Lets hope he "spreads the wealth".

CommyCommy Posts: 4,984
edited November 2008 in A Moving Train
"The top 1 percent of households received 22.9 percent of all pre-tax income in 2006, more than double what that figure was in the 1970s," the Working Group on Extreme Inequality reports. "This is the greatest concentration of income since 1928." And: "Between 1979 and 2006, the top 5 percent of American families saw their real incomes increase 87 percent. Over the same period, the lowest-income fifth saw zero increase in real income."

Its time for action. But, we can't expect Obama to do it himself. "When President Franklin Roosevelt heard pleas for bold steps to counter extreme economic inequality, he replied: "Go out and make me do it."

Keep hope alive.
Post edited by Unknown User on
«13

Comments

  • OffHeGoes29OffHeGoes29 Posts: 1,240
    I know you make more then me, and thats bull shit. Send me part of your pay check, I'll PM you my address.
    BRING BACK THE WHALE
  • dmitrydmitry Posts: 136
    FDR was a retard
  • prytojprytoj Posts: 536
    C'mon commy, you're smarter than that! And so are we. let's get it together over there.
  • let's hope he spreads peace...and healthcare. for starters, that's my hope. that's more than enough 'wealth distribution' for me.
    Stay with me...
    Let's just breathe...


    I am myself like you somehow


  • OffHeGoes29OffHeGoes29 Posts: 1,240
    Fuck it, I just want part of your pay check because I don't make all that much, and I don't think its right that you have more then me.
    BRING BACK THE WHALE
  • Commy you make more than me.. Spread the wealth biatch. Gimme my dam money!!!!!!!
  • CommyCommy Posts: 4,984
    The inequality of wealth is a result of the policies carried out by Washington, not a fix that can be made on an individual basis. I could give you my paycheck, but what does that do? The problem is systemic, as such policy needs to change, to address that. Its not socialism, (I hope at the very least) its getting things back to levels pre Reagan's neoliberalism, pre Bush dynasty.
  • What a joke.

    The top 1 percent of taxpayers (AGI over $364,657) earned approximately 21.2 percent of the nation's income (as defined by AGI), yet paid 39.4 percent of all federal income taxes.

    Want them to pay the whole thing? How much is enough? How about a flat/fair tax so people don't get a free ride anymore.

    After all deductions, credits, etc - the top 1% pays 23% of their AGI in income taxes while the bottom 50% pays less then 3%.

    http://www.taxfoundation.org/news/show/22652.html

    SHOW COUNT: (164) 1990's=3, 2000's=53, 2010/20's=108, US=118, CAN=15, Europe=20 ,New Zealand=4, Australia=5
    Mexico=1, Colombia=1 



  • mammasanmammasan Posts: 5,656
    Why should we spread the wealth? Instead of punishing those that make more money why not improve our schools and educational standards so the poor have more opportunities to make a living for themselves. Instead of bring the rich down a notch let's try to bring the poor up a notch without having to gauge anyone's pockets.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • OffHeGoes29OffHeGoes29 Posts: 1,240
    Commy wrote:
    The inequality of wealth is a result of the policies carried out by Washington, not a fix that can be made on an individual basis. I could give you my paycheck, but what does that do? The problem is systemic, as such policy needs to change, to address that. Its not socialism, (I hope at the very least) its getting things back to levels pre Reagan's neoliberalism, pre Bush dynasty.

    Well come on....what better way to help a PJ fan who is down financially? We take the Government out of the equation completely and you get to help a military vet who qualifies for food stamps. Not only would you be doing a great thing....but

    You would be DOING instead of TALKING.

    A couple hundred dollars a month is all I'm asking....spread the wealth around.
    BRING BACK THE WHALE
  • kenny olavkenny olav Posts: 3,319
    What is Commy is getting at is the fundamental unfairness in our economy.

    Why are people OK with living in a society that pays athletes millions of dollars per year, but can't pay decent salaries to school teachers and nurses? Why are we OK with the fact that many people have to work 60-80 hours just to have shelter, clothes and food? Meanwhile, people who barely work, were born into wealth, and maybe don't even really work at all, well, life is a playground to them. This is fucking slavery, people. This is not to say that our current tax system is fair towards working people. We need a complete overhaul. We need to completely reorganize society. We work too much and produce too much shit - this only benefits the well-connected and wealthy. We could all work 20-30 hours a week and still have all the things we love, and more importantly everyone would have everything they need. We need not just spread the wealth, but also spread the responsibility. Our economic freedom shouldn't come at the expense of the hard working. The 'underlings' of society shouldn't be stuck with all of the nasty jobs. These should be shared responsibilities, and we'd all be better off for it. We'd have a cleaner environment and a sense of pride in our communities.

    We should have a fair minimum wage and also maximum wage. The President earns $400,000 a year. Is there a job more important than President? So why should anyone make more money than the President in a year? Many people in this country (and, shit, in every other country too) make more money than they've actually earned, if we think critically about fairness. And many millions earn much less than they deserve. This leads to the sicknesses we have in our society. It's a dog-eat-dog world and it's unpleasant. We can make our lives better, but instead we choose to keep this unjust system alive in case we can join the ranks of the rich. Even at age 32, this still pisses me off greatly.
  • OffHeGoes29OffHeGoes29 Posts: 1,240
    Kenny Olav wrote:
    What is Commy is getting at is the fundamental unfairness in our economy.

    Why are people OK with living in a society that pays athletes millions of dollars per year, but can't pay decent salaries to school teachers and nurses? Why are we OK with the fact that many people have to work 60-80 hours just to have shelter, clothes and food? Meanwhile, people who barely work, were born into wealth, and maybe don't even really work at all, well, life is a playground to them. This is fucking slavery, people. This is not to say that our current tax system is fair towards working people. We need a complete overhaul. We need to completely reorganize society. We work too much and produce too much shit - this only benefits the well-connected and wealthy. We could all work 20-30 hours a week and still have all the things we love, and more importantly everyone would have everything they need. We need not just spread the wealth, but also spread the responsibility. Our economic freedom shouldn't come at the expense of the hard working. The 'underlings' of society shouldn't be stuck with all of the nasty jobs. These should be shared responsibilities, and we'd all be better off for it. We'd have a cleaner environment and a sense of pride in our communities.

    We should have a fair minimum wage and also maximum wage. The President earns $400,000 a year. Is there a job more important than President? So why should anyone make more money than the President in a year? Many people in this country (and, shit, in every other country too) make more money than they've actually earned, if we think critically about fairness. And many millions earn much less than they deserve. This leads to the sicknesses we have in our society. It's a dog-eat-dog world and it's unpleasant. We can make our lives better, but instead we choose to keep this unjust system alive in case we can join the ranks of the rich. Even at age 32, this still pisses me off greatly.

    I just want my part of the "pie", and you guys make more then me, so its pretty simple. Give me part of your pay check, its not complicated.
    BRING BACK THE WHALE
  • polarispolaris Posts: 3,527
    and those who treat this topic simply are being disingenous ... there are a lot of factors that goes into this disparity in wealth ... yes - the wealthy pay the most taxes but they also benefit greatly - money spent on infrastructure, gov't programs for employment programs, tax rebates, etc ...

    it's not just a matter of everyone paying the same amount ... it's about a system that is fair which affords people the same level of opportunities and life standards ...

    right now - the rich can afford to eat the best, the best doctors, the best education ... it's a perpetual cycle creating a properity gap ...

    it's not simply about taking and giving from one group to another - it's about formulating a system that serves the needs of everyone not just a select few
  • WildsWilds Posts: 4,329
    I just want my part of the "pie", and you guys make more then me, so its pretty simple. Give me part of your pay check, its not complicated.

    I'm pretty sure they got your point. Perhaps you should say the same thing another 10 times?
  • OffHeGoes29OffHeGoes29 Posts: 1,240
    Wilds wrote:
    I'm pretty sure they got your point. Perhaps you should say the same thing another 10 times?

    I'm sorry...but it kills me that people talk about all this Socialist change, but when it comes to their pay check...its different.


    Thats Hypocritical.
    BRING BACK THE WHALE
  • ajedigeckoajedigecko \m/deplorable af \m/ Posts: 2,430
    What a joke.

    The top 1 percent of taxpayers (AGI over $364,657) earned approximately 21.2 percent of the nation's income (as defined by AGI), yet paid 39.4 percent of all federal income taxes.

    Want them to pay the whole thing? How much is enough? How about a flat/fair tax so people don't get a free ride anymore.

    After all deductions, credits, etc - the top 1% pays 23% of their AGI in income taxes while the bottom 50% pays less then 3%.

    http://www.taxfoundation.org/news/show/22652.html
    i agree that a flat tax is the solution.
    live and let live...unless it violates the pearligious doctrine.
  • AbuskedtiAbuskedti Posts: 1,917
    let's hope he spreads peace...and healthcare. for starters, that's my hope. that's more than enough 'wealth distribution' for me.

    and food and education... may the rest of that wealth rain over whomever it chooses..
  • Gonzo1977Gonzo1977 Posts: 1,696
    The problem is that there are far too many people in this country that have bought the notion hook line and sinker that "Poor" some how equates to "Lazy" or that the Lower Class "Just doesn't work hard enough".

    It's complete bullshit
    Anyone with half a brain and a pinch of common sense should be able to see that our tax system in this country is failing many more people than it is helping.

    There is a denfinate need for tax reform and I'm willing to give Obama's tax plan a chance considering the fact that this trickle-down Republican fairy tale that we've been sold by Reagan and every greed horny Conservative since has failed this country for too long.

