Ron Paul '90s newsletters rant against blacks, gays

bryn_cmbsbryn_cmbs Posts: 407
edited January 2008 in A Moving Train
There is no defending this.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/10/paul.newsletters/index.html

From Brian Todd
CNN

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A series of newsletters in the name of GOP presidential hopeful Ron Paul contain several racist remarks -- including one that says order was restored to Los Angeles after the 1992 riots when blacks went "to pick up their welfare checks."


This is a copy of one of the "Ron Paul Political Report" newsletters, which has stirred controversy.

1 of 2 CNN recently obtained the newsletters -- written in the 1990s and one from the late 1980s -- after a report was published about their existence in the New Republic.

None of the newsletters CNN found says who wrote them, but each was published under Paul's name between his stints as a U.S. congressman from Texas.

Paul spokesman Jesse Benton told CNN the material was not written by Paul, and that he finds them "abhorrent." CNN asked the presidential contender for a direct response. He is to appear on CNN's "The Situation Room" Thursday afternoon around 5 p.m. ET.

"I have publicly taken moral responsibility for not paying closer attention to what went out under my name," Paul said in a written statement.

That's not good enough, says one political veteran.

"These stories may be very old in Ron Paul's life, but they're very new to the American public and they deserve to be totally ventilated," said David Gergen, a CNN senior political analyst. "I must say I don't think there's an excuse in politics to have something go out under your name and say, 'Oh by the way, I didn't write that.'"

Paul, who is not considered a front-runner, has become an Internet phenomenon in the current race, raising tens of millions of dollars from a devoted online base, many of them young people drawn to his libertarian straight talk. See where the money is coming from »

The controversial newsletters include rants against the Israeli lobby, gays, AIDS victims and Martin Luther King Jr. -- described as a "pro-Communist philanderer." One newsletter, from June 1992, right after the LA riots, says "order was only restored in L.A. when it came time for the blacks to pick up their welfare checks."

Another says, "The criminals who terrorize our cities -- in riots and on every non-riot day -- are not exclusively young black males, but they largely are. As children, they are trained to hate whites, to believe that white oppression is responsible for all black ills, to 'fight the power,' to steal and loot as much money from the white enemy as possible."

In some excerpts, the reader may be led to believe the words are indeed from Paul, a resident of Lake Jackson, Texas. In the "Ron Paul Political Report" from October 1992, the writer describes carjacking as the "hip-hop thing to do among the urban youth who play unsuspecting whites like pianos."

The author then offers advice from others on how to avoid being carjacked, including "an ex-cop I know," and says, "I frankly don't know what to make of such advice, but even in my little town of Lake Jackson, Texas, I've urged everyone in my family to know how to use a gun in self defense. For the animals are coming."

Benton says Paul never wrote those words and is "saddened" somebody took advantage of him.

Matt Welch, the editor-in-chief of "Reason" magazine who shares some of Paul's beliefs on big government, says he has never heard the congressman make such comments.


"What I think some people are looking for him to do is to say, 'OK, who wrote that?' I mean, there's 20 years, give or take, worth of newsletters there," Welch said.

Benton maintains that the GOP presidential candidate doesn't know who wrote any of the newsletters. Asked if Paul would try to find out, his spokesman said, "No, what's the point? ... It's time to move on.
Post edited by Unknown User on
«134

Comments

  • Hey lets post this FOR A FIFTH TIME!

    :rolleyes:
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • eyedclaareyedclaar Posts: 6,980
    bryn_cmbs wrote:
    There is no defending this.

    http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/10/paul.newsletters/index.html

    From Brian Todd
    CNN

    WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A series of newsletters in the name of GOP presidential hopeful Ron Paul contain several racist remarks -- including one that says order was restored to Los Angeles after the 1992 riots when blacks went "to pick up their welfare checks."


    This is a copy of one of the "Ron Paul Political Report" newsletters, which has stirred controversy.

    1 of 2 CNN recently obtained the newsletters -- written in the 1990s and one from the late 1980s -- after a report was published about their existence in the New Republic.

