, i don't share them.
Of course you don't. But only one of us is willing to impose their beliefs on the other at the point of a gun.
but if huckabee is guilty for supporting what he believes in, then why shouldn't you be?
Huckabee is not "guilty for supporting what he believes in". Supporting what you believe in is not a crime, nor is it something anyone should be ashamed of.
Mike Huckabee is simply guilty of professing a host of contradictions and calling them facts or morals. And he's proposing pushing those contradictions on everyone. That's what he's guilty of.
Of course you don't. But only one of us is willing to impose their beliefs on the other at the point of a gun.
Huckabee is not "guilty for supporting what he believes in". Supporting what you believe in is not a crime, nor is it something anyone should be ashamed of.
Mike Huckabee is simply guilty of professing a host of contradictions and calling them facts or morals. And he's proposing pushing those contradictions on everyone. That's what he's guilty of.
I would say "misguided" before I would say "guilty."
Just me. He actually seems somewhat sincere about what he speaks.
I mean, he isn't sincere to the public in the realistic sense, but he thinks he is.
Mike Huckabee, on the other hand, has played an important role in killing babies and burning churches through his continued support of American endeavors in Iraq and Afghanistan.
ok que - gee, you splitting hairs too? - was writing while you were posting
farm - you play an important role in abortions - ok?
every cross your mind he's running for pres?
if elected he uphold the law of the land...does that mean he has to believe in every law on the books? or just uphold them?
Sincerity has absolutely no relevance to guilt or innocence.
But, guilt (or innocence) is a judgement call. You can perceive a candidate on merits, but I don't think you can judge a candidate of guilt or innocence, unless of course a crime has been committed.
Guilt seems a heavy word for what you're saying.
Comments
where do you live? the U.S.?
This is actually a very healthy attitude. Unfortunately, you don't really believe it.
I'm assuming by "got 2 in on 'em", you probably mean Supreme Court justices. Those 2 he got in, by the way, aren't likely to overturn Roe V Wade, and he's not likely to get any more in. So don't get your hopes up. And here's one that might surprise you...I think Roe V Wade should be overturned. It was a bad decision. But that doesn't mean I believe abortion should be illegal. That would be a moral contradiction.
I don't believe in God. And I don't believe in killing babies, either. And I am against the war. And I don't believe that everyone thinks the same.
I'm not really interested in votes, 810wmb. That's your game, remember:
"some people believe in those things. that's why they have elections.." -810wmb
Shouldn't the above make you feel a little silly when complaining about others voting in and imposing their morality on you? Isn't that what you're trying to do to them?
edit: meant "fair tax" or whatever...not flat tax
http://www.ronpaulforums.com
Yes. North Carolina. Where do you live?
i'm for abortions in cases of rape and if they knew without a doubt the baby would grow up like you
i was just wondering...glad yr a citizen
ky - not one of the 12 kkk left though
huh? weren't you calling chavez an evil dictator for that sort of thing?
i never said he was a dictator, he a wannabe...he got his ass shot down...i think he a fuckin prick just the same
What things do I support?
not today. i've been writing about king lear and libertarianism all day and waiting to hear the results of a loved one's brain surgery. im a bit fried. in a few minutes i get to put this place to good use and talk about hate crimes in othello and merchant of venice.
it doesn't sound like you are for any of this
wow! by the way, sorry about the loved one, i hope everything turns out ok
no worries, it all came out just fine. just not as sharp and biting as my usual self
I'm certainly for eliminating Federal funding for abortion clinics. I'm not for replacing that with Federal funding for anti-abortion "education". I'm for abortion-related decisions being made on the state level. I'm for states hopefully realizing that abortion is, for better or worse, an individual choice best made by the women in question.
I'm firmly against the death penalty, as I like to consider myself better than a murderer. I do not believe in creationism, as one cannot believe in creationism without suggesting that evidence has no bearing on conclusion. Similarly, I will not say that creationism is wrong, as I I have no evidence that firmly disproves it. I do believe in evolution, as there is much evidentiary support for it as a theory. That said, I'm quite sure there are many mysteries in this universe that man does not understand.
I do not believe in taxing people against their will, nor do I believe it to be wise to increase governmental spending at rates greater than incomes.
Perhaps most importantly, I do not believe that anyone, of any political persuasion, will find a correct answer in a contradiction.
That's what I believe, vis a vis the issues at hand.
but if huckabee is guilty for supporting what he believes in, then why shouldn't you be?
Nobody called Huckabee "guilty."
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
Of course you don't. But only one of us is willing to impose their beliefs on the other at the point of a gun.
Huckabee is not "guilty for supporting what he believes in". Supporting what you believe in is not a crime, nor is it something anyone should be ashamed of.
Mike Huckabee is simply guilty of professing a host of contradictions and calling them facts or morals. And he's proposing pushing those contradictions on everyone. That's what he's guilty of.
I would say "misguided" before I would say "guilty."
Just me. He actually seems somewhat sincere about what he speaks.
I mean, he isn't sincere to the public in the realistic sense, but he thinks he is.
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
ok que - gee, you splitting hairs too? - was writing while you were posting
farm - you play an important role in abortions - ok?
every cross your mind he's running for pres?
if elected he uphold the law of the land...does that mean he has to believe in every law on the books? or just uphold them?
Sincerity has absolutely no relevance to guilt or innocence.
The attorney general does that, at least on the federal level.
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
What role is that?
But, guilt (or innocence) is a judgement call. You can perceive a candidate on merits, but I don't think you can judge a candidate of guilt or innocence, unless of course a crime has been committed.
Guilt seems a heavy word for what you're saying.
Again, just me. A language usage thing.
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
supporting them
How am I "supporting" them?
yer wearing me out!
either you are for them or against them...you stated you are for legal abortion..so you support it, right?
true, he's gotta uphold the law..so is the pres, so will whoever gets elected...that doesn't mean they have to personally believe in it
I personally believe in it.
when i can get in it.
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
He lives in the blue ridge, living off the land, avoiding taxes as he goes...
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.