    Hense the word CHANGE folks.

    It's high time we gave some other ideas a shot rather than shoot it down simply because it came from the "dreaded" left side of the floor.

    Later.
  • polarispolaris Posts: 3,527
    I'm sorry...but it kills me that people talk about all this Socialist change, but when it comes to their pay check...its different.


    Thats Hypocritical.

    uhhh ... no ... you are taking a big issue and simplifying it unrealistically ... i can understand now why mccain/palin focus on negative campaigning instead of offering a campaign of substance ...
  • OffHeGoes29OffHeGoes29 Posts: 1,240
    polaris wrote:
    uhhh ... no ... you are taking a big issue and simplifying it unrealistically ... i can understand now why mccain/palin focus on negative campaigning instead of offering a campaign of substance ...

    Maybe so, but what you are describing is not realistic, I don't care how you cut it, any form of socialism "spreads misery equally" as the saying goes. This Utopian idea that we can all work together in one common cause of spreading the wealth around equally is crazy. Its not that the idea its self is bad, it just that it requires man to reach a new level of honesty and integrity that won't ever happen. People are only a couple of days with our food and water before they become part of the animal kingdom again. What you are asking is something that not realistic in society.

    Our system isn't perfect, but it sure is a lot better then 80% of the world. And if there is a way for people to take advantage, they will. I just want the most amount of control over my money, I don't trust it to any one else.
    BRING BACK THE WHALE
  • There's nothing wrong with "inequality of wealth." There's no reason everyone should be equal.

    Everyone deserves the basics ... food ... clothing ... shelter ... after that, some people have more, some people have less. That's just fucking life.

    Some people have more because they worked harder. Some people have more because they are more talented than everyone else. Some people have more because their Daddy was rich, some people have more because they hit the fucking lottery.

    Again, that's life. And that's the way it should be.

    In general, I am for exceptionalism being rewarded. Not punished.
    everybody wants the most they can possibly get
    for the least they could possibly do
  • kenny olavkenny olav Posts: 3,319
    Gonzo1977 wrote:
    The problem is that there are far too many people in this country that have bought the notion hook line and sinker that "Poor" some how equates to "Lazy" or that the Lower Class "Just doesn't work hard enough".

    It's complete bullshit
    Anyone with half a brain and a pinch of common sense should be able to see that our tax system in this country is failing many more people than it is helping.

    There is a denfinate need for tax reform and I'm willing to give Obama's tax plan a chance considering the fact that this trickle-down Republican fairy tale that we've been sold by Reagan and every greed horny Conservative since has failed this country for too long.

    Hense the word CHANGE folks.

    It's high time we gave some other ideas a shot rather than shoot it down simply because it came from the "dreaded" left side of the floor.

    Later.

    When I worked minimum wage (or near-minimum wage) jobs - loading trucks, stocking warehouses, etc, I worked MUCH MUCH harder than I do now at my OK-paying desk job. This might not be true in everyone, but every time I get a better job or a promotion, I end up working less for more money. But not everyone has the ability to graduate from college and get a semi-decent job, or a really nice job (which I'm still looking for). A lot of people get stuck doing shit jobs for shit wages... and resentment builds in these people, and then they mug us and/or kill us. It's fucking stupid.

    Obama's no socialist, and he's probably not even a New Dealer, but it seems like he wants to make things a little more fair in this country. I mean, if he lives up to his promise of lowering taxes for 95% of us while taxing the top 5% more... that's better than what we've got.
  • polarispolaris Posts: 3,527
    Maybe so, but what you are describing is not realistic, I don't care how you cut it, any form of socialism "spreads misery equally" as the saying goes. This Utopian idea that we can all work together in one common cause of spreading the wealth around equally is crazy. Its not that the idea its self is bad, it just that it requires man to reach a new level of honesty and integrity that won't ever happen. People are only a couple of days with our food and water before they become part of the animal kingdom again. What you are asking is something that not realistic in society.

    Our system isn't perfect, but it sure is a lot better then 80% of the world. And if there is a way for people to take advantage, they will. I just want the most amount of control over my money, I don't trust it to any one else.

    well ...

    1. it depends on how you judge what is better ... if you base it on the un human development index ... there are a few countries that are better and the majority of them are more "socialist"

    2. you do realize that the system you're in is a mixed system that has socialist principles ... what we are talking here is an adjustment of a system that levels the playing field ... it's like you are in a professional sports league where the best team gets the first pick in the draft every year ...
  • OffHeGoes29OffHeGoes29 Posts: 1,240
    Kenny Olav wrote:
    Obama's no socialist, and he's probably not even a New Dealer, but it seems like he wants to make things a little more fair in this country. I mean, if he lives up to his promise of lowering taxes for 95% of us while taxing the top 5% more... that's better than what we've got.