    None of the newsletters CNN found says who wrote them, but each was published under Paul's name between his stints as a U.S. congressman from Texas.

    Paul spokesman Jesse Benton told CNN the material was not written by Paul, and that he finds them "abhorrent." CNN asked the presidential contender for a direct response. He is to appear on CNN's "The Situation Room" Thursday afternoon around 5 p.m. ET.

    "I have publicly taken moral responsibility for not paying closer attention to what went out under my name," Paul said in a written statement.

    That's not good enough, says one political veteran.

    "These stories may be very old in Ron Paul's life, but they're very new to the American public and they deserve to be totally ventilated," said David Gergen, a CNN senior political analyst. "I must say I don't think there's an excuse in politics to have something go out under your name and say, 'Oh by the way, I didn't write that.'"

    Paul, who is not considered a front-runner, has become an Internet phenomenon in the current race, raising tens of millions of dollars from a devoted online base, many of them young people drawn to his libertarian straight talk. See where the money is coming from »

    The controversial newsletters include rants against the Israeli lobby, gays, AIDS victims and Martin Luther King Jr. -- described as a "pro-Communist philanderer." One newsletter, from June 1992, right after the LA riots, says "order was only restored in L.A. when it came time for the blacks to pick up their welfare checks."

    Another says, "The criminals who terrorize our cities -- in riots and on every non-riot day -- are not exclusively young black males, but they largely are. As children, they are trained to hate whites, to believe that white oppression is responsible for all black ills, to 'fight the power,' to steal and loot as much money from the white enemy as possible."

    In some excerpts, the reader may be led to believe the words are indeed from Paul, a resident of Lake Jackson, Texas. In the "Ron Paul Political Report" from October 1992, the writer describes carjacking as the "hip-hop thing to do among the urban youth who play unsuspecting whites like pianos."

    The author then offers advice from others on how to avoid being carjacked, including "an ex-cop I know," and says, "I frankly don't know what to make of such advice, but even in my little town of Lake Jackson, Texas, I've urged everyone in my family to know how to use a gun in self defense. For the animals are coming."

    Benton says Paul never wrote those words and is "saddened" somebody took advantage of him.

    Matt Welch, the editor-in-chief of "Reason" magazine who shares some of Paul's beliefs on big government, says he has never heard the congressman make such comments.


    "What I think some people are looking for him to do is to say, 'OK, who wrote that?' I mean, there's 20 years, give or take, worth of newsletters there," Welch said.

    Benton maintains that the GOP presidential candidate doesn't know who wrote any of the newsletters. Asked if Paul would try to find out, his spokesman said, "No, what's the point? ... It's time to move on.

    So what you are saying is that when word of this leaks, he’ll easily be the front-runner of all the candidates? Fuckin’ hillbilly country that we live in.
    Idaho's Premier Outdoor Writer

    Please Support My Writing Habit By Purchasing A Book:

    https://www.createspace.com/3437020

    http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000663025696

    http://earthtremors.blogspot.com/
  • ledveddermanledvedderman Posts: 7,761
    Hey lets post this FOR A FIFTH TIME!

    :rolleyes:

    That'd equal the number of pro Ron Paul threads on here everyday. It's the law to give equal time.
  • That'd equal the number of pro Ron Paul threads on here everyday. It's the law to give equal time.

    Owned......
  • In the second paragraph...

    "None of the newsletters CNN found says who wrote them, but each was published under Paul's name between his stints as a U.S. congressman from Texas."

    I guess it depends if you think a few articles written by some volunteer in this particular newsletter during his campaigning is in fact the very manifesto of Ron Paul's being, and can be equally considered his personal private thoughts diary.

