Fox News
Options
Comments
-
I don't know about unsealing documents?0
-
All major news sites are talking about proud boys verdict and fox is talking about hunter Biden. Shocker."You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
mickeyrat said:Fox opposes fellow journalists trying to uncover documentsBy DAVID BAUDER8 mins ago
NEW YORK (AP) — Fox News is opposing a renewed effort by three news organizations to unseal documents related to its recently settled defamation lawsuit, saying it would do nothing but “gratify private spite or promote public scandal.”
The Associated Press, The New York Times and National Public Radio asked a Delaware judge earlier this week to reveal mostly private text messages and conversations between Fox employees shortly after the 2020 presidential election that were uncovered during the Dominion Voting Systems lawsuit.
Fox lawyer Katharine L. Mowery, in a letter sent late Wednesday to Delaware Superior Court Judge Eric Davis, said much of the material its competitors sought wasn't relevant to the issues of the lawsuit. She said the media has no right to access such records.
Many of the already-uncovered conversations have proven newsworthy, showing that Fox hosts and executives didn't believe the false allegations about Dominion's voting equipment but still continued to air them. Another batch of messages revealed former Fox host Tucker Carlson's scorn for former President Donald Trump, including one text where he declared, “I hate him passionately.”
“They have not been shy about sharing the communications with the most potential to grab headlines,” Mowery wrote of the media challenging the sealed documents.
One of the reasons Fox agreed to settle the case was to “buy peace and bring an end to the media spectacle,” she wrote.
The news organizations said the documents, most of which Fox said it redacted because it contained proprietary information about the company, were still relevant.
Fox agreed last month to pay $787 million to end the case. Dominion had accused the network of repeatedly airing bogus claims that its voting equipment rigged the 2020 election against Trump, despite knowing those claims were false.
& we all know the last thing Fox News wants to do is gratify private spite or promote public scandal.
0 -
tempo_n_groove said:I don't know about unsealing documents?why. fox has portrayed and continues to portray themselves in a certain light. these redactions would seem to factually contradict that portrayal.fox doesn't need or care about ad revenue to be profitable. its all about carriage fees, which they look to increase as they renegotiate contracts in 23 and 24 from a total of 1.3 billon to 1.8 billion. they only reason I can see they can command such fees, is eyeballs.the truth of these redactions would seem to be to put those negotiations in jeopardy.unseal and show that company for what it is. then let the shareholders sue._____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
It's very evident as it is. They had to pay a lot of money to have those sealed too, not that it's right but it was part of an agreement. You shouldn't be allowed to unseal a document after it's legal agreement in a court of law.mickeyrat said:tempo_n_groove said:I don't know about unsealing documents?why. fox has portrayed and continues to portray themselves in a certain light. these redactions would seem to factually contradict that portrayal.fox doesn't need or care about ad revenue to be profitable. its all about carriage fees, which they look to increase as they renegotiate contracts in 23 and 24 from a total of 1.3 billon to 1.8 billion. they only reason I can see they can command such fees, is eyeballs.the truth of these redactions would seem to be to put those negotiations in jeopardy.unseal and show that company for what it is. then let the shareholders sue.0 -
tempo_n_groove said:
It's very evident as it is. They had to pay a lot of money to have those sealed too, not that it's right but it was part of an agreement. You shouldn't be allowed to unseal a document after it's legal agreement in a court of law.mickeyrat said:tempo_n_groove said:I don't know about unsealing documents?why. fox has portrayed and continues to portray themselves in a certain light. these redactions would seem to factually contradict that portrayal.fox doesn't need or care about ad revenue to be profitable. its all about carriage fees, which they look to increase as they renegotiate contracts in 23 and 24 from a total of 1.3 billon to 1.8 billion. they only reason I can see they can command such fees, is eyeballs.the truth of these redactions would seem to be to put those negotiations in jeopardy.unseal and show that company for what it is. then let the shareholders sue.
unsealing happens every fucking day. you petition the court, if your petition has merit , documents unsealed.
