*** Lawsuit Against Obama Dismissed, Appeal Goes to US Supreme Court ***

DriftingByTheStorm
Posts: 8,684
Time for more drama.
Too bad the Supreme Court is the most supremely bought and sold court.
We'll see what's left of American Justice.
Anyone with the odds on the Court taking this appeal?
This should be great,
given that the appeal case would be based upon the judges dismissal ... which means Berg probably (at least, on constitutional principle) has a shot at winning.
Looks like Berg is outraged for the same reason I am.
Constitutional principle.
Read the article:
Lawsuit Against Obama Dismissed, Appeal Goes to US Supreme Court
Too bad the Supreme Court is the most supremely bought and sold court.
We'll see what's left of American Justice.
Anyone with the odds on the Court taking this appeal?
This should be great,
given that the appeal case would be based upon the judges dismissal ... which means Berg probably (at least, on constitutional principle) has a shot at winning.
Looks like Berg is outraged for the same reason I am.
Constitutional principle.
Read the article:
Lawsuit Against Obama Dismissed, Appeal Goes to US Supreme Court
Its On wrote:(Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania - 10/25/08) -
Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama's lack of "qualifications" to serve as President of the United States, announced today that he is immediately appealing the dismissal of his case to the United States Supreme Court. The case is Berg v. Obama, No. 08-cv-04083.
Berg said, "I am totally disappointed by Judge Surrick's decision and, for all citizens of the United States, I am immediately appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court.
This is a question of who has standing to uphold our Constitution. If I don't have standing, if you don't have standing, if your neighbor doesn't have standing to question the eligibility of an individual to be President of the United States - the Commander-in-Chief, the most powerful person in the world - then who does?
So, anyone can just claim to be eligible for congress or the presidency without having their legal status, age or citizenship questioned.
According to Judge Surrick, we the people have no right to police the eligibility requirements under the U.S. Constitution.
What happened to ‘...Government of the people, by the people, for the people,...' Abraham Lincoln in his Gettysburg Address 1863.
We must legally prevent Obama, the unqualified candidate, from taking the Office of the Presidency of the United States," Berg said.
Our website obamacrimes.com now has 71.8 + million hits. We are urging all to spread the word of our website - and forward to your local newspapers and radio and TV stations.
Berg again stressed his position regarding the urgency of this case as, "we" the people, are heading to a "Constitutional Crisis" if this case is not resolved forthwith.
* * For copies of all Court Pleadings, go to obamacrimes.com
If I was to smile and I held out my hand
If I opened it now would you not understand?
If I opened it now would you not understand?
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
-
This is hardly breaking news. What, you didn't think this would go to the Supreme Court when it was dismissed? C'mon now. If theres one thing we are good at, it's dragging useless law suits through the justice system.
Sue baby Sue!0 -
Man, if any of this is remotely true they're ALL going to look like FOOLS.
Peace*We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti
*MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
.....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti
*The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)0 -
how does anyone actually prove they are an American?the Minions0
-
Strangest Tribe wrote:how does anyone actually prove they are an American?0
-
-
Strangest Tribe wrote:define real:rolleyes:
:click above:If I was to smile and I held out my hand
If I opened it now would you not understand?0 -
It was already thrown out once due to lack of evidence. Let's hope they don't waste the court's resources again.
If it proves to be a real issue, I apologize,
but at this point I don't see it."I'd rather be with an animal." "Those that can be trusted can change their mind." "The in between is mine." "If I don't lose control, explore and not explode, a preternatural other plane with the power to maintain." "Yeh this is living." "Life is what you make it."0 -
wolfbear wrote:It was already thrown out once due to lack of evidence. Let's hope they don't waste the court's resources again.
If it proves to be a real issue, I apologize,
but at this point I don't see it.
I'm not that up on my legal concepts,
but if i'm not mistaken this appeal will no longer be about Obama's citizenship specifically.
It will be an appeal based on what the judge said when he dismissed the case.
The Supreme Court will then be forced to decide on whether, on a matter of legal principle, Mr. Berg had a right to bring his case before the lower court.
It will be about precedent.
Because that is what this judge did when he threw out the case, he set a precedent saying essentially "citizens don't have any inherent right to question the constitutional electability of their leaders" ...
Mr. Berg is appealing that notion to the Supreme Court.
Again, someone with more legal experience is welcome to comment.If I was to smile and I held out my hand
If I opened it now would you not understand?0 -
DriftingByTheStorm wrote:I'm not that up on my legal concepts,
but if i'm not mistaken this appeal will no longer be about Obama's citizenship specifically.
It will be an appeal based on what the judge said when he dismissed the case.
The Supreme Court will then be forced to decide on whether, on a matter of legal principle, Mr. Berg had a right to bring his case before the lower court.
It will be about precedent.
Because that is what this judge did when he threw out the case, he set a precedent saying essentially "citizens don't have any inherent right to question the constitutional electability of their leaders" ...
Mr. Berg is appealing that notion to the Supreme Court.
Again, someone with more legal experience is welcome to comment."I'd rather be with an animal." "Those that can be trusted can change their mind." "The in between is mine." "If I don't lose control, explore and not explode, a preternatural other plane with the power to maintain." "Yeh this is living." "Life is what you make it."0 -
Strangest Tribe wrote:define real
http://snarkybytes.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/hawaii-birth-certificate-1963.jpg0 -
I believe the supreme court will say "fuck you Mr. Berg ....next case please"the Minions0
-
Nevermind wrote:This happens to be real.
http://snarkybytes.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/hawaii-birth-certificate-1963.jpg
how do you know?the Minions0 -
Strangest Tribe wrote:how do you know?0
-
Strangest Tribe wrote:I believe the supreme court will say "fuck you Mr. Berg ....next case please"
Close, but not exactly.
The case is being appealed from the third circuit court which is headed by Supreme Court Justice David Souter who is one of the more liberal judges on the Supreme Court. There is a snowball's chance in hell of him actually recommending that the Supreme Court will ever hear an appeal to this decision.- Busted down the pretext
- 8/28/98
- 9/2/00
- 4/28/03, 5/3/03, 7/3/03, 7/5/03, 7/6/03, 7/9/03, 7/11/03, 7/12/03, 7/14/03
- 9/28/04, 9/29/04, 10/1/04, 10/2/04
- 9/11/05, 9/12/05, 9/13/05, 9/30/05, 10/1/05, 10/3/05
- 5/12/06, 5/13/06, 5/27/06, 5/28/06, 5/30/06, 6/1/06, 6/3/06, 6/23/06, 7/22/06, 7/23/06, 12/2/06, 12/9/06
- 8/2/07, 8/5/07
- 6/19/08, 6/20/08, 6/22/08, 6/24/08, 6/25/08, 6/27/08, 6/28/08, 6/30/08, 7/1/08
- 8/23/09, 8/24/09, 9/21/09, 9/22/09, 10/27/09, 10/28/09, 10/30/09, 10/31/09
- 5/15/10, 5/17/10, 5/18/10, 5/20/10, 5/21/10, 10/23/10, 10/24/10
- 9/11/11, 9/12/11
- 10/18/13, 10/21/13, 10/22/13, 11/30/13, 12/4/130 -
so you're saying it can't possibly be counterfeitedthe Minions0
-
Strangest Tribe wrote:so you're saying it can't possibly be counterfeited0
-
Nevermind wrote:So youre saying its not real?
I can't prove it either way, my birth-certificate is a copy, how do I know it's real???
My point is....
I think this is just a bunch of whiney bullshit from a bunch of sour grapes...
how big of crybaby pussy are you to even logically entertain this notion???the Minions0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.9K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 275 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help