I always considered the NY Post to be a tabloid???
hey! it's one of the top 10 papers in the US i thought. but it's a daily newspaper, sadly. it's not quite like the national enquirer. but i think that's more dangerous actually, it's masquerading as a legitimate paper. also, it's cheaper than NYT so many people read NYP.
yeah, it became more sensationalized with murdoch's purchase of it. go figure.
if you wanna be a friend of mine
cross the river to the eastside
See..to the leftists, it's not a leftist paper. It's the "news". But don't get them started on Foxnews Channel. THAT is just propaganda.
See how it works?
so ... in your opinion - neither is telling the truth? ... so, if i'm a "leftist" and you're a "rightist" ... neither of us are capable of the truth and both of us are capable of propaganda?
OMG, first of all you can't have a straight comparison becuase one is a cable news outlet and the other is a news paper. What a cheap shot with the Jefferson flub!
Why is a comparison between the Times and Fox News not valid? Both are media outlets that deliver news. One is a newspaper and one is a cable news network, but both should adhere to the same journalistic standards. Of course, Fox can't even seem to match CNN for journalistic standards, so I might be asking for a bit much.
How is the Jefferson flub a "cheap shot"? The guy was in the news last year when the investigation started and speaker Pelosi tried to get him kicked off his committee. I don't think it's too much to ask for Fox News to be able to identify a member of congress.
"Of course it hurts. You're getting fucked by an elephant."
Would repeatedly identifying Mark Foley as a democrat be a better shot?
My whole life
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln
Comments
hey! it's one of the top 10 papers in the US i thought. but it's a daily newspaper, sadly. it's not quite like the national enquirer. but i think that's more dangerous actually, it's masquerading as a legitimate paper. also, it's cheaper than NYT so many people read NYP.
yeah, it became more sensationalized with murdoch's purchase of it. go figure.
cross the river to the eastside
so ... in your opinion - neither is telling the truth? ... so, if i'm a "leftist" and you're a "rightist" ... neither of us are capable of the truth and both of us are capable of propaganda?
Why is a comparison between the Times and Fox News not valid? Both are media outlets that deliver news. One is a newspaper and one is a cable news network, but both should adhere to the same journalistic standards. Of course, Fox can't even seem to match CNN for journalistic standards, so I might be asking for a bit much.
How is the Jefferson flub a "cheap shot"? The guy was in the news last year when the investigation started and speaker Pelosi tried to get him kicked off his committee. I don't think it's too much to ask for Fox News to be able to identify a member of congress.
Would repeatedly identifying Mark Foley as a democrat be a better shot?
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln