NT

Chris1401Chris1401 Posts: 354
edited September 2018 in A Moving Train
NT
Post edited by Chris1401 on
«13

Comments

  • nickcat0nickcat0 Posts: 75
    That's why I prefer the more liberal attitudes of the Church of England , over these more conservative , reactionary faiths .
    Worship God , don't judge others ,try and be loving and considerate to all , and let God decide what He thinks is right and wrong .
    Nil Satis Nisi Optimum
    9/9/06
    Everton 3 RS 0
  • normnorm Posts: 31,146
    that's abhorrent.....:mad:....and very sad....
  • hippiemomhippiemom Posts: 3,326
    Simons said the church believes homosexuality is a sin, but it would have appeared to endorse that lifestyle if the service had been held there.
    So they only do funerals for those that are free from sin? I guess that leaves them with an awful lot of spare time.

    Am I to believe they've never done a funeral for a fornicator, a covetor, one who didn't make the sabbath holy?
    "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." ~ MLK, 1963
  • gue_bariumgue_barium Posts: 5,515
    "Principles of cruelty", anyone?

    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • jeffbrjeffbr Seattle Posts: 7,177
    Why is it shocking that a church would be narrow minded and exclusive? Exclusivity is the name of the game with organized religion isn't it?
    "I'll use the magic word - let's just shut the fuck up, please." EV, 04/13/08
  • gue_bariumgue_barium Posts: 5,515
    jeffbr wrote:
    Why is it shocking that a church would be narrow minded and exclusive? Exclusivity is the name of the game with organized religion isn't it?
    Why is it shocking, jeffbr?

    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • jeffbrjeffbr Seattle Posts: 7,177
    gue_barium wrote:
    Why is it shocking, jeffbr?

    It isn't to me. I just wonder why it is "news".
    "I'll use the magic word - let's just shut the fuck up, please." EV, 04/13/08
  • gue_bariumgue_barium Posts: 5,515
    jeffbr wrote:
    It isn't to me. I just wonder why it is "news".

    Well, you're the only one who said it was shocking. Does news have to be shocking to be news?

    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • jeffbrjeffbr Seattle Posts: 7,177
    gue_barium wrote:
    Well, you're the only one who said it was shocking. Does news have to be shocking to be news?

    If you want to sell advertising it does.
    "I'll use the magic word - let's just shut the fuck up, please." EV, 04/13/08
  • gue_bariumgue_barium Posts: 5,515
    jeffbr wrote:
    If you want to sell advertising it does.
    So, in your mind, the aim of the church was to enable the media to shock its readers sufficiently enough to sell advertising?

    Whew.

    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • LikeAnOceanLikeAnOcean Posts: 7,718
    I'm pretty sure there's a "god", but I fucking hate religion. Fuck it!
  • I'm pretty sure there's a "god", but I fucking hate religion. Fuck it!
    i second that....

    when my dad was a pastor there was a woman who had aids that was contracted by her cheating husband... when she passed away, my father held her funeral at our small building where we had "church". apparently, her family were from another denomination... don't know which, but they didn't want to hold her funeral for similar reasons. so my father allowed an entire group probably 300-400 guests in a building that was meant for only 100 or so.
    This isn't the land of opportunity, it's the land of competition.
  • know1know1 Posts: 6,794
    hippiemom wrote:
    So they only do funerals for those that are free from sin? I guess that leaves them with an awful lot of spare time.

    Am I to believe they've never done a funeral for a fornicator, a covetor, one who didn't make the sabbath holy?


    Same thing I was thinking. It's highly hypocritical.
    The only people we should try to get even with...
    ...are those who've helped us.

    Right 'round the corner could be bigger than ourselves.
  • jeffbrjeffbr Seattle Posts: 7,177
    gue_barium wrote:

    Whew.

    Whew, indeed. It must be exhausting trying to chase your mind around. You can fixate on a single word and then follow around a stream of consciousness to see where it leads you. Good luck with that.
    "I'll use the magic word - let's just shut the fuck up, please." EV, 04/13/08
  • JuberooJuberoo Posts: 472
    nickcat0 wrote:
    That's why I prefer the more liberal attitudes of the Church of England , over these more conservative , reactionary faiths .
    Worship God , don't judge others ,try and be loving and considerate to all , and let God decide what He thinks is right and wrong .