    I suppose if one likes to stretch the imagination into that contortion and run with it.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • macgyver06macgyver06 Posts: 2,500
    these letters may not even be real. and if they are real...they may not even be written by him...and if they are written by him its 2007 not the early nineties...and if its not the early nineties than is must be 2007 because...clearly Ron Paul is still alive...and if Ron Paul is still alive that means a lot has changed since the early nineties...and if a lot has changed than those documents dont mean anything...and if those documents dont mean anything than why post a reply to this reply.
  • Sigh...this story should almost be on Snopes already

    http://www.ronpaul2008.com/press-releases/125/ron-paul-statement-on-the-new-republic-article-regarding-old-newsletters

    "January 8, 2008 5:28 am EST

    ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA – In response to an article published by The New Republic, Ron Paul issued the following statement:

    “The quotations in The New Republic article are not mine and do not represent what I believe or have ever believed. I have never uttered such words and denounce such small-minded thoughts.

    “In fact, I have always agreed with Martin Luther King, Jr. that we should only be concerned with the content of a person's character, not the color of their skin. As I stated on the floor of the U.S. House on April 20, 1999: ‘I rise in great respect for the courage and high ideals of Rosa Parks who stood steadfastly for the rights of individuals against unjust laws and oppressive governmental policies.’

    “This story is old news and has been rehashed for over a decade. It's once again being resurrected for obvious political reasons on the day of the New Hampshire primary.

    “When I was out of Congress and practicing medicine full-time, a newsletter was published under my name that I did not edit. Several writers contributed to the product. For over a decade, I have publicly taken moral responsibility for not paying closer attention to what went out under my name.”
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • g under pg under p Surfing The far side of THE Sombrero Galaxy Posts: 18,200
    Man, I thought I was going to be reading something really new and interesting in these posts but instead wasted my time.

    So what else is new with RP?

    Peace
    *We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti

    *MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
    .....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti

    *The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)


  • ledveddermanledvedderman Posts: 7,761
    I don't believe that Ron Paul is a racist. However, you're telling me to support a guy for President of the United States who can't even keep a close eye on a newsletter that bares his name?
  • DPrival78DPrival78 CT Posts: 2,263
    i'm more a fan of popular bands.. like the bee-gees, pearl jam
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    this guy is toast...


    and honestly... the supporters explaining this away or ignoring it are just being silly


    "i own a newsletter, my name is on the newsletter, but i have no idea what was written in it?"

    hahahahahahahaha...

    i got a fucking bridge to sell ya :rolleyes:
  • my2hands wrote:
    this guy is toast...


    and honestly... the supporters explaining this away or ignoring it are just being silly


    "i own a newsletter, my name is on the newsletter, but i have no idea what was written in it?"

    hahahahahahahaha...

    i got a fucking bridge to sell ya :rolleyes:

    You're making something out of nothing.

    “When I was out of Congress and practicing medicine full-time, a newsletter was published under my name that I did not edit. Several writers contributed to the product. For over a decade, I have publicly taken moral responsibility for not paying closer attention to what went out under my name.”
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    You're making something out of nothing.

    “When I was out of Congress and practicing medicine full-time, a newsletter was published under my name that I did not edit. Several writers contributed to the product. For over a decade, I have publicly taken moral responsibility for not paying closer attention to what went out under my name.”


    this is nothing?

    wow


    dude... he published a newsletter that was around for quite some time... you have read what was in it... you really believe he had no idea what was being printed under his name? that is just flat out ridiculous for him to claim that? this was some pretty strong stuff... you dont think he saw this? or someone else saw this and told him? come on man...

    i love when wolf blitzer asks him "sir, did you EVER read YOUR newsletter?"... Ron paul stutters for a minute and blurts out some bs...


    he is straight up caught with his hands in the cookie jar from what i can see... there is no explantion good enough... especially not "i had no idea what was being printed under my name in MY newsletter"

    what a joke
  • g under pg under p Surfing The far side of THE Sombrero Galaxy Posts: 18,200
    Here's an interesting article on RP, what do ya'll think?

    http://pennsylvaniaprogressive.typepad.com/my_weblog/2007/06/ron_paul_white_.html

    Guilt by association or what???

