Not that I know of. The arabs disliked Usury and incorporated into the Sharia Law that Usury be banned. This system of Usury allowed individuals to easy amass great wealth. It was kind of a Jewish secret of sorts. So, it could have happened that non-Jewish Germans (because many Germans were Jews) noticed that their Jewish counter-parts were better off. That may have given rise to some discontent.
I doubt 10% of the population of Germany was back then, or is even still Jewish.
So, you admit that the Treaty of Versailles came before Hitler?
Great, now maybe you will remember this part
France wanted revenge, Britain wanted a relatively strong, economically viable Germany as a counterweight to French dominance on Continental Europe, and the U.S. wanted the creation of a permanent peace as quickly as possible, with financial compensation for its military expenditures and the destruction of the old empires.
No shit the treaty was before him. He took advantage of it's repercussions. Dude, this wasn't even the issue I was discussing, but a well known part of it. The second part is the rationale behind the treaty, now seen as a complete failure because of the state it left Germany in--which gave rise to a despot. Your post states the facts and well-known. What is your point? Idiot.
I doubt 10% of the population of Germany was back then, or is even still Jewish.
Well 82,438,000 is the population of germany today. According to the Jewish account 6,000,000 Jews were killed. Assuming the population was the same in the 1950's (which it was probably less).
So that's 7.28%
Yea, not a significant part of the population. Which means they were a minority making it much easier to discriminate against. But I suppose you are right. Maybe they hated the Jews before Hitler came along. I can't see why they would though, without that connection between wealth and Judaism. Maybe there is another causality I'm not aware of.
I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
No shit the treaty was before him. He took advantage of it's repercussions. Dude, this wasn't even the issue I was discussing, but a well known part of it. The second part is the rationale behind the treaty, now seen as a complete failure because of the state it left Germany in--which gave rise to a despot. Your post states the facts and well-known. What is your point? Idiot.
The causality of the coercion of the German people and the rise of the Third Reich was highly dynamical and infinitely caused.
The Treaty of Versailles as you know was due to WW1, which was due to.. and so on and so on.
I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
Well 82,438,000 is the population of germany today. According to the Jewish account 6,000,000 Jews were killed. Assuming the population was the same in the 1950's (which it was probably less).
So that's 7.28%
Yea, not a significant part of the population. Which means they were a minority making it much easier to discriminate against. But I suppose you are right. Maybe they hated the Jews before Hitler came along. I can't see why they would though, without that connection between wealth and Judaism. Maybe there is another causality I'm not aware of.
It's possible.
I think Hitler's Germany rise in it's nationalism for supremcy is bit of a myth.
People wanted better lives. Men wanted better wives. Etc., etc.
Maybe there is another causality I'm not aware of.
Are you kidding me!? Yeah, there was a major 'causality', and you better never forget it, you obtuse dipshit--the man suffered from severe psychosis and paranoia. Get that through your thick, dropped-as-a-baby skull, so it gets to your ignorant, uneducated brain. If you sympathize with that man in the slightest, you need to get help. You were right, I should be more careful with how I use 'idiot'. That was a step up for you. You are treading in the seas of your own tardation. You make me lose faith in man.
I think Hitler's Germany rise for it's nationalism in supremcy is bit of a myth.
From the ground up yes, it's a bit over-simplified. Over time the nationalism strengthened.
There are so many aspects of it, the Nazis were really smart, particularly Hermann Göring.
I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
Are you kidding me!? Yeah, there was a major 'causality', and you better never forget it, you obtuse dipshit--the man suffered from severe psychosis and paranoia. Get that through your thick, dropped-as-a-baby skull, so it gets to your ignorant, uneducated brain. If you sympathize with that man in the slightest, you need to get help. You were right, I should be more careful with how I use 'idiot'. That was a step up for you. You are treading in the seas of your own tardation. You make me lose faith in man.
I would sympathize with anyone who suffers from Psychosis.
I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
I would sympathize with anyone who suffers from Psychosis.
Let me rephrase that: I sympathize with everyone.
I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
I'm not giving it to anyone that doesn't request it. It exists within my brain, which is the only place it is really important.
Tell me, do you sympathize for the families of the 6 million jews killed?
Absolutely.
I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
Comments
I doubt 10% of the population of Germany was back then, or is even still Jewish.
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
No shit the treaty was before him. He took advantage of it's repercussions. Dude, this wasn't even the issue I was discussing, but a well known part of it. The second part is the rationale behind the treaty, now seen as a complete failure because of the state it left Germany in--which gave rise to a despot. Your post states the facts and well-known. What is your point? Idiot.
Well 82,438,000 is the population of germany today. According to the Jewish account 6,000,000 Jews were killed. Assuming the population was the same in the 1950's (which it was probably less).
So that's 7.28%
Yea, not a significant part of the population. Which means they were a minority making it much easier to discriminate against. But I suppose you are right. Maybe they hated the Jews before Hitler came along. I can't see why they would though, without that connection between wealth and Judaism. Maybe there is another causality I'm not aware of.
The causality of the coercion of the German people and the rise of the Third Reich was highly dynamical and infinitely caused.
The Treaty of Versailles as you know was due to WW1, which was due to.. and so on and so on.
It's possible.
I think Hitler's Germany rise in it's nationalism for supremcy is bit of a myth.
People wanted better lives. Men wanted better wives. Etc., etc.
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
Are you kidding me!? Yeah, there was a major 'causality', and you better never forget it, you obtuse dipshit--the man suffered from severe psychosis and paranoia. Get that through your thick, dropped-as-a-baby skull, so it gets to your ignorant, uneducated brain. If you sympathize with that man in the slightest, you need to get help. You were right, I should be more careful with how I use 'idiot'. That was a step up for you. You are treading in the seas of your own tardation. You make me lose faith in man.
From the ground up yes, it's a bit over-simplified. Over time the nationalism strengthened.
There are so many aspects of it, the Nazis were really smart, particularly Hermann Göring.
I would sympathize with anyone who suffers from Psychosis.
Let me rephrase that: I sympathize with everyone.
The man that needs your sympathy is truly lost. Tell me, do you sympathize for the families of the 6 million jews killed?
I'm not giving it to anyone that doesn't request it. It exists within my brain, which is the only place it is really important.
Absolutely.