    Which is exactly why he had the bible written to express what his thoughts on right and wrong were as well as how he wanted to be worshiped. Good thing too because he knew that humans would mess it up and argue amongst one another unless he left directions.
    Makes much more sense, to live in the present tense.

    A truly liberal person is conservative when necessary.

    Pro-life by choice.
  • hippiemomhippiemom Posts: 3,326
    Juberoo wrote:
    Which is exactly why he had the bible written to express what his thoughts on right and wrong were as well as how he wanted to be worshiped. Good thing too because he knew that humans would mess it up and argue amongst one another unless he left directions.
    Whew! Good thing he left those directions! I guess that's why no one in the world argues about spiritual matters, because he made it all so crystal clear.
    "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." ~ MLK, 1963
  • gue_bariumgue_barium Posts: 5,515
    jeffbr wrote:
    Whew, indeed. It must be exhausting trying to chase your mind around. You can fixate on a single word and then follow around a stream of consciousness to see where it leads you. Good luck with that.

    Coherent logic needs no luck.
    You could use some.

    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • JuberooJuberoo Posts: 472
    hippiemom wrote:
    Whew! Good thing he left those directions! I guess that's why no one in the world argues about spiritual matters, because he made it all so crystal clear.
    actually you missed the sardonic undertone to "humans would mess it up and argue amongst one another"....but these things are frequently lost on you...

    anyways, the bible is pretty clear actually on a variety of subjects. Try actually opening one and reading it....you might be suprised at what you find. That way, you won't have to worry about someone tainting your mind...ooooooooooooooo it's all a conspiracy to brainwash you and control every second of every moment regarding every thought or action in your life oooooooooooooo :o
    Makes much more sense, to live in the present tense.

    A truly liberal person is conservative when necessary.

    Pro-life by choice.
  • gue_bariumgue_barium Posts: 5,515
    Juberoo wrote:
    actually you missed the sardonic undertone to "humans would mess it up and argue amongst one another"....but these things are frequently lost on you...

    anyways, the bible is pretty clear actually on a variety of subjects. Try actually opening one and reading it....you might be suprised at what you find. That way, you won't have to worry about someone tainting your mind...ooooooooooooooo it's all a conspiracy to brainwash you and control every second of every moment regarding every thought or action in your life oooooooooooooo :o
    Individuality has nothing to do with the bible. The conformity you preach sure does.

    Get lost.

    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • JeanieJeanie Posts: 9,446
    NOPE!!!

    *~You're IT Bert!~*

    Hold on to the thread
    The currents will shift
  • freedomboyfreedomboy Posts: 129
    nickcat0 wrote:
    That's why I prefer the more liberal attitudes of the Church of England , over these more conservative , reactionary faiths .
    Worship God , don't judge others ,try and be loving and considerate to all , and let God decide what He thinks is right and wrong .

    Why follow any religion based on a book that contradicts itself, makes grand claims without evidence, and which promotes any value which does not follow the evolution of social understanding?

    I don't understand why you would chose a book like this, pick and chose what to follow based on either your biased upbringing and/or the evolution of social understanding, and then claim it is the end all know all to everything in existence... which then leads to making daily decisions in everyday life and in politics based on those distorted dogmas.

    Please explain.
    Freedom is a state of mind...
  • JuberooJuberoo Posts: 472
    gue_barium wrote:
    Individuality has nothing to do with the bible. The conformity you preach sure does.

    Get lost.
    lol "get lost"? Why? Because I wont "conform" to your ideology of "indivduality"? How hypocritical.
    Makes much more sense, to live in the present tense.

    A truly liberal person is conservative when necessary.

    Pro-life by choice.
  • JeanieJeanie Posts: 9,446
    Yeah, so back to the topic at hand, it's really sad that this church conducted itself in this manner. The time to refuse was when the request was made, not the day before the funeral. Really poor form on their part.

    I feel very sorry for the man and his family. Really badly handled at an extremely difficult time for them.
    NOPE!!!

    *~You're IT Bert!~*

    Hold on to the thread
    The currents will shift
  • Jeanie wrote:
    :D Thanks Roland. Needed that! :)

    Excellent article too btw. :)

    Hey you're welcome. Honestly...it might not seem like it at all, but when I'm not bitching about the ugly hard political stuff, I'm really a fun guy to be around.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • JuberooJuberoo Posts: 472
    Jeanie wrote:
    Yeah, so back to the topic at hand, it's really sad that this church conducted itself in this manner. The time to refuse was when the request was made, not the day before the funeral. Really poor form on their part.

