*** Lawsuit Against Obama Dismissed, Appeal Goes to US Supreme Court ***

Nevermind

Strangest Tribe wrote:

how big of crybaby pussy are you to even logically entertain this notion???

If suspicions equal crybaby pussy then im a huge crybaby pussy.

Strangest Tribe

Nevermind wrote:

If suspicions equal crybaby pussy then im a huge crybaby pussy.

I'm suspicious of everybody's birth certificate

DriftingByTheStorm

Strangest Tribe wrote:

I'm suspicious of everybody's birth certificate

I'm suspicious when people get sued to prove something simple, and then they fail to do it.

The question still stands,
why did Obama's legal team decide not to comply with the discovery process?

bootlegger10

DriftingByTheStorm wrote:

I'm suspicious when people get sued to prove something simple, and then they fail to do it.

The question still stands,
why did Obama's legal team decide not to comply with the discovery process?

You are dealing with a religion here. Obama is Jesus to the majority of liberals. You are not going to convince many folks on this board that there may be a crack in Obama's armor.

wolfbear

DriftingByTheStorm wrote:

I'm suspicious when people get sued to prove something simple, and then they fail to do it.

The question still stands,
why did Obama's legal team decide not to comply with the discovery process?

That remains to be seen I guess. I do agree with your question though, and still think it's much ado about nothing. I'm ready to be proved wrong though!

Anon

bootlegger10 wrote:

You are dealing with a religion here. Obama is Jesus to the majority of liberals. You are not going to convince many folks on this board that there may be a crack in Obama's armor.

Jesus? I thought he was the anti-christ, make up your mind :rolleyes:
I love how you seem to be the authority on how obama supporters feel. Why don't you spend some time educating yourself and looking back through posts, and you will see many examples of obama supporters, (myself included) explaining the reasons why they support him and what policies they may not be happy with. i don't think i've ever seen anyone on here say that they agree with everything their candidate stands for.

DriftingByTheStorm

Pj_Gurl wrote:

i don't think i've ever seen anyone on here say that they agree with everything their candidate stands for.

if anyone here seriously thinks either of these jokers is "their" candidate ...

... we are chattel.

fugawzi

DriftingByTheStorm wrote:

if anyone here seriously thinks either of these jokers is "their" candidate ...

... we are chattel.

I think because he's not your candidate, you're unfairly dismissing him as other people's candidate. Just my opinion.

Anon

DriftingByTheStorm wrote:

if anyone here seriously thinks either of these jokers is "their" candidate ...

... we are chattel.

I heart you, but i can't always agree with you. Let's leave it at that.

brandon10

DriftingByTheStorm wrote:

I'm suspicious when people get sued to prove something simple, and then they fail to do it.

The question still stands,
why did Obama's legal team decide not to comply with the discovery process?

If some quack decided to sue McCain to prove he was born on American soil, I wouldn't expect him to respond either.

Do you conspiracy nuts actually think Obama went back in time and planted birth announcements in the Honolulu news papers in the 60's? From what powers you people seem to believe Obama has, he could produce perfect fake documents if he wanted to. So what's the point in responding? You'll say he forged them somehow or come up with some new nutjob conspiracy.

NOCODE#1

DriftingByTheStorm wrote:

Time for more drama.
Too bad the Supreme Court is the most supremely bought and sold court.
We'll see what's left of American Justice.
Anyone with the odds on the Court taking this appeal?

This should be great,
given that the appeal case would be based upon the judges dismissal ... which means Berg probably (at least, on constitutional principle) has a shot at winning.

Looks like Berg is outraged for the same reason I am.
Constitutional principle.

Read the article:

Lawsuit Against Obama Dismissed, Appeal Goes to US Supreme Court

or the fact he has a legal birth certificate and he's black bothers you. its all over. back to your klan rally.

NOCODE#1

Nevermind wrote:

If suspicions equal crybaby pussy then im a huge crybaby pussy.

suspicion? dont you mean inherit racism?


funny how not one white candidate ever was questioned about his birth certificate.

NOCODE#1

DriftingByTheStorm wrote:

I'm suspicious when people get sued to prove something simple, and then they fail to do it.

The question still stands,
why did Obama's legal team decide not to comply with the discovery process?

it wasnt on their radar? its obvious bullshit? they have an election to landslide?? they dont answer to racist shenanigans? they have an IQ?

should i go on?

NOCODE#1

DriftingByTheStorm wrote:

if anyone here seriously thinks either of these jokers is "their" candidate ...

... we are chattel.

[insert] above quote every four years[/insert]


ahh! Whew! ...that was a lot of thinkin!

chopitdown

NOCODE#1 wrote:

it wasnt on their radar? its obvious bullshit? they have an election to landslide?? they dont answer to racist shenanigans? they have an IQ?

should i go on?

from an interview with philip berg, the man who brought the lawsuit

(Q)I've written a lot over the past few months about race and politics, and back in February and March warned of the potential for Barack Obama and his supporters to counter substance with charges of racism and cries of racial intolerance. What do you say to those people who inevitably will, perhaps looking at the underlying African story, call you a racist?

(PB)Of course some people might look at me and assume I’m doing this because he’s black. I’m not. I’m Jewish, and I’m a life-long member of the NAACP, so people will be hard-pressed to confront me on any of those issues.
http://www.americasright.com/2008/08/q-with-phillip-berg.html

bootlegger10

NOCODE#1 wrote:

or the fact he has a legal birth certificate and he's black bothers you. its all over. back to your klan rally.

You've got the talking points going. Good for you.

chopitdown

chopitdown wrote:

from an interview with philip berg, the man who brought the lawsuit

(Q)I've written a lot over the past few months about race and politics, and back in February and March warned of the potential for Barack Obama and his supporters to counter substance with charges of racism and cries of racial intolerance. What do you say to those people who inevitably will, perhaps looking at the underlying African story, call you a racist?

(PB)Of course some people might look at me and assume I’m doing this because he’s black. I’m not. I’m Jewish, and I’m a life-long member of the NAACP, so people will be hard-pressed to confront me on any of those issues.
http://www.americasright.com/2008/08/q-with-phillip-berg.html

he also is an aclu member

SoonForgotten2

bootlegger10 wrote:

You've got the talking points going. Good for you.

Pot. Kettle. Black.

Rider

Well, it certainly fits here too...

Boy, you all are getting desperate for anti-Obama material aren't you? Maybe you should cut a B onto your cheek....Well, hopefully Obama wins big anyway and you can thank the rest of us for fixing the mess you repubs have made of this country.

bootlegger10

SoonForgotten2 wrote:

Pot. Kettle. Black.

Oh I get it, only Republicans have talking points, and only Dems can complain. Woops, my bad.