I'm not sure if someone has posted this yet, but this is a link to a video on Flight 77. I think it's worth seeing. It shows lots of pictures of the debris and a simulation of the crash compared with the security video.
I'm not sure if someone has posted this yet, but this is a link to a video on Flight 77. I think it's worth seeing. It shows lots of pictures of the debris and a simulation of the crash compared with the security video.
I'm not sure if someone has posted this yet, but this is a link to a video on Flight 77. I think it's worth seeing. It shows lots of pictures of the debris and a simulation of the crash compared with the security video.
Yea, pretty well the only people I've heard dispute wether a plane struck the pentagon are the creators of Loose Change. In my opinion that whole movie is full of steamy bullshit. The film only does harm to the 9/11 truth movement. Most of their evidence is circumstantial and they make some pretty broad assumptions.
I wouldn't even waste my time argueing Loose Change.
I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
Yea, pretty well the only people I've heard dispute wether a plane struck the pentagon are the creators of Loose Change. In my opinion that whole movie is full of steamy bullshit. The film only does harm to the 9/11 truth movement. Most of their evidence is circumstantial and they make some pretty broad assumptions.
I wouldn't even waste my time argueing Loose Change.
as a friend once put it: it's like a shady defense lawyer throwing up a bunch of disjointed things hoping something will stick
standin above the crowd
he had a voice that was strong and loud and
i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
eager to identify with
someone above the crowd
someone who seemed to feel the same
someone prepared to lead the way
as a friend once put it: it's like a shady defense lawyer throwing up a bunch of disjointed things hoping something will stick
something did. the freefall thing. buildings dont freefall because they are on fire. also, where any pieces of flight 93. and, how do they get away with explaining that the plane that hit the pentagon disintegrated when its scientifically not possible. why has the govt not released the tapes of the plane hitting the pentagon?
Its a movie worth watching that asks questions. dont believe everything you see or read. but, watch and read things hoping they make you ask more questions.
peace.
All that's sacred, comes from youth....dedications, naive and true.
something did. the freefall thing. buildings dont freefall because they are on fire. also, where any pieces of flight 93. and, how do they get away with explaining that the plane that hit the pentagon disintegrated when its scientifically not possible. why has the govt not released the tapes of the plane hitting the pentagon?
Its a movie worth watching that asks questions. dont believe everything you see or read. but, watch and read things hoping they make you ask more questions.
peace.
I think the government deliberately with-held evidence so if questions were raised they could prove some of them wrong, essentially debunking the alternate theories.
For example, the only pictures released of UA 93 and the Pentagon show no plane fragments. My guess is, photos of plane fragments exist and haven't been made public, this raises questions, also I believe a video of a plane hitting the pentagon exists, but by releasing them at a later date they can effectively convince people there is no conspiracy.
The real solid questions are with the actual World Trade Center.
I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
We talk a lot about what we HAVE seen from video, pics and documentation etc. about 9/11. But what about the things we have NOT seen, heard or been exposed to in relation to that day? For instance...
Things that make you go hmmmmmmm...feel free to add to my list...there are so many.
1. Where are the pics of the bodies / body parts AFTER they hit the ground from jumping out of the twin towers. You know someone took pics of that. I don't delight in seeing them, but nothing has ever been released.
2. Black box recordings from the plane that hit the Pentagon.
3. Other pictures of the lawn of the Pentagon. Surely someone else took other pics showing more of the grounds. We seem to only see the same pics over and over.
4. Other video footage from various sources surrounding the Pentagon. I've heard, and I assume, that there must have been other cameras pointed towards the Pentagon. One can only hope! Heh!! It is the Pentagon after all...
So many others...
Maybe I haven't been paying attention for a while, but since when did you jump on the crazy train? (By that I mean the level of crazy beyond just being republican)
Comments
http://youtube.com/watch?v=YVDdjLQkUV8
I believe a plane did hit the pentagon but that doesn't rule out the inside job theory.
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
-Oscar Wilde
Yea, pretty well the only people I've heard dispute wether a plane struck the pentagon are the creators of Loose Change. In my opinion that whole movie is full of steamy bullshit. The film only does harm to the 9/11 truth movement. Most of their evidence is circumstantial and they make some pretty broad assumptions.
I wouldn't even waste my time argueing Loose Change.
I posted this mainly in response to the original #3 question, and in response to the cruise missile theory I've read about.
as a friend once put it: it's like a shady defense lawyer throwing up a bunch of disjointed things hoping something will stick
he had a voice that was strong and loud and
i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
eager to identify with
someone above the crowd
someone who seemed to feel the same
someone prepared to lead the way
Its a movie worth watching that asks questions. dont believe everything you see or read. but, watch and read things hoping they make you ask more questions.
peace.
I think the government deliberately with-held evidence so if questions were raised they could prove some of them wrong, essentially debunking the alternate theories.
For example, the only pictures released of UA 93 and the Pentagon show no plane fragments. My guess is, photos of plane fragments exist and haven't been made public, this raises questions, also I believe a video of a plane hitting the pentagon exists, but by releasing them at a later date they can effectively convince people there is no conspiracy.
The real solid questions are with the actual World Trade Center.
I don't understand how people can say this. I don't know what else to say, except that you're not looking.
Flight 93 audio and pictures of debris:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/04/13/wuaf13.xml&sSheet=/news/2006/04/13/ixnewstop.html
http://pittsburgh.about.com/library/pictures/shanksville/uc_flight_93-5.htm
http://www.chasingthefrog.com/reelfaces/united93/planepart1.jpg
http://www.chasingthefrog.com/reelfaces/united93/debris1.jpg
http://www.chasingthefrog.com/reelfaces/united93/debris2.jpg
http://www.chasingthefrog.com/reelfaces/united93/93blackbox.jpg
http://www.thememoryhole.org/911/flight93-air-traffic.wma
Flight 77 video footage and pictures of debris:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=YVDdjLQkUV8