    I feel very sorry for the man and his family. Really badly handled at an extremely difficult time for them.
    shouldn't the family have known ahead of time what the stance their chosen church would take on the issue?
    Makes much more sense, to live in the present tense.

    A truly liberal person is conservative when necessary.

    Pro-life by choice.
  • JeanieJeanie Posts: 9,446
    Hey you're welcome. Honestly...it might not seem like it at all, but when I'm not bitching about the ugly hard political stuff, I'm really a fun guy to be around.

    :D Silly fella! Never crossed my mind that you weren't a fun guy! :)

    Politics usually brings out a different side to people. Bit like religion really. :)
    NOPE!!!

    *~You're IT Bert!~*

    Hold on to the thread
    The currents will shift
  • JeanieJeanie Posts: 9,446
    Juberoo wrote:
    shouldn't the family have known ahead of time what the stance their chosen church would take on the issue?

    Don't know about you, but planning a funeral is an extremely stressful business. Last thing you'd be thinking about is whether or not your church is homophobic. As far as I'm concerned if the church didn't bother to mention they had a problem when the initial plans were made then the onus is on them. Not the grieving. And if they really have a problem with performing funerals for particular sections of the community then I would suggest that those are questions they should be asking when the initial request is made. Oh but that's right, that would probably be discriminatory wouldn't it?
    NOPE!!!

    *~You're IT Bert!~*

    Hold on to the thread
    The currents will shift
  • JuberooJuberoo Posts: 472
    Jeanie wrote:
    Don't know about you, but planning a funeral is an extremely stressful business. Last thing you'd be thinking about is whether or not your church is homophobic.

    Well, in my church, we know exactly what we believe. We actually GO to church and listen to what is being preached. There is no wondering what is expected. Also, everyone knows one another in the congregation quite well....this church didn't know the man, his family had also never made it known that he was gay. No one in the congregation, including the minister knew this information. Hmmm...makes one wonder how religious these people really were first of all. Maybe holiday only worshipers. You know, token service. Secondly, if they didnt' know their church and their church didn't know them well enough to know that the deceased was gay....makes me wonder why they felt a religious funeral was necessary anyways.
    Makes much more sense, to live in the present tense.

    A truly liberal person is conservative when necessary.

    Pro-life by choice.
  • JeanieJeanie Posts: 9,446
    Juberoo wrote:
    Well, in my church, we know exactly what we believe. We actually GO to church and listen to what is being preached. There is no wondering what is expected. Also, everyone knows one another in the congregation quite well....this church didn't know the man, his family had also never made it known that he was gay. No one in the congregation, including the minister knew this information. Hmmm...makes one wonder how religious these people really were first of all. Maybe holiday only worshipers. You know, token service. Secondly, if they didnt' know their church and their church didn't know them well enough to know that the deceased was gay....makes me wonder why they felt a religious funeral was necessary anyways.

    All of which could have been ascertained with the initial request. Not the day before the funeral which they agreed to conduct. My point being that regardless of the churches views in this situation they are not the ones grieving. The man's brother worked at the church, said so in the article, and an official from the church attended the dying man's bedside where they were introduced to his partner. So somebody in the organization knew something about the man and his family. If they were not in the habit of performing funerals for people that were not regular paritioners then the time to say so was when the family initially requested that they conduct the funeral. Regardless of their views on homosexuality, it's pretty poor form to go ahead with planning the funeral and then leave a grieving family in the lurch the day before the funeral. People should have the right to expect to have their loved ones buried in a compassionate and considerate way and if the church doesn't view itself to have a responsibility to all that they agree to conduct funerals for then I would suggest that they need to re evaluate their procedures. If they don't want to hold funerals for homosexuals or people who are not regular paritioners then they need to make that VERY clear LONG before they agree to the job and making the arrangements.

    I would hope that when I die my family isn't forced to confess all my sexual preferences just so that I might have a funeral, but then hell would freeze over before I'd send them off to a church to officiate over my funeral anyway. I really hope that when you die your church doesn't kick your relatives when they're down because of some ridiculous bungling on the part of the organization.

    If you can't see past the fact that this particular church has behaved appallingly on this particular occasion then I really don't see that we've got anything else to discuss on this matter. The church acted badly as far as I'm concerned.
    NOPE!!!

    *~You're IT Bert!~*

    Hold on to the thread
    The currents will shift
Sign In or Register to comment.