Animal activists are terrorists

69charger

gabers wrote:

Sorry, I meant charger.

They were just trying to instigate there.

How was I 'being a dick'?

I stated that I hunt deer and motivation. I was hardly 'being a dick'.

Vedderlution_Baby

69charger wrote:

Is there a difference?

Of course there is a difference. Fucking duh.



Anyway, what do you use to hunt Charger?

69charger

Vedderlution_Baby! wrote:

Of course there is a difference. Fucking duh.

I was kidding.

Anyway, what do you use to hunt Charger?

A gun.

Vedderlution_Baby

69charger wrote:

I was kidding.



A gun.

My bad.


How come you don't use a bow and arrow (I promise this isn't a bait)
Wouldn't it be more thrilling if you used a bow compared to a gun?

sourdough

I've never hunted but I really would like to one day. I think there is a huge disconnect with people and their food. People don't see their food for what it is and probably take it for granted.

I don't agree with killing for the fun of it but I see no ethical issue with hunting for meat. Without the help of hunters we would not see nearly as much protected wilderness areas. Hunting groups have accomplished a hell of a lot more than environmental groups.

sourdough

Vedderlution_Baby! wrote:

My bad.


How come you don't use a bow and arrow (I promise this isn't a bait)
Wouldn't it be more thrilling if you used a bow compared to a gun?

It is illegal to hunt with crossbows or bow and arrows. I think it is because most often people with these things don't kill the animal but merely maim it is seen as more cruel.

Vedderlution_Baby

sourdough wrote:

It is illegal to hunt with crossbows or bow and arrows. I think it is because most often people with these things don't kill the animal but merely maim it is seen as more cruel.

I don't think it is in the states.

69charger

Vedderlution_Baby! wrote:

My bad.


How come you don't use a bow and arrow (I promise this isn't a bait)
Wouldn't it be more thrilling if you used a bow compared to a gun?

Bow and arrow has never really interested me. Not nearly loud enough ;-)

I really admire people who hunt with a bow and arrow. Gun hunting is hard enough.

69charger

Vedderlution_Baby! wrote:

I don't think it is in the states.

You are correct. Bow and arrow are perfectly legal. Crossbow, depending on the state law, are usually reserved for those with disabilities.

Vedderlution_Baby

69charger wrote:

Bow and arrow has never really interested me. Not nearly loud enough ;-)

I really admire people who hunt with a bow and arrow. Gun hunting is hard enough.

Nah. You're just a bad shot!

Riot_Rain

farfromglorified wrote:

Umm....animal activists have been getting prison sentences for a long time too. Not saying it's right, but it's nothing new. What is new is your sensitivity to the word "terrorist".

Nah, I'm just worried that the term terrorist is going to be used where no terrorism is involved, just to be able to give harsher punishment. Will it reach the point where a member of any environmental group (even a peaceful Friends of So-and-So Nature Reserve) could be labelled a terrorist (and punished accordingly) just to stop them from protecting a piece of land from being developed into a mall? Even if they are just peacefully obstructing building work for example? It looks like this might become possible and I find that scary.

harmless_little_f***

69charger wrote:

You are correct. Bow and arrow are perfectly legal. Crossbow, depending on the state law, are usually reserved for those with disabilities.

Well I don't know. Animals, people with disabilities, they all should be protected in my view.

Scratchin a Letter

Riot_Rain wrote:

Nah, I'm just worried that the term terrorist is going to be used where no terrorism is involved, just to be able to give harsher punishment.

Just what I was going to say. Any pro-hunting or pro-gun administration anywhere will have to deal with hoardes of animal rights activists, whereby the fear and loathing is mutual. Yes, PETA have been a little too controversial at times, but to label them terrorists is ridiculous. There's no common ground between the two definitions.

69charger

Vedderlution_Baby! wrote:

Nah. You're just a bad shot!

I wouldn't know. I've never really tried to shoot a bow. You may be right.

69charger

harmless_little_f*** wrote:

Well I don't know. Animals, people with disabilities, they all should be protected in my view.

Protected and managed. Deer no longer have anything to keep thier numbers in check, no top predator because no one wants wolves and mountain lion roaming thier property. We need to maintain a healthy population of animals. Anything else is truely cruelty.

harmless_little_f***

69charger wrote:

Protected and managed. Deer no longer have anything to keep thier numbers in check, no top predator because no one wants wolves and mountain lion roaming thier property. We need to maintain a healthy population of animals. Anything else is truely cruelty.

Um... that's how NOT to get a joke.

69charger

harmless_little_f*** wrote:

Um... that's how NOT to get a joke.

What's the joke?

harmless_little_f***

69charger wrote:

What's the joke?

Animals and disabled people should be protected, certainly not be shot with crossbows.

Don't worry

black tattoo

miller8966 wrote:

hunting is part of the american tradition my friend. Nothing better than being out in the woods with a few buddies, wearing camoflage, and following deer tracks.

While i only hunt with a rifle, i have a friend that hunts with a bow and arrow..god damn what a beautiful site that is. Taking down a large Buck with a bow n arrow is amazing...then you just gotta follow the blood trail. And eat him before hanging his head on your wall.

If you use ALL of the beast and kill it as quickly and humanly?? as possible ..... I dont have a problem. As for your mate with a bow and arrow- on some levels he is more fair to the beast! than hunting it with a gun, - only take a shot if you have clear TRUE GREAT vision RIGHT?
you can guess the other side I have a problem with... I have seen a beast with it jaw shot off starving to death, not pretty not nice.
BUT no need to stir people up though every one is entitled to their opinion, dont need to drench them in blood if they dont want it.

black tattoo

miller8966 wrote:

I see where your coming from....but do you like seeing deer laying dead on the side of the road.

So either
A) i kill it and use it as a trophy

you kill it and damage your car while risking your life at the same time.

its population control...

sorry complete cop out........