Animal activists are terrorists

2»

Comments

  • halv wrote:
    And as for groups like the ALF....they have never ever hurt a human or animal while freeing any animals. Sure, those mink farmers just lost some money, but thousands of animals just got to escape being anally electrocuted or beaten to death so some ugly bitch like Beyonce can wear a mink coat.


    You must be losing it. Beyonce is hot! ;)
    NERDS!
  • 69charger69charger Posts: 1,045
    I bet you have never been hunting in your life. I gotta feeling you couldnt find your ass if you were taking a shit.

    I have. I just went this morning. Opening day.

    I do kill just to kill. I don't like the taste of the meat and I have no desire to keep it's head. I give the deer to my brother-in-law who's land I hunt on. It doesn't go to waste. They live on a farm and freeze all the venison they can get and eat it throughout the year. I love the thrill of the hunt. This coming from someone who'd never had a desire to bungie jump or skydive. Hunting is the ultimate thrill.

    God Bless Ted Nugent! ;-)
  • flywallyflyflywallyfly Posts: 1,453
    69charger wrote:
    I have. I just went this morning. Opening day.

    I do kill just to kill. I don't like the taste of the meat and I have no desire to keep it's head. I give the deer to my brother-in-law who's land I hunt on. It doesn't go to waste. They live on a farm and freeze all the venison they can get and eat it throughout the year. I love the thrill of the hunt. This coming from someone who'd never had a desire to bungie jump or skydive. Hunting is the ultimate thrill.

    God Bless Ted Nugent! ;-)

    Good for you, buddy. You write this as though it would surprise someone on here that you enjoy killing for thrills. Not very shocking.
  • gabersgabers Posts: 2,787
    You know miller and surferdude you can be a proud manly hunter and still not be a dick about it. Try it!
  • jeffbrjeffbr Posts: 7,177
    gabers wrote:
    You know miller and surferdude you can be a proud manly hunter and still not be a dick about it. Try it!

    WFT did suferdude say? Why are you calling him out?
    "I'll use the magic word - let's just shut the fuck up, please." EV, 04/13/08
  • 69charger69charger Posts: 1,045
    Good for you, buddy. You write this as though it would surprise someone on here that you enjoy killing for thrills. Not very shocking.

    Well at least you know where I stand ;-)

    Unlike the people of PETA I can differentiate between a human and non-human.
  • 69charger wrote:
    Well at least you know where I stand ;-)

    Unlike the people of PETA I can differentiate between a human and non-human.



    Too bad the administration can differentiate between terrorist and protester
  • Even nonviolent? I don't get it.

    I thought the whole point of a terrorist was somebody that used violence to create terror. Am I missing something?

    Doesn't have to be violent. Look at number 2 for both.

    Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.0.1) - Cite This Source
    ter‧ror‧ist  /ˈtɛrərɪst/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[ter-er-ist] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation

    –noun
    1. a person, usually a member of a group, who uses or advocates terrorism.
    2. a person who terrorizes or frightens others.

    Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.0.1) - Cite This Source
    ter‧ror‧ism  /ˈtɛrəˌrɪzəm/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[ter-uh-riz-uhm] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation

    –noun 1. the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, esp. for political purposes.
    2. the state of fear and submission produced by terrorism or terrorization.
    3. a terroristic method of governing or of resisting a government.
    www.myspace.com/olafvonmastadon
  • gabersgabers Posts: 2,787
    jeffbr wrote:
    WFT did suferdude say? Why are you calling him out?

    Sorry, I meant charger.

    They were just trying to instigate there.
  • 69charger69charger Posts: 1,045
    Too bad the administration can differentiate between terrorist and protester

    Is there a difference?
  • 69charger69charger Posts: 1,045
    gabers wrote:
    Sorry, I meant charger.

    They were just trying to instigate there.

    How was I 'being a dick'?

    I stated that I hunt deer and motivation. I was hardly 'being a dick'.
  • 69charger wrote:
    Is there a difference?


    Of course there is a difference. Fucking duh.



    Anyway, what do you use to hunt Charger?
  • 69charger69charger Posts: 1,045
    Of course there is a difference. Fucking duh.

    I was kidding.
    Anyway, what do you use to hunt Charger?

    A gun.
  • 69charger wrote:
    I was kidding.



    A gun.


    My bad.


    How come you don't use a bow and arrow (I promise this isn't a bait)
    Wouldn't it be more thrilling if you used a bow compared to a gun?
  • I've never hunted but I really would like to one day. I think there is a huge disconnect with people and their food. People don't see their food for what it is and probably take it for granted.

    I don't agree with killing for the fun of it but I see no ethical issue with hunting for meat. Without the help of hunters we would not see nearly as much protected wilderness areas. Hunting groups have accomplished a hell of a lot more than environmental groups.
  • My bad.


    How come you don't use a bow and arrow (I promise this isn't a bait)
    Wouldn't it be more thrilling if you used a bow compared to a gun?

    It is illegal to hunt with crossbows or bow and arrows. I think it is because most often people with these things don't kill the animal but merely maim it is seen as more cruel.
  • sourdough wrote:
    It is illegal to hunt with crossbows or bow and arrows. I think it is because most often people with these things don't kill the animal but merely maim it is seen as more cruel.


