Fox News

mickeyrat

rgambs said:

She lacks the requisite depth and warmth.

well she's also an asshole so.......

HughFreakingDillon

rgambs said:

She lacks the requisite depth and warmth.

lol nicely done

HughFreakingDillon

my vote is ingraham. she even criticized trump at times for not being trump enough. she's vomit in a skin suit. 

OnWis97

None of them possesses any positive human qualities.

Bentleyspop

So here's my question...

If focksnooze and its yapping heads are so awful bad, so disgusting, such big liars.

Now imagine the viewers

Now what's worse....

The yapping heads or the viewers who believe all the hateful ignorant  rhetoric 

PJNB

Bentleyspop said:

So here's my question...

If focksnooze and its yapping heads are so awful bad, so disgusting, such big liars.

Now imagine the viewers

Now what's worse....

The yapping heads or the viewers who believe all the hateful ignorant  rhetoric 

I would like to add a 3rd party to the mix. The advertisers. They are the ones that are funding these primetime opinion shows. Without the big $$$ rolling in they would not have the platform on primetime to spew their bullshit. 

HughFreakingDillon

lou dobbs went full on crazy last night. devin nunes, for crying out loud, was the cooler head on this one. lou was shouting at devin "what is the republican party doing about this election being stolen? they need to just come out and say they aren't going to accept the result of the election!". 

this type of shit is incredibly dangerous. one would almost go so far as to say inciting violence. 

DewieCox

Lou Dobbs is being the dangerous one?

HughFreakingDillon

DewieCox said:

Lou Dobbs is being the dangerous one?

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/525969-lou-dobbs-casts-election-results-as-effort-to-deny-trump-what-is-rightfully

DewieCox

Oh wow!! I’m pretty sure I saw  a recent segment where he was exasperated at Trump’s unwillingness to concede.

Smellyman

All of them are evil and lie for money.

Lou Dobbs might just be flat insane.

LOL at his polls too.

rgambs

Bentleyspop said:

So here's my question...

If focksnooze and its yapping heads are so awful bad, so disgusting, such big liars.

Now imagine the viewers

Now what's worse....

The yapping heads or the viewers who believe all the hateful ignorant  rhetoric 

What's worse is that Fox isn't extremist enough for them anymore and they are all heading to OAN and Newsmax where their conspiracy theories, open racism, and fantasies about revolution are not just welcome, but endorsed. 😳

rgambs

Bentleyspop said:

So here's my question...

If focksnooze and its yapping heads are so awful bad, so disgusting, such big liars.

Now imagine the viewers

Now what's worse....

The yapping heads or the viewers who believe all the hateful ignorant  rhetoric 

What's worse is that Fox isn't extremist enough for them anymore and they are all heading to OAN and Newsmax where their conspiracy theories, open racism, and fantasies about revolution are not just welcome, but endorsed. 😳

HughFreakingDillon

apparently there's some push to get conservatives to move from twitter to parler, and this is somehow owning the libs again. 

if my trash takes itself out, i celebrate it, not get sad about it. 

mickeyrat

HughFreakingDillon said:

apparently there's some push to get conservatives to move from twitter to parler, and this is somehow owning the libs again. 

if my trash takes itself out, i celebrate it, not get sad about it. 

parler is more quick to ban posts and people than facebook or twitter from what I am hearing.

HughFreakingDillon

mickeyrat said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

apparently there's some push to get conservatives to move from twitter to parler, and this is somehow owning the libs again. 

if my trash takes itself out, i celebrate it, not get sad about it. 

parler is more quick to ban posts and people than facebook or twitter from what I am hearing.

from the sounds of it, conservatives are actually saying the opposite. or is it that parler censors liberal speech?

DewieCox

DewieCox

It says right in the terms of service that it does all things these goobers  complain about FB and Twitter. The right to censor and the info gathering type stuff. 

Aside from getting a kick out of it, it’s a very dangerous game these people are playing to enter that type of echo chamber.

static111

HughFreakingDillon said:

mickeyrat said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

apparently there's some push to get conservatives to move from twitter to parler, and this is somehow owning the libs again. 

if my trash takes itself out, i celebrate it, not get sad about it. 

parler is more quick to ban posts and people than facebook or twitter from what I am hearing.

from the sounds of it, conservatives are actually saying the opposite. or is it that parler censors liberal speech?

Yes there is censorship of liberal speech.  Here is a link to a cnn article about one of the current financiers.   If you really do some digging there is also the fact that one of the higher ups married a Russian woman and suddenly had money right before the start up...not dissimilar to a certain OAN ceo meeting and marrying a Russian wife in Russia, not that there is anything wrong with falling in love internationally.  Of course the other connections are circumstantial.   Anyways here’s a good vetted tie into Cambridge analytica for you...

https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/15/media/rebekah-mercer-parler/index.html

HughFreakingDillon

DewieCox said:

i saw that a few days ago on twitter and i laughed hysterically. why are liberals so much better at this??