    Peace
    *We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti

    *MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
    .....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti

    *The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)


  • my2hands wrote:
    this is nothing?

    wow


    dude... he published a newsletter that was around for quite some time... you have read what was in it... you really believe he had no idea what was being printed under his name? that is just flat out ridiculous for him to claim that? this was some pretty strong stuff... you dont think he saw this? or someone else saw this and told him? come on man...

    i love when wolf blitzer asks him "sir, did you EVER read YOUR newsletter?"... Ron paul stutters for a minute and blurts out some bs...


    he is straight up caught with his hands in the cookie jar from what i can see... there is no explantion good enough... especially not "i had no idea what was being printed under my name in MY newsletter"

    what a joke

    What part of "When I was out of Congress and practicing medicine full-time" is eluding your comprehension?

    It's crap. You're eating crap and loving it for some bizarre reason.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    What part of "When I was out of Congress and practicing medicine full-time" is eluding your comprehension?

    It's crap. You're eating crap and loving it for some bizarre reason.

    what does being out of congress and having a job have to do with the things written in the newsletter? does that make him illiterate? this stuff was printed in that periodical quite consistently... its not liek it is one article tucked in the back of issue #27... this type of stuff was being written consistently... and having a job is maybe the worst excuse i think i have ever heard...

    i work, and i still read? especially something printed under my name :rolleyes:


    i have lost all respect for the man...


    and i am not being conned or duped... i just dont buy his explanation for one second... not even 1/2 of a second...
  • WMAWMA Posts: 175
    from the houston Chronicle on 05/23/1996:
    http://www.chron.com/CDA/archives/archive.mpl?id=1996_1343749
    ...
    Paul continued that politically sensible blacks are outnumbered ""as decent people." Citing reports that 85 percent of all black men in the District of Columbia are arrested, Paul wrote:

    ""Given the inefficiencies of what D.C. laughingly calls the `criminal justice system,' I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal," Paul said.

    Paul also wrote that although ""we are constantly told that it is evil to be afraid of black men, it is hardly irrational. Black men commit murders, rapes, robberies, muggings and burglaries all out of proportion to their numbers."

    A campaign spokesman for Paul said statements about the fear of black males mirror pronouncements by black leaders such as the Rev. Jesse Jackson, who has decried the spread of urban crime.

    Paul continues to write the newsletter for an undisclosed number of subscribers, the spokesman said.
    ...

    From an Austin Chronicle in 96:
    http://www.austinchronicle.com/issues/vol16/issue9/pols.paul.html
    ...
    Though billed as a pledge for no new taxes, the plan took a back seat to the protestors, who carried signs denouncing Paul and requesting that he release his newsletters to the media. Morris had repeatedly made the same request; while he had already provided the media a smattering of articles received anonymously, there were years of back issues he wanted to see. For months, Paul had responded that it is impossible to dredge up all his old writings, but he told voters that they could request individual copies from his campaign headquarters. However, at the press conference-turned-protest, Paul conceded to pressure from reporters, promising to release all back copies.

    But that promise has yet to come to pass. His concealment is easy to figure: The articles that have been leaked have been an embarrassment for Paul. In one 1992 article, Paul labeled the illustrious congresswoman Barbara Jordan, now deceased, a "moron" and "fraud" whose accomplishments depended on her race and sex. Paul now explains that he's been wronged -- his "academic, tongue-in-cheek" opinions have been stripped of their context. But when the Victoria Advocate requested the entire copy of the newsletter, promising to publish its entirety, he refused that too.
    ...

    Paul maintains that he keeps no correspondence with ultra-right wing organizations, and he doesn't know how the Heritage Front discovered his newsletter, speculating flippantly, "maybe Lefty sent the name up to them." As to why the neo-Nazi group was drawn to his newsletter in the first place, he credits his strong and consistent support of individual liberties.

    So in the late 90s his response was that his "academic, tongue-in-cheek opinions have been stripped of their context", and he refused to release the full letter for context. A campaign spokesman even verified that Paul was still writing them, and said they "mirror pronouncements by black leaders such as the Rev. Jesse Jackson".

    So which is it? Did he write them or not?
  • my2hands wrote:
    what does being out of congress and having a job have to do with the things written in the newsletter? does that make him illiterate? this stuff was printed in that periodical quite consistently... its not liek it is one article tucked in the back of issue #27... this type of stuff was being written consistently... and having a job is maybe the worst excuse i think i have ever heard...

    i work, and i still read? especially something printed under my name :rolleyes:


    i have lost all respect for the man...


    and i am not being conned or duped... i just dont buy his explanation for one second... not even 1/2 of a second...


    If you work at a restaurant (or anywhere for that matter) full time as the head cook (or manager etc), and you decide to go back to school full time, and someone burns the fries (fucks up a few times etc) while you're busy writing exams or attending classes, does that mean it's your fault, and never fit to work again?

    There's only 24 hours in a day. How much free time do you think a full time doctor has?

    I'm an exceptional judge of character, and I can say with full confidence Ron Paul does not have a mean bone in his body.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • WMA wrote:
    from the houston Chronicle on 05/23/1996:
    http://www.chron.com/CDA/archives/archive.mpl?id=1996_1343749


    From an Austin Chronicle in 96:
    http://www.austinchronicle.com/issues/vol16/issue9/pols.paul.html


    So in the late 90s his response was that his "academic, tongue-in-cheek opinions have been stripped of their context", and he refused to release the full letter for context. A campaign spokesman even verified that Paul was still writing them, and said they "mirror pronouncements by black leaders such as the Rev. Jesse Jackson".

    So which is it? Did he write them or not?


    He wasn't in congress at the time. We was back to practicing medicine full time. He didn't write any of it.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • JOEJOEJOEJOEJOEJOE Posts: 10,619
    What part of "When I was out of Congress and practicing medicine full-time" is eluding your comprehension?

    It's crap. You're eating crap and loving it for some bizarre reason.

    Notwithstanding whatever the truth may be, is a racist doctor preferred over a racist congressman?
  • JOEJOEJOE wrote:
    Notwithstanding whatever the truth may be, is a racist doctor preferred over a racist congressman?


    Moot question, the author is neither.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • WMAWMA Posts: 175
    He wasn't in congress at the time. We was back to practicing medicine full time. He didn't write any of it.

    Ron Paul (1996) said that people took his letter out of context.

    You calling Ron Paul a liar?
  • WMA wrote:
    Ron Paul (1996) said that people took his letter out of context.

    You calling Ron Paul a liar?


    Can you give a specific? That context of that question has no denominator.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • WMAWMA Posts: 175
    Can you give a specific? That context of that question has no denominator.

    The last post of mine that you responded to had the details.
  • WMA wrote:
    The last post of mine that you responded to had the details.

    It looks like more of the same newsletter propagana story.

    Are you saying he's now supporting what is written even though he condemns it and never wrote it?
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    i csnt believe people are buying this "i was a doctor so i NEVER read MY newsletter" crap...


    he acts like he had NOTHING to do with HIS NEWSLETTER...


    what the fuck does he have a newsletter in his name for then?
  • WMAWMA Posts: 175
    It looks like more of the same newsletter propagana story.

    Are you saying he's now supporting what is written even though he condemns it and never wrote it?

    No, I'm saying that in 1996 he claimed that people were taking his letter out of context and never denied writing them until after 2001.
  • my2hands wrote:
    i csnt believe people are buying this "i was a doctor so i NEVER read MY newsletter" crap...


    he acts like he had NOTHING to do with HIS NEWSLETTER...


    what the fuck does he have a newsletter in his name for then?

    If you want to call someone both a racist and a liar without any substantiated proof...that's your prerogative.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • my2hands wrote:
    "i own a newsletter, my name is on the newsletter, but i have no idea what was written in it?"

    hahahahahahahaha...
    rolleyes:

    How much review do you think any of the five (ahem, six) members of Pearl Jam before "Deep" goes out twice a year?

    Seriously.

    [half expecting Sea to show up and pwne me with inside information. :D ]
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    If you want to call someone both a racist and a liar without any substantiated proof...that's your prerogative.

    oh, there is plenty pf proof...

    some of you guys just refuse to ackowledge it... but, that's your prerogative ;)
Sign In or Register to comment.