_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
Faux needs to be exposed for the frauds they are for the “public interest,” particularly since they advertise themselves as “fair and balanced,” and have yet to air any retractions of their knowingly and admitted false reporting. As they are still allowed to broadcast, it’s in the “public interest” to report on their internal chicanery so that consumers and advertisers can make an informed decision as to their legitimacy, and decide whether to “consume” their content or spend their money on them.
Twist baby twist, you Murdick POSs.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
No shit sherlock. I should have been more clear so the vultures don't come after me as usual...mickeyrat said:tempo_n_groove said:
It's very evident as it is. They had to pay a lot of money to have those sealed too, not that it's right but it was part of an agreement. You shouldn't be allowed to unseal a document after it's legal agreement in a court of law.mickeyrat said:tempo_n_groove said:I don't know about unsealing documents?why. fox has portrayed and continues to portray themselves in a certain light. these redactions would seem to factually contradict that portrayal.fox doesn't need or care about ad revenue to be profitable. its all about carriage fees, which they look to increase as they renegotiate contracts in 23 and 24 from a total of 1.3 billon to 1.8 billion. they only reason I can see they can command such fees, is eyeballs.the truth of these redactions would seem to be to put those negotiations in jeopardy.unseal and show that company for what it is. then let the shareholders sue.
unsealing happens every fucking day. you petition the court, if your petition has merit , documents unsealed.
I don't see what good opening these will do? Everybody seems to know the shit show that went on over there. I don't think they are reopened. What "merit" is going to come from it?0 -
I bet this gains them more support....Halifax2TheMax said:Faux needs to be exposed for the frauds they are for the “public interest,” particularly since they advertise themselves as “fair and balanced,” and have yet to air any retractions of their knowingly and admitted false reporting. As they are still allowed to broadcast, it’s in the “public interest” to report on their internal chicanery so that consumers and advertisers can make an informed decision as to their legitimacy, and decide whether to “consume” their content or spend their money on them.
Twist baby twist, you Murdick POSs.
Seriously.0 -
tempo_n_groove said:
No shit sherlock. I should have been more clear so the vultures don't come after me as usual...mickeyrat said:tempo_n_groove said:
It's very evident as it is. They had to pay a lot of money to have those sealed too, not that it's right but it was part of an agreement. You shouldn't be allowed to unseal a document after it's legal agreement in a court of law.mickeyrat said:tempo_n_groove said:I don't know about unsealing documents?why. fox has portrayed and continues to portray themselves in a certain light. these redactions would seem to factually contradict that portrayal.fox doesn't need or care about ad revenue to be profitable. its all about carriage fees, which they look to increase as they renegotiate contracts in 23 and 24 from a total of 1.3 billon to 1.8 billion. they only reason I can see they can command such fees, is eyeballs.the truth of these redactions would seem to be to put those negotiations in jeopardy.unseal and show that company for what it is. then let the shareholders sue.
unsealing happens every fucking day. you petition the court, if your petition has merit , documents unsealed.
I don't see what good opening these will do? Everybody seems to know the shit show that went on over there. I don't think they are reopened. What "merit" is going to come from it?
But, what bad would come of them being unsealed?
Everybody 'seems' to know, but let's see for sure.
What's that they say about sunlight being the best disinfectant?
0 -
CRTC considering banning Fox News from cable packages in Canada.
https://nationalpost.com/news/politics/crtc-ban-fox-news-canadian-cable
Hugh Freaking Dillon is currently out of the office, returning sometime in the fall0 -
What about Newsmax and the other crazies?HughFreakingDillon said:CRTC considering banning Fox News from cable packages in Canada.
https://nationalpost.com/news/politics/crtc-ban-fox-news-canadian-cable
It becomes censorship though. I don't like them but I don't want to ban them.0 -
the comments on that article are...hilarious. "liberals want to turn canada into USSR or China". are these people fucking brain dead?
Hugh Freaking Dillon is currently out of the office, returning sometime in the fall0 -
Would you agree they shouldn’t be able to call themselves “news”? How bout Fox Tales?tempo_n_groove said:
What about Newsmax and the other crazies?HughFreakingDillon said:CRTC considering banning Fox News from cable packages in Canada.
https://nationalpost.com/news/politics/crtc-ban-fox-news-canadian-cable
It becomes censorship though. I don't like them but I don't want to ban them.0 -
I have no problem with banning propaganda, especially propaganda that incites violence. CRTC already banned Russian state tv.tempo_n_groove said:
What about Newsmax and the other crazies?HughFreakingDillon said:CRTC considering banning Fox News from cable packages in Canada.
https://nationalpost.com/news/politics/crtc-ban-fox-news-canadian-cable
It becomes censorship though. I don't like them but I don't want to ban them.Hugh Freaking Dillon is currently out of the office, returning sometime in the fall0 -
tempo_n_groove said:
No shit sherlock. I should have been more clear so the vultures don't come after me as usual...mickeyrat said:tempo_n_groove said:
It's very evident as it is. They had to pay a lot of money to have those sealed too, not that it's right but it was part of an agreement. You shouldn't be allowed to unseal a document after it's legal agreement in a court of law.mickeyrat said:tempo_n_groove said:I don't know about unsealing documents?why. fox has portrayed and continues to portray themselves in a certain light. these redactions would seem to factually contradict that portrayal.fox doesn't need or care about ad revenue to be profitable. its all about carriage fees, which they look to increase as they renegotiate contracts in 23 and 24 from a total of 1.3 billon to 1.8 billion. they only reason I can see they can command such fees, is eyeballs.the truth of these redactions would seem to be to put those negotiations in jeopardy.unseal and show that company for what it is. then let the shareholders sue.
unsealing happens every fucking day. you petition the court, if your petition has merit , documents unsealed.
I don't see what good opening these will do? Everybody seems to know the shit show that went on over there. I don't think they are reopened. What "merit" is going to come from it?
apparently not everyone does....
_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
Yes.HughFreakingDillon said:the comments on that article are...hilarious. "liberals want to turn canada into USSR or China". are these people fucking brain dead?09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
Maybe Faux viewers will come out of their coma and join reality?tempo_n_groove said:
No shit sherlock. I should have been more clear so the vultures don't come after me as usual...mickeyrat said:tempo_n_groove said:
It's very evident as it is. They had to pay a lot of money to have those sealed too, not that it's right but it was part of an agreement. You shouldn't be allowed to unseal a document after it's legal agreement in a court of law.mickeyrat said:tempo_n_groove said:I don't know about unsealing documents?why. fox has portrayed and continues to portray themselves in a certain light. these redactions would seem to factually contradict that portrayal.fox doesn't need or care about ad revenue to be profitable. its all about carriage fees, which they look to increase as they renegotiate contracts in 23 and 24 from a total of 1.3 billon to 1.8 billion. they only reason I can see they can command such fees, is eyeballs.the truth of these redactions would seem to be to put those negotiations in jeopardy.unseal and show that company for what it is. then let the shareholders sue.
unsealing happens every fucking day. you petition the court, if your petition has merit , documents unsealed.
I don't see what good opening these will do? Everybody seems to know the shit show that went on over there. I don't think they are reopened. What "merit" is going to come from it?
Schwaaaaaaaaaaaaark!09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
It's literally 18 straight days with a deadline. I've been counting. No jokeGern Blansten said:I have noticed Fox News repeatedly posting a story about how Bud Light is being given away free to distributors because it isn't selling...that it is losing it's status as the top light beer in the US, etc.
I'm not seeing that story anywhere else.
Also, the other day three of the top six stories were about trans people. And if you read the comments, people post "yeah I'm sick of these trannies shoving it down our throats." Not recognizing for a moment that it's Fox doing it.0 -
They are doing it. Where do you think these stories originate? They are feeding it to the Post and Times.Gern Blansten said:I'm not sure how it hasn't happened yet but I can't wait for tRump to start tearing Tucker to pieces for the shit he said about him.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.7K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help