    I voted for McCain, but I'm over it and support our new President. There is no reason why he and the congress can't make things happen, they are in complete control and now its time for them to make good on their promises.
    BRING BACK THE WHALE
  • I think the problem is that alot of these rich fuckers aren't actually earning the amount of money they are making. I don't think increasing taxes further on the rich to spread it around is the right answer, but I also don't think so many fucking people should be as overpaid as they are. The tax the rich more is just a band aid approach and doesn't really fix the real problem. It is more like taking advil for a headache every day instead of fixing whatever it is that is actually giving you the headache.
  • I think the problem is that alot of these rich fuckers aren't actually earning the amount of money they are making.

    You'll have to explain.

    I mean, on one level, it seems silly Alex Rodriguez makes a bajillion dollars to play baseball. It's not like he's curing cancer or even teaching inner-city kids math.

    But on the other hand ... if someone is willing to pay it, you've earned it ... and who is the government to say you didn't?

    (And, while we're on the subject, if we want to talk about rich fuckers who don't earn what they are paid, I give you members of the United States Congress.)
    everybody wants the most they can possibly get
    for the least they could possibly do
  • There is no reason why he and the congress can't make things happen,

    This is kind of what I'm afraid of.

    I'd be less wary of an Obama presidency if there he had some sort of buffer in Congress. Instead, he's free to kowtow to the craziest fringe of his party ... which, as we learned the past eight years, is never good.

    I will hope for the best, though.
    everybody wants the most they can possibly get
    for the least they could possibly do
  • You'll have to explain.

    I mean, on one level, it seems silly Alex Rodriguez makes a bajillion dollars to play baseball. It's not like he's curing cancer or even teaching inner-city kids math.

    But on the other hand ... if someone is willing to pay it, you've earned it ... and who is the government to say you didn't?

    (And, while we're on the subject, if we want to talk about rich fuckers who don't earn what they are paid, I give you members of the United States Congress.)

    I was referring more to executives who get paid to run their companies straight into the ground while the laborers for those companies who run the everyday shit so it doesn't get run into the ground get paid piss poor wages. Many people think higher taxes for the wealthy is the answer. I think not going bat shit crazy when deciding the salary of your top executives is more of an answer.

    Like I somewhat alluded to in my distaste for increasing taxes on anyone, I don't think the government should have a say on whether you've earned your dollar or not. I just think it's gotten to a point where, due to dishonest ties, certain people are getting paid way more than what their true worth is. You fail a company, then your salary should suffer as well. I just look at the growing disparity between what the rich make compared to what the working class citizens make as more and more disgusting as time goes on. I'm sure you and many others have seen how executive pay has increased way more than average worker pay. It just seems there is no accountability for this anymore and that the American people are too apathetic to do anything to actually solve the root of the problem.

    I agree with you about the US Congress. They have been selling out the interest of the American people since the early 1900's and it has only gotten worse as time goes on.
  • cincybearcatcincybearcat Posts: 16,507
    Commy wrote:
    "The top 1 percent of households received 22.9 percent of all pre-tax income in 2006, more than double what that figure was in the 1970s," the Working Group on Extreme Inequality reports. "This is the greatest concentration of income since 1928." And: "Between 1979 and 2006, the top 5 percent of American families saw their real incomes increase 87 percent. Over the same period, the lowest-income fifth saw zero increase in real income."

    Its time for action. But, we can't expect Obama to do it himself. "When President Franklin Roosevelt heard pleas for bold steps to counter extreme economic inequality, he replied: "Go out and make me do it."

    Keep hope alive.


    I see a very big problem with your statistic...it says the top 1% of households "received" 22.9% of all pre-taxed income...didn;t they "earn" it?
    hippiemom = goodness
  • El_KabongEl_Kabong Posts: 4,141
    What a joke.

    The top 1 percent of taxpayers (AGI over $364,657) earned approximately 21.2 percent of the nation's income (as defined by AGI), yet paid 39.4 percent of all federal income taxes.

    Want them to pay the whole thing? How much is enough? How about a flat/fair tax so people don't get a free ride anymore.

    After all deductions, credits, etc - the top 1% pays 23% of their AGI in income taxes while the bottom 50% pays less then 3%.

    http://www.taxfoundation.org/news/show/22652.html

    what about multi-million/billion $ corporations that pay no taxes? halliburton hasn't paid any taxes in years (they are headquartered in the cayman islands) is that right?

    i heard an interesting take on this 'spread the wealth around' concept. New York City gives something like $80million more in taxes to the state of NY than it gets back, is that evil socialism?
    standin above the crowd
    he had a voice that was strong and loud and
    i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
    eager to identify with
    someone above the crowd
    someone who seemed to feel the same
    someone prepared to lead the way
Sign In or Register to comment.