men: sexually aggressive women. thoughts.

catefrances

gue_barium wrote:

trust and honesty. honesty and trust.

and a nice bottle of red.

gue_barium

catefrances wrote:

and a nice bottle of red.

nah. i mean, sure, on a given night.

love, love, love,
all you need is love.

catefrances

gue_barium wrote:

nah. i mean, sure, on a given night.

love, love, love,
all you need is love.

any night for me's a given night for red.

the beatles lied.

Rats of Multa

gue_barium wrote:

But I'm talking about, generally, being single and out and about, and there are the women that fawn all over you, worship you even, and then there are the women that have that certain look about them, usually very attractive, and they're not messing around. They are genuinely aggressive, just not in a passive way like the submissives. They want control. You know what kind I'm talking about?
Sometimes it's like finding the way you've been to women all the sudden turned around on you. Lots of flattery, lots of sexual innuendo, some physicality to it, mysteriousness, like where the heck is this leading?

i hear ya Q. cougars are great fun, chasing yarn and such, but i'm always reminded of mr. cobain.

we all have to pick and choose our fun i guess.

Rats of Multa

gue_barium wrote:

who's the boss?

is this a rhetorical question?

gue_barium

Rats of Multa wrote:

i hear ya Q. cougars are great fun, chasing yarn and such, but i'm always reminded of mr. cobain.

we all have to pick and choose our fun i guess.

I think cougars are older, financially well-off women, if i'm not mistaken.

No thanks.

I'm speaking more in terms of someone your own age, or thereabouts, maybe a little richer or poorer, but not much.

gue_barium

Rats of Multa wrote:

is this a rhetorical question?

yes.

gue_barium

catefrances wrote:

any night for me's a given night for red.

the beatles lied.

no they didn't. love is understanding. even when you're a bottle-a-day
red drinker.

catefrances

gue_barium wrote:

no they didn't. love is understanding. even when you're a bottle-a-day
red drinker.

ah right, that explains it. im not understanding anything atm.

gue_barium

catefrances wrote:

ah right, that explains it. im not understanding anything atm.

no wonder i love you.

Rats of Multa

gue_barium wrote:

I think cougars are older, financially well-off women, if i'm not mistaken.

No thanks.

I'm speaking more in terms of someone your own age, or thereabouts, maybe a little richer or poorer, but not much.

yah, i just dont know how old you are, so figured we could stretch the term theoretically. i think youre right though, money often does play a factor in such personalities, since otherwise single women at that age are typically working too much or raising families for said sexual predation(s). i have seen exceptions though.

anyway, nice thread,... should be interesting to see what some other dudes have to say on the matter. [im guessing most are gonna go with "you shoulda fucked her que", but ya never can tell for sure],...

aight, im well beyond the state where im in need of passing out. ciao.

catefrances

gue_barium wrote:

no wonder i love you.

LMAO!!

but no gue, you love me cause you dont know me.

gue_barium

Rats of Multa wrote:

yah, i just dont know how old you are, so figured we could stretch the term theoretically. i think youre right though, money often does play a factor in such personalities, since otherwise single women at that age are typically working too much or raising families for said sexual predation(s). i have seen exceptions though.

anyway, nice thread,... should be interesting to see what some other dudes have to say on the matter. [im guessing most are gonna go with "you shoulda fucked her que", but ya never can tell for sure],...

aight, im well beyond the state where im in need of passing out. ciao.

I even said i shoulda f***** her. But that's only because I was sixteen and not a whole lot more matters at that point. I wasn't any moralist by any stretch at that age. I wasn't scared off because she was my girlfriend's older sister, either, or that I had a girlfriend. I was just simply scared off by her approach. And the weed may have been making me feel tweakish.

gue_barium

catefrances wrote:

LMAO!!

but no gue, you love me cause you dont know me.

Well, i love you in a cyber sense. I am understanding of your forays into different kinds of thinking. Maybe because I do it myself.

catefrances

gue_barium wrote:

Well, i love you in a cyber sense. I am understanding of your forays into different kinds of thinking. Maybe because I do it myself.

i didnt think there was any sense in cyber space.

gue_barium

catefrances wrote:

i didnt think there was any sense in cyber space.

I do think there is a human being typing at the keyboard for every post that is submitted here.

I used to think of this place in different terms, more objectively I guess, for lack of a better word.

catefrances

gue_barium wrote:

I do think there is a human being typing at the keyboard for every post that is submitted here.

I used to think of this place in different terms, more objectively I guess, for lack of a better word.

and how do you think now?

gue_barium

catefrances wrote:

and how do you think now?

er, i just said that i think there is a human being at the end of every post.
no matter how absurd, really. people get to know themselves in this sort of forum, whether you believe it or not.

i used to think, words are just words. people will make of them what they will, no problem of mine. in the past here in the message pit, i didn't attach the idea that those words might mean something to someone in any sort of real time kind of sense. it's just a message board, and that's true, philosophically speaking, however, in time i've found it is better to acknowledge the person you are replying to is as much flesh and blood as yourself. you know?

catefrances

gue_barium wrote:

er, i just said that i think there is a human being at the end of every post.
no matter how absurd, really. people get to know themselves in this sort of forum, whether you believe it or not.

i used to think, words are just words. people will make of them what they will, no problem of mine. in the past here in the message pit, i didn't attach the idea that those words might mean something to someone in any sort of real time kind of sense. it's just a message board, and that's true, philosophically speaking, however, in time i've found it is better to acknowledge the person you are replying to is as much flesh and blood as yourself. you know?

hmm well i know that everything i say on the pit is a faithful representation of me as a person. if i dont believe something or mean what i say then why bother. and i dont post anything just for shock value. i dont lie in real life so why would i not be truthful on the pit?

so consequently i believe, perhaps naively, that others act the same.

gue_barium

catefrances wrote:

hmm well i know that everything i say on the pit is a faithful representation of me as a person. if i dont believe something or mean what i say then why bother. and i dont post anything just for shock value. i dont lie in real life so why would i not be truthful on the pit?

so consequently i believe, perhaps naively, that others act the same.

the language has its limits, so much can be told by those pretending to be somebody else, even if they aren't aware that that's what they're doing. that is to say, honesty comes through even in a forum such as this. we're not always perfectly honest all of the time, regardless of how hard we try. in this forum of language as life our weaknesses show and we strengthen our language, hopefully, as to ourselves and its inherit change.
Q: Dude, you're so full of shit.
A: no i'm not.