1.2 Million Iraqis killed in war

13»

Comments

  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    Byrnzie wrote:
    Even though your figures are wrong, are you in fact trying to say that the turmoil in Iraq is mainly the fault of Iraqis, and that America is innocent in all of this?
    sure they have some responsibilty. do Iraqis?
    Byrnzie wrote:
    Do you think any of this chaos would have occured if the U.S hadn't invaded and torn the country apart?
    no, because Saddam did a great job of killing anyone who opposed him. I guess thats ok too?
  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    Abuskedti wrote:
    The fact that we killed most of the Iraqi military and disbanded the rest - eliminated their government and then set up security.... and that we still occupy their nation and patrol their streets in with weapons....

    yes, the complete lawlessness is 100% our responsibility

    and 99% is obscene...

    many deaths are from crime due to the complete failure of our occupation...

    but the numbers killed directly by "coalition" hands is more than half.. Hell we killed 100,000 in the military alone.

    but we still like to pretend .. in spite of the horrific consequences.

    I thought about this last night after posting my 15% - 20%, and yeah, I think you're right. I'd say the U.S military is more than likely responsible for at least 40% - 50% of the deaths.
  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    jlew24asu wrote:
    sure they have some responsibilty. do Iraqis?

    Do the Iraqis who are engaged in civil war have some responsibility for the civil war? Err..yeah. Did those Africans and Indians have any responsibility for the civil wars that ripped their nations apart at the end of British, French and Belgian colonialism? Yep, I'd say so.
    It's a pretty moot point though.
    jlew24asu wrote:
    no, because Saddam did a great job of killing anyone who opposed him. I guess thats ok too?

    It's not o.k that he killed anyone who opposed him, no. But there was order in the country and not genocide. Saddam could have been overthrown by other means than by a foreign army invading and starting a civil war.
  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    And the killing goes on and on....
    tick, tock,
    tick, tock
  • 810wmb810wmb Posts: 849
    Byrnzie wrote:
    Saddam could have been overthrown by other means than by a foreign army invading and starting a civil war.

    we tried to get some midgets with rubber hammers to do it...

    they didn't cut it, but they whooped the shit outta his knees though
    i'm the meat, yer not...signed Capt Asshat
  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    810wmb wrote:
    we tried to get some midgets with rubber hammers to do it...

    they didn't cut it, but they whooped the shit outta his knees though

    One of them didn't happen to be called Tinky Winky did he/she/it? I knew those pesky little fuckers were up to something.
  • OpenOpen Posts: 792
    810wmb wrote:
    we tried to get some midgets with rubber hammers to do it...

    they didn't cut it, but they whooped the shit outta his knees though


    Should have sent you, you could have bad joked him to death.
  • YoyoyoYoyoyo Posts: 310
    jlew24asu wrote:
    sorry I dont find it to be accurate. no matter how long your replies of cutting and pasting are.


    LOL

    Ignorance is bliss!
    No need to be void, or save up on life

    You got to spend it all
Sign In or Register to comment.