    I don't think it is in the states.
  • 69charger69charger Posts: 1,045
    My bad.


    How come you don't use a bow and arrow (I promise this isn't a bait)
    Wouldn't it be more thrilling if you used a bow compared to a gun?

    Bow and arrow has never really interested me. Not nearly loud enough ;-)

    I really admire people who hunt with a bow and arrow. Gun hunting is hard enough.
  • 69charger69charger Posts: 1,045
    I don't think it is in the states.

    You are correct. Bow and arrow are perfectly legal. Crossbow, depending on the state law, are usually reserved for those with disabilities.
  • 69charger wrote:
    Bow and arrow has never really interested me. Not nearly loud enough ;-)

    I really admire people who hunt with a bow and arrow. Gun hunting is hard enough.


    Nah. You're just a bad shot!
  • Umm....animal activists have been getting prison sentences for a long time too. Not saying it's right, but it's nothing new. What is new is your sensitivity to the word "terrorist".

    Nah, I'm just worried that the term terrorist is going to be used where no terrorism is involved, just to be able to give harsher punishment. Will it reach the point where a member of any environmental group (even a peaceful Friends of So-and-So Nature Reserve) could be labelled a terrorist (and punished accordingly) just to stop them from protecting a piece of land from being developed into a mall? Even if they are just peacefully obstructing building work for example? It looks like this might become possible and I find that scary.
    Like a cloud dropping rain
    I'm discarding all thought
    I'll dry up, leaving puddles on the ground
    I'm like an opening band for the sun
  • 69charger wrote:
    You are correct. Bow and arrow are perfectly legal. Crossbow, depending on the state law, are usually reserved for those with disabilities.

    Well I don't know. Animals, people with disabilities, they all should be protected in my view.
    'We're learning songs for baby Jesus' birthday. His mum and dad were Merry and Joseph. He had a bed made of clay and the three kings bought him Gold, Frankenstein and Merv as presents.'

    - the great Sir Leo Harrison
  • Riot_Rain wrote:
    Nah, I'm just worried that the term terrorist is going to be used where no terrorism is involved, just to be able to give harsher punishment.
    Just what I was going to say. Any pro-hunting or pro-gun administration anywhere will have to deal with hoardes of animal rights activists, whereby the fear and loathing is mutual. Yes, PETA have been a little too controversial at times, but to label them terrorists is ridiculous. There's no common ground between the two definitions.
  • 69charger69charger Posts: 1,045
    Nah. You're just a bad shot!

    I wouldn't know. I've never really tried to shoot a bow. You may be right.
  • 69charger69charger Posts: 1,045
    Well I don't know. Animals, people with disabilities, they all should be protected in my view.

    Protected and managed. Deer no longer have anything to keep thier numbers in check, no top predator because no one wants wolves and mountain lion roaming thier property. We need to maintain a healthy population of animals. Anything else is truely cruelty.
  • 69charger wrote:
    Protected and managed. Deer no longer have anything to keep thier numbers in check, no top predator because no one wants wolves and mountain lion roaming thier property. We need to maintain a healthy population of animals. Anything else is truely cruelty.

    Um... that's how NOT to get a joke.
    'We're learning songs for baby Jesus' birthday. His mum and dad were Merry and Joseph. He had a bed made of clay and the three kings bought him Gold, Frankenstein and Merv as presents.'

    - the great Sir Leo Harrison
  • 69charger69charger Posts: 1,045
    Um... that's how NOT to get a joke.

    What's the joke?
  • 69charger wrote:
    What's the joke?

    Animals and disabled people should be protected, certainly not be shot with crossbows.

    Don't worry ;)
    'We're learning songs for baby Jesus' birthday. His mum and dad were Merry and Joseph. He had a bed made of clay and the three kings bought him Gold, Frankenstein and Merv as presents.'

    - the great Sir Leo Harrison
  • miller8966 wrote:
    hunting is part of the american tradition my friend. Nothing better than being out in the woods with a few buddies, wearing camoflage, and following deer tracks.

    While i only hunt with a rifle, i have a friend that hunts with a bow and arrow..god damn what a beautiful site that is. Taking down a large Buck with a bow n arrow is amazing...then you just gotta follow the blood trail. And eat him before hanging his head on your wall.

    If you use ALL of the beast and kill it as quickly and humanly?? as possible ..... I dont have a problem. As for your mate with a bow and arrow- on some levels he is more fair to the beast! than hunting it with a gun, - only take a shot if you have clear TRUE GREAT vision RIGHT?
    you can guess the other side I have a problem with... I have seen a beast with it jaw shot off starving to death, not pretty not nice.
    BUT no need to stir people up though every one is entitled to their opinion, dont need to drench them in blood if they dont want it.

    Peace love and mung beans baby!
     Australia, Melbourne 17/03/1995, 02/03/1998, 19/02/2003, 13/11/2006, 20/11/2009 and ...
  • miller8966 wrote:
    I see where your coming from....but do you like seeing deer laying dead on the side of the road.

    So either
    A) i kill it and use it as a trophy

    B) you kill it and damage your car while risking your life at the same time.

    its population control...

    sorry complete cop out........

    Peace love and mung beans baby!
     Australia, Melbourne 17/03/1995, 02/03/1998, 19/02/2003, 13/11/2006, 20/11/2009 and ...
Sign In